johnydon22:
What we know today is that the creation story in genesis is just a jewish myth copied from that of mesopothomia, and genetics have proved the story to be impossible. . . so if adam and eve are not real, then their was never an original sin, and if their was no original sin, remind me again why Jesus came?

italo:

First things first, prove the bold.

Ymodulus:


Proofs that Genesis 1 is nothing but a text-book photocopied version of Ancient Myths are numerous and cannot be over captioned.



Ma the above is called Enumaelish found by some archealogists and when examined the most striking thing about this piece is that a lot of stories in Genesis 1 were copied from this Piece. Ma do not say its the other way round( the text on the piece were copied from Genesis 1) No it can never be, as the piece as ben subjected to series of carbon - dating test and its age is over 200yeas older than the bible.

Italo is this a coincidence?



That been said, now to the poster. Jesus coming had no relevance. Christians and Religionist will say he came to save the world or die for me and you. These are pure lies. Jesus was just a Pseudo- Comic character, what amazes me is why he isnt used in heroic cartoons likes of BatMan, Superman etc

fhunn:


What if the date of the first bible is wrong? What if they backdated the dates of the manuscripts?
Hey! I'm not saying I'm correct/wrong and you're wrong/correct but this is a case of 'what ifs' and yes we can't really trust those carrying out the experiments and those who are giving us these 'facts' even though they have Ph.d's, Msc's, Bsc's and years of experience coupled with vast knowledge, we can't fully rely on their infos.

italo:


First things first, prove the bold.

Ymodulus:


Proofs that Genesis 1 is nothing but a text-book photocopied version of Ancient Myths are numerous and cannot be over captioned.



Ma the above is called Enumaelish found by some archealogists and when examined the most striking thing about this piece is that a lot of stories in Genesis 1 were copied from this Piece. Ma do not say its the other way round( the text on the piece were copied from Genesis 1) No it can never be, as the piece as ben subjected to series of carbon - dating test and its age is over 200yeas older than the bible.

Italo is this a coincidence?



That been said, now to the poster. Jesus coming had no relevance. Christians and Religionist will say he came to save the world or die for me and you. These are pure lies. Jesus was just a Pseudo- Comic character, what amazes me is why he isnt used in heroic cartoons likes of BatMan, Superman etc

Ymodulus:


Proofs that Genesis 1 is nothing but a text-book photocopied version of Ancient Myths are numerous and cannot be over captioned.



Ma the above is called Enumaelish found by some archealogists and when examined the most striking thing about this piece is that a lot of stories in Genesis 1 were copied from this Piece. Ma do not say its the other way round( the text on the piece were copied from Genesis 1) No it can never be, as the piece as ben subjected to series of carbon - dating test and its age is over 200yeas older than the bible.

Italo is this a coincidence?



That been said, now to the poster. Jesus coming had no relevance. Christians and Religionist will say he came to save the world or die for me and you. These are pure lies. Jesus was just a Pseudo- Comic character, what amazes me is why he isnt used in heroic cartoons likes of BatMan, Superman etc

Ymodulus:

Are you trying to be AGNOSTIC about the whole issue? Let me let you know that these have been verified by source ( s ), credible and worthy enough

italo:


First things first, you believe everything the archeologists are reported to have said about the Enuma elish and its age without ever seeing it...or the archeologists. Yes or no?

italo:


First things first, you believe everything the archeologists are reported to have said about the Enuma elish and its age without ever seeing it...or the archeologists. Yes or no?

italo:


Who are the sources?

What makes them credible and infallible?

Ymodulus:


You believe everything the bible say without seeing it?

justaqad:


whats your point exactly?
You believed scientist when they said we are constituted of millions of cells,even without seeing those cells with your bare eyes.
Atleast the manuscript is real and in safe keeping if you wanna scrutinize it the more.
Just make a request,unlike god that aint real.

justaqad:


the source is real and open for criticism unlike your god that is above questioning.
Just make a request you might get lucky your wished might be granted.
Wish you luck.

italo:


Have you ever scrutinized the source or met them?

If not, how do you know they are real?

You just have great faith in what reporters tell you...then accuse others of blind faith?

italo:


I dont know why you are so defensive. It's just a simple question. Answering it honestly wont kill you.

You believe everything the archeologists are reported to have said about the Enuma elish and its age without ever seeing it...or the archeologists. Yes or no?

justaqad:


if i have any reason to doubt the archealogist the manual is there for scrutiny..
Unlike god that aint real

justaqad:


from a reliable and reputable source YES.

italo:


That is FAITH.

Why then do you quarrel me for believing what the Church tells me about God, since I consider the Church reliable and reputable.

We are all men of great FAITH. Believing without physical perception.

johnydon22:
What we know today is that the creation story in genesis is just a jewish myth copied from that of mesopothomia, and genetics have proved the story to be impossible. . . so if adam and eve are not real, then their was never an original sin, and if their was no original sin, remind me again why Jesus came?

sukkot:
he came to spiritually ressurect the prophets of old. keep in mind jesus is the word

johnydon22:


so not to die for our sins

justaqad:


i dont need faith to know the archealogist made a finding and went through a lot to validate their findings.
Unlike the church
if by tomorrow there was an error,the archaelogist would acknowledge it and move.
Unlike the church.
If the archealogist were asked to prove the ancient manual is real,they will gladly do so,you dont need faith to see it.
Unlike the church

Ymodulus:

Are you trying to be AGNOSTIC about the whole issue? Let me let you know that these have been verified by source ( s ), credible and worthy enough

Ymodulus:

Are you trying to be AGNOSTIC about the whole issue? Let me let you know that these have been verified by source ( s ), credible and worthy enough

sukkot:
no he did not come to die for your sins. that is a myth created by people who either are purposely trying to mislead or just couldnt understand the bible themselves and put everyone down the wrong path

johnydon22:


sir please are you a christian

sukkot:
yes

johnydon22:


am very curious, i am wondering how you learnt your own that Jeus didnt come to die for our sin