₦airaland Forum

SmooshCHN:
Where did he say he was doing masters

Again maybe I do have a split personality but please where did I say I was? You can simply refer me to the post and I'll admit to being less than honest. Otherwise you're just a rabble rousing idiot who has run out of arguments to make and is looking to score cheap points.

My God! What is wrong with these people?

NictisZorander:
Lol. Assuming it's an MSc, some MSc's don't you knucklehead.

This is the only time I spoke about a master's course directly and even then how can someone misconstrue this into me stating that I'm doing my masters? Don't get me wrong I'm starting my masters in a few months but where did I specifically state here that the thesis I spoke of was for a master's. SMH

BTW. The reason I said this was because my older brothers both did their masters and both didn't require a defense.

NictisZorander:
LMAO this guy is dumber than I thought.

First of all I spoke of Turnitin and other protocols like milestone reports, research justification that eliminate the need for defense

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.

Secondly you don't just get data and deduce, my research is analytical and required using correlation and regression models with SPSS after which you reduce your result from there

What is this baloney? Is there any research that is not analytical? You actually think you know anything? LOL

You don't create theories from your conclusion m.oron, you use them to justify the basis of researching the variables to begin with.

What you draw from your data analysis is conclusions and recommendations.

I see. I was wasting my time. Typical non-STEM degree carrying academic mountebank. In STEM degrees, your conclusion is the theory you are putting out. That is why a colloquial synonym for thesis is also proposition or claim. Or you think conclusion implies that you have resolved the issue? Fool. Your conclusion simply implies that is YOUR own interpretation of the data you have collated. Someone else can have a different interpretation from yours. That is why you are mandated to defend that conclusion in front of the experts and colleagues alike. You should return the cert of participation your school gave you. You are a quack.

My God, the stupidity and ignorance percolating out of this idiot and he has the cohones to question my intellect or credibility. SMH. Just FOH you're embarrassing yourself!

I did not question your intellect or credibility. I cannot question what does not exist.

NictisZorander:
Maybe I do have a split personality but didn't this idiot just claim only masters, PhD and other post graduate courses require a dissertation and deduced I was either doing a master's or PhD?

I don't care which sh.it hole school you went to or what you studied, my issue here is with you calling me a liar or claiming a thesis must be defended in order to be validated because that's the only thing you're used to or you've heard of. FOH ignoramus!

And for the record, I graduated from secondary school when I was 16 knucklehead.

I claimed ONLY masters and PhDs required dissertation?

Provide where I said it.

Fool, when you backed out of the PhD talk, I went further to propound that even if you were in masters program, the thesis will still need to be defended just as it will be if it was an undergraduate thesis.

The key word there being THESIS.

You finished High School aged 16?

Every one of my siblings (yours truly included) did same. It is not an achievement. That is why I have told you to just STFU.

If this was a session of boasting about academic achievements, you will run. And I don't even think I have done anything.

Now you see why all that shameless gloating about IQ and age was irking me. You won't measure up. You don't.

Eruditor:
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.

Out of ideas?

What is this baloney? Is there any research that is not analytical? You actually think you know anything? LOL

You just got caught charlatan! There are descriptive researches that dont require data analysis. LMAO!

I see. I was wasting my time. Typical non-STEM degree carrying academic mountebank. In STEM degrees, your conclusion is the theory you are putting out. That is why a colloquial synonym for thesis is also proposition or claim. Or you think conclusion implies that you have resolved the issue? Fool. Your conclusion simply implies that is YOUR own interpretation of the data you have collated. Someone else can have a different interpretation from yours. That is why you are mandated to defend that conclusion in front of the experts and colleagues alike. You should return the cert of participation your school gave you. You are a quack.

When did i ask for all of this rubbish? what does STEM degree have to do with this? This slowpoke claims a persons conclusion is his theory LMAO

Standard researches have research hypothesis which your data either supports or disproves and your conclusion based on that is definite, you dont create theories from conclusions like you claimed you stupid mo.ron

I did not question your intellect or credibility. I cannot question what does not exist.

Your comment is redundant seeing it is just reiterating what the question asked, stupid old foool!

Eruditor:
I claimed ONLY masters and PhDs required dissertation?

Provide where I said it.

Fool, when you backed out of the PhD talk, I went further to propound that even if you were in masters program, the thesis will still need to be defended just as it will be if it was an undergraduate thesis.

The key word there being THESIS.

You asked for PHD and masters and didnt entertain another possibility meaning your tiny little brain has exhausted the breadth of possible options and you also stipulated as if after masters and phds there arent other options for dissertations. You posted a link to an undergraduate program and claimed its not a masters program as if that invalidates it from being a thesis.

And how many times does someone have to tell you not all thesis' requires defense you friggin doltish ape

Like i said, dangers of being limited to a nigerian university.

Eruditor:
You finished High School aged 16?

Every one of my siblings (yours truly included) did same. It is not an achievement. That is why I have told you to just STFU.

If this was a session of boasting about academic achievements, you will run. And I don't even think I have done anything.

Now you see why all that shameless gloating about IQ and age was irking me. You won't measure up. You don't.

Why are you calling it high school? you graduated from a nigerian secondary school, so did i, its called secondary school, no need trying to impress people with that?

I didnt start a discussion on academics, you and the midget did, i'm just defending my honor (even though i shouldnt care what pillocks like you think) and in the process educating you?

Of course my intellectual prowess will irk someone like you, its called envy and jealously witless m.oron!

Lol so this guy has two accounts here.

NictisZorander:
You just caught caught charlatan! There are descriptive researches that dont require data analysis. LMAO!

I only have one question: When you type these foolish things, do you hope it will hide your very glaring naivety?

When did i ask for all of this rubbish? what does STEM degree have to do with this? This slowpoke claims a persons conclusion is his theory LMAO

You are so simple. It is funny. Skip was arguing GOAT status with Shannon. Shannon tried to water down MJs other aspects besides scoring by stating that Pippen posed better assists than Jordan. To counter this, Skip argues that Pippen's assist numbers were high because most were to Jordan who was a prime scorer. 2 men, using the same data with both having varying conclusions but Skip presented a theory (to explain the data).

Standard researches have research hypothesis which your data either supports or disproves and your conclusion based on that is definite, you dont create theories from conclusions like you claimed you stupid mo.ron

This is shallow and dumb. Research could begin from a hypothesis but it is not necessary. That is why I have told your Non-STEM behind to STFU. For instance, Skip could expound on his conclusion about Pippen and theorise that high assists signify having good team-mates therefore any high-assisting player (like Lebron) cannot propose bad players as an excuse for losing.

That is an example of drawing a theory from a conclusion. Alexander Fleming did that too with Penicillin (by theorising from his conclusion what it could be used for after disproving his own hypothesis).

Your comment is redundant seeing it is just reiterating what the question asked, stupid old foool!

Being old is relative. And with your foolishness, you may not live to become my present age.

NictisZorander:
You asked for PHD and masters and didnt entertain another possibility meaning your tiny little brain has exhausted the breadth of possible options and you also stipulated as if after masters and phds there arent other options for dissertations. You posted a link to an undergraduate program and claimed its not a masters program as if that invalidates it from being a thesis.

And how many times does someone have to tell you not all thesis' requires defense you friggin doltish ape

Like i said, dangers of being limited to a nigerian university.

LOL. Your use of "as if", just shows you are trying to draw false conclusions.

You knew announcing you were in an undergrad prog will taint the showboating and boasting you had been doing here so you preferred to sell the relative young age with this false aura of being a PhD to legitimize this Dougie-Howser impression you had been trying to sell. When the PhD act was knocked off, you tried to couch under the Msc one and it too was knocked off. That is the main throwaway from this exchange.

I have consistently mentioned that a thesis must be defended and even capitalized the word THESIS to demonstrate the major point of emphasis. Attempting to hide under "undergraduate" just makes you look stupid because I never even attached any tertiary level to my explanation on the word. We only brought up the PhD and MSc aspects to expose you as a liar who was pretending to be a 20 year old PhD.

NictisZorander:
Why are you calling it high school? you graduated from a nigerian secondary school, so did i, its called secondary school, no need trying to impress people with that?

I didnt start a discussion on academics, you and the midget did, i'm just defending my honor (even though i shouldnt care what pillocks like you think) and in the process educating you?

Of course my intellectual prowess will irk someone like you, its called envy and jealously witless m.oron!

Slowly, humility is filtering through.

Eruditor:
I only have one question: When you type these foolish things, do you hope it will hide your very glaring naivety?

WTF

What is wrong with this dweeb?

You are so simple. It is funny. Skip was arguing GOAT status with Shannon. Shannon tried to water down MJs other aspects besides scoring by stating that Pippen posed better assists than Jordan. To counter this, Skip argues that Pippen's assist numbers were high because most were to Jordan who was a prime scorer. 2 men, using the same data with both having varying conclusions but Skip presented a theory (to explain the data).

No you mor.on! In an analytical research the data is definite, its either pippen had higher stats or not. Its either pippens points were higher without jordan or not. A recommendation is necessary is some thesis but speculations arent compulsory as long as you answer your research questions, thats why abstracts dont contain theories you friggin dolt!

This is shallow and dumb. Research could begin from a hypothesis but it is not necessary. That is why I have told your Non-STEM behind to STFU. For instance, Skip could expound on his conclusion about Pippen and theorise that any high assists signify having good team-mates therefore any high-assisting player (like Lebron) cannot propose bad players as an excuse for losing.

That is an example of drawing a theory from a conclusion. Alexander Fleming did that too with Penicillin (by theorising from his conclusion what it could be used for after disproving his own hypothesis).

LOL, But when you started your argument you knew we were talking about a non STEM course and still made those foolish comments. Even if you didnt you didnt make that distinction nor did you entertain the possibility. Now you're bringing up excuses to move the goal post! Just FOH you shameless brainless fool! Again what does your stupid analogy have to do with the fact that you botched the method and aim of an academic research?

Being old is relative. And with your foolishness, you may not live to become my present age.

No you mo.ron, age and intellect is definite, its either you're old or not, its either you're stupid in comparison to the standard for your age or not. You are old and way too stupid for your age small fry. If someone like you can live as long as you have and if intellect was the only variable that determines age, i'd take my chances to live a very long and fruitful life knucklehead.

STEM degree lmao, next thing he brings up is branch degree.

The idiot got exposed and instead of him to go away and stop embarrassing himself he came back with even more poppycock!

Eruditor:
LOL. Your use of "as if", just shows you are trying to draw false conclusions.

No, your actions after wards proves that there are basis for these conclusions and since you cant prove otherwise there is enough evidence to suggest its true.

You knew announcing you were in an undergrad prog will taint the showboating and boasting you had been doing here so you preferred to sell the relative young age with this false aura of being a PhD to legitimize this Dougie-Howser impression you had been trying to sell. When the PhD act was knocked off, you tried to couch under the Msc one and it too was knocked off. That is the main throwaway from this exchange.

LOL I never stated i was studying for a PHD or even specified my level of study because i dont like to divulge anything about me on this forum. You and the midget drew conclusion i neither confirmed nor denied as such so whatever impressions you have about me being at a certain level is your deduction based on what you feel suits my contributions in which case i guess i should be flattered.

I have consistently mentioned that a thesis must be defended and even capitalized the word THESIS to demonstrate the major point of emphasis. Attempting to hide under "undergraduate" just makes you look stupid because I never even attached any tertiary level to my explanation on the word. We only brought up the PhD and MSc aspects to expose you as a liar who was pretending to be a 20 year old PhD.

Idiot, show me the rule book that says every thesis must be defended, and if you're trying to use the excuse that its not the same as a dissertation then you're not only an im.becile but also an incorrigible pathological liar, when we started this you were specifically talking about dissertations being defended, now youve switched to thesis to feign some technicality.

Liar, means someone who states or spreads falsities, where did i ever claim i was studying for a PHD, if you cant provide that evidence you are a shameless liar and so is every kith and kin of yours. Shameless lying sack of sh it!

First i'm lying about writing a thesis, then all thesis must be defended, then an undergraduate thesis isnt a thesis, then a non STEM thesis isnt a thesis now he only said all of that to prove i wasnt a PHD holder, where did i ever claim that i was? LMAO By God, this clown wont kill me.

Eruditor:
Slowly, humility is filtering through.

I just called you a jealous envious witless mo.ron and you took that for humility from my end?

What a bitch

Congrats to GOLDEN STATE. Well deserved eventhough I can't help but ponder what might have been had CP3 not left the game injured with the series still up in the balance.

FMVP was a tight one with Curry having a slight edge until KD took over Game 3. Methinks when all is said and done, KD was the worthy winner of that award.

donlittle25:
When I started using turnitin, they haven’t given you your Ukrainian visa yet.

I do speak a bit of Russian. But Ukraine? Lol! Not even close.

donlittle25:
doesnt have turnitin?

Do you know how that thing works?

That piece of website is on line.

Anyone can use it. It’s not some software that a school acquires and restrict access to it.

It’s for all.

LMAO and this is how I know you've never used Turnitin before. Lying little bastard. Schools can acquire Turnitin and integrate It to their Moodle which you can access and submit your works on. This is someone who claims to be acquainted with the uses of Turnitin

I am 100 percent this short fool has never used Turnitin to submit anything before in his life otherwise he wouldn't make such a re.tarded statement. If you have please let me know how. Friggin midget

I know I'm dealing with boneheads but dammit I can't quit

KEVIN DURANT :- 28.9 10.75 7.5 0.75 2.0 2.25 65% +86


STEPH CURRY :- 27.5 6.0 6.75 1.5 0.75 2.75 56% +47

This is why KD won the Finals MVP.

NictisZorander:
No you mor.on! In an analytical research the data is definite, its either pippen had higher stats or not. Its either pippens points were higher without jordan or not. A recommendation is necessary is some thesis but speculations arent compulsory as long as you answer your research questions, thats why abstracts dont contain theories you friggin dolt!

If everyone would come to the same conclusion based on fixed set of data then why is it research? You are trying to sound smart but you are just making a fool of yourself. Lol

LOL, But when you started your argument you knew we were talking about a non STEM course and still made those foolish comments. Even if you didnt you didnt make that distinction nor did you entertain the possibility. Now you're bringing up excuses to move the goal post! Just FOH you shameless brainless fool! Again what does your stupid analogy have to do with the fact that you botched the method and aim of an academic research?

You are slow of thought. Non-STEM behind is because you are making unidrectionally nitwitted statements like data is definite. Of course it is..but are conclusions and propositions from data definite?

No you mo.ron, age and intellect is definite, its either you're old or not, its either you're stupid in comparison to the standard for your age or not. You are old and way too stupid for your age small fry. If someone like you can live as long as you have and if intellect was the only variable that determines age, i'd take my chances to live a very long and fruitful life knucklehead.

You still have not learnt even when you have just done what I have been teaching you. Age is fixed data but you are choosing to theorize about it in a way that may vary from a more sensible person. Yes, I was born before you so I am older than you. It is not an achievement to be older or younger. But I can tell you free of charge that you are at best above average. So your younger age means nothing.

If you had a PhD or some grandiose achievement which most people your age do not have, that may have made a case for you but you have none. To think that what you thought was a sure-fire sign you were smart is the same thing other people did and still felt like it was nothing. This shows where you really are.

BTW You are still talking about an age you hope to get to. I am already there. Which means you might not get to the point I am already living behind. Your false bravado and misplaced megalomania cracks me up.

NictisZorander:
First i'm lying about writing a thesis, then all thesis must be defended, then an undergraduate thesis isnt a thesis, then a non STEM thesis isnt a thesis now he only said all of that to prove i wasnt a PHD holder, where did i ever claim that i was? LMAO By God, this clown wont kill me.

If I can reduce it to absurdities perhaps people will not see I was exposed.

Eruditor:
If I can reduce it to absurdities perhaps people will not see I was exposed.

Do tell...

Hmm. So that's the thinking behind your posts. And now that your plan failed woefully how do you feel?

Eruditor:
If everyone would come to the same conclusion based on fixed set of data then why is it research? You are trying to sound smart but you are just making a fool of yourself. Lol

LMAO Thats what a problem statement and research justification is for you dolt!

Part of the requirement for our thesis is that it has to be a topic no one has covered before.

I dont need to try, it comes naturally to me because i am smart and you of a surety are not. Is it your fault? not entirely but deal with it without envy and jealousy. Some people are just superior, i told you its in my blood.

You are slow of thought. Non-STEM behind is because you are making unidrectionally nitwitted statements like data is definite. Of course it is..but are conclusions and propositions from data definite?

But you claimed a research or conclusion is incomplete without theoretical conclusions LMAO! FOH Dumbass!

You still have not learnt even when you have just done what I have been teaching you. Age is fixed data but you are choosing to theorize about it in a way that may vary from a more sensible person. Yes, I was born before you so I am older than you. It is not an achievement to be older or younger. But I can tell you free of charge that you are at best above average. So your younger age means nothing.

Young age is not an accomplishment but its definitely a privilege. Let me explain something to you small fry, age is important when discussing intellect because a kid having a genius level IQ isnt necessarily more skilled than an adult, it just means he has an IQ much higher than the mean of his age. But it does make him smarter, thats why i brought up your old age and stupidity or lack of knowledge and skill that accompanied it in your case.

If you had a PhD or some grandiose achievement which most people your age do not have, that may have made a case for you but you have none. To think that what you thought was a sure-fire sign you were smart is the same thing other people did and still felt like it was nothing. This shows where you really are.

LOL! I didnt bring up a PHD as an accomplishment nor did i ever use it for the basis of my superior intellect ever before in this forum. Being a member of MENSA though and recording an IQ of 147, i say thats way above most people my age.

BTW You are still talking about an age you hope to get to. I am already there. Which means you might not get to the point I am already living behind. Your false bravado and misplaced megalomania cracks me up.

I speak of age because i am more learned at my age than you at your old age and i count that as an accomplishment and a testament to the time and effort ive dedicated to improving myself as a human being in addition to my natural talents.

NictisZorander:
But you claimed a research or conclusion is incomplete without theoretical conclusions LMAO! FOH Dumbass!

Provide where I said this.

Young age is not an accomplishment but its definitely a privilege. Let me explain something to you small fry, age is important when discussing intellect because a kid having a genius level IQ isnt necessarily more skilled than an adult, it just means he has an IQ much higher than the mean of his age. But it does make him smarter, thats why i brought up your old age and stupidity or lack of knowledge and skill that accompanied it in your case.

Let me show you how stupid you are.

Mental age/Actual age × 100= IQ

So if a child is 2 actually but thinks like a 4year old the child's IQ is 200 or that the child is 2 times smarter than the mean. Ok so when the child is 40 does it mean they think like 80 year olds? That is why the theory Alfred Binet proposed on this has been upturned by more seasoned psychologists.

I can tell you free of charge that you are at best a little above average. Your achievements for your age are just above the mean ever so slightly. Even on this thread, it is the same thing. So when you think you are in some top 2 percentile...ask yourself if you have done anything beyond 98% of the people in the world. The answer is a resounding NO.

LOL! I didnt bring up a PHD as an accomplishment nor did i ever use it for the basis of my superior intellect ever before in this forum. Being a member of MENSA though and recording an IQ of 147, i say thats way above most people my age.

LOL. Imagine all the people who have run circles around you on this thread, many of which don't even see themselves as some high IQ confraternity. If your IQ is anything to go by, Donlittle is neatly a 294 IQ. FACTS.

I speak of age because i am more learned at my age than you at your old age and i count that as an accomplishment and a testament to the time and effort ive dedicated to improving myself as a human being in addition to my natural talents.

LOL. How many years do you really think I have on you? I am not even up to 30 and I have celebrated my birthday this year. I don't want to talk too much abeg. I told you to just learn to shut up. You have achieved nothing. Diddly squat. And you certainly won't even do much because you over-celebrate meaningless things.

Eruditor:
Provide where I said this.

Please dont retract another blunt statement you made, go and re read what you typed.

Let me show you how stupid you are.

Now this is interesting.



Mental age/Actual age × 100= IQ

So if a child is 2 actually but thinks like a 4year old the child's IQ is 200 or that the child is 2 times smarter than the mean. Ok so when the child is 40 does it mean they think like 80 year olds? That is why the theory Alfred Binet proposed on this has been upturned by more seasoned psychologists.

I never proposed any such equation that is just a conclusion you condensed from hot air. Its a simple straight forward concept, a kid knowing as much as an average adult of a certain makes him smarter than most his peers and smarter than the adult as well but not more learned. The extent to which must not necessarily correlate to any given correlation but the standards and averages used.

I can tell you free of charge that you are at best a little above average. Your achievements for your age are just above the mean ever so slightly. Even on this thread, it is the same thing. So when you think you are in some top 2 percentile...ask yourself if you have done anything beyond 98% of the people in the world. The answer is a resounding NO.

LOL Achievement does not necessarily equate to intelligence and thats why i told you i dont gauge my intellect based on them. A lot of people achieved a lot more than einstein at certain earlier stages of his life, doesnt make them smarter than him.

LOL. Imagine all the people who have run circles around you on this thread, many of which don't even see themselves as some high IQ confraternity. If your IQ is anything to go by, Donlittle is neatly a 294 IQ. FACTS.

The very fact that you think the little man can run circles around a goat let alone me or the very fact that you think you saying that riles me up or gives it any credibility is why i keep telling you that you're just plain dumb!

LOL. How many years do you really think I have on you? I am not even up to 30 and I have celebrated my birthday this year. I don't want to talk too much abeg. I told you to just learn to shut up. You have achieved nothing. Diddly squat. And you certainly won't even do much because you over-celebrate meaningless things.

So i'm guessing you're in your late twenties, possibly 29 to be more precise and getting your arse handed to you by someone who just became old enough to drink

Where did i ever claim that i achieved anything? LOL I'm such saying i am smarter than you and better than you in every way possible.

Roland17:
To celebrate my prediction come tire me sef!



www.nairaland.com/attachments/7234063_snip_png06f4cf5758f7ae939d0c1434f7e0c2f6

Me nko that predicted it last year....

Decale:
Me nko that predicted it last year....

Wow. Boldest most shameless edit I've ever seen. Friggin classic decale.