₦airaland Forum

ElFenomeno1:
Elampiro getting exposed!!!!!

Nihilist:
So you can verify the authenticity of famous photograph?

More importantly, did Starboard and Nyabinghi know each other? Cos that beef na east coast- west coast....And I rep the west coast.

elampiro:
Coogar.

Schweinsteiger had a negative rating. Which means his first half contribution was negative. He had the lowest rating.

Whoscored set everyone at 6.0 at kick off, as the opta data hitting the chart lives, the ratings keep fluctuating based on a players performance on the pitch.

But was Schweinsteiger really the worst player? I think not so. Lingard the worst followed by Rooney.

Whoscored rating experience:

6.0 or less =poor and even with critical errors.
6.0-6.9 =Average or poor
7.0-8.0= above average/good game
8.0-8.9= had a very good game.
9.0 - 10= Near excellent or excellent.

However, there might be marginal points between rages.

elampiro:
All these don't make sense at all. You brought posts when we were still analysing the guy. UniqueGem was not sure, he only wanted someone who could strike other than Rooney.

But once video was out, I stamped Martial and that was the beginning for everyone else.

parrotibaba:
You don the find trouble now

darefestus:
I think i read one of Debo's posts after Monaco beat the gayners where he said he loved the look of Martial and expected him to blow or smthing along that line.

elampiro:

This is a joke right?

The difference is that I was the first to name him a world class player. The rest before then were all permutations. UniqueGem and the rest were all making analysis of an unknown player. UniqueGem never knew Martial before I announced Martial. He said even though he didn't know him, he like anyone who could shoot.

But I was the first to say "Martial is in the league of Sterling, Arguero and Suarez" That was a midas touch.

Nihilist:
Are those shots being fired?

parrotibaba:
@Elampiro do you think you are dealing with senile folks? You were one of the folks that were skeptical about the acquisition of Anthony Martial, even questioned his goals return. I think Elf n UniqueGem were the first to welcome his acquisition to the club, then I n others( n some Chelsea fans) who had seen him play were of the opinion that he will be a hit, hell I even did a comparison with him n Berainho after one Chelsea fan asked if he was even on par with Berainho. Our only problem was that his price tag was huge for a teenager.

StarBoard:
Leave story. Me and nyabinghi are in good terms. No fighting.

StarBoard:
Leave story. Me and nyabinghi are in good terms. No fighting.

parrotibaba:
Iffahear

elampiro:
You aren't being logical.

I analyzed his goals returns, I did not question or dismiss his goals returns.

The first time I saw his video, I approved him not just as a good player but as a world class player. This was even before he kicked a ball for us.

Again, this argument started when I said I was the first to announce his coming. They said it's a lie that I didn't want him because of Rooney. If I didn't want him, how come I put him in the light of Suarez and Aguero, players with striking ability better than Rooney?

coogar:
elampiro, stop trying to be clever by half. bastian played only 46 mins in the game. unless he scored or assisted, his points overall would be less than the players that played more minutes on the night. bastian's early bath was responsible for his low point.

however, rooney spent the most minutes on the night. lingard came off in the 80th minute & yet still had more overall point than rooney. it simply means rooney was animal-shyte throughout the game. had rooney come off when bastian came off, he woulda been rated less than 5.0



he was sure!
he knew martial would hit the ground running as soon as he replaces rooney in the #9 position & that was what happened exactly.



liar!
the video came out on the 31st of august & adeyemi2015 was the first to declare martial a machine. as at then, you thought martial would make us regret selling welbeck.

elampawa, you have been thoroughly exposed as a white liar.

StarBoard:
No fighting. I have house fellowship right now Then night vigil later.

elampiro:

I stand my my words and they are the truth.

1. I was the first to announce we were buying Martial.

2. I was the first to put him along such big names as Suarez and Arguero. I also said he has dribbling ability of Sterling.

So how come I was accused I didn't want him to come because of Rooney. I endorsed him even before he played along side Rooney.

StarBoard:
Leave story.
Me and nyabinghi are in good terms.
No fighting.

elampiro:
You are a big liar.

5.9 is a negative Marking.

So till now you don't know how it works? If you play 1 minute you are expected to score 6.0 rating.

"I have always preferred small
selections [squads]. I think I have the smallest
selection in the Premier League. Last season we
had 24 players.
"We sold 15 players and bought five players.
This year we have sold again or have loaned
players out. Ten players have gone and only six
players have been bought.
"I think 22 players and three goalkeepers is
enough so I am still one short."

parrotibaba:
he has been exposed multiple times as a fraud in this thread, it's nothing new I expect him to try and wiggle his way out of this.

UniqueGem:
Okay Elampiro. If i say you win, will you shut up and lets move on?

coogar:
you are a tool!
if 6.0 is the minimum rating but you cop a yellow card, misplace passes, etc then it would go below 6.0

bastian never had the chance to redeem his poor first half in the second half like his fellow team mates. rooney at half time woulda had worse than 5.9 but he was able to cop few points here & there when united got on top of the game.

by then, bastian was already taking his bath!

UniqueGem:
Okay Elampiro. If i say you win, will you shut up and lets move on?

elampiro:
6.0 is the kick off/start off for any player.
See Memphis that played for just 11 minutes has 6.2. Blind 28 minutes 6.19

It's not by length of play but by activities. Someone can play for 20 minutes and score 8.0. Someone else can play for 90 minutes and score 5.7

Score a goal = +1.0
Assist a goal about 0.5
Have an error leading to a goal 0.5-1.0 negative.

Dispossessed = negative.
missed a chance = negative.

raumdeuter:
As per all the posts and counter posts, Its not really about the age or how long the poster has been posting its about the quality of their posts.
Someone like elampiro even though he recently started posting in this section, He adds more value to sporting debates than many here. even Nihilist even though joined around the same time came with interesting football perspective and his opinions are well respected that I even tried to convince him to be a Bayern fan several times
This is first a Sport section and it helps if your posts is Sport related even if there is a diss to it at the end not just several lines of "you are stuppidd , you are madd you are a bastardd".
If you notice most who carry this diss and cussfest for head are those who have nothing to contribute to the football related discussion
Many people became friends from this thread/forum. Many people have helped one another in one way or the other. One of my closest pals I met on this forum as a Man utd fan, Tkb, Nyabinghi and Starboard I knew them even before coming to this forum, chamtex and lalaboy are friends and they probably met from here, Some people got admissions, advise on life issues from random people they met here.
There are some people on here that can really help you in life. I have referred someone to Ibime and Debo and they helped him with admissions into a foreign uni which changed his life.
So if you check your whole posts and you see that its more than 50% picking a fight and not really football discussions then you are mostly reducing the quality on here.

Nihilist:
With your scatter scatter teeth like james bond bullet....

darefestus:
Egbon Dayo, u people laid the foundation, and yes, no one likes to see insults about the place, but it also helps when people at least try to be reasonable even if they want to air their unpopular opinions.

Regarding 'advice on life issues', you remember one chat we had on YIM around 2008?