Teempakguy:
yes, and the wise thinks a God sacrificed himself to himself to save his creation from his creation.

There is a huge difference between religious skepticism and atheism

You need this right now to obviate further embarrassing and absurd comments : https://www.nairaland.com/3500235/must-read-god-without-religion

benzics:

Either ways that is a proof that there is no God and after life, since it's possible to preserve life and later re-animate the life years or even centuries after...

Cryonics is the science of using ultra-cold temperature to preserve human life with the intent of restoring good health when technology becomes available to do so.

Is the technology now available to do so since you claim it is possible to preserve life and later reanimate it in years or even centuries.

Calling you stupid is an understatement. Even the person who liked that comment of yours is worse off than you are on the scale of dumbness.

KingEbukasBlog:


There is a huge difference between religious skepticism and atheism

You need this right now to obviate further embarrassing and absurd comments : https://www.nairaland.com/3500235/must-read-god-without-religion

but why are you like this? he used a Christian reference and I fired back in kind. I'm supposed to also have fun while doing this.

4everGod:


Cryonics is the science of using ultra-cold temperature to preserve human life with the intent of restoring good health when technology becomes available to do so.

Is the technology now available to do so since you claim it is possible to preserve life and later reanimate it in years or even centuries.

Calling you stupid is an understatement. Even the person who liked that comment of yours is worse off than you are on the scale of dumbness.

Lol, thank you for acknowledging that "the technology is not yet available", which means there are a lot of possibilities of it being available in the future.. Since a dog was successfully re-animated, I think the re-animation of humans would be possible in the future.

That is science for you, it doesn't just sit down and imagine things by logic, and then run into conclusions without evidence! Science rather takes it's time to know more about the things it doesn't!

4kings:


Mr Teempakguy
I think Sir DeepSight has properly addressed your misconception of Nothing so I won't go any further.

And on object creating it self; I am glad I was not the only one that saw the absurdity.

when I began the discussion with deepsight, it was solely on the grounds that it was a philosophical discussion. I am surprised and deeply disappointed at his attitude.

take last thursdayism. it postulates that the world popped into existence last Thursday. it seems unbelievable. however, dismissing it in a philosophical argument because it "sounds absurd" is just laughable. He is currently doing that and you are too.

KingEbukasBlog:


There is a huge difference between religious skepticism and atheism

You need this right now to obviate further embarrassing and absurd comments : https://www.nairaland.com/3500235/must-read-god-without-religion

and there is a huge difference between monotheism and deism in a broad sense
All though there are various diestic beliefs they are not as absurd as the core belief of Christianity
Kapeesh
And stop spamming your threads

benzics:

Lol, thank you for acknowledging that "the technology is not yet available", which means there are a lot of possibilities of it being available in the future.. Since a dog was successfully re-animated, I think the re-animation of humans would be possible in the future.

That is science for you, it doesn't just sit down and imagine things by logic, and then run into conclusions without evidence! Science rather takes it's time to know more about the things it doesn't!

Do you even know what cryonics is? Is your video Cryonics?

Do you know what goes into cryonics? How come you are this obtuse?

Teempakguy:
but why are you like this? he used a Christian reference and I fired back in kind. I'm supposed to also have fun while doing this.

he's just pained because cr7 won the balon d'or this year

jonbellion:
and there is a huge difference between monotheism and deism in a broad sense
All though there are various diestic beliefs they are not as absurd as the core belief of Christianity
Kapeesh
And stop spamming your threads

Non sequitur .

KingEbukasBlog:


Non sequitur .

and you did not do the same in...
What the....
Oh my.....
*facepalm*

30 PAGES AND RUNNING...YET ALL OUR SELF ACCLAIMED EXTRA INTELLIGENT ARMCHAIR SCIENTIFIC ATHEISTS HAVE ABSOLUTELY NO REBUTTAL TO THE OP. COP OUTS ON A MASSIVE SCALE!

Teempakguy:
again, this ridiculous fallacy of personal incredulity.

I stated clearly earlier that humans are quite incapable of observing or imagining nothing. myself included.

If this is the case, whence do you derive your conclusion that such a thing as nothing exists at all.

Sometimes I can only shake my head at you lot. You deny the existence of God on the ground that you have not observed IT, however you insist that such a thing as nothing exists while agreeing that you have not and cannot observe it.[/b]

That one even bothers to respond to this kind of circular absurdity must be a sign of boredom.

you make yet another ridiculous claim: "there is no such thing as nothing."

How is it ridiculous?
Can you show me this nothing?

yet we are currently discussing nothing. is it possible to talk of something that if no concept of it exists?

People discuss Pink Unicorns and Flying Spaghetti Monsters too.

you haven't proven your claims yet. eternity is just a concept.

Stop time na.

no one has ever observed an eternal object.

No one said eternity is an object.

similarly, an infinite space is merely a mathematical construct. No one knows if the universe is infinite or not. indeed, no infinite object has ever been observed physically. if you claim they do, you'll have to provide a proof or evidence. you have done neither, instead, I find myself being coerced to prove a negative.

Space is indeed infinite, unless you can show me its boundaries. In fact, there is infinite space in every point of space.

jonbellion:
he's just pained because cr7 won the balon d'or this year

Why did you bring this up . Messi was by far the best player this year . Ronaldo scooped the award because he won more important trophies. Messi still remains the cynosure and doyen of football . I mean its indisputable .

Teempakguy:
when I began the discussion with deepsight, it was solely on the grounds that it was a philosophical discussion. I am surprised and deeply disappointed at his attitude.

take last thursdayism. it postulates that the world popped into existence last Thursday. it seems unbelievable. however, dismissing it in a philosophical argument because it "sounds absurd" is just laughable. He is currently doing that and you are too.

Last thursdayism is actually a valid argument, just like simulation.
However, your concept of Nothing was absurd.

Teempakguy:
when I began the discussion with deepsight, it was solely on the grounds that it was a philosophical discussion. I am surprised and deeply disappointed at his attitude.

take last thursdayism. it postulates that the world popped into existence last Thursday. it seems unbelievable. however, dismissing it in a philosophical argument because it "sounds absurd" is just laughable. He is currently doing that and you are too.

I have not merely dismissed your claims as absurd, I have shown you why. You are free not to read and absorb, and you are also free to continue to observe and dissect nothingness.

benzics:

Lol, thank you for acknowledging that "the technology is not yet available", which means there are a lot of possibilities of it being available in the future.. Since a dog was successfully re-animated, I think the re-animation of humans would be possible in the future.

That is science for you, it doesn't just sit down and imagine things by logic, and then run into conclusions without evidence! Science rather takes it's time to know more about the things it doesn't!

According to Wikipedia :

Cryonics is regarded with skepticism within the mainstream scientific community and is not part of normal medical practice. It is not known if it will ever be possible to revive a cryopreserved human being. Cryonics depends on beliefs that death is a process rather than an event that clinical death is a prognosis of death rather than a diagnosis of death, and that the cryonics patient has not experienced information-theoretic death.Such views are at the speculative edge of medicine.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cryonics

There is no possibility a dead person can be revived . The preservation is just to prevent decay that's all .

benzics:

Either ways that is a proof that there is no God and after life, since it's possible to preserve life and later re-animate the life years or even centuries after...

See how I educated this man.



Nevertheless, I'll accept your ignorance up there when your ancestors are reanimated or just when your scientist gods will abolish death altogether,
Which from basic education we're taught is A CHARACTERISTIC OF LIVING THINGS

MrMontella:

Thank You!
Finally you saw my point on ''Time''..

On that thread, I was concentrating only on this universe(from big bang).

4everGod:


Do you even know what cryonics is? Is your video Cryonics?

Do you know what goes into cryonics? How come you are this obtuse?

Cryonics uses extremely cold temperature to preserve human life (cells that haven't completely died off)...

If this is possible, I think in the future, a way of reversing it would be possible.. If I told you in the year 1960 that you would one day speak, and a computer will write what you said, would you have believed me? Don't worry, just sit tight and keep being ignorant, while science works to better your life!

KingEbukasBlog:



According to Wikipedia :

Cryonics is regarded with skepticism within the mainstream scientific community and is not part of normal medical practice. It is not known if it will ever be possible to revive a cryopreserved human being. Cryonics depends on beliefs that death is a process rather than an event that clinical death is a prognosis of death rather than a diagnosis of death, and that the cryonics patient has not experienced information-theoretic death.Such views are at the speculative edge of medicine.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cryonics

There is no possibility a dead person can be revived . The preservation is just to prevent decay that's all .

That guy is a half wit.

KingEbukasBlog:


Why did you bring this up . Messi was by far the best player this year . Ronaldo scooped the award because he won more important trophies. Messi still remains the cynosure and doyen of football . I mean its indisputable .

Messi is a fraudster with a bionic leg and as such is a cheat and should be stripped of everything he has ever won.
http://bleacherreport.com/articles/1492546-lionel-messi-and-hgh-the-truth-about-the-best-footballer-in-the-world

benzics:

Cryonics uses extremely cold temperature to preserve human life (cells that haven't completely died off)...

If this is possible, I think in the future, a way of reversing it would be possible.. If I told you in the year 1960 that you would one day speak, and a computer will write what you said, would you have believed me? Don't worry, just sit tight and keep being ignorant, while science works to better your life!

You are a dolt. Everyone has already confirmed this one after the other.

KingEbukasBlog:



According to Wikipedia :

Cryonics is regarded with skepticism within the mainstream scientific community and is not part of normal medical practice. It is not known if it will ever be possible to revive a cryopreserved human being. Cryonics depends on beliefs that death is a process rather than an event that clinical death is a prognosis of death rather than a diagnosis of death, and that the cryonics patient has not experienced information-theoretic death.Such views are at the speculative edge of medicine.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cryonics

There is no possibility a dead person can be revived . The preservation is just to prevent decay that's all .

And don't you think the reanimation of a decapitated dog is proof enough that death is a process?

120years ago, was it known that one day you could switch on and off lights by clapping? Was it known that a computer would be able to show you the gender of the child a pregnant woman is carrying??

Of course it was NOT KNOWN, because we don't time travel, and the future holds a lot for us!

4kings:

Last thursdayism is actually a valid argument, just like simulation.
However, your concept of Nothing was absurd.

it's not mine. it's a fairly common philosophical concept. Even last thursdayism includes nothing as the starting point from which the universe appears. apparently on last Thursday.

flamingREED:


See how I educated this man.



Nevertheless, I'll accept your ignorance up there when your ancestors are reanimated or just when your scientist gods will abolish death altogether,
Which from basic education we're taught is A CHARACTERISTIC OF LIVING THINGS

Death is inevitable ,but it can be postponed one way or another you will die, and cryonics doesn't mean making someone immortal!!

Jezus faking qwist!!!

So christians actually know how to use google and highlight references from Wikipedia?

Ask them to use the same google/wikipedia to get a reference for "Contradictions in the buybull" or "Evidences for Evolution", and na dat time the epilepsy of the hand, gonorrhea of the eye and tuberculosis of the mouth go start!!!

Unbelievable hypocrites!!!

KingEbukasBlog:



According to Wikipedia :

Cryonics is regarded with skepticism within the mainstream scientific community and is not part of normal medical practice. It is not known if it will ever be possible to revive a cryopreserved human being. Cryonics depends on beliefs that death is a process rather than an event that clinical death is a prognosis of death rather than a diagnosis of death, and that the cryonics patient has not experienced information-theoretic death.Such views are at the speculative edge of medicine.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cryonics

There is no possibility a dead person can be revived . The preservation is just to prevent decay that's all .

you need to remember the quote I gave you. highly important.

Teempakguy:
it's not mine. it's a fairly common philosophical concept. Even last thursdayism includes nothing as the starting point from which the universe appears. apparently on last Thursday.

Listen man, no such thing as nothing exists - and that will remain the case even if Einstein or the greatest congregation of Einsteins think otherwise.

Keep up your study, evaluation and processing of nothingness.
It will do you good.

KingEbukasBlog:


Why did you bring this up . Messi was by far the best player this year . Ronaldo scooped the award because he won more important trophies. Messi still remains the cynosure and doyen of football . I mean its indisputable .

Mr man
Did barca win UEFA
Nooooooo
Is barca top of the la liga table
Noooooooooo
Can messi give Argentina the euro league if Argentina was an European country
Nooooooo
Maybe one day messi will be better than Ronaldo
What is saving that dude is his loyalty to barca
He wouldn't survive in the EPL
it'll basically be Paul Pogba and angel di Maria all over again

Teempakguy:
it's not mine. it's a fairly common philosophical concept. Even last thursdayism includes nothing as the starting point from which the universe appears. apparently on last Thursday.

Abeg stop saying "Nothing"
Start using self-existent

DeepSight:


Messi is a fraudster with a bionic leg and as such is a cheat and should be stripped of everything he has ever won.
http://bleacherreport.com/articles/1492546-lionel-messi-and-hgh-the-truth-about-the-best-footballer-in-the-world

. Well in his defense , he was phenomenal as a kid- his dribbling scythed through defenses , his finishing was superb - before the prescribed treatment for his medical condition


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bS6nS8W0bOU