₦airaland Forum

yahmohy27:
Thank you my brother , they should allow the independent investigation into the padding and those involved should step down asap

[color=#006600][/color]

Yea u are on point. That's d only way to get a positive conclusion on the matter

Icecomrade:

Why do people celebrate this Abdul Jibrin of a man?

I still remember him admitting to taking 650m illegal allowances.

This guy is fraud himself and wonder how he parades himself around because he was stripped of leadership role.

He has already admitted to fraudulent practices. He is supposed to be behind bars. Even if he will later turn to prosecution witness.

This is what obtains in a sane country.

All of these will turn to nothing.

They just waste our time. I am even wondering why I burn my energy typing any reaction to this charade.

I totally disagree with u. Is dis how we intend to rid our society of corruption? So without gathering facts and evidence, u call for the arrest of a supposed whistle blower without any investigation carried out to support or deny his claims? This case has the potential to shine light into the NASS which most leaders have said is submerged in corruption. Have u for a split second asked urself "are d leaders of the house trying really hard to hide something or suppress the truth knowing they will be fully indicted if revealed? Think for a second, Jibrin lives a very comfortable life (albeit from ill gotten wealth), even if he lost a leadership role in the house, do u think he'll go thru dis episode dat myt see him jailed and his assets stripped jst out of a personal vendetta for d speaker and other mentioned officials? I dnt know who has a clean record in dis country, bt that's not enof reason to disregard allegations of dis magnitude. If there are elements of truth no matter how small in jibrins allegations, then I think dis case shld b taken more seriously than it is. Even if guilty of frivolous activities in the past, Jibrin can still be used to cleanse the national assembly and develop bills that'll promote transparency in the dealings of the NASS. In other developed countries, whistleblowers are protected, rewarded in different ways and paraded to d public as heros so to encourage pple that possess sensitive materials to bring down looters and criminals to come forward. Pls bear in mind, I'm not for or against Jibrin or the speaker. I jst want the truth to be revealed and for the masses to know wot really happened, obviously with the country's interest at heart. Either way, I sense a huge scandal underneath all of this and I think it's high time lawmakers are made to understand dat the laws were also created for them to abide to and for defaulters to be penalised regardless of wealth, status or resources acquired. If either or both are convicted, it can only be for d good of the country and her citizens bt until then, let's not discredit any information brought forward cos we think the informant isn't 100% a saint.

WhiskeyTangoFox:
I totally disagree with u. Is dis how we intend to rid our society of corruption? So without gathering facts and evidence, u call for the arrest of a supposed whistle blower without any investigation carried out to support or deny his claims? This case has the potential to shine light into the NASS which most leaders have said is submerged in corruption. Have u for a split second asked urself "are d leaders of the house trying really hard to hide something or suppress the truth knowing they will be fully indicted if revealed? Think for a second, Jibrin lives a very comfortable life (albeit from ill gotten wealth), even if he lost a leadership role in the house, do u think he'll go thru dis episode dat myt see him jailed and his assets stripped jst out of a personal vendetta for d speaker and other mentioned officials? I dnt know who has a clean record in dis country, bt that's not enof reason to disregard allegations of dis magnitude. If there are elements of truth no matter how small in jibrins allegations, then I think dis case shld b taken more seriously than it is. Even if guilty of frivolous activities in the past, Jibrin can still be used to cleanse the national assembly and develop bills that'll promote transparency in the dealings of the NASS. In other developed countries, whistleblowers are protected, rewarded in different ways and paraded to d public as heros so to encourage pple that possess sensitive materials to bring down looters and criminals to come forward. Pls bear in mind, I'm not for or against Jibrin or the speaker. I jst want the truth to be revealed and for the masses to know wot really happened, obviously with the country's interest at heart. Either way, I sense a huge scandal underneath all of this and I think it's high time lawmakers are made to understand dat the laws were also created for them to abide to and for defaulters to be penalised regardless of wealth, status or resources acquired. If either or both are convicted, it can only be for d good of the country and her citizens bt until then, let's not discredit any information brought forward cos we think the informant isn't 100% a saint.

Well done bro for this great post!!!

hmm. .

WhiskeyTangoFox:
I totally disagree with u. Is dis how we intend to rid our society of corruption? So without gathering facts and evidence, u call for the arrest of a supposed whistle blower without any investigation carried out to support or deny his claims? This case has the potential to shine light into the NASS which most leaders have said is submerged in corruption. Have u for a split second asked urself "are d leaders of the house trying really hard to hide something or suppress the truth knowing they will be fully indicted if revealed? Think for a second, Jibrin lives a very comfortable life (albeit from ill gotten wealth), even if he lost a leadership role in the house, do u think he'll go thru dis episode dat myt see him jailed and his assets stripped jst out of a personal vendetta for d speaker and other mentioned officials? I dnt know who has a clean record in dis country, bt that's not enof reason to disregard allegations of dis magnitude. If there are elements of truth no matter how small in jibrins allegations, then I think dis case shld b taken more seriously than it is. Even if guilty of frivolous activities in the past, Jibrin can still be used to cleanse the national assembly and develop bills that'll promote transparency in the dealings of the NASS. In other developed countries, whistleblowers are protected, rewarded in different ways and paraded to d public as heros so to encourage pple that possess sensitive materials to bring down looters and criminals to come forward. Pls bear in mind, I'm not for or against Jibrin or the speaker. I jst want the truth to be revealed and for the masses to know wot really happened, obviously with the country's interest at heart. Either way, I sense a huge scandal underneath all of this and I think it's high time lawmakers are made to understand dat the laws were also created for them to abide to and for defaulters to be penalised regardless of wealth, status or resources acquired. If either or both are convicted, it can only be for d good of the country and her citizens bt until then, let's not discredit any information brought forward cos we think the informant isn't 100% a saint.

Inasmuch as i do not disagree with your line of thought, I ve been around for a while. I know this country and also know when they are waisting my time.

This is another one. It doesnt matter how you and i feel about it, THIS WILL PASS.
There is no sincerity of purpose.

On Jibril, i dont see him as a whsitle blower, i rather see him as a disgruntled fellow.

In countries you refer to, whistle blowers do not partake in the same crime they are escalating.

in this instance, the information Jibril has could be used to bargain his culpability, get him a soft landing to be used as prosecution witness.

He is not allowed to walk freely. He has admitted to criminality and he should be treated as such.

if you have an objective mind, am sure you will see it.

yahmohy27:
with due respect ,yes Jibril admitted he too the money ,but he is saying he is nt the only one that took such illegal money .so what are we talking if u actually agreed he took the money and he's saying there more ppl that did same ,then let investigation continues and not by persecutions

There is a difference between Persecution and Prosecution?

Clarify your point pls

Icecomrade:
Inasmuch as i do not disagree with your line of thought, I ve been around for a while. I know this country and also know when they are waisting my time.

This is another one. It doesnt matter how you and i feel about it, THIS WILL PASS.
There is no sincerity of purpose.

On Jibril, i dont see him as a whsitle blower, i rather see him as a disgruntled fellow.

In countries you refer to, whistle blowers do not partake in the same crime they are escalating.

in this instance, the information Jibril has could be used to bargain his culpability, get him a soft landing to be used as prosecution witness.

He is not allowed to walk freely. He has admitted to criminality and he should be treated as such.

if you have an objective mind, am sure you will see it.

Yes, we have a lackadaisical and non-challant attitude to things like dis dat end up affecting we the masses in the long run. We suffer from a complex case of amnesia in dis country. Call Jibrin wot u like, even if he revealed all due to being disgruntled, it doesn't change d fact he myt have incriminating materials dat can implicate some high profile elected officials. His willingness to share these materials is also classified as whistleblowing, and it shld b taken advantage of by the appropriate authorities. Pple who have bin proven guilty of past crimes have also bin listened to and rewarded with shorter sentences as u highlighted in ur post so yes, whistleblowers can b pple dat also participated in the same crime bt assisted the justice system in gathering evidence, identifying, apprehending and convicting fellow suspects. On paper, we live in a society were a suspect is innocent until prosecuted and proven guilty, bt the reverse is the case in reality jst like u've shown. However, for u to say u have an objective mind bt yet despite not prosecuted in the court of law, expect Jibrin to be jailed and d case to be dropped since its a waste of ur time is delusional, bias and unacceptable. This is not the mindset to have if u seek d presence of justice in dis lawless and persecuting country we call Nigeria

Icecomrade:
Inasmuch as i do not disagree with your line of thought, I ve been around for a while. I know this country and also know when they are waisting my time.

This is another one. It doesnt matter how you and i feel about it, THIS WILL PASS.
There is no sincerity of purpose.

On Jibril, i dont see him as a whsitle blower, i rather see him as a disgruntled fellow.

In countries you refer to, whistle blowers do not partake in the same crime they are escalating.

in this instance, the information Jibril has could be used to bargain his culpability, get him a soft landing to be used as prosecution witness.

He is not allowed to walk freely. He has admitted to criminality and he should be treated as such.

if you have an objective mind, am sure you will see it.

Yes, we have a lackadaisical and non-challant attitude to things like dis dat end up affecting we the masses in the long run. We suffer from a complex case of amnesia in dis country. Call Jibrin wot u like, even if he revealed all due to being disgruntled, it doesn't change d fact he myt have incriminating materials dat can implicate some high profile elected officials. His willingness to share these materials is also classified as whistleblowing, and it shld b taken advantage of by the appropriate authorities. Pple who have bin proven guilty of past crimes have also bin listened to and rewarded with shorter sentences as u highlighted in ur post so yes, whistleblowers can b pple dat also participated in the same crime bt assisted the justice system in gathering evidence, identifying, apprehending and convicting fellow suspects. On paper, we live in a society were a suspect is innocent until prosecuted and proven guilty, bt the reverse is the case in reality jst like u've shown. However, for u to say u have an objective mind bt yet despite not prosecuted in the court of law, expect Jibrin to be jailed and d case to be dropped since its a waste of ur time is delusional, bias and unacceptable. This is not the mindset to have if u seek d presence of justice in dis lawless and persecuting country we call Nigeria.

Icecomrade:

Why do people celebrate this Abdul Jibrin of a man?

I still remember him admitting to taking 650m illegal allowances.

This guy is fraud himself and wonder how he parades himself around because he was stripped of leadership role.

He has already admitted to fraudulent practices. He is supposed to be behind bars. Even if he will later turn to prosecution witness.

This is what obtains in a sane country.

All of these will turn to nothing.

They just waste our time. I am even wondering why I burn my energy typing any reaction to this charade.

park well abeg

Bossontop:
Smd

You too make sense