₦airaland Forum

Doctordan:
➜Sexual intimacy is deeper than you may think.

Nonsense! 🥱

Kobojunkie:
See the kain stewpid question you dey ask? Of course, there is absolutely nothing wrong with either a man or a woman who has been with partners.

Your personal fear of people who have been with multiple partners before you is a mental problem likely linked with some trauma from your past that you need to detangle when you are ready to do so, and not something to brandish or weaponize against others. 🥱🥱🥱

Ok let me put it this way, would you marry an olosho? And along the lines I don't have any mental problems linked with any kind of trauma.

Kobojunkie:
Nonsense! 🥱

Sexual intimacy is deeper than you think it is(paraphrase)

Doctordan:
➜Ok let me put it this way, would you marry an olosho?
➜ And along the lines I don't have any mental problems linked with any kind of trauma.

Yes, there is nothing wrong with marrying someone with multiple sexual partners in the past. 🥱🥱

2. Your responses and the questions you continue to ask make the fact that you are still carrying some deep-seated trauma, which you hide behind the mention of the word Spiritual, and the suggestions that you are better in some way than those who have had multiple partners before you.🥱🥱🥱

I can bet my hairy chin that your particular blindness would prevent you from considering in the same manner friendships you may have with men whom you have no romantic interests, but have had multiple sexual partners as well. 🥱🥱

Doctordan:
Sexual intimacy is deeper than you think it is(paraphrase)

No matter how many times you repeat hogwash, it remains hogwash! 🥱🥱

Kobojunkie:
No matter how many times you repeat hogwash, it remains hogwash! 🥱🥱

Hogwash to people who cannot B reasoned with. In your own case this is disturbing but not surprising.

Doctordan:
✓ Hogwash to people who cannot B reasoned with. In your own case this is disturbing but not surprising.

But this is literally you since this conversation began. 🥱🥱🥱

Kobojunkie:
Yes, there is nothing wrong with marrying someone with multiple sexual partners in the past. 🥱🥱

2. Your responses and the questions you continue to ask make the fact that you are still carrying some deep-seated trauma, which you hide behind the mention of the word Spiritual, and the suggestions that you are better in some way than those who have had multiple partners before you.🥱🥱🥱

I can bet my hairy chin that your particular blindness would prevent you from considering in the same manner friendships you may have with men whom you have no romantic interests, but have had multiple sexual partners as well. 🥱🥱

Many people that had multiple sex partners in the past have settled and gotten married. That is good but saving sex for marriage and only having intimacy with one partner is still the best way to go. It can save a lot of uneeded headache and stress and not to mention that is still the best protection against AIDS and STD. And I'm not going through any trauma or blindness. You better take my word for it. Having casual sex is a risk. You are engaging in intimacy ,not eating meatpie. Feel free to laugh at me if you like. I want to be a one- woman person

Doctordan:
➜Many people that had multiple sex partners in the past have settled and gotten married. That is good but saving sex for marriage and only having intimacy with one partner is still the best way to go. It can save a lot of uneeded headache and stress and not to mention that is still the best protection against AIDS and STD. And I'm not going through any trauma or blindness. You better take my word for it. Having casual sex is a risk. You are engaging in intimacy ,not eating meatpie. Feel free to laugh at me if you like. I want to be a one- woman person

. You keep unevidenced claims, aka hogwash, to achieve what exactly?

Kobojunkie:
But this is literally you since this conversation began. 🥱🥱🥱

Stop projecting your problem on me. You are looking at things from the wrong point of view.

Kobojunkie:
. You keep unevidenced claims, aka hogwash, to achieve what exactly?

Let me help you out here. What I'm driving at is that sex is a bonding of the spirit soul and body and not just a physical thing. That is how God designed it. When a man and a woman have union they are one. There is a joining. That is why it is better to keep sex for marriage and not be engaged in "casual" sex outside of marriage which is not even "casual" at all (because of the issue of the joining which I talked about). Do you want to hook with several women from all over the place who might have been with several men from all over the place. One should think of what one is doing to his/ herself.

Doctordan:
✓ Let me help you out here. What I'm driving at is that sex is a bonding of the spirit soul and body and not just a physical thing. That is how God designed it. When a man and a woman have union they are one. There is a joining. That is why it is better to keep sex for marriage and not be engaged in "casual" sex outside of marriage which is not even "casual" at all (because of the issue of the joining which I talked about). Do you want to hook with several women from all over the place who might have been with several men from all over the place. One should think of what one is doing to his/ herself.

Again, what is the point of posting this hogwash over and over? E be like say you no go school at all. Saying something over and over does not a fact or truth make. 🥱🥱🥱

Kobojunkie:
Again, what is the point of posting this hogwash over and over? E be like say you no go school at all. Saying something over and over does not a fact or truth make. 🥱🥱🥱

It is hogwash to you because you have the wrong assessment of the whole matter.

Kobojunkie:
Again, what is the point of posting this hogwash over and over? E be like say you no go school at all. Saying something over and over does not a fact or truth make. 🥱🥱🥱

It doesn't take a PhD to get the point of what I'm saying. You are not assessing things from a spiritual view point. That is Y it is hogwash to U.