₦airaland Forum

Ironfaceman:
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cgjwxdz45ywo

At this point if u no wan fulfil your husband or wife sexual desire make everybody dey their dey..olosho and hookupians or call girls plenty..

zagorakis:
Why would you chose to marry him in the first place if he has nothing to offer?

You have obviously not read enough of our conversation to know why I'd marry him or not.

He offered a lot of promise then I found he was all air.

Murketeer:
He’s trying to tell you that with the level of hate that western women have for men … they will exploit this law to the fullest … you will hear husbands been arrested everyday .. this law will add to the present problem of diminishing marriages that already exists in the west today … where a lot of men don’t wish to be married anymore … so it’s going to be a loss loss for them

He is actually trying to tell me that western women are stupid, but this law France is now introducing has existed for a while now where I live, and evidence does not show he knows what he's talking about.

But perhaps you need some information, so here's a link.

https://www.richardnelsonllp.co.uk/guides/marital-rape-in-the-uk/

After you've read it, provide me with your evidence for your supposed "level of hate that western women have for men" that will make them "exploit this law to the fullest".

I'll be waiting patiently for it, and thanks in advance.

lecowas:
This is just a normal thing even if it's not in the law, whenever someone lies with another person who is not "in the mood", something just doesn't feel right, cos both parties have to be actively involved.

No one should be forced to have coitus even if they are your spouse. What a lady decades ago still felt like rape even though physically stronger than her. No means No.

There's nothing like Marital rape.....it's a recent concept being pushed by women predicated on the already victimhood mentality celebrated in the west. Victimhood is now power. You must be a victim before you can be listened to.

Are you married. How many times have you asked your partner for sex.

Teymanhenry:
For better or for worse” is not a legal justification. What the law is trying to do is actually very simple: no forceful sex, even within marriage.
Consent works both ways ,she cannot force him, and he cannot force her. It really is that straightforward.
Anyone who is married should understand this clearly. Honestly, it’s hard to imagine how a sane person would even want to have sex with their spouse by force in the first place.

Peterlove11:
There's nothing like Marital rape.....it's a recent concept being pushed by women predicated on the already victimhood mentality celebrated in the west. Victimhood is now power. You must be a victim before you can be listened to.

There used to be a time when there was nothing like rape of women. Women were not even allowed to vote or inherit from their parents, get degrees, have bank accounts or choose whom they married, but now women are presidents and prime ministers and heads of states, and a woman is talking to God!.

Don't you just hate the "recent concept" of progress that women have pushed.

Host78:
And yes, you cannot divorce your wife because divorcing requires a reason. You can walk to the court to say you don't want your wife anymore and since you can't cite lack of intimacy as a reason, suddenly you cannot provide why.

Dude please, mr not naive, you can very easily create reasons why you want to divorce your wife!

You can cheat on her for instance, and that could be your reason. You can just abandon her, if cheating don't work. And if you are really really desperate and can't reason better, you can beat the shït out of her and say that's why you want to divorce her, though I strongly suggest you find much less vicious reasons!

Stop oozing stůpîdïty bro.

What do you mean you can cheat on her and turn it into a reason?

Do you think there are no consequences if you cheat on your spouse during divorce?

You see a problem staring at you right in the face, instead of solving it, you're running around in circles.

So you would rather cheat on your spouse Just to be able to divorce her and face harsher consequences or have a law that actually makes room for you to divorce her based on the actual problem?

This una wokeness dey irritate me

budaatum:
Dude please, mr not naive, you can very easily create reasons why you want to divorce your wife!

You can cheat on her for instance, and that could be your reason. You can just abandon her, if cheating don't work. And if you are really really desperate and can't reason better, you can beat the shït out of her and say that's why you want to divorce her, though I strongly suggest you find much less vicious reasons!

Kobojunkie would love this, forming woke and wise but na them muumuu pass. All these illuminati and Baphomet worshipping people in power, always trying to anger the Lord with stupid laws. They are simply trying to encourage cheating/adultery.

brain54:
Without sex couples are just roommates living together though...

Why wouldn't anyone be obligated to have sex with their married partner?🤷

Civilization. Everyone just dey open eyes dey prove right. My right is righter than your right!

Which right you dey see for this matter?

This is simply perversion.

Dem dey use the so-called advanced talk dey do perverse things.

Even the gods wey create humans go dey vex for this nonsense.

If you now ask these advanced morons why a man go marry when even sex now come be as they want am, dem no go get any reasonable explanation...

It's just like that animal doctor wey dey support LGBTQ. Dem ask the useless woman if a man fit get pregnant, she no fit answer straight. Begin talk rubbish like: "I can't answer that, it's complicated".... And this na person wey claim to be for the sciences and biological make ups o.
Abeg o, wetin dey complicated for the question?

Useless people. And Black man wey no geh sense go support dem because of inferiority complex.

Just as dem tell black man say polygamy no good but gayism is bae... And some animals in human skin agree with that.

My own be say, there's different levels of madness. Some na werey wey wear cloth

Did you read the story provided? The woman denied her husband for years. How can you not be in the mood for years? What will one do in such a case?

lecowas:
This is just a normal thing even if it's not in the law, whenever someone lies with another person who is not "in the mood", something just doesn't feel right, cos both parties have to be actively involved.

No one should be forced to have coitus even if they are your spouse. What a lady decades ago still felt like rape even though physically stronger than her. No means No.

Okay. Well, I really don’t know what to make of this sha

elipheleh:
If you rubb my belly without first taking my permission, I will sur you for rape.
If you wear skimpy clothes around me, I will accuse you of serial harassment and rape.

It's just that men don't know how to exploit laws like this

Trust me men know how to exploit the law , its just a mans nature not to stress over such kind of cases in court. It sounds and looks feminine to sue a woman for rape. But trust me men know the law more than women

Kukutente23:
Why will African men mean backward pigs? Does African women mean dirty bitches?
Being backward or "forward" has nothing to do with race
The African man was more morally upright and responsible than his Caucasian counterparts whom you worship

Dont mind her , they think every thing western is right and every thing african is wrong.. some africans are like that, they worship any thing the white man say, like religious addicts and their pastors

Jeezuzpick:
France is Europe HQ of "Satan Inc."

So now a married couple can go without sex, and one cannot end a marriage due to lack thereof?

A woman can deny her husband sex for years, and he has to stay in the marriage?

A man can abandon his wife and not touch her for ages, and she can't use this as a basis to leave anymore?

Well, folks, cheating is getting closer to being legalized, and more people won't even want to get married anymore.

EXACTLY.. LESS MARRIAGE , MORE CHEATING.. THAT THE ONLY OUTCOME OF THIS LAW. .. so more sexual immorality, more baby mamas, more single parents, more children out of wedlock, more crime.... the devil is a genius

LordIsaac:
Good...it's progressive indeed. Sex should not be a prerequisite for consummation!

Sex should not be a prerequisite for consummation...
Maybe you don't understand what "Summation" means in the word "Consummation".
Be typing English upside-down

FuckYeyeMods:
Sex should not be a prerequisite for consummation...
Maybe you don't understand what "Summation" means in the word "Consummation".
Be typing English upside-down

Summation is the process of adding things together....and that is not limited to coitus.

I

lecowas:
This is just a normal thing even if it's not in the law, whenever someone lies with another person who is not "in the mood", something just doesn't feel right, cos both parties have to be actively involved.

No one should be forced to have coitus even if they are your spouse. What a lady decades ago still felt like rape even though physically stronger than her. No means No.

This is why it is better to be a Muslim. You are allowed to marry up to 4 wives. If one wife began to prove law in your own house you move to the next wife who has 80% chance of welcoming you

I don't understand why I will need sex with my wife at least once in a week then you will begin misbehaving because of one useless constitution. The solution is shari'a, that is marry more than 1 wife then nonsense behavior will stop else she packs out

Ironfaceman:
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cgjwxdz45ywo

This will discourage so many people from getting married...gradually, we are getting closer to what was predicted by 2030

Josen:
So can the concept of infidelity be erased as well?
If the wife cannot consent to sex, I think the man has the basic right as well to look elsewhere for his aim or the term "Marriage" needs to be redefine.

You are right sir. They also need to remove the clause that commits marriage to fidelity. You can't beat a child and expect the child not to cry.

Host78:
So you would rather cheat on your spouse Just to be able to divorce her and face harsher consequences or have a law that actually makes room for you to divorce her based on the actual problem?

This una wokeness dey irritate me

You are the one being stupid in thinking you can't just walk away from a relationship you don't want, and I am giving you extreme cause for walking away if you can not find simpler reasons to walk away.

If they seem to extreme for you, just walk away and pay the cost, instead of limiting yourself unto believing her not letting you fuq is you only reason.

And note. I don't give a flying fuq what irritates you. You and your opinion is irrelevant.

drsibz66:
Dont mind her , they think every thing western is right and every thing african is wrong.. some africans are like that, they worship any thing the white man say, like religious addicts and their pastors

You are the one who should not be minded since you are obviously far too lazy to read. Because if you were not lazy to read, you'd know I know the person you are telling not to mind is an African man when I was cooking him that African meal he loves so much and was marrying him and worshipping his African bit before he began grunting like a pig I can not stand!

It will still affect both party. In fact, na women go later cry. Na them their body no dey calm down. If you refuse me sex when I want, then you will now expect me to do when you want? Very stupid law. I don't how this oyinbo dey reason when it comes to social, moral stuffs

Ironfaceman:
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cgjwxdz45ywo

I hope as they are closing this door, they are opening another one. Coz I cannot have a wife that denies me sex expect that I won't have it somewhere else. Once you say no, you give up your right to fidelity and I can satisfy myself somewhere else. That will balance the equation.

brain54:
Without sex couples are just roommates living together though...

Why wouldn't anyone be obligated to have sex with their married partner?🤷

Civilization. Everyone just dey open eyes dey prove right. My right is righter than your right!

If obligatory sex in marriage is illegal then cheating in marriage should be legal.

If sex in marriage is non-compulsory then fidelity shouldn't be compulsory.

But then I can't tolerate fidelity from my woman and it's grounds for my own divorce.

I just think I can operate in that kind of clime in France.

budaatum:
I wasn't worshipping "Caucasians counterparts" when I was extolling the non-pig "morally upright and responsible" qualities I assumed you had, so stop showing your ego is hurt when you finally failed to meet up to my standards.

A man, African or Caucasian or from Mars, who thinks a woman is for his gratification is a pig.

If you assume qualities and also dismiss them based on Internet conversations then the fault lies with your ability to make sound, reasonable judgement and not the African man.

And to reduce a proportional retort for an insult to all African men including your own dear father to ego only shows you have not grown beyond the obscenely manipulative tendencies of the average feminist that has led to such a high failure rate in marriages and attendant social consequences

The major reason why men, ok let me speak for myself. The major reason why I got married is to have access to sxx whenever I want without wasting money getting it. I know wetin I don press from last night till this morning so this law in France doesn't make sense to me.


I have never ræp..ed any woman let alone my previous wife, is she isn't in the mood for it I either put her in the mood or postpone it till we're both ready.

budaatum:
You have obviously not read enough of our conversation to know why I'd marry him or not.

He offered a lot of promise then I found he was all air.

If you have made the wrong choice in a partner, you have to bear the consequences of your wrong choice, or you divorce him and go back to the street. But if you chose to stay in that marriage, and the man is trying in his fundamental roles as a man (providing, feeding, clothing, protection)you must be giving the man his conjugal rights (as far as Nigeria is concerned) otherwise you go to France, ofcourse, that as well comes with consequences.

lecowas:
This is just a normal thing even if it's not in the law, whenever someone lies with another person who is not "in the mood", something just doesn't feel right, cos both parties have to be actively involved.

No one should be forced to have coitus even if they are your spouse. What a lady decades ago still felt like rape even though physically stronger than her. No means No.

Did you read the part where a man who divorced his wife withholding sex from him for YEARS was condemned?

So a wife can decide not to be in the mood for years and still oppose to a divorce?

budaatum:
I think you are far way too intelligent and decent for some people here.

So a man should be denied the right to ask for a divorce from a wife who denied him conjugal relationship for years?

budaatum:
There used to be a time when there was nothing like rape of women. Women were not even allowed to vote or inherit from their parents, get degrees, have bank accounts or choose whom they married, but now women are presidents and prime ministers and heads of states, and a woman is talking to God!.

Don't you just hate the "recent concept" of progress that women have pushed.

The founding fathers of western nations that promoted Human rights were Christians, infact the current civilization and laws promoted by the west were based on the Bible. The Bible was the basis of that illumination and wherever they go around the world people come under there influence and were both impacted Culturally and Religiously.
Society were protected both on a family and individual level

But the recent extreme move nowadays was a far crime from the Bible that formed and shaped that civilization.
Extreme movement built on victimhood and selfhood arose recently and were largely targeted towards family cohesion and promotion e.g gays right, trans, my body my right, pro-abortion etc. A society that can't protect family no matter how great it is will go down. Family is the foundation of a thriving and joyous society

In a cohesive home, there is no spousal rape. You can argue it on the plater of individualism, which I say is Yes (my body, my right), but on holistic arguement of a healthy home it is NO.
Even most of the religious books which has formed the basis of how many societies conduct themselves through laws says NO. No matter the level of agitation, nor formlessless promoted in our society, the universe always knows how to go back to it's default settings. Laws ain't made to please some group of people, nor to divide people or home but to foster peace and unity on both a communal and family level