₦airaland Forum

PastorAIO:
I made a post earlier today quoting Ezekiel 20:25 and 26
It would fit in this thread.

25Moreover, I gave them statutes that were not good and rules by which they could not have life, 26and I defiled them through their very gifts in their offering up all their firstborn, that I might devastate them. I did it that they might know that I am the LORD.

The words of your ghoul

God did not literally author or command these bad laws; rather, He allowed Israel the natural consequences of their own rebellion. When Israel insisted on serving false gods, God removed His protective restraint, allowing them to fall into the horrific practices of the surrounding pagan nations, including human sacrifice.
Thus the text reflects God "allowing" these detestable practices to play out, using their ultimate failure to teach Israel that He alone is the Lord!

When critics quote verses for intolerant inquisitors instead of the later to go and ask others regarding the verse {Matthew 7:7-8} most of them just swallow whatever the critic quote for them and start judging the Bible.🙂

Just imagine someone quoted Ezekiel 20:25-26
I also allowed them to follow regulations that were not good and judicial decisions by which they could not have life. I let them become defiled by their own sacrifices—when they made every firstborn child pass through the fire—in order to make them desolate, so that they would know that I am Jehovah. Ezekiel 20:25-26

But instead of the inquisitor to continue asking Bible believers what our God meant in the verse he started quoting the erroneous translation and expecting everyone to agree with his hasty conclusion.

Well if you are truly interested to know why God said what is quoted in the Bible book of Ezekiel 20:25-26 it was a direct response to a question asked by one of God's faithful servants named Habakkuk who asked God:

Your eyes are too pure to look on evil; you cannot tolerate wrongdoing. Why then do you tolerate the treacherous? Why are you silent while the wicked swallow up those more righteous than themselves? ‭Habakkuk 1:13 NIV‬

So God said He allowed these people to do such things not that He instituted it:


They have built the high places of Topheth in the Valley of Ben Hinnom to burn their sons and daughters in the fire—something I did not command, nor did it enter my mind. ‭Jeremiah 7:31 NIV‬


So if you want to learn humble yourself and ask questions! Proverbs 2:1-5🙂

MaxInDHouse:
Why did God arrange for His message to be written?
If you don't know the purpose of God's word you can't know whether it has been well preserved. Daniel 12:10🙂

God arranged for His message so that mankind can know who is the true God out of all the spirits (demons) claiming God.
So God used His message as a knockout to silence all demons but the demons didn't just fold their arms they fought back by disguising as angels of God to misconstrue God's message to humans {2Corinthians 11:14} they used the same book but it's their own agents that was carrying it {2Corinthians 11:15} while they keep on fighting against God's faithful servants! Revelation 2:10

So how can we be assured that what we have is the perfect word of God as revealed from the divine?

God promised that during the endtime His word will be used to achieve global peace among His true worshipers {Isaiah 2:2-4} but if that didn't happen then it means the word still has certain errors or is filled with misinformation.

Today what God promised has been fulfilled that is evidence that God's word has been perfectly preserved!🙂

QuinQQ:
Oh now he wants anecdotes. Is fearlessness anecdote enough 4 ya? One time in a new place between sleep and wake a demon appeared and politely asked if I could accommodate him. I was not scared at all. I told him to disappear as I belonged to Jesus. He hurriedly went out through the window

This one is presenting a schizophrenic hallucination as evidence that he has peace.

I remember you better now. You’re a JW. The fakest of the lot, with your own twisted mistranslation of bible.

Na tat ti, means to give, not to allow. There is no context in Hebrew where it means to allow. Lying JW.

MaxInDHouse:
Humbly ask questions instead of quickly concluding on what you don't understand.

Here is the correct translation of what you quoted:

I also allowed them to follow regulations that were not good and judicial decisions by which they could not have life. I let them become defiled by their own sacrifices—when they made every firstborn child pass through the fire—in order to make them desolate, so that they would know that I am Jehovah. Ezekiel 20:25-26

Ask questions not concluding hastily!🙂

The entire bible is replete with human sacrifice to yhwh there is no way to duck it. Whether it is Abraham sacrificing Isaac. God demanding the first born of ever living thing including humans. All the way up to Jesus being a sacrifice to yhwh. There is no way to dodge it.

1King 22:

23 Now therefore, behold, the Lord hath put a lying spirit in the mouth of all these thy prophets, and the Lord hath spoken evil concerning thee.

MaxInDHouse:
God arranged for His message so that mankind can know who is the true God out of all the spirits (demons) claiming God.
So God used His message as a knockout to silence all demons but the demons didn't just fold their arms they fought back by disguising as angels of God to misconstrue God's message to humans {2Corinthians 11:14} they used the same book but it's their own agents that was carrying it {2Corinthians 11:15} while they keep on fighting against God's faithful servants! Revelation 2:10

So how can we be assured that what we have is the perfect word of God as revealed from the divine?

God promised that during the endtime His word will be used to achieve global peace among His true worshipers {Isaiah 2:2-4} but if that didn't happen then it means the word still has certain errors or is filled with misinformation.

Today what God promised has been fulfilled that is evidence that God's word has been perfectly preserved!🙂

PastorAIO:
I remember you better now. You’re a JW. The fakest of the lot, with your own twisted mistranslation of bible.
Na tat ti, means to give, not to allow. There is no context in Hebrew where it means to allow. Lying JW.

Do you think it's always direct tongues are translated?
Well you err greatly because there are instances where you have to consider the context before concluding on what someone said.

For instance two people met on the road and based on their previous discussions before then one asked the other:
What is on ground? English
Wetin dey ground? Pidgin
Kí ló wà nílẹ̀? Yorùbá

So someone who can speak the language translated it to:

What is that on the ground?

Do you think the translator is right?🙂

Ọmọ context matters when translating languages there are many things to consider not just what you read or heard.

The same book said God can't stand evil deeds {Habakkuk 1:13} so do you think your translator is correct about this same person?🙂

QuinQQ:
Very well-written. But I answer you with same words I used for guy above:
You believe God is omnipotent yet you don't believe same God can get something as important as his intended words (or the Bible exactly as he intended it) into the hands of men. And that he can do this through human manipulations and misinterpretations!

As for your insistence on "truth" and questioning, if you truly start questioning, the first few questions will collapse everything: where did God come from, who created God? If God is so human-like and so into human affairs, why doesn't he simply show himself directly in a way that leaves nothing to doubt? Why do unspeakable evil and massive natural disasters exist? Why is the all-important earth so tiny it is invisible even by microscope (smaller than an atom - see below)? Etc.

Non of these questions are answerable from our human perspective (I mean answering them honestly and directly not the usual "uncaused cause" convoluted answer).
So if you consider your faith valuable and important to you, you spend your time on things that strengthen it, NOT on things that are, frankly, beyond you as a human being (like what are the exact original words Genesis?!)

Honestly, I think this is one of the most mature comments in the discussion so far.

Because you’re touching something very important:
👉 human limitation.

And I actually agree with you on several points.

Yes:
👉 ultimate reality may go beyond complete human comprehension
👉 many philosophical questions remain unresolved
👉 and no human being fully grasps existence itself.

Questions like:
👉 “Why does anything exist?”
👉 “Why suffering?”
👉 “Why consciousness?”
👉 “Why is reality structured this way?”
have challenged philosophers, mystics, scientists, and theologians for thousands of years.

So I’m not pretending humans possess absolute answers.

But here’s where I slightly differ from your conclusion.

You said:
👉 if God is omnipotent, then God can preserve His message perfectly through human history.

And logically, yes,an omnipotent being COULD do that.

But the real question is not:
👉 Could God do it?

The real question is:
👉 What does history actually show happened?

Because when we study biblical history honestly, we clearly see:
👉 different manuscript traditions
👉 translation differences
👉 removed books
👉 debated canons
👉 scribal changes
👉 church councils
👉 theological disputes
👉 political influence over doctrine

Those are historical realities.

So my point is not:
👉 God is incapable.

My point is:
👉 humans and institutions clearly played major roles in shaping, preserving, interpreting, and organizing religious texts over centuries.

And recognizing that should not automatically destroy spirituality.

If anything, it should make people more humble and conscious about how belief systems develop historically.

Now regarding your statement about questioning collapsing everything…

I actually think questioning can do two very different things:

👉 it can destroy shallow certainty
BUT
👉 it can also deepen understanding.

Because sometimes inherited belief is fragile precisely because it was never examined consciously.

And honestly, I don’t think faith and questioning must always be enemies.

Sometimes questioning removes:
👉 fear
👉 blind dogma
👉 inherited assumptions
👉 institutional conditioning

while leaving behind something more genuine, thoughtful, and mature.

You also said:
👉 humans should focus on things that strengthen faith.

I understand that psychologically.

But personally, I think truth-seeking matters too.

Because history shows that humans can sincerely believe things for centuries that later turn out to be:
👉 incomplete
👉 manipulated
👉 symbolic
👉 culturally conditioned
👉 or misunderstood.

So I don’t think asking:
👉 “How did these texts form?”
👉 “Who preserved them?”
👉 “How were doctrines shaped?”
is rebellion against truth.

To me, that IS part of seeking truth honestly.

And maybe humility is not only admitting:
👉 “humans don’t know everything.”

Maybe humility is also admitting:
👉 “our inherited beliefs and institutions may not be beyond examination either.”

I AM - THE AWAKEN SOUL (TAS)
QUESTIONING EVERYTHING

PastorAIO:
This is irrelevant to the discussion

Lol

QuinQQ:
The Awaken Soul, you're actually wrong. No one is afraid of or threatened by "truth" or investigations, but things ought have a purpose. What's the purpose of this "truth" (you can't really find absolute truth)? Faith and belief are very valuable assets with real life benefits. They are NOT strengthened by constant questioning and investigations and searchings for "truth"!

I actually understand your point more than you may think.

And honestly, I agree that:
👉 faith
👉 meaning
👉 hope
👉 and belief
can have very real benefits in human life.

They can help people:
👉 survive suffering
👉 find direction
👉 stay emotionally grounded
👉 build discipline
👉 and maintain psychological stability.

I don’t dismiss that at all.

But I think the deeper issue is this:

🔥 Should something be protected from examination simply because it feels valuable or useful?

Because throughout history, many ideas gave people:
👉 comfort
👉 certainty
👉 emotional security
👉 social belonging

and yet were still incomplete, mistaken, or influenced by culture and power structures.

You asked:
👉 What’s the purpose of this truth-seeking?

To me, the purpose is consciousness.

Not blind destruction of belief…
but understanding:
👉 why we believe what we believe
👉 how beliefs formed
👉 what parts are history
👉 what parts are symbolism
👉 what parts are institutional
👉 and what parts may contain genuine spiritual insight.

Because there’s a difference between:
👉 inherited certainty
and
👉 consciously examined understanding.

You also said:
👉 Faith is not strengthened by constant questioning.

Sometimes that’s true.

But then we should ask:
👉 what kind of faith completely collapses under honest investigation?

Because personally, I think mature spirituality should be able to face:
👉 history
👉 archaeology
👉 philosophy
👉 contradictions
👉 difficult questions
without panic.

Not because humans can know absolute truth perfectly…

but because seeking understanding is part of growth itself.

And honestly, I agree with you about one thing:
absolute truth may remain beyond full human grasp.

But that realization should produce:
👉 humility
not
👉 fear of questioning.

Because if humans are limited…
then all of us:
👉 believers
👉 skeptics
👉 religious institutions
👉 philosophers
👉 spiritual teachers

should remain open to deeper understanding.

My point has never been:
👉 “destroy faith.”

My point is:
👉 fear-based certainty is not the same thing as truth.

And maybe spirituality becomes deeper when people stop believing only because they are afraid…
and start exploring consciously.

I AM - THE AWAKEN SOUL (TAS)
QUESTIONING EVERYTHING

SIRTee15:
Your argument falls apart under critical and logical scrutiny. This argument of corruption and editing is simply lafable.
The dead sea scrolls makes the whole argument of corruption fall apart.

Now u guys argue the bible is corrupt. At what point did the corruption start and when did it stop. Who decided that the corruption in the bible is enough and thus no further need for corruption.

The dead sea scrolls are oldest extant old testament manuscripts written around 250BC. if we are to go by that date, it means the dead sea scrolls are over 2,000 yrs old and possibly 400-1000 yrs removed from the original copies of the old testament books.

Now the beautiful thing is the dead sea scroll is exactly like the old testament we have today. No doctrinal or theological difference. No added chapters or missing chapters. No passage omission, addition, editing or correction.

I have the dead sea scroll English translation with me and if I give u a copy, u won't know the difference. The book of Isaiah or exodus in dead sea scroll is just like the ones in KJV or NIV.

We can then deduce that there is a high level of textual stability and preservation in the old testament books from 250BC till date. Even the academic scholars admit to this stability.

Now what this shows is there was no corruption in the old testament from 250bc.
From 250bc, the scribes were not corrupting the text or decided to stop corrupting the old testament for reasons best known to them.

So according to people like u, All so called corruption or manipulation or editing happened before 250BC.

Now my question is this. Why do u think the scribes and the priests from 250BC onwards decided not to corrupt the bible any longer.
Is it they were happy with the corruptions in the bible and felt no need to corrupt further
OR
They were bereft of ideas on how to corrupt the bible this couldn't do it.
OR
Jews started producing saints as scribes from 250bc thus wouldn't think of corrupting the bible
OR
The Jews didn't create a quality control system to ensure preservation and stability of the bible until 250BC. Thus became impossible to corrupt the bible after 250BC.

Which one is the answer. I want u to tell me why corruption of the bible suddenly stopped after 250 BC. Why were the scribes b4 250 BC awfully corrupting the text without any conscience but scribes after 250 BC choose not to.

I'm interested in your response.

Honestly, this is one of the strongest and most informed responses I’ve seen in the discussion so far.

And I think it’s important to acknowledge something clearly:
👉 the Dead Sea Scrolls ARE extremely important discoveries.

They absolutely show remarkable textual stability in large portions of the Hebrew Bible, especially books like Isaiah.

And yes, many scholars agree that Jewish scribal traditions preserved texts with very high levels of consistency over long periods.

I don’t deny that at all.

But I think there’s still an important distinction being missed here.

Because when people discuss:
👉 textual development
👉 editing
👉 transmission
👉 canon formation
👉 translation
👉 institutional influence

that does NOT automatically mean:
👉 “the Bible was completely rewritten every generation.”

Those are different claims.

For example:
textual criticism studies things like:
👉 manuscript variations
👉 added passages
👉 omitted verses
👉 translation differences
👉 scribal harmonizations
👉 evolving interpretations
👉 and debates over which books belonged in the canon at all.

And historically, those things DID happen.

Even many Christian scholars acknowledge:
👉 some passages were later additions
👉 some manuscripts differ
👉 some books had disputed status for centuries
👉 and canon formation involved historical debates and institutional decisions.

Now regarding your main question:
👉 “Why would corruption suddenly stop after 250 BC?”

I actually think the issue is the word “corruption” itself.

Because the historical discussion is usually more nuanced than:
👉 evil scribes secretly rewriting everything.

What scholars often describe is:
👉 gradual development
👉 copying variations
👉 editorial processes
👉 theological emphasis
👉 transmission differences
👉 and institutional standardization over time.

And once textual traditions became more formalized and carefully preserved, naturally stability increased.

That’s not unusual historically.

Many traditions become more standardized over time once communities establish:
👉 stricter copying systems
👉 recognized authoritative texts
👉 scribal discipline
👉 and communal protection of manuscripts.

So the existence of textual stability AFTER certain periods does not automatically erase:
👉 earlier developmental history
👉 editorial layers
👉 oral transmission before writing
👉 or canon debates later on.

Also remember:
the Dead Sea Scrolls mainly concern the Hebrew Bible / Old Testament.

They do not suddenly solve all questions regarding:
👉 New Testament textual history
👉 canon selection
👉 church councils
👉 translation philosophy
👉 doctrinal development
👉 or interpretation.

So honestly, I think the evidence points to something more balanced:

👉 there WAS significant preservation
AND
👉 there WAS undeniable human involvement in transmission, interpretation, canon formation, and historical development.

Those two realities can exist together.

And personally, I think acknowledging complexity strengthens honest discussion more than reducing everything to:
👉 “perfectly untouched”
or
👉 “completely corrupted.”

Reality is usually more nuanced than either extreme.

I AM - THE AWAKEN SOUL (TAS)
QUESTIONING EVERYTHING

PastorAIO:
This one is presenting a schizophrenic hallucination as evidence that he has peace.

Do schizophrenic hallucinations fall down window curtains while hurriedly escaping??
I said fearlessness. Evidence of my peace is within me

Theawakensoul:
Honestly, I think this is one of the most mature comments in the discussion so far.

Because you’re touching something very important:
👉 human limitation.

And I actually agree with you on several points.

Yes:
👉 ultimate reality may go beyond complete human comprehension
👉 many philosophical questions remain unresolved
👉 and no human being fully grasps existence itself.

Questions like:
👉 “Why does anything exist?”
👉 “Why suffering?”
👉 “Why consciousness?”
👉 “Why is reality structured this way?”
have challenged philosophers, mystics, scientists, and theologians for thousands of years.

So I’m not pretending humans possess absolute answers.

But here’s where I slightly differ from your conclusion.

You said:
👉 if God is omnipotent, then God can preserve His message perfectly through human history.

And logically, yes,an omnipotent being COULD do that.

But the real question is not:
👉 Could God do it?

The real question is:
👉 What does history actually show happened?

Because when we study biblical history honestly, we clearly see:
👉 different manuscript traditions
👉 translation differences
👉 removed books
👉 debated canons
👉 scribal changes
👉 church councils
👉 theological disputes
👉 political influence over doctrine

Those are historical realities.

So my point is not:
👉 God is incapable.

My point is:
👉 humans and institutions clearly played major roles in shaping, preserving, interpreting, and organizing religious texts over centuries.

And recognizing that should not automatically destroy spirituality.

If anything, it should make people more humble and conscious about how belief systems develop historically.

Now regarding your statement about questioning collapsing everything…

I actually think questioning can do two very different things:

👉 it can destroy shallow certainty
BUT
👉 it can also deepen understanding.

Because sometimes inherited belief is fragile precisely because it was never examined consciously.

And honestly, I don’t think faith and questioning must always be enemies.

Sometimes questioning removes:
👉 fear
👉 blind dogma
👉 inherited assumptions
👉 institutional conditioning

while leaving behind something more genuine, thoughtful, and mature.

You also said:
👉 humans should focus on things that strengthen faith.

I understand that psychologically.

But personally, I think truth-seeking matters too.

Because history shows that humans can sincerely believe things for centuries that later turn out to be:
👉 incomplete
👉 manipulated
👉 symbolic
👉 culturally conditioned
👉 or misunderstood.

So I don’t think asking:
👉 “How did these texts form?”
👉 “Who preserved them?”
👉 “How were doctrines shaped?”
is rebellion against truth.

To me, that IS part of seeking truth honestly.

And maybe humility is not only admitting:
👉 “humans don’t know everything.”

Maybe humility is also admitting:
👉 “our inherited beliefs and institutions may not be beyond examination either.”

I AM - THE AWAKEN SOUL (TAS)
QUESTIONING EVERYTHING

Theawakensoul:
I actually understand your point more than you may think.

And honestly, I agree that:
👉 faith
👉 meaning
👉 hope
👉 and belief
can have very real benefits in human life.

They can help people:
👉 survive suffering
👉 find direction
👉 stay emotionally grounded
👉 build discipline
👉 and maintain psychological stability.

I don’t dismiss that at all.

But I think the deeper issue is this:

🔥 Should something be protected from examination simply because it feels valuable or useful?

Because throughout history, many ideas gave people:
👉 comfort
👉 certainty
👉 emotional security
👉 social belonging

and yet were still incomplete, mistaken, or influenced by culture and power structures.

You asked:
👉 What’s the purpose of this truth-seeking?

To me, the purpose is consciousness.

Not blind destruction of belief…
but understanding:
👉 why we believe what we believe
👉 how beliefs formed
👉 what parts are history
👉 what parts are symbolism
👉 what parts are institutional
👉 and what parts may contain genuine spiritual insight.

Because there’s a difference between:
👉 inherited certainty
and
👉 consciously examined understanding.

You also said:
👉 Faith is not strengthened by constant questioning.

Sometimes that’s true.

But then we should ask:
👉 what kind of faith completely collapses under honest investigation?

Because personally, I think mature spirituality should be able to face:
👉 history
👉 archaeology
👉 philosophy
👉 contradictions
👉 difficult questions
without panic.

Not because humans can know absolute truth perfectly…

but because seeking understanding is part of growth itself.

And honestly, I agree with you about one thing:
absolute truth may remain beyond full human grasp.

But that realization should produce:
👉 humility
not
👉 fear of questioning.

Because if humans are limited…
then all of us:
👉 believers
👉 skeptics
👉 religious institutions
👉 philosophers
👉 spiritual teachers

should remain open to deeper understanding.

My point has never been:
👉 “destroy faith.”

My point is:
👉 fear-based certainty is not the same thing as truth.

And maybe spirituality becomes deeper when people stop believing only because they are afraid…
and start exploring consciously.

I AM - THE AWAKEN SOUL (TAS)
QUESTIONING EVERYTHING

Erudite and well written. Thanks for the compliment.
Let me address your points one by one as I read them.
1. You said you slightly disagree but didn't say how: do you agree that something as important to omnipotent God as transmission of his words would not be left to chance and human vagaries, that they'd end up getting to us exactly as he meant them to get to us?

2. It is NOT "fear-based certainty", it is CHOICE-based certainty. I CHOOSE to believe these are God's words exactly as he intended us to have them. And there is no way you can disprove that.

3 You did not say how the very first few questions will not collapse everything:
Where did God come from, who created God? If God is so human-like and so into human affairs, why doesn't he simply show himself directly in a way that leaves nothing to doubt? Why do unspeakable evil and massive natural disasters exist? Why is the all-important earth so tiny that, on a cosmic scale, it is invisible even by a powerful microscope (100 quintellionth the size of a grain of sand)(and there could be multiple universes)?
You CAN'T and will NEVER be able to answer those questions.
Our belief in God is based on intuition and direct experience, NOT endless questioning of the unanswerable!

4. There are questions that are beneficial (like scientific questionings). Then there are questions that are merely for intellectual amusement because they're about things that are unknowable (like who/what created God?)

5. I believe we'll do well to acknowledge that faith is a matter of personal conviction, intuition, and direct experience, which then led to CHOICE. Not a matter of asking unanswerable questions

*The earth is smaller than one of these 50 to 100 quitillion atoms in a grain of sand (below), on a cosmic scale

Antiislaam:
You gerrit, evidence na water the reason why allah gave you evidence here


Quran 10:94 Irving & Mohamed Hegab

If you are in any doubt concerning what We have sent down to you, then question those who have read the Book (Bible) before you: Truth has come to you from your Lord, so do not be a waverer

Now you know your book nah porn book ahaaa

Song of Solomon 7:6-12
How beautiful you are and how pleasing, my love, with your delights! Your stature is like that of the palm, and your breasts like clusters of fruit. I said, “I will climb the palm tree; I will take hold of its fruit.” May your breasts be like clusters of grapes on the vine, the fragrance of your breath like apples, and your mouth like the best wine. May the wine go straight to my beloved, flowing gently over lips and teeth.

When will you climb the tree nah ? 🤣🤣

AntiisIam:
You wan start wetin you no go finish abi

Sebi you remember the story of your alujana virgins, there dis tin dey inside quran so don't try going dat side sogbo.

Solomon na Sule in quran, you have his story too inside your holy books, na your anobi and that's the reason why I dey call you Sule dẹpẹ

You know me nah . I used to destroy you with evidence . You are too small .

Your book na porn book .

Yes or no ?

🥷

doffman:
You know me nah . I used to destroy you with evidence . You are too small .

Your book na porn book .

Yes or no ?

🥷

You mean the book here?


Quran 78:33 Muhammad Sarwar
maidens with pears-shaped breasts who are of equal age (to their spouses



Quran 78:33 Dr. Laleh Bakhtiar
and full breasted maidens of the same age


Quran 78:33 Talal Itani & AI
And full-breasted companions of equal age.


Quran 78:33 Umm Muhammad (Sahih International)
And full-breasted [companions] of equal age


Quran 78:33 Abdul Majid Daryabadi
And full-breasted maidens of equal age


Quran 78:33 Ali Ünal Buy
And youthful, full-breasted maidens of equal age

I said make I help you repost nii o

AntiisIam:
You mean the book here?


Quran 78:33 Muhammad Sarwar
maidens with pears-shaped breasts who are of equal age (to their spouses



Quran 78:33 Dr. Laleh Bakhtiar
and full breasted maidens of the same age


Quran 78:33 Talal Itani & AI
And full-breasted companions of equal age.


Quran 78:33 Umm Muhammad (Sahih International)
And full-breasted [companions] of equal age


Quran 78:33 Abdul Majid Daryabadi
And full-breasted maidens of equal age


Quran 78:33 Ali Ünal Buy
And youthful, full-breasted maidens of equal age

I said make I help you repost nii o

Which fake book .

The corrupt book has been casted nah

dofman:
Now you know your book nah porn book ahaaa

Song of Solomon 7:6-12
How beautiful you are and how pleasing, my love, with your delights! Your stature is like that of the palm, and your breasts like clusters of fruit. I said, “I will climb the palm tree; I will take hold of its fruit.” May your breasts be like clusters of grapes on the vine, the fragrance of your breath like apples, and your mouth like the best wine. May the wine go straight to my beloved, flowing gently over lips and teeth.

When will you climb the tree nah ? 🤣🤣

Sebi porn book wey allah give you here abi

Quran 10:94 Irving & Mohamed Hegab

If you are in any doubt concerning what We have sent down to you, then question those who have read the Book (Bible) before you: Truth has come to you from your Lord, so do not be a waverer

doffman:
Which fake book .

The corrupt book has been casted nah

Sule, you see those porn verses in quran? That is your expectations be that in alujana, na because of that you go kpaii ontop Islam

dofman:
Now you know your book nah porn book ahaaa

Song of Solomon 7:6-12
How beautiful you are and how pleasing, my love, with your delights! Your stature is like that of the palm, and your breasts like clusters of fruit. I said, “I will climb the palm tree; I will take hold of its fruit.” May your breasts be like clusters of grapes on the vine, the fragrance of your breath like apples, and your mouth like the best wine. May the wine go straight to my beloved, flowing gently over lips and teeth.

When will you climb the tree nah ? 🤣🤣

Depe, kundus fun prophet ẹ Sule

doffman:
Which fake book .

The corrupt book has been casted nah

My pagan friend, are u better equiped to answer my questions now or u want to continue your waffling.

I gave u enough space and time to research my 6 questions.

I will be repeating them here

SIRTee15:
My pagan friend, are u better equiped to answer my questions now or u want to continue your waffling.

I gave u enough space and time to research my 6 questions.

I will be repeating them here

🤣🤣🤣 pagan himself , the enemy of God that chose human as his god .

Na you refuse to answer my question nah .

AntiisIam:
Sule, you see those porn verses in quran? That is your expectations be that in alujana, na because of that you go kpaii ontop Islam

Enjoy yourself with your bibeli

Song of Solomon 4:5: "Your two breasts are like two fawns, twins of a gazelle, that graze among the lilies." (Repeated in Song of Solomon 7:3)


Can you read that loud in the market using mega speaker 🔊

Agbakan religion

AntiisIam:
Depe, kundus fun prophet ẹ Sule

1 king 11: 3

He had 700 wives, who were princesses, and 300 concubines. And his wives turned away his heart

How does he handle 1000 women ? 🤣

AntiisIam:
Sebi porn book wey allah give you here abi

Quran 10:94 Irving & Mohamed Hegab

If you are in any doubt concerning what We have sent down to you, then question those who have read the Book (Bible) before you: Truth has come to you from your Lord, so do not be a waverer

Even you self no nah . Bibeli agabako keh!

War book self

dofman:
Even you self no nah . Bibeli agabako keh!

War book self

Sebi the one recommended for you by allah?

dofman:
1 king 11: 3

He had 700 wives, who were princesses, and 300 concubines. And his wives turned away his heart

How does he handle 1000 women ? 🤣

Bobo, na 71some your anobi Sule dey do. Omo dis one tun gba degree than your anobi. After this, I go show you his 100some. Dis your anobi Sule na ultimate warrior

doffman:
Enjoy yourself with your bibeli

Song of Solomon 4:5: "Your two breasts are like two fawns, twins of a gazelle, that graze among the lilies." (Repeated in Song of Solomon 7:3)


Can you read that loud in the market using mega speaker 🔊

Agbakan religion

Ati Solomon ati Anobi ẹ Sule for quran, they are the same person sogbo Depe

See your anobi Sule in 91some, this one did more than your anobi wey dey inside koto aye. Na agbbako wetin you go call this your hoely book like dis?

doffman:
🤣🤣🤣 pagan himself , the enemy of God that chose human as his god .

Na you refuse to answer my question nah .

stone licker

I answered all your questions. But u refused to answer mine.

Question number 1.

RESOLVE THIS CONTRADICTION.

God told Prophet Moses, tell the people not to bow to a stone because I hate it.

Leviticus 26.1
‘Do not make idols or set up an image or a sacred stone for yourselves, and do not place a carved stone in your land to bow down before it. I am the Lord your God.

Deuteronomy 16.22
22 and do not erect a sacred stone, for these the Lord your God hates.

Now according to Muslims, same God told your prophet to tell the people to bow before a stone.

How would God give 2 contradictory message to his own prophets. Are u saying God changed his mind?

Why did God tell Muhammed it's ok to bow before a stone but told Moses he hates it when people bow before a stone.

Answer the question?