₦airaland Forum

davien:
I don't know if nothing can come from nothing because in no point in time did anyone observe a "nothing" to begin with...

And since when do things create nothing?...

What something can you prove produces a nothing?

If you have #1000 in a bag and remove all, what will you have?

Emmalot121:
That that which you sow, you reap.

You reap where and what?

There's profit in heaven? What of sin, it exists in heaven?

What does Yahweh reap by roasting people? Especially those guilty of the heinous crime of not believing in him?

Also, I take it you have no problem with Isis burning people alive?

Emmalot121:
If you have #1000 in a bag and remove all, what will you have?

An empty bag, which is something.

davien:
An empty bag, which is something.

You're naughty. I am referring to the content, not where it it was kept. The correct definition of nothing is Something in its zero/dormant state.

Emmalot121:
You're naughty. I am referring to the content, not where it it was kept. The correct definition of nothing is Something in its zero/dormant state.

it's still a something is it not, only in its lowest state....not a complete nothing...
And if you're referring to the money, then it's with you...And you're a something.

davien:
it's still a something is it not, only in its lowest state....not a complete nothing...
And if you're referring to the money, then it's with you...And you're a something.

Contradiction. When I wrote zero, I meant nonexistent. There were once mathematicians who didn't regard zero as an answer.

Emmalot121:
Contradiction. When I wrote zero, I meant nonexistent. There were once mathematicians who didn't regard zero as an answer.

Explain further...

davien:
Explain further...

Let me ask you a question, is zero a number?

Emmalot121:
Let me ask you a question, is zero a number?

yes...it express quantitative data...

Emmalot121:
It still remains very relevant and highly intellectual, provided there is no proof of the nonexistence of God.

How exactly? None of the refutations even try to disprove Gods' existence.

davien:
yes...it express quantitative data...

It is an abstract number, it doesn't exist.

DProDG:
How exactly? None of the refutations even try to disprove Gods' existence.

I know the arguments against it (not refutations), I've read it over a year ago. What I mean is that, the statement still stands firm once there is no proof of God's nonexistence.

Emmalot121:
I know the arguments against it (not refutations), I've read it over a year ago. What I mean is that, the statement still stands firm once there is no proof of God's nonexistence.

Do the words "burden of proof" sound familiar?

If the statement you're referring to now is the op, well...

DProDG , davien you guys really dealing some sense into someone here... You people did not even call me to join from the beginning ... Aaaaww mb low

DProDG:
Do the words "burden of proof" sound familiar?

If the statement you're referring to now is the op, well...

He that loveth not knoweth not God; for God is love. 1 John 4:8

foolish ones that question God's Destruction Of Men, Imagine You Are A Scientist And You Created Robots, Shouldnt You Have The Right To Terminate Those Against Your Will?

johnydon22:
DProDG , davien you guys really dealing some sense into someone here... You people did not even call me to join from the beginning ... Aaaaww mb low

I invited you to a vital discussion, you neglected it.

Emmalot121:
It is an abstract number, it doesn't exist.

No numbers exist.
And what do you mean by abstract number?

Emmalot121:
What if God and Jesus exists? How will you feel going to hell when you see people like me going to Heaven and you being destroyed in fire till eternity.

P.S. This is based on pure assumption, therefore unnecessary and inapplicable questions are not entertained.

I'll be glad I used my brain