₦airaland Forum

AnonyNymous:
Again, as I said, your god supposedly created the universe, and its perfect. Why then does he feel the need to interfere with the order of things if its already perfect. You don't alter perfection..

winner01:
Who else saw this




Tomorrow he might tell you. I was a born again pastor, a powerful prayer warrior and Bible scholar.

winner01:
1. I remember having gone about few pages arguing this same Joshua 10:13 with some atheist dude right here. My point is, come up with other arguments, not stale ones

2. You are mocking the religious beliefs of people, tell me again why I shouldnt mock your thread with memes.
I'm not wrong remember. There's no such thing as wrong or right.

winner01:
Who else saw this




Tomorrow he might tell you. I was a born again pastor, a powerful prayer warrior and Bible scholar.

AnonyNymous:
Well, I am not 'some dude'. I am an individual who probed into the illogicality of saying the earth stopped.
I am yet to see you construct a proper argument without using memes. Don't use memes to distract people from your points. State your facts and discuss them well, instead of using backup from pictures created by your kind which are failed attempts at being humorous. You just came here to accuse me of copying from other atheists to get a round of applause from your band of followers. I'm thinking freely, and I'm expressing my points. You can go through my posts on this section and see if there's any plagiarized content. If you don't have any reasonable counter to what I raised in the op, then don't derail the thread with memes

AnonyNymous:
Well, I am not 'some dude'. I am an individual who probed into the illogicality of saying the earth stopped.
I am yet to see you construct a proper argument without using memes. Don't use memes to distract people from your points. State your facts and discuss them well, instead of using backup from pictures created by your kind which are failed attempts at being humorous. You just came here to accuse me of copying from other atheists to get a round of applause from your band of followers. I'm thinking freely, and I'm expressing my points. You can go through my posts on this section and see if there's any plagiarized content. If you don't have any reasonable counter to what I raised in the op, then don't derail the thread with memes

AnonyNymous:
I could go on arguing with these people but its obvious that all they can offer are childish behaviours, imagine pointing out the slightest mistake of another poster that isn't even relevant to the argument at hand, or the other one littering this place with irrelevant memes in an effort to derail it. They have no logical explanation for the sun standing still.

AnonyNymous:
I could go on arguing with these people but its obvious that all they can offer are childish behaviours, imagine pointing out the slightest mistake of another poster that isn't even relevant to the argument at hand, or the other one littering this place with irrelevant memes in an effort to derail it. They have no logical explanation for the sun standing still.

AnonyNymous:
Well, I am not 'some dude'. I am an individual who probed into the illogicality of saying the earth stopped.
I am yet to see you construct a proper argument without using memes. Don't use memes to distract people from your points. State your facts and discuss them well, instead of using backup from pictures created by your kind which are failed attempts at being humorous. You just came here to accuse me of copying from other atheists to get a round of applause from your band of followers. I'm thinking freely, and I'm expressing my points. You can go through my posts on this section and see if there's any plagiarized content. If you don't have any reasonable counter to what I raised in the op, then don't derail the thread with memes

felixomor:
Its very interesting that some scientists couldnt actually account for a day in chronology, using the position of the sun.

Wow, awesome!


https://www.uwgb.edu/dutchs/pseudosc/missday.htm

AnonyNymous:
Jesus was a nice guy,

AlfaSeltzer:
No, he wasn't

AnonyNymous:
So. . . Irritated by people here, trying to justify the 'sun stand still' story, let me give you a little science lesson .
Let's go.
******************
1. The sun stopped moving
As we now know, the sun is the centre and not the other way round, it's stationary(not exactly, because our whole solar system is moving, but relative to the earth it is), and the earth and other planets revolve around it. So the idea of the sun stopping its motion is r
........................................................................

AnonyNymous:
First off, a perfect being will not need to alter the natural process of a perfect creation to achieve his aims.

4everGod:
Did he ask you a question? He made a statement and you are answering it like a question. Alfa go and sleep.

4everGod:
He does not need to derail the thread. You are doing a great job with your initial post.

I want to ask you a simple question just to test you... if the earth is rotating as fast as it is and we do not feel the earths centrifugal force how many Newtons per kilogram of gravity is keeping us from feeling this and if the earths spin is slowed down and the gravitational pull reduced at a matching rate what effect would this give?

felixomor:
Please read here, and see how science could not really account for a day in history before you think you are making sense there:


https://www.uwgb.edu/dutchs/pseudosc/missday.htm

4everGod:
Look up! I asked you a question. Answer it. Let me even give you a hint to the answer so as to help you.

If you have a bag of feathers weighing 50kg and a bag of stones also weighing 50kg and you drop both from a height of 300 meters in the air, which would hit the ground first?

AnonyNymous:
I knew someone was going to bring this up. The '23 hour, 20 minute' hoax. It is an urban Christian myth, and in official statements, NASA has publicly claimed the story to be false.
So much for Mr. Geography. There's no such 'chronological method' for accounting for days and nights.

AnonyNymous:
Gravity in a layman definition is our attraction towards the centre of the earth. From Newtons gravitational law however, we understand further that every two bodies experience a gravitational force of attraction directly proportional to the product of their masses and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between their centres. . . In other words, each object experiences a different gravitational force on earth, based on its mass. However, the acceleration due to gravity for every body has been observed to be the same. So to your question, if I have a mass of 70kg , I experience a gravitational force of 700N. The reaction balances out the action of my weight, causing me not to feel anything. A 10kg/100N bag of rice experiences a gravitational force of 100N. Not the same force as me, but the same acceleration due to gravity.
*******
If the earth's spin is slowed down and gravitational pull is reduced, what you are implying is that the 'reaction' force, that cancels out the force of our weight is reduced at a matching rate. This will result in us not feeling the effect of the reduction of the earth's speed. However, for such an impossible feat to be achieved, it means the mass of the earth will have to be reduced at a uniform rate i.e hollowing out a sphere inside the earth. There are theories that the inside of th earth is hollow, yes, but further hollowing it out, and then filling it back when the speed is increasing, would have left significant geological evidence that would have been easily spotted by scientists nowadays.

felixomor:
Please where did they disprove the missing day?

AnonyNymous:
I knew someone was going to bring this up. The '23 hour, 20 minute' hoax. It is an urban Christian myth, and in official statements, NASA has publicly claimed the story to be false.
So much for Mr. Geography. There's no such 'chronological method' for accounting for days and nights.

KingEbukasBlog:
Actually autotheism falls under theism . But the fact still remains that North Korea's president is a megalomaniacal atheist who thinks He is god . His megalomania led to that state of confusion

4everGod:
Do u see why I had to test you? Your response is wrong. Shows your copy and paste is confusing you.

More speed... less gravitational force needed

Less speed more gravitational pull.

Due to our magnetic north we are actually reacting via centripetal force and not centrifugal but I deliberately usef centrifugal to test u and you failed.

Now let me tell you why your OP is wrong.

Because of our magnetic poles the spin at both ends is shorter than at the equator or closer to it so even if the earths spin stops or slows down exponentially it would be hardly felt at the poles but felt more at the equator but not in a centrifugal manner it would be in a centripetal manner.

AnonyNymous:
http://www.ibtimes.com.au/hoax-alert-nasa-did-not-find-missing-day-creation-universe-based-biblical-verse-1513796
http://www.hoax-slayer.com/nasa-missing-day.shtml
http://urbanlegends.about.com/od/errata/fl/NASA-and-the-Missing-Day-in-Time.htm

AnonyNymous:
You claim to be a geography student and you're saying this?? More speed less gravity needed? Are you kidding me? A simple demonstration = tie a stone to a string and whirl it around. The faster you whirl it in a circle, the stronger the string has to be, for the stone not to fly off. i.e, more speed, more pull. In fact, just google 'how fast does the earth have to spin for us to fly off' and you'll see many answers. You dont know what you're saying, you probably crammed without having a complete understanding. The only thing you got right is that the speed of the earth's rotation is felt to be faster at the equator. You're just throwing around the words centrifugal and centripetal without knowing what you're saying, lol. Action and reaction, newton's third law. When the rotation stops, we fly off the earth. A quick google search wont hurt you.

felixomor:
I thought u were taking me to NASA site.

Anyway sha, I didnt see anywhere that debunked "the missing day" phenomenom I didnt also see the name of anybody officially from NASA who came out categorically.

Just saying sha, and I also forgot to tell u that 2 of the links point to the same page, an article that also points to another site, and the third link page has been closed.

Wow

4everGod:
Chai chai. So u do not realise that the earth has a magnetic core which reacts with gravity? So you use a rope and a rock to illustrate?

I know you did not have a clue what u were on about. If I ask you now to go and read up on the Dynamo effect u will vanish now in order to research. Lol

Talking with you is a waste of my time really. Since u are no student of geography then you would not know how oue magnetic core uses the dynamo effect to interact with the earths rotation and keep us spinning inward and not outward.

You really need to learn before you speak.

AnonyNymous:
Mr Man. All the links are working. However, NASA's official site has closed that page and are no more accepting questions as its irrelevant and a waste of time and resources. They initially published the article in 1997. You shouldnt expect them to still be putting it up now.

felixomor:
Hhehehehe, yeah right.

I guess u dont know what it means to put up a disclaimer.

And please which year did u see it on NASA site, 1997? If I may ask.