₦airaland Forum

Okhuadams:
This pple have helped in killing most of their member's they should be arrested, and old friend lost his sister to This foolish believe, the siblings insisted for proper treatment but the father/mother and the rest of the foolish members Said know. But some do it secretly

Janosky:
Luke 16:19-31
New Living Translation
Parable of the Rich Man and Lazarus
19 Jesus said, “There was a certain rich man who was splendidly clothed in purple and fine linen and who lived each day in luxury. 20 At his gate lay a poor man named Lazarus who was covered with sores. 21 As Lazarus lay there longing for scraps from the rich man’s table, the dogs would come and lick his open sores


Oga, Jesus spoke a parable not a real life occurrence.
Lazarus did not see or speak to Abraham in real life.
Bibles with subheadings listed it as Parable of Lazarus & rich man...
Jesus spoke a parable about 5 wise virgins & 5 unwise virgins.

Did any Jewish King marry 5 wise virgins & reject 5 unwise virgins in real life?
No.

Romans 8:3 & 1 Peter 3:18-19.
Jesus was a spirit being born on earth as a man .
He died & God raised up His Son to life back again as spirit being.

Please understand your Bible & learn more.

God bless.

Janosky:
The same disease resulted in the loss of two women who opted for their choice of treatment.

I don't know what your problem is.

Janosky:
What is your business with an adult expressing his or her fundamental rights to chose the form of treatment they prefer?

Are you even listening to yourself?

Do unto others what you want them to do unto you.

Janosky:

No mind their ignorance.
They can't hide their bad belle
They want their fundamental rights to be respected but they gleefully disrespect the rights of others.

MaxInDHouse:
It's cancer case nah.

Less than 5% do survive it so whoever is disturbing his or her brain regarding someone who dies due to cancer is just joking jàre!🙂

jaephoenix:
Liar liar,pants on fire.
Who said less than 5% survive cancer.

jaephoenix:
Bro, maybe I'll stop debating with you. You don't answer questions, but instead deflect it to answer a different question.

MaxInDHouse:
🤔

jaephoenix:
You bring this post up whenever you don't have answers. But you were quoting me in the other thread

jaephoenix:
Bro, maybe I'll stop debating with you. You don't answer questions, but instead deflect it to answer a different question.

Janosky:
Oga, educate yourself beyond viewing posts on Nairaland.
Or
Stick to your false claims & ignorance.

Biko,grow up .

writeprof:
It's well with you

MaxInDHouse:
You people need to educate yourselves.

If she wants to die as you insinuated then why going to the hospital in the first place?

Medically it's unlawful to administer any form of treatment that's not approved by the patient because he or she knows better about his body that any physician!

jaephoenix:
You're wrong.
We don't give medications or intervene in patients who don't approve because it's against their freedom and human rights. It's not cos they know about their bodies. The physician knows about your body more than you. If a patient declines life saving interventions,it's their business. We explain the consequences,document and tell them to come back if they change their minds

Emusan:
His business with such and adult is because he knew such adult was brainwashed to have making a wrong choice.

Just as you have business with an adult who chooses to commit suicide.

Do you always listen to your own self?



Have you ever applied this to yourself?

Janosky:
You wey no brainwashed, go change the laws wey guide the law & medical practice worldwide.

Isi aku.

jaephoenix:
You're wrong.
We don't give medications or intervene in patients who don't approve because it's against their freedom and human rights. It's not cos they know about their bodies. The physician knows about your body more than you. If a patient declines life saving interventions,it's their business. We explain the consequences,document and tell them to come back if they change their minds

jaephoenix:
Bro, maybe I'll stop debating with you. You don't answer questions, but instead deflect it to answer a different question.

Janosky:
The interventions wey no save Ananda Lewis & Nollywood celebrities wey get the same disease.

Janosky:
The interventions wey no save Ananda Lewis & Nollywood celebrities wey get the same disease.

jaephoenix:
I don't know Ananda Lewis but I checked her out. She died of stage 4 breast ca. Stage 4 breast ca is terminal. No doctor would save you from that AND WE HAVE NEVER CLAIMED TO SAVE ANYONE FROM TERMINAL CANCER: THATS WHY ITS CALLED TERMINAL IN THE FIRST PLACE. It means it's spread to target organs,which in this case is the liver. We give palliative management and tell you ahead of time how long you've got. If she came in stage 1 or even 2,cure would be around 90%. My own mom had breast ca. She has done surgery,radio and chemo and she's good now. Same with other folks that present early.

jaephoenix:
I Same with other folks that present early. That's why we hammer on early detection. So stop capping lubbissh. You don't point to few outliers and decide to commit suicide (which is what your member did).

Screenshot evidence.
Did the medical team recommended 2 options the lady exercised her right to chose from?
Yes.

Did the medical team make the claim you are making in public?
No.

You are claiming to be a medical professional and at the sametime opposing the fundamental rights of an adult to choose the option of treatment they prefer.

Your public opposition to the ethics of your profession speaks volumes.

Isi aku.

MaxInDHouse:
If they choose to deceive themselves it's better to allow them jàre!🙂

Janosky:
Aunty E case was not detected early unlike your mom's.
Linda McCartney, Kelly Preston , Ananda Lewis had similar challenges too (non JWs),but your preferred option of treatment didn't save them.

Janosky:
Aunty E case was not detected early unlike your mom's.
Linda McCartney, Kelly Preston , Ananda Lewis had similar challenges too (non JWs),but your preferred option of treatment didn't save them.

Janosky:
Screenshot evidence.
Did the medical team recommended 2 options the lady exercised her right to chose from?
Yes.

Did the medical team make the claim you are making in public?
No.

You are claiming to be a medical professional and at the sametime opposing the fundamental rights of an adult to choose the option of treatment they prefer.

Your public opposition to the ethics of your profession speaks volumes.

Isi aku.

Janosky:
The same people wey want their rights to be protected and respected by Law are WAILING their disrespect for the rights of Aunty E & all JWs as well as people who refuse B.T.

Na wa !!!!!!!

jaephoenix:
We respect rights in medicine,reason why we won't force you to take blood. If you die from your choice,....its your choice. You chose suicide

jaephoenix:
1. I don't know much about your Aunty E but from what I garner she has stage 2 breast ca. Now with stage 2,there is hope even though it's not as high as stage 1. And the fact that she was offered blood transfusion means she wasn't on palliative,thus the transfusion would increase her chance. You don't transfuse a palliative case,it's pointless. So yes,your Aunty E stood a very good chance of beating the ca.
The other names you listed had late stage cancer and thus almost nil chances of survival.
No matter how you and your ilk twist this narrative, that woman killed herself. She refused help. It may help you by researching how medicine has helped folks with stage 2 breast ca

Janosky:
Is that the opinion of the medical team or jaephoenix biased opinion?
Did the ethics (in screenshot (you pretend to uphold) support your opinion?
You proven you don't respect the preferred choice of your patients.
Oga,stop deceiving yourself.
[/b]

Janosky:
By chosen from options recommended by medical profession and enshrined in law.
An adult chose what you recommend & you say nah "suic.de."
Oga,are you even listening to yourself?
If you read about the individuals, there's initially was not late stage, (dem dey do check up more & get modern facilities sef) they were not JW's & would undertake whatever their medical team proposes.