₦airaland Forum

coogar:
elampiro's stand on the issue is retardëd...
if we map out moyes' injury list here from the day he was appointed(may 9 2013) to the 4th of december(2013), he had more injuries on his record than van gaal. moyes had close to 50 injuries!

so anything else? yet elampiro was lying through his teeth that moyes only had 18 injuries in his first 14 league games - some people have no dignity - lying is their profession.


numbers don't lie - failure has one colour & that colour is david moyes!

So Gaal no longer have more injuries compared to Moyes? I thought the initial defence of Gaal was that he had more injuries than Moyes.

When did I say Moyes had 18 injuries at Man United? I said he had 18 injuries per 14 matches at Everton before joining Man United. Therefore the injury this season can never be blamed on Moyes. This has been my stand. We all know the history of injuries in Manchester United. If Moyes was blamed for injuries under his reign, Gaal should be blamed for injuries under his reign. SAF for his own under his reign. Period!

Lastly, have you noticed some of the players who trained under Moyes who left for other clubs have stayed fit?

Welbeck injured under Gaal but has stayed fit since joining Arsenal.
Cleverley has been fit
Nani has been fit.
Chicharito has been fit.
Vidic has been fit
Evra has been fit
Ferdinand has been fit
Kagawa has been fit.
Butnner has been fit.
Fabio has been fit.


All these players trained under Moyes. Only the ones who remained have been injured. I don't know any player who has not been injured under Gaal, but all the players who left have managed to stay fit to the best of my knowledge.

coogar:
fit jones?
that's good news - valencia can then go back to the middle-3 like he did few weeks ago & gave us thrust in that part of the pitch.

jones--smalling--rojo--young unit looks very secure.

I think Valencia will drop to the bench. he's done commendably but Rafael is also fit again, so it will just be a matter of time. Rojo as well may be pulled wide for Jones & Smalling depending on Shaw's availability. I fully expect LvG to give Jones some prefentials when fully fit because he was our best CB before he injured himself.

this is not hating on any player (as @chrisley024 may put it when I suggested Carrick makes way when Blind returns) but just playing the very best in every position to ensure maximum output.

it is also great that replacements do just as well or even better when called upon, this keep every man chosen on his toes.

Deiok:
Any arguement involving elampiro is always endless. I think this means he is back from his break from this thread.

So what about all the endless arguments I saw here for the past weeks I have been less active here? Like I argue with myself.

coogar:
this is a ridiculous comparison.
LVG wouldn't have had 41 injuries last season if he had inherited the defending champions. moyes took over a very good side that stood neck & neck with the almighty madrid & lost narrowly to nani's red card. your analogy should be where would moyes have finished if he had to deal with 41 different injuries in his first 3 months of last season?



oh please....
no 2 league seasons are the same. if someone else had taken over liverpool after their impressive showing last season, you would be arguing that new manager is wack. the same manager that took them 2nd last season is misfiring now.

look at wenger too - from winning 2 titles in 3 seasons to giving arsënal their worst start in 50 years this season. if someone else had taken over from him last season, he would have been the scapegoat. if the same manager can produce 2 polarising performances, why then did you prematurely blame LVG from the woes he inherited from moyes?



what has this gotta do with anything?



if moyes had this injury woe last season, we woulda relegated. if moyes had inherited a team that finished 7th, with no european competition, we woulda relegated. moyes inherited the league champions. you keep forgetting the psychological bit. how did league champions crash all the way to 7th position? how??

coogar:
elampiro's stand on the issue is retardëd...
if we map out moyes' injury list here from the day he was appointed(may 9 2013) to the 4th of december(2013), he had more injuries on his record than van gaal. moyes had close to 50 injuries!
so anything else? yet elampiro was lying through his teeth that moyes only had 18 injuries in his first 14 league games - some people have no dignity - lying is their profession.
numbers don't lie - failure has one colour & that colour is david moyes!

Coogar is Contradiction.

elampiro:
So Gaal no longer have more injuries compared to Moyes? I thought the initial defence of Gaal was that he had more injuries than Moyes.

you are talking nonsense.....
the 41-injury statistics of van gaal dated back to the day he was appointed. as at then, van gaal was with the dutch team & prepping them for brazil. how in the name of zeus can he be held responsible for the injuries when he hadn't even met united players?

When did I say Moyes had 18 injuries at Man United? I said he had 18 injuries per 14 matches at Everton before joining Man United. Therefore the injury this season can never be blamed on Moyes. This has been my stand.

your stand makes no sense.
united players ain't everton players. why not compare van gaal's injury stats for the oranje team to moyes' everton?

We all know the history of injuries in Manchester United. If Moyes was blamed for injuries under his reign, Gaal should be blamed for injuries under his reign. SAF for his own under his reign. Period!

you are starting to misyarn again?
who sacked the medical team that was managing our injuries to the barest minimum? was it SAF or van gaal?

Lastly, have you noticed some of the players who trained under Moyes who left for other clubs have stayed fit?

that is irrelevant.....
the clubs they joined do not play with the same intensity as man utd.

Welbeck injured under Gaal but has stayed fit since joining Arsenal.
Cleverley has been fit
Nani has been fit.
Chicharito has been fit.
Vidic has been fit
Evra has been fit
Ferdinand has been fit
Kagawa has been fit.
Butnner has been fit.
Fabio has been fit.

all these players have been injured at one point or the other since they left united. stop lying to make points.

All these players trained under Moyes. Only the ones who remained have been injured. I don't know any player who has not been injured under Gaal, but all the players who left have managed to stay fit to the best of my knowledge.

similarly, there's no player of ours last season that didn't spend at least one week on the sick bench when moyes was here. it was moyes who sacked the medical team SAF described as the best in the world with a wealth of experience.

if you still cannot see that moyes should be held responsible for the injury curse then buy IQ booster pills cos it means you are not smarter than a nanny-goat!

elampiro:
Coogar is Contradiction.

your lack of comprehension skills is the reason you are seeing contradiction.

moyes' first 3 months is may-july. he had not racked up a high number of injuries as at july cos the season hadn't started in july.

van gaal's first 3 months is july to october. even though gaal was appointed in may, he did not oversee any team training until united went to the preseason.

i wonder how you manage to complete your day-to-day task with this your low level IQ. can you not read english very well or you are just pretending to be stüpid so we can keep going round in circles?

Deiok:
Any arguement involving elampiro is always endless. I think this means he is back from his break from this thread.

Smh!

Enough of this argument already! We gat move on to better things!


Speaking of better things,what do you guys think of our next match against Soton? Their main player/midfield enforcer,Morgan Schneiderlin is out.

Your preferred line-up?

coogar:
you are talking nonsense.....
the 41-injury statistics of van gaal dated back to the day he was appointed. as at then, van gaal was with the dutch team & prepping them for brazil. how in the name of zeus can he be held responsible for the injuries when he hadn't even met united players?



your stand makes no sense.
united players ain't everton players. why not compare van gaal's injury stats for the oranje team to moyes' everton?



you are starting to misyarn again?
who sacked the medical team that was managing our injuries to the barest minimum? was it SAF or van gaal?

You told us Gaal had more injuries. You arent steady at all.
United player arent Everton players? That's a merit to Moyes. Meaning United players aren't as fit as the players Moyes brought up.
Foget about that medical team buahaha. Dont delve into what you don'y know. Give us link that Moyes closed the clinic opened by SAF, and he cancelled the contract entered with the sponsors. Was it United backroom staff that kept his Everton players fit?

coogar:
that is irrelevant.....
the clubs they joined do not play with the same intensity as man utd.

all these players have been injured at one point or the other since they left united. stop lying to make points.



similarly, there's no player of ours last season that didn't spend at least one week on the sick bench when moyes was here. it was moyes who sacked the medical team SAF described as the best in the world with a wealth of experience.

if you still cannot see that moyes should be held responsible for the injury curse then buy IQ booster pills cos it means you are not smarter than a nanny-goat!

Here you go again with your contradiction.

any way, Man United players have always been prone to injury. But it is worrying now that they are missing many matches due to injuries.

Danhumprey:
Enough of this argument already! We gat move on to better things!


Speaking of better things,what do you guys think of our next match against Soton? Their main player/midfield enforcer,Morgan Schneiderlin is out.

Your preferred line-up?

bros I no wan use ear hear say we no collect three points mehn!

for me, same team like the last game with the replacement of Wilson & van Persie for Rooney & Falcao

elampiro:
You told us Gaal had more injuries. You arent steady at all.

van gaal had more injuries in his first 3 months than moyes did. if the stats extend to first week of december from the date they were both appointed then moyes had more. read with your common sense, next time.

United player arent Everton players? That's a merit to Moyes. Meaning United players aren't as fit as the players Moyes brought up.

how many games do everton play in a season? how many games is a must-win for everton under moyes? no wonder the failure couldn't win a single game in the grounds of the traditional top 4 sides for 12 seasons.

while united are expected to go blood & thunder and secure wins in every game, moyes takes it easy & only worries about his home form. how then can you compare match intensity of a failure to the intensity faced by perpetual champions?

you should buy that IQ booster pill ASAP!

Foget about that medical team buahaha. Dont delve into what you don'y know. Give us link that Moyes closed the clinic opened by SAF, and he cancelled the contract entered with the sponsors. Was it United backroom staff that kept his Everton players fit?

another heap of rubbish!
moyes was copping 53 injuries per year @ everton. i posted the stats last night - moyes works his players to exhaustion & injuries. his ex-players at everton said that last season that moyes' training methods are pre-historic

Here you go again with your contradiction.

any way, Man United players have always been prone to injury.

that changed after united refurbished their medical centre. we had a near-perfect bill of health in 2012/13. we became champions, SAF left. moyes came on board, sacked everyone & replaced with his crew of failure from everton & our injury crisis resurfaced!

coogar:
fit jones?
that's good news - valencia can then go back to the middle-3 like he did few weeks ago & gave us thrust in that part of the pitch.

jones--smalling--rojo--young unit looks very secure.

Jones is just back in training. I don't see him taking part in any of our next two games.

elampiro:
It has now been revealed that Moyes suffered more injuries than Gaal.

Not sure whether that is the crux of the matter.

Fact is van Gaal still appears to be doing a lot better than Moyes even with the said injuries.
Forget what the Poly boys are telling you.

coogar:
van gaal had more injuries in his first 3 months than moyes did. if the stats extend to first week of december from the date they were both appointed then moyes had more. read with your common sense, next time.

Ayagayagayagayo hei, ayagayagayagayo.

Height of confusion. We are talking about Gaal's 41 injuries you quoted in your posts.

coogar:
how many games do everton play in a season? how many games is a must-win for everton under moyes? no wonder the failure couldn't win a single game in the grounds of the traditional top 4 sides for 12 seasons.

while united are expected to go blood & thunder and secure wins in every game, moyes takes it easy & only worries about his home form. how then can you compare match intensity of a failure to the intensity faced by perpetual champions?

you should buy that IQ booster pill ASAP!

This is another contradiction. Indirectly you are telling us that Moyes and Gaal knew they needed they stretch their players more to be able to win more games. Hence the injuries?

You are not helping your case at all. As this time last season, Moyes was in all 3 competition having already won the Shield. Gaal is playing only one competition.

coogar:
another heap of rubbish!
moyes was copping 53 injuries per year @ everton. i posted the stats last night - moyes works his players to exhaustion & injuries. his ex-players at everton said that last season that moyes' training methods are pre-historic

that changed after united refurbished their medical centre. we had a near-perfect bill of health in 2012/13. we became champions, SAF left. moyes came on board, sacked everyone & replaced with his crew of failure from everton & our injury crisis resurfaced!

Can we see Moyes injuries number visavis other EPL teams over several season? Then we can take you serious.

United refurbished medical centre in 2012, okay, you want to tell us Moyes closed it?

Danhumprey:
Enough of this argument already! We gat move on to better things!


Speaking of better things,what do you guys think of our next match against Soton? Their main player/midfield enforcer,Morgan Schneiderlin is out.

Your preferred line-up?

we should beat southampton!
falcao, rooney, RVP are fit. di maria would miss the game but we have enough quality in the squad to rely on angel.

elampiro:
Ayagayagayagayo hei, ayagayagayagayo.
Height of confusion. We are talking about Gaal's 41 injuries you quoted in your posts.

which gaal's 41 injuries?
are you retardëd? the 41 injuries was calculated from the day he was appointed not since he officially met united players in july. surely, that little clause is too much for your mental comprehension.

This is another contradiction. Indirectly you are telling us that Moyes and Gaal knew they needed they stretch their players more to be able to win more games. Hence the injuries?
You are not helping your case at all.

you can never draw a logical inference from my sentence cos you are not even intelligent to understand them in the first place. for you to make a sensible opinion out of my comments, you need to understand them first & you have never shown that ability since you joined NL.

As this time last season, Moyes was in all 3 competition having already won the Shield. Gaal is playing only one competition.

this is the most idiotic comparison ever.
if SAF didn't win the league, moyes wouldn't have played the community shield. if SAF didn't qualify for europe, moyes wouldn't have played in the champions league.

moyes failed to win us the league - he failed to qualify us for europe(not even europa) and you have the gall to mention the number of competitons he was still playing at this time last season? you are not intelligent at all.

Can we see Moyes injuries number visavis other EPL teams over several season? Then we can take you serious.

how's that relevant?
you told us moyes always had a fit squad at everton. i busted that myth by producing injury stats of 3 different calendar years - you were caught pants down lying again.

United refurbished medical centre in 2012, okay, you want to tell us Moyes closed it?

so replacing experienced staff without quacks means he closed down the centre? these mumu genes shouldn't follow you to 2015. you better seek the help of oyakhilome before it's too late.

I had to modify this post.

Meanwhile, I smell 3pt against Soto

elampiro:
Coogar is Contradiction.

That's why i hate to argue.. u begin to sound stupid when your points are not looking valid anymore

coogar:
which gaal's 41 injuries?
are you retardëd? the 41 injuries was calculated from the day he was appointed not since he officially met united players in july. surely, that little clause is too much for your mental comprehension.

Yes. You have contradicted and confused yourself on this number. You said if Moyes had 41 injuries he would be relegated. So how many injuries did Moyes get from the day he was appointed?

coogar:
you can never draw a logical inference from my sentence cos you are not even intelligent to understand them in the first place. for you to make a sensible opinion out of my comments, you need to understand them first & you have never shown that ability since you joined NL.



this is the most idiotic comparison ever.
if SAF didn't win the league, moyes wouldn't have played the community shield. if SAF didn't qualify for europe, moyes wouldn't have played in the champions league.

moyes failed to win us the league - he failed to qualify us for europe(not even europa) and you have the gall to mention the number of competitons he was still playing at this time last season? you are not intelligent at all.



how's that relevant?
you told us moyes always had a fit squad at everton. i busted that myth by producing injury stats of 3 different calendar years - you were caught pants down lying again.



so replacing experienced staff without quacks means he closed down the centre? these mumu genes shouldn't follow you to 2015. you better seek the help of oyakhilome before it's too late.

You are no longer sounding logical except resorting to insults. When one has lost ability to argue logical and attack the points but resort to attacking the person, it's obvious such a person has ran out of points and completely lost it. ;

I only brought it to your notice that Gaal's injury should be less with just one compectition.

We will win the game against saints.
Mean while our u21 are currently playing liverpul u21.

elampiro:

Yes. You have contradicted and confused yourself on this number. You said if Moyes had 41 injuries he would be relegated. So how many injuries did Moyes get from the day he was appointed?

olodo 20 kobo!
i said if moyes had the same number of injuries van gaal had [b]in his first 3 months,[b]then we would have relegated.

You are no longer sounding logical except resorting to insults. When one has lost ability to argue logical and attack the points but resort to attacking the person, it's obvious such a person has ran out of points and completely lost it.

you lost when i was able to produce moyes' injury sheet from the day he was appointed to the 4th of december 2013.

the difference between you & me is that i have facts to back my assertion while you lie bold-faced to back yours. why did you lie moyes had only 18 injuries in his first 14 league games at united?

SailorXY:
apparently injuries are part of this sport, but when you move against advice of a legend like Sir Alex - sacking the crew who knew the players better [{from coaching to medics (the injury argument)}, disbanding the favorite cheese or whatever the players enjoyed before your arrival, failing to secure any of your targets & players complaining of your gruesome training routine (another injury page)] - all in the space of 6 months?? then surely failure awaits.

now I can understand if you put up any sort of argument favoring Moyes as a rival fan (of course you want to see your rival down), but when an acclaimed fan does the same? then I can safely conclude (even if I no know anyone here personally) that failure lurks somewhere in their genes!

Sailor this is the very first time you're embracing objectivity and I'm impressed.

Injuries are part of the game, those were the exact words I told Coogar weeks ago when he was busy dragging Moyes' name to the mud.

It's a good thing you're admitting this.

I'm being objective and it has got nothing to do with choosing debates.

StarBoard:
Not sure whether that is the crux of the matter.

Fact is van Gaal still appears to be doing a lot better than Moyes even with the said injuries.
Forget what the Poly boys are telling you.

Not disputing the fact that Gaal is better. I saw Gaal's team in the wold cup. I saw the Ajax of '95 and '96. I know he is technical guru. But my argument is different. My argument is not about who is the better coach. I stated this many weeks ago.

The fist argument some weeks back was about too many injuries in the team. The new issue which called me into this, is when some guys wont allow us hear word every time we won. There was no need telling us about how Moyes would probably have lost to Stoke blablabla. This argument was further prolong when some recent crisis were blamed on Moyes.

AirborneLacer:
Sailor this is the very first time you're embracing objectivity and I'm impressed.

Injuries are part of the game, those were the exact words I told Coogar weeks ago when he was busy dragging Moyes' name to the mud.

It's a good thing you're admitting this.

I'm being objective and it has gotten nothing to do with choosing debates.

so why is it that the teams with the less number of injuries usually win league titles. why won't you say injuries are parts & parcel of the game when you have had nothing considerably ridiculous like united?

i want to see schurlle & willian as your fullbacks with cahill & mikel as centre-halves for 4 league games. let's see if you would still hold this hypocritical opinion of yours when you drop 8 points out of the 12 available.

coogar:
olodo 20 kobo!
i said if moyes had the same number of injuries van gaal had [b]in his first 3 months,[b]then we would have relegated.

You mentioned 41. Are you saying all Gaal's injury came in three months? And I put it to you that Gaal didn't have 41 injuries in three months (from August to October or September to November).

coogar:
you lost when i was able to produce moyes' injury sheet from the day he was appointed to the 4th of december 2013.

the difference between you & me is that i have facts to back my assertion while you lie bold-faced to back yours. why did you lie moyes had only 18 injuries in his first 14 league games at united?

If you cannot produce where I said Moyes had 18 injuries in Man United, shame on you.

Your Moyes injury list actually expose you- Mr Contradiction.

Lastly, we are yet to see Moyes injury season by season in comparison with other EPL teams.

elampiro:
You mentioned 41. Are you saying all Gaal's injury came in three months? And I put it to you that Gaal didn't have 41 injuries in three months (from August to October or September to November).

i mentioned 41 in a different paragraph &
i mentioned the first 3 months in another paragraph entirely. they are 2 different statistics - only a fool would loop them together.

If you cannot produce where I said Moyes had 18 injuries in Man United, shame on you.

that was what you said.
after a while, you said you pro-rata it. that's the lamest excuse of a dullard. why pro-rata it? why not just count from may(appointed date) to december(present date)?

you lied to us moyes always had a fit squad at everton. you must have been watching everton from your half-filled calabash when moyes was still there. the stats have exposed your lies.

give up!

Your Moyes injury list actually expose you- Mr Contradiction.

Lastly, we are yet to see Moyes injury season by season in comparison with other EPL teams.

like i told you earlier, people with sübzero IQ like yourself cannot understand my comments so i ain't surprised it got you confused.

in another 5 years, you will understand it.

Louis Van Gaal Manchester United Rule Slammed by Michael Owen, Raymond Verheijen
By Rob Blanchette , Featured Columnist Dec 3, 2014

Manchester United manager Louis van Gaal has been criticised by a Dutch fitness coach and a former Red Devils player—with Raymond Verheijen and Michael Owen both making their feelings known about the team's injury list.

Owen has been specifically critical of Van Gaal's conditioning of his squad, saying it has been a "really poor season" for LvG and directing the blame fully at the manager's door.

His comments came during an appearance on BT Sport as the panel discussed Van Gaal's season so far, with Owen adding United have "no say [in the title race]."

Colin Harvey of the Daily Star reported on Verheijen's comments to the BBC—where the fitness coach proclaimed Van Gaal's methods were the sole reason for his squad's pandemic injury crisis

I think this was predictable. It's not a coincidence. I think the strength of Louis van Gaal has also been shown to be his weakness.[b] I think this was avoidable. [/b]As an assistant I've seen with my own eyes that he has the ability, because he is a great tactical teacher, to improve a team and players within one session.

He is extremely intelligent, extremely knowledgeable, but also very intense. That's what you have heard Manchester United's players saying all the time this season. This intense style of training and coaching is his strength, but also his weakness in terms of injuries.

[...] You saw this pattern for the first time when he was coaching at Ajax. It happened at Barcelona, it happened at Bayern Munich and now it's happening at Manchester United. It's the same pattern.

Some may find both Owen's and Verheijen's comments strange considering United are up to fourth and playing their best football for well over a year.

Owen's comments are especially baffling. He cites Arsenal as a team who in the past "never suffered injuries," but the Gunners are themselves in the middle of a huge injury crisis now—under the same Arsene Wenger regime that Owen once played against.

Verheijen's statement is more insightful, joining the dots between the clubs LvG has coached.

United have now suffered a staggering 41 injuries since Van Gaal took over, per 101 Great Goals, with the players bursting to get out of the treatment centre at Carrington.

But despite the injuries, Van Gaal has managed to find a way to get the team in tactical shape, if not yet a physical one.

United beat Stoke on Tuesday night to record their fourth straight win in the Premier League, allowing them to sit in the Champions League positions going into the festive period.

United fans have taken to Van Gaal and his gregarious style, and there is a real feeling of unity behind his methods and philosophy. The manager has been on the charm offensive from day one, highlighted by Bleacher Report's Rob Dawson after United's last match:

After a season of heartbreak for the Red Devils following the exit of Sir Alex Ferguson, United fans are contented with their current state—with a lowering of expectations coming after David Moyes' failed tenure.

Taking United back to the top is very much a long-term project, and it was clear last year that a number of professionals needed to leave the club.



http://bleacherreport.com/articles/2287799-louis-van-gaal-manchester-united-rule-slammed-by-michael-owen-raymond-verheijen

coogar:
so why is it that the teams with the less number of injuries usually win league titles. why won't you say injuries are parts & parcel of the game when you have had nothing considerably ridiculous like united?

i want to see schurlle & willian as your fullbacks with cahill & mikel as centre-halves for 4 league games. let's see if you would still hold this hypocritical opinion of yours when you drop 8 points out of the 12 available.

Ill-luck knocks at the door bruh.

That United are facing injury woes wouldn't stop me from asserting that Injuries are part of the game.

Your ability to manage those woes defines how astute you're.

Simples!

coogar:
this is a ridiculous comparison.
LVG wouldn't have had 41 injuries last season if he had inherited the defending champions. moyes took over a very good side that stood neck & neck with the almighty madrid & lost narrowly to nani's red card. your analogy should be where would moyes have finished if he had to deal with 41 different injuries in his first 3 months of last season?



oh please....
no 2 league seasons are the same. if someone else had taken over liverpool after their impressive showing last season, you would be arguing that new manager is wack. the same manager that took them 2nd last season is misfiring now.

look at wenger too - from winning 2 titles in 3 seasons to giving arsënal their worst start in 50 years this season. if someone else had taken over from him last season, he would have been the scapegoat. if the same manager can produce 2 polarising performances, why then did you prematurely blame LVG from the woes he inherited from moyes?



what has this gotta do with anything?



if moyes had this injury woe last season, we woulda relegated. if moyes had inherited a team that finished 7th, with no european competition, we woulda relegated. moyes inherited the league champions. you keep forgetting the psychological bit. how did league champions crash all the way to 7th position? how??

coogar:
i mentioned 41 in a different paragraph &
i mentioned the first 3 months in another paragraph entirely. they are 2 different statistics - only a fool would loop them together.
that was what you said.
after a while, you said you pro-rata it. that's the lamest excuse of a dullard. why pro-rata it? why not just count from may(appointed date) to december(present date)?
you lied to us moyes always had a fit squad at everton. you must have been watching everton from your half-filled calabash when moyes was still there. the stats have exposed your lies.
give up!
like i told you earlier, people with sübzero IQ like yourself cannot understand my comments so i ain't surprised it got you confused.
in another 5 years, you will understand it.

You are exposed again. Except may be you don't know the meaning of paragraph. Good bye.

AirborneLacer:
Ill-luck knocks at the door bruh.

That United are facing injury woes wouldn't stop me from asserting that Injuries are part of the game.

Your ability to manage those woes defines how astute you're.

Simples!

i don't believe in luck.
it's just sheer incompetence on the part of moyes. letting experienced hands walk away from carrington against fergie's advice was the beginning of his end. moyes is an eternal failure.

phil jaglieka:

“Pre-season has been drastically different.
Normally you’re working a lot harder off the ball – you’re running around and running around and the balls rarely come out, whereas now we do a lot of running around with the ball.

“The manager’s very keen on you having a lot higher concentration levels which will obviously help us when we’re trying to keep the ball for the majority of the time.

“This is the way we’re going to play for the season and I’m sure once it settles down – we’re only two weeks in – the boys will love it and hopefully it can make us progress as a club.

“We’ll play differently. But it doesn’t mean we’ll always have to play from the back.

“I think the whole team will enjoy it, not just the back four,” he said.

“It’s a case of what options have the back-four got – or the back five or the back three if the manager decides to change it – when they’ve got the ball.

“There’s more emphasis not just on the first phase of getting the ball, but what happens when he gets it and then what happens when the next person gets it.

“It’s going to be very educational and probably hard to grasp overnight, but we’ve got quite a few weeks before the start of the season.

“The manager seems very happy with the way we’ve taken to things at the moment and hopefully when it comes to Norwich on August 17 we’ll be firing on all cylinders, playing some nice football but at the same time putting teams under some pressure and hopefully scoring some goals.”

elampiro:
You are exposed again. Except may be you don't know the meaning of paragraph. Good bye.

you are a tool!
i meant....i mentioned 41 injuries in one paragraph and the relegation bit in another paragraph. that was the crux of the issue.

RIP.

elampiro:
RIP.

liar!
"david moyes has always had a fit squad at everton."

you must think this is facebook where you can lie to get likes.

smh

make una carry go