₦airaland Forum

budaatum:
So, you need your wife to be obligated to have sex with you, and if she doesn't give you permission, it's okay for you to rape her by having sex with her without her permission, and you think that's a healthy desirable relationship?

Can you not imagine doing what you can do to make your wife actually want to have sex with you?

How do you enjoy sex with a wife that doesn't want you to gave sex with her? No, actually, ignore that, since I'm certain rapïsts must enjoy rapïng their wife!

Although I don't support rape in marriage but still In marriage, sex is a responsibility, just like looking after your wife is a responsibility. People have tasted fornication so much that the line is blurred and even marriage is now considered as a mere relationship.

Some women even prefer to owe an obligation to their boyfriend than owe an obligation to their husband. Even while in marriage, they owe an obligation to the adultery than intimacy to their spouse.

It is not good that man should be alone and so the woman was formed. So if the intimacy that builds the bond between man and his woman is now based on rights, what is relationships without a bonding sporadically random intimacy activity?

lecowas:
This is just a normal thing even if it's not in the law, whenever someone lies with another person who is not "in the mood", something just doesn't feel right, cos both parties have to be actively involved.

No one should be forced to have coitus even if they are your spouse. What a lady decades ago still felt like rape even though physically stronger than her. No means No.

What about making her get in the mood by say eating her out or heavy petting? Is it OK to tap your wife's ass without permission?

Legalizing the phrase “ LIVING IN BONDAGE”……

They say marriage is the only place where sex is permitted.

Now the law is saying marriage is not.

I wonder where our Christian brothers who carry marriage on their head will stand now

As usual the worshipper will support everything.

lecowas:
This is just a normal thing even if it's not in the law, whenever someone lies with another person who is not "in the mood", something just doesn't feel right, cos both parties have to be actively involved.

No one should be forced to have coitus even if they are your spouse. What a lady decades ago still felt like rape even though physically stronger than her. No means No.

Tomorrow a wife will claim her husband raped her. Madness reigns supreme in the west these days.

Farrason:
So if the intimacy that builds the bond between man and his woman is now based on rights, what is relationships without a bonding sporadically random intimacy activity?

So, you need some law saying your wife should let you sex her instead of you forming a relationship with your wife that makes her want to sex you?

Do you also need a law to tell your children to love and respect you instead of you earning your children's respect and love?

And should your employer too have a law that makes you serve them instead of you willingly serving your employer because they reward you?

This is not about being in the mood.

This is something far more serious.

Imagine getting married to someone. But they have no intentions of sleeping with you.

Now by this law, you cannot divorce them. So you can get married to someone and their intentions for the marriage is not to have sex but to live together with you essentially as roommates.

And now that's valid.

So, it's not about being in the mood. It's about choice.

You could be getting married to start a family while your spouse may just be getting married to live with you or off you without the intention of ever consumating such marriage.

The law says this difference doesn't matter as marriage is not a contract involving sex.

Tohsynetita1:
I think they should just find a way to balance it. Why if wife is in the mood and husband isn’t also? What should wife do?

Kukutente23:
Lol
Sex is a spontaneous biological act based on hormones not a mechanical act.

Does you biology control you and not your brain?

budaatum:
Does you biology control you and not your brain?

Your brain is a biological device as well
It simply makes no sense to reduce sex between partners to a mechanical act
Rape is even more mechanical than biological

Some local fellows here are just claiming to be whiter than the whites.

Yeye laws everywhere. Is it not same Macaroni abi Macron that his class teacher he married was caught on camera some time ago, slapping him like a houseboy. What right does he have. Why wouldn't like others to legally miss what he has been missing

Host78:
This is not about being in the mood.

This is something far more serious.

Imagine getting married to someone. But they have no intentions of sleeping with you.

Now by this law, you cannot divorce them.

This is not true! You can divorce them. You just can't divorce them on the basis that they don't let you sex them. You can always divorce them because you don't want to be with that person anymore!

But the question is, why would the person you married have no intention of sleeping with you?

What did you do or not do to make that person not want to sleep with you?

Kukutente23:
Your brain is a biological device as well
It simply makes no sense to reduce sex between partners to a mechanical act
Rape is even more mechanical than biological

Sex is not "a mechanical act" is precisely why it can't be a duty I am obligated to perform when I don't want to!

I sure would want to have sex with you, husband, if you make yourself desirable and irresistible. I'd in fact be the one waking you up with your bit in my mouth because I love you so much and enjoy you. I just hope you don't want to divorce me because I can't leave you alone.

But know it's not got anything to do with the content of your wallet or pants when I'm more interested in your very irresistible smart kind considerate loving mind.

budaatum:
So, you need your wife to be obligated to have sex with you, and if she doesn't give you permission, it's okay for you to rape her by having sex with her without her permission, and you think that's a healthy desirable relationship?

Can you not imagine doing what you can do to make your wife actually want to have sex with you?

How do you enjoy sex with a wife that doesn't want you to gave sex with her? No, actually, ignore that, since I'm certain rapïsts must enjoy rapïng their wife!

You are just naive, and probably not married, otherwise you would understand that women would exploit this law to the fullest, a husband would Perpetually be working hard both outside and within the home to be able to consummate his marriage.

zagorakis:
You are just naive, and probably not married, otherwise you would understand that women would exploit this law to the fullest, a husband would Perpetually be working hard both outside and within the home to be able to consummate his marriage.

I should introduce you to my grandchildren so you know how naive I might be.

Husband, if you work hard at making me want you, I definitely will exploit you by jumping on you every morning, but what makes you think I'd let you touch me if you have nothing to offer me?

budaatum:
Sex is not "a mechanical act" is precisely why it can't be a duty I am obligated to perform when I don't want to!

I sure would want to have sex with you, husband, if you make yourself desirable and irresistible. I'd in fact be the one waking you up with your bit in my mouth because I love you so much and enjoy you. I just hope you don't want to divorce me because I can't leave you alone.

But know it's not got anything to do with the content of your wallet or pants when I'm more interested in your very irresistible smart kind considerate loving mind.

So what happens if the husband is not feeling giddy enough at that moment to have his bit in your mouth while you've already taken the liberty of fixing your lips on it? Ain't that rape right there?

When the world begins to have problem is when they allow women to be among decision makers. The world will never be the same again.

Kukutente23:
So what happens if the husband is not feeling giddy enough at that moment to have his bit in your mouth while you've already taken the liberty of fixing your lips on it? Ain't that rape right there?

Of course it is! It cuts both ways. But I do expect us to have sufficient respect and regard and love for each other so that when you say, "not now, honey", instead of irrationally yelling rape, I'd respect your feelings as you always do mine.

There's after all tonight or tomorrow morning when I hope you will feel giddy enough, my darling, especially after I've cooked that meal you love so much and after I've rubbed your belly while wearing that very sexy underwear I know you can not resist.

The satan of Oyibo land is so strong that it has been able to scatter marriage from the roots. First it was LGBTQRSTUVWXYZ, and now it's u can still marry and u no Bleep am. So what is marriage if I no fit Bleep am? It means married couples can withhold sex from their partners and then it automatically becomes a permission to seek sexual satisfaction elsewhere. Is that marriage? Has it not been scattered?

lailo:
When the world begins to have problem is when they allow women to be among decision makers. The world will never be the same again.

Yeah, keep women down. Weak men like you can not compete otherwise!

Thankfully, your are failing now.

budaatum:
Sex is not "a mechanical act" is precisely why it can't be a duty I am obligated to perform when I don't want to!

I sure would want to have sex with you, husband, if you make yourself desirable and irresistible. I'd in fact be the one waking you up with your bit in my mouth because I love you so much and enjoy you. I just hope you don't want to divorce me because I can't leave you alone.

But know it's not got anything to do with the content of your wallet or pants when I'm more interested in your very irresistible smart kind considerate loving mind.

In this new law if you wake a man with his bit in your mouth. He can sue you for rape and you land in jail.
Afyerall, you didnt get his consent before doing that

budaatum:
I should introduce you to my grandchildren so you know how naive I might be.

Husband, if you work hard at making me want you, I definitely will exploit you by jumping on you every morning, but what makes you think I'd let you touch me if you have nothing to offer me?

If you jump on me without taking my permission, I will sue you for rape and you'll go to jail. So you think this law permits a woman to touch the man anytime she wants?
If you even rest on my shoulder without permission, I will sue you

budaatum:
Of course it is! It cuts both ways. But I do expect us to have sufficient respect and regard and love for each other so that when you say, "not now, honey", instead of irrationally yelling rape, I'd respect your feelings as you always do mine.

There's after all tonight or tomorrow morning when I hope you will feel giddy enough, my darling, especially after I've cooked that meal you love so much and after I've rubbed your belly while wearing that very sexy underwear I know you can not resist.

If you rubb my belly without first taking my permission, I will sur you for rape.
If you wear skimpy clothes around me, I will accuse you of serial harassment and rape.

It's just that men don't know how to exploit laws like this

elipheleh:
If you jump on me without taking my permission, I will sue you for rape and you'll go to jail. So you think this law permits a woman to touch the man anytime she wants?
If you even rest on my shoulder without permission, I will sue you

I'm your wife, and not just some woman who jumps on you anytime I want!

The judge you intend to sue me before is not stupid like you think! And I definitely wouldn't have married you in the first place if this is how shallow you reason!

Please read my other posts on the thread and get with the program!

elipheleh:
If you ....

Dude, please. You definitely do not have the belly nor the brains that I would want to touch even with a ten foot barge pole wearing gloves!

You are not my kind caring regarding respecting considerate loving brainy Kukutente23!

budaatum:
Of course it is! It cuts both ways. But I do expect us to have sufficient respect and regard and love for each other so that when you say, "not now, honey", instead of irrationally yelling rape, I'd respect your feelings as you always do mine.

There's after all tonight or tomorrow morning when I hope you will feel giddy enough, my darling, especially after I've cooked that meal you love so much and after I've rubbed your belly while wearing that very sexy underwear I know you can not resist.

You ma'am are a hopeless romantic and a progressive one at that
I'm a traditional man so I'll leave the naming out and stick to the cuisine and rubbing part

So,are they telling me that they are now wiser than their fathers who made laws classifying sex in marriage one of the marital obligations?
Their fathers defined marriage as a UNION between a man and a woman.
Now, they are defining marriage as a COMMUNITY of LIVING.
Community,as how nah?
Which kind non...sense is this?

Things like this is what makes me to still respect our African forefathers a lot.
The made polygamy their culture.So that if your wife tells you she won't be in the mood for sex for one week, you leave her alone and go to your other wives to fulfill your biological desires.By the time she stays for 6 months without seeing you in her bed,she beg to be in the mood.
But in this our era, this same oyibo came with their idea of monogamy and sold it to us and we buy it without asking questions.
As if that wasn't enough, they are now making laws to make sex in marriage and optional things which by next year,we will copy it from them and practice it more religiously than the French that enacted the law.
With this law now,most of the women in marriage are now emboldened to deny their husbands sex intentionally,and any attempt by such husbands to ask questions can land them in federal prisons.

With this useless assertion, I agreed with the marriage is a scam group for the first time ever. French men need to fight back!

budaatum:
I think you are far way too intelligent and decent for some people here.

That’s one side of the coin, on the other hand it means there will be nothing as cheating. You can F**k you ever you like. Whether it’s accurate, it’s not for me to judge

Kukutente23:
You ma'am are a hopeless romantic and a progressive one at that
I'm a traditional man so I'll leave the naming out and stick to the cuisine and rubbing part

Well, I've described what you would have to be to be married to me, and I would investigate you for those qualities before we get that far. So, if your tradition shows you to be unqualified, there's thankfully many other better fish in the sea.

elipheleh, please don't bother applying, because you wouldn't even be called for an interview based on your submitted cv.