₦airaland Forum

kulikuli26:
To your shallow mind, you have made sense? Saraki didn't work in SGBN? He didn't work briefly as a doctor? On what ground was tinubu's case thrown out at CCT? Are you been unknowingly ignorant or self induced?

HungerBAD:
This Saraki is a Comedian.

He should go into the home video business after he gets kicked out of the Senate, and completes his jail time. There are many differences between you and Tinubu, but most importantly Tinubu is one of the reason's why we have democracy in Nigeria.

When Tinubu and the likes of Abraham Adesanya, were in the trenches fighting for Nigeria via the NADECO, where was this Mr Ibu?so the PDP lead Government cooked up charges, and tried to put Tinubu away. But, they also knew that touching a freedom fighter like Tinubu, would signify the West going their way.

So the honest man was left alone.

Saraki in your case, you have never worked in your life, and from your fathers living room you went into power where looting became your surname.Please Saraki, never in your life compare yourself to Tinubu.

You committed a crime, Tinubu was not there, so face your trial alone without calling names.

HungerBAD:
This Saraki is a Comedian.

He should go into the home video business after he gets kicked out of the Senate, and completes his jail time. There are many differences between you and Tinubu, but most importantly Tinubu is one of the reason's why we have democracy in Nigeria.

When Tinubu and the likes of Abraham Adesanya, were in the trenches fighting for Nigeria via the NADECO, where was this Mr Ibu?so the PDP lead Government cooked up charges, and tried to put Tinubu away. But, they also knew that touching a freedom fighter like Tinubu, would signify the West going their way.

[b]So the honest man was left alone.

Saraki in your case, you have never worked in your life, and from your fathers living room you went into power where looting became your surname.Please Saraki, never in your life compare yourself to Tinubu.

You committed a crime, Tinubu was not there, so face your trial alone without calling names.

vivalavida:
Did u even read the write up @ all?
Or you rushed to comment just because u love ur comment appearing first?
You said that there is a difference in tinubu's case because it was cooked up by PDP. Whether sarakis case is real or cooked up,dont you think he has to be invited first to clear things up befort the CCT starts trying him?
Of What relevance does Tinubu and that late old monkey look-alike Adesanya Nadeco days contribute to this discourse?

Rubbish


If Saraki is guilty,he should be jailed but due process must be followed and he must be afforded fair hearing.

HungerBAD:
This Saraki is a Comedian.

He should go into the home video business after he gets kicked out of the Senate, and completes his jail time. There are many differences between you and Tinubu, but most importantly Tinubu is one of the reason's why we have democracy in Nigeria.

When Tinubu and the likes of Abraham Adesanya, were in the trenches fighting for Nigeria via the NADECO, where was this Mr Ibu?so the PDP lead Government cooked up charges, and tried to put Tinubu away. But, they also knew that touching a freedom fighter like Tinubu, would signify the West going their way.

So the honest man was left alone.

Saraki in your case, you have never worked in your life, and from your fathers living room you went into power where looting became your surname.Please Saraki, never in your life compare yourself to Tinubu.

You committed a crime, Tinubu was not there, so face your trial alone without calling names.

iamrealdeji:
then everybody should be acquitted no matter what they do in this country if you want to defend Saraki. Armed robbers and thieves shouldn't be jailed then,afterall,they're also Nigerians

HungerBAD:
This Saraki is a Comedian.

He should go into the home video business after he gets kicked out of the Senate, and completes his jail time. There are many differences between you and Tinubu, but most importantly Tinubu is one of the reason's why we have democracy in Nigeria.

When Tinubu and the likes of Abraham Adesanya, were in the trenches fighting for Nigeria via the NADECO, where was this Mr Ibu?so the PDP lead Government cooked up charges, and tried to put Tinubu away. But, they also knew that touching a freedom fighter like Tinubu, would signify the West going their way.

So the honest man was left alone.

Saraki in your case, you have never worked in your life, and from your fathers living room you went into power where looting became your surname.Please Saraki, never in your life compare yourself to Tinubu.

You committed a crime, Tinubu was not there, so face your trial alone without calling names.

HungerBAD:
This Saraki is a Comedian.

He should go into the home video business after he gets kicked out of the Senate, and completes his jail time. There are many differences between you and Tinubu, but most importantly Tinubu is one of the reason's why we have democracy in Nigeria.

When Tinubu and the likes of Abraham Adesanya, were in the trenches fighting for Nigeria via the NADECO, where was this Mr Ibu?so the PDP lead Government cooked up charges, and tried to put Tinubu away. But, they also knew that touching a freedom fighter like Tinubu, would signify the West going their way.

So the honest man was left alone.

Saraki in your case, you have never worked in your life, and from your fathers living room you went into power where looting became your surname.Please Saraki, never in your life compare yourself to Tinubu.

You committed a crime, Tinubu was not there, so face your trial alone without calling names.

midolian:
https://www.today.ng/news/national/94884/apply-ruling-on-tinubu-to-my-case-saraki-tells-cct

henrysam:
It was the same Danladi Umar that ruled on Tinubu case and we shall see if he's going to over rule himself
The issue is did the ccb do the needful before rushing to cct?
We are watching and waiting

Roadmap27:
I don't know why people forget thing easily, Saraki was invited but fail to show up. Court order arrest warrant two weeks after their invitation. Some1 should tell me what else does he want?

SouthernBreeze:
What is good for Tinubu is also good for Saraki

adeaks:
Nope. He submitted it himself but the CCB should have first invited him to clarify any issues they found in the forms he submitted before going to court.
If he says he has a house in London, then invite him and ask him how he got the property. If you are not satisfied with his explanation, then charge him to court.

KANU Agabi's submission is that just charging him to court without allowing him to explain whatever they felt was wrong in his declaration form, robs the court of the necessary jurisdiction to hear the case.

bigass123:
The Law is an interesting instrument to use especially for criminals and people (lawyers) defending criminals.
Let's ask ourselves in layman language without complicating issues with the technicalities of law.
The clarification Saraki is saying he was not given a chance to make.... Why can't he make that same clarification in court. I mean that "error" of the CCB of not inviting him prior to going to court should be used by his defence to their advantage. Make the "truth" known in your defence and the CCB be publicly ridiculed or even to pay damages. That should have been the trend if Mr. Saraki is factually not hiding anything. Why leaving that good chance of beating the CCB hands down with your facts and trying to use the "loophole" to strike out the case. Even to a slowpoke that act indicates that Mr. Saraki and his defence are running away from the real issue.

alexlee50:
u are missing the point here.what I am saying is this, what is good for tinubu is equally good for saraki. Everybody should be equal in the eyes of the law.nobody should be seen as sacred or special, if tinubu's case was dismissed because the ccb investigating did not invite him to explain the discrepeancies in his form that same judgement should apply to saraki

iamrealdeji:
With due respect,you're still not making sense. You should rather say Tinubu's case should be reopened and he should face the law once more. There is a thief that steals 4,500 and imprisoned immediately,why is he not allowed the right to romance the law the same way thief Saraki is doing now? They don't have equal rights? If those common thieves can't be acquitted then,same should apply to our corrupt politicians too

Danyahaya:
You and the people who liked your comment are jockly jocking. Tinubu then

was in opposition, yet the sitting govt. Could not find him guilty, so has to be set free. But for your Saraki, He is under trial by the govt of His govt. Which is advocating NO to corruption from any body.

alexlee50:
a thief and saraki cannot be charged with the same offence because they are different offences with different ingredients to prove them, so no basis to keep comparing both scenarios. However if you are msking both references for the sake of equality for all persons in the eyes of the law, then it is order.also I see you have come to my position now, which is that we should all be treated equally in the eyes of the law.And based on this , saraki should enjoy the same acquital tinubu got or if there is going to be a trial, tinubu should also be tried.anything short of this is persecution.

bigass123:
The Law is an interesting instrument to use especially for criminals and people (lawyers) defending criminals.
Let's ask ourselves in layman language without complicating issues with the technicalities of law.
The clarification Saraki is saying he was not given a chance to make.... Why can't he make that same clarification in court. I mean that "error" of the CCB of not inviting prior to going to court should be used by his defence to their advantage. Make the "truth" known in your defence and would be publicly ridiculed. That should be the trend if Mr. Saraki is factually not hiding anything. Why leaving that good chance of beating the CCB hands down with your facts and trying to use the "loophole" to strike out the case. Even to a slowpoke that act indicates that Mr. Saraki and his defence are running away from the real issue.

adeaks:
Interesting. The decision of the CCT in Tinubu's case is a precedent, though not absolutely binding on the CCT. I just wonder why the Fed govt rushed to charge Saraki to court when they were aware of the decision in Tinubu's case.

I was hoping that now that Rotimi Jacobs is handling the govt's high profile criminal cases, there would be a change from the glaring incompetence and shoddy prosecution displayed by festus keyamo. Keyamo only wanted to play to the gallery.

Why not take time to build their case and tighten all loopholes before going to court? As much as I want Saraki to be brought to justice, he has the right to rely on Tinubu's case if the prosecution has made the same mistake upon which the charge against Tinubu was struck out.

adeaks:
They are not the same. It's like saying your neighbour reported a case at the police station, accusing you of stealing his black shoe. If the police invite you to their station to give a statement stating your own side of the story, in which you explained that your uncle bought you a shoe exactly like that of your neighbor and you show them the receipt as proof..........That's CLARIFY.

Imagine if the police just arrest and charge you to court without even inviting you to respond to the allegation made by your neighbour....that's TRIAL.