₦airaland Forum

odizeey:
I say that Mainoo injury is a lie. I don't believe it.

Leyqute:
100%. That’s why I said it’s such a shame. Na him for dey boss midfield now if not for that rubbish.

Leyqute:
Oh boy. Amorim don dey fight INEOS.

The worst type of billionaire na truly audio billionaire. After that na American billionaire.

odizeey:
Where e dey happen?

Leyqute:
100%. That’s why I said it’s such a shame. Na him for dey boss midfield now if not for that rubbish.

adebayo201:
https://www.skysports.com/football/news/11095/13490334/ruben-amorim-manchester-united-boss-claims-he-is-a-manager-and-not-a-head-coach-following-leeds-draw

odizeey:
No be small thing

adebayo201:
I tell you.

From the look of things, Mainoo is gone. Like, how can Bruno and Mount likely be available for Wednesday match against Burnley but he's not? Mhen...

Leyqute:
Oh boy. Amorim don dey fight INEOS.

The worst type of billionaire na truly audio billionaire. After that na American billionaire.

adebayo201:
Amorim must be the most happiest person on earth today with this draw.

Let me goan read post match interview.

patrickmuf:
We have played against 10 man Everton, West Ham, Wolves and Leeds in the past weeks and only gotten 3 pts from a possible 12. We should be up the table competing for the EPL trophy Amorim really has no excuse.

nitrogen:
I really think Ineos is giving the fans what they wanted. I remember the whole conversation and demand for a structure in place with the said structure determining the style of football we want to play. We would only need a manager that will come in to play based on the players signed for him and the style to play. The only mistake they’ve made is to get someone like Amorim who is inflexible and is insisting on playing a particular formation.

Amorim should stop moaning and whining about the concept of coach vs manager and start getting results by adapting. The 3-4-3/5-2-3 nonsense won’t take us anywhere. It’s mainly for mid and bottom table teams that want to have 5-6 defenders on the pitch.

nitrogen:
I really think Ineos is giving the fans what they wanted. I remember the whole conversation and demand for a structure in place with the said structure determining the style of football we want to play. We would only need a manager that will come in to play based on the players signed for him and the style to play. The only mistake they’ve made is to get someone like Amorim who is inflexible and is insisting on playing a particular formation.

Amorim should stop moaning and whining about the concept of coach vs manager and start getting results by adapting. The 3-4-3/5-2-3 nonsense won’t take us anywhere. It’s mainly for mid and bottom table teams that want to have 5-6 defenders on the pitch.

Trevor012:
Above your useless club

LostMyZeal:
This has nothing to do with his former league. I'm not defending him but if you see United's erratic anywhere belle face as a striker you'll be frustrated because there's no pattern with this team at all so you don't know what to expect and this kills morale.

When you watch some teams you see a clear pattern of how they want to get the ball to their striker and this pattern certainly won't be a one-off thing; it's repeated over and over. You watch united and there's nothing like that.

In fairness to our striker, he troubled Leeds defence at least with his back to goal while receiving the endless hoofings from Lammens.

Leyqute:
You don’t think the “structure” goofed by appointing a philosophical coach who has a totally different football strategy/structure/system to what they thought they wanted and was very clear with them from day 1 about it?

We know say you be Glazer and INEOS mouthpiece but softly softly.

Jamiuokolaa:
When "football gurus" Berradarada and co joined from City and the likes, false hopes were renewed and peeps were already salivating at the "City Model" being implemented here..

Last season, coach open him mouth for interview tell them say him no get plan B tactics and them still see am as the right choice...after which we nearly go relegation.

Hmmn

nitrogen:
I don’t like Ineos at all, but to be honest, they have put in place the so called structure fans were craving for. I do agree that they got it wrong with manager appointment. I would assume that they thought they could get him to do their bid given he’s a young manager seeking professional progress or the well experienced CEO, director etc did tell him what they were looking to achieve irrespective of the 3-4-3 nonsense.

But getting the wrong manager for a particular system and structure is a common issue across clubs. You realize it early and move on. Unfortunately, Amorim is a fish bone in their throats. Management does not want to follow the ‘sack and fire’ approach that most fans hate, hence the reason Amorim is still here.

Goosethetruth:
Amorim should roll up his sleeves and get to work pending when the job comes to an end. Whether he is the manager or coach of Manchester United is not important. What is important is for Amorim to understand that the board is NOT ready to give him any more money in January to buy new players so that he can play them out of their prefered positions while setting up an 8-1-1 formation against teams like Wolves.
The end is apparently getting near.



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IaxOoxmUwws?si=xUTXg1n_D2w3Y4vR