₦airaland Forum

A40:
Lmaooo look at this bonobo monkey. The argument is between Shaq and Olajuwon. Stop phoolishly trying to save face! You have not disproven my argument one bit.

I don't think Houston would have won a ring had the GOAT not retired as I do not believe prime GOAT would have lost to Vernon Maxwell and Otis Thorpe.

However facts are facts and unless you can dig up where I rated Shaq over Hakeem in the past then the joke is on you as usual

Just FOH and hide your head in Shame man. I'm so done with idiots like you on this thread who only know how to move goal posts when they're clearly wrong. You've been exposed. Lying sack of sh.it.

NictisZorander:
LOL. Going into these finals is there anyone that didn't see a sweep? The same Rob Parker that was glorifying that Cavs team that wouldn't have made the playoffs? LOL Fvck off with your malaria. If someone can root for a re.tard like Rob Parker only speaks to the level of brain damage he himself has.

Most of you Lebtards didn't. Even I thought the Cavs could nick a game though I recall warning you idiots that the old team stood a better shot against the Warriors.

STFU!! Y'all buffoons were glorifying the team as well claiming it had gotten younger and athletic. You root for tools like Nick Wright and Colin Cowherd.. You're one to talk lol

A40:
We are having a debate about Shaq and Olajuwon and this mountain goat digs up posts about Jordan. Lmaooo no wonder niggas were questioning your academic background. Smh

LMAO two face, niggas question my academic background for the same reason you're having this re.tarded debate to begin with. When im.beciles don't know they're im.beciles and it's graciouly pointed out to them by destroying them in every argument, they bring up a foolish debate that makes no sense whatsoever and begin to make up stuff because they've been owned.

A40:
Most of you Lebtards didn't. Even I thought the Cavs could nick a game though I recall warning you idiots that the old team stood a better shot against the Warriors.

STFU!! Y'all buffoons were glorifying the team as well claiming it had gotten younger and athletic. You root for tools like Nick Wright and Colin Cowherd.. You're one to talk lol

LOL the team did get better, did anyone give them a chance against golden state? Look at this confused idiot! So because a team got better it means people are saying they can beat golden state? No bigger curse in life than stupidity

NictisZorander:
Just FOH and hide your head in Shame man. I'm so done with idiots like you on this thread who only know how to move goal posts when they're clearly wrong. You've been exposed. Lying sack of sh.it.

Shut up your mouth you obtuse mountain goat with your 0.147 IQ. Even if I didn't fancy Houston picking up a ring against Jordan does that invalidate his greatness? You must be very dyslexic!

May warapa grip you there you depressingly stewpid human being! Come here and explain why Shaq was swept 5 times and sodomized by Hakeem and a second year Tim Duncan in his 7th year in the league. Loool!

This is how bad things were. This is the Cavs team this professional clown is trying to glorify.

NictisZorander:
LMAO two face, niggas question my academic background for the same reason you're having this re.tarded debate to begin with. When im.beciles don't know they're im.beciles and it's graciouly pointed out to them by destroying them in every argument, they bring up a foolish debate that makes no sense whatsoever and begin to make up stuff because they've been owned.

What is the connection between this piffle and the Shaq vs Olajuwon argument? Who have you owned? You were pummeled and battered so bad you were begging for a truce. You're a terrible waste of time honestly

NictisZorander:
This is how bad things were. This is the Cavs team this professional clown is trying to glorify.

What were their position in the standings you decrepit donkey. Show us that instead of sensational and click bait headlines you simple minded schmuck

NictisZorander:
LOL the team did get better, did anyone give them a chance against golden state? Look at this confused idiot! So because a team got better it means people are saying they can beat golden state? No bigger curse in life than stupidity

The team got better? The same team you leprechauns swore is the worst LeNomad ever got to the Finals? What kind of confused bomboclart is this? Where was the team before the trade was made? Where did they end up in the standings? Who were the players that made the difference and made the team 'better'

Boy you better get help

A40:
Shut up your mouth you obtuse mountain goat with your 0.147 IQ. Even if I didn't fancy Houston picking up a ring against Jordan does that invalidate his greatness? You must be very dyslexic!

May warapa grip you there you depressingly stewpid human being! Come here and explain why Shaq was swept 5 times and sodomized by Hakeem and a second year Tim Duncan in his 7th year in the league. Loool!

Shaq was swept five times the same reason Jordan was swept twice in the first round.

Shaq was young and had the lesser team against Hakeem.


Better teams always beat better players, same reason wilt is better than Russell but got consistently spanked by him.

If you can't understand this I told you, stick to hockey.

A40:
The team got better? The same team you leprechauns swore is the worst LeNomad ever got to the Finals? What kind of confused bomboclart is this? Where was the team before the trade was made? Where did they end up in the standings? Who were the players that made the difference and made the team 'better'

Boy you better get help

So because they're better than the previous team it automatically means this team isn't bad. Right, all that alcohol stays killing your brain cells.

I told you, I don't forget anything.

Another sample of this mo.rons pure hypocrisy and stupidity. Me telling him the downside of the rockets while he advocates for them as LeBrons best landing spot. Today they're suddenly a horrible fit because it suits his argument

What's the point in arguing with a shameless brainless hypocrite like this?

NictisZorander:
Shaq was swept five times the same reason Jordan was swept twice in the first round.

Shaq was young and had the lesser team against Hakeem.


Better teams always beat better players, same reason wilt is better than Russell but got consistently spanked by him.

If you can't understand this I told you, stick to hockey.

You're a shameless wasteman for comparing Jordan's case to a guy who was swept 5 times in 6 years even by lower seeds.

I've asked you how old was Hakeem when he beat the Showtime Lakers yet you are still frothing in the mouth

NictisZorander:
Doesn't have to be consistent. PG is a knockdown shooter, Covington is a 3 and D specialist first team all defense, LeBron is a reliable 3 ball shooter, even Embiid can shoot threes nowadays. Forget that, look at the defensive potential of that team since they're all elite defenders. The spurs didn't have 3 ball shooting when they had the warriors in a headlock. The Cavs in game 1 were horrible from deep. Not everything is about 3 ball shooting.

I don't like Houston either but didn't you just claim a few weeks ago that he should go there and I explained to you my worries about that. Why are you such a hypocrite?

Why would the spurs give excuses when they were the better team, the favourites and they won? Are you dumb? Seriously, are you?

Doesn't have to be consistent against Golden State? Ok!

LeNomad is an ok 3 point shooter but we all know his strength is getting to the rim and his 3pt shooting won't win you a series. LeNomad is no longer an elite defender! Stop deceiving yourself.

Over the course of a series you're going to have to shoot and defend better than the Warriors.

Don't you do other things with your brain rather than worry about any banal thing I tell you in the past? I've said he should go to Houston or wherever he likes! Hell he can even join Golden State if he's that desperate.

You're shameless! Your LeNomad, Wade and Bosh in their athletic primes lost to 38 year old Duncan, 37 year old Manu, 32 year old Parker and a 2nd year Kawhi with that stacked Heatle team and you're talmbout better team. Efulefu

A40:
Doesn't have to be consistent against Golden State? Ok!

LeNomad is an ok 3 point shooter but we all know his strength is getting to the rim and his 3pt shooting won't win you a series. LeNomad is no longer an elite defender! Stop deceiving yourself.

Over the course of a series you're going to have to shoot and defend better than the Warriors.

Don't you do other things with your brain rather than worry about any banal thing I tell you in the past? I've said he should go to Houston or wherever he likes! Hell he can even join Golden State if he's that desperate.

You're shameless! Your LeNomad, Wade and Bosh in their athletic primes lost to 38 year old Duncan, 37 year old Manu, 32 year old Parker and a 2nd year Kawhi with that stacked Heatle team and you're talmbout better team. Efulefu

The only new argument you've brought here that I care to tackle given your hypocritical tendencies is about the spurs.

To that I say; the Heatles were so great and the spurs so washed the bookies made the spurs the favourite even though the heat won the title the year before.

LOL.

NictisZorander:
I told you, I don't forget anything.

Another sample of this mo.rons pure hypocrisy and stupidity. Me telling him the downside of the rockets while he advocates for them as LeBrons best landing spot. Today they're suddenly a horrible fit because it suits his argument

This bitchhh is on crack!!! I don't think I've ever come across such gullible sheep like you in all of my days. Do I sound to you like someone who genuinely has LeNomad's best interests at heart? What part of that post suggested I was pro-Houston?

Newsflash: I do not care where he lands! He is a nomadic Tuareg so let him join where he pleases

A40:
This bitchhh is on crack!!! I don't think I've ever come across such gullible sheep like you in all of my days. Do I sound to you like someone who genuinely has LeNomad's best interests at heart? What part of that post suggested I was pro-Houston?

Newsflash: I do not care where he lands! He is a nomadic Tuareg so let him join where he pleases

LOL you were pitching to me why Houston was is a great fit because you don't have LeBrons best interest at heart and LeBron reads nairaland and takes your opinion seriously and that's why you're trying to deceive him.


"But manna just call them Simba, Dem man are just kings of lying Dem man are just lyin' kings"

NictisZorander:
The only new argument you've brought here that I care to tackle given your hypocritical tendencies is about the spurs.

To that I say; the Heatles were so great and the spurs so washed the bookies made the spurs the favourite even though the heat won the title the year before.

LOL.

Lmaooo waste man! The bookies predicted a 4-1 win too? Keep defending a team who hopelessly underperformed as if the bookies are the ones that get on the court.

Whether you like it or not that L is another stain on LeNomad's legacy.

I'm here for the Shaq and Olajuwon debate anyway so I don't care for your obfuscation tactics. You're pretty much a drowning man so I might as well laugh at your wailings and teeth gnashing

A40:
Lmaooo waste man! The bookies predicted a 4-1 win too? Keep defending a team who hopelessly underperformed as if the bookies are the ones that get on the court.

Whether you like it or not that L is another stain on LeNomad's legacy.

I'm here for the Shaq and Olajuwon debate anyway so I don't care for your obfuscation tactics. You're pretty much a drowning man so I might as well laugh at your wailings and teeth gnashing

LOL. Do you even read the rubbish you're typing? You said the heatles lost to the spurs, I pointed out to you that it was obvious which team was better. Now you're bringing up the margin

Like I said all you hypocrites do is move goal posts when you're exposed.

Obfuscation tactics? I am the one who brought up the spurs? you did you confused deluded dolt!

As for the shaq Hakeem debate. You've already defeated yourself and I want no part in your shameless dirty dishonourable tactics. Go away you shameless liar!

NictisZorander:
LOL you were pitching to me why Houston was is a great fit because you don't have LeBrons best interest at heart and LeBron reads nairaland and takes your opinion seriously and that's why you're trying to deceive him.


"But manna just call them Simba, Dem man are just kings of lying Dem man are just lyin' kings"

I'm trying to understand your angle and how this is germane to the debate. Where did I say Houston's LeNomad's only option? If that's where he wants to go there's nothing you or I can do to stop it so what is the point of your senseless lamentations?

Jesus Christ! You're so emotional and in touch with your feminine side FFS

NictisZorander:
So because they're better than the previous team it automatically means this team isn't bad. Right, all that alcohol stays killing your brain cells.

You can't even prove they are better cos this would contradict the narrative that LeNomad dragged this team to the Finals, you've still not explained how they were better. Dangbana

A40:
You can't even prove they are better cos this would contradict the narrative that LeNomad dragged this team to the Finals, you've still not explained how they were better. Dangbana

Burnley is better than Brighton, does that mean they're both not shitty teams or does that make Burnley not a shitty team? I don't know why I'm even legitimising this poppycock with a technical term but it's called fallacy of composition.

NictisZorander:
LOL. Do you even read the rubbish you're typing? You said the heatles lost to the spurs, I pointed out to you that it was obvious which team was better. Now you're bringing up the margin

Like I said all you hypocrites do is move goal posts when you're exposed.

Obfuscation tactics? I am the one who brought up the spurs? you did you confused deluded dolt!

As for the shaq Hakeem debate. You've already defeated yourself and I want no part in your shameless dirty dishonourable tactics. Go away you shameless liar!

I'm sure you were fed your placenta as a child, so a two-time defending champion going against a team with an ageing core laughably past their prime had absolutely no shot at winning because a group of bookies determined it to be so? Are you not running mad like this?

The Spurs were a obvious sidenote which you phoolishly latched on to to begin another jejune argument! That is obfuscation tactics.

Last I checked Shaq's name is not Jordan. Stop trying to run away and come and explain how the greatest big of all time was sodomized by every quality big he faced, and why he was swept 5 times in 6 years including to the guy he is being compared with. Anuofia

A40:
I'm trying to understand your angle and how this is germane to the debate. Where did I say Houston's LeNomad's only option? If that's where he wants to go there's nothing you or I can do to stop it so what is the point of your senseless lamentations?

Jesus Christ! You're so emotional and in touch with your feminine side FFS

You keep saying dumb things and then keep backtracking when you get exposed. You brought them up has his best, possibly only option to beat the warriors. Now you're trying to deny that or claim you were being facetious. Yeah right!

NictisZorander:
Burnley is better than Brighton, does that mean they're both not shitty teams or does that make Burnley not a shitty team? I don't know why I'm even legitimising this poppycock with a technical term but it's called fallacy of composition.

Burnley made Europa League, Brighton barely escaped relegation. What kind of spectacularly daft inference are you even trying to make? Is that what they are teaching you in that jelosinmi community college you are attending. Jesus Wept

A40:
I'm sure you were fed your placenta as a child, so a two-time defending champion going against a team with an ageing core laughably past their prime had absolutely no shot at winning because a group of bookies determined it to be so? Are you not running mad like this?

The Spurs were a obvious sidenote which you phoolishly latched on to to begin another jejune argument! That is obfuscation tactics.

Last I checked Shaq's name is not Jordan. Stop trying to run away and come and explain how the greatest big of all time was sodomized by every quality big he faced, and why he was swept 5 times in 6 years including to the guy he is being compared with. Anuofia

When bookies make a team the favourite it means they're better than the team theyre facing, that's how odds work mo.ron. why is it so inconceivable that the favourite team in a team sport won?

Stop putting words into my mouth. I don't recall ever calling shaq the greatest big but the most dominant and if I did I was carried away by your blasphemy. He is however much better than Hakeem. That's just a fact. When you explain to me why Jordan could only win ONE game in three years and got swept twice in the first round, then I'll do the same for you about shaq. Confused shameless liar.

A40:
Burnley made Europa League, Brighton barely escaped relegation. What kind of spectacularly daft inference are you even trying to make? Is that what they are teaching you in that jelosinmi community college you are attending. Jesus Wept

I'm just saying just because one shitty team is better than another shitty team it doesn't automatically make them good.

If Burnley > Brighton (both s.hit)

New Cavs > Old Cavs (both s.hit)

If you can't understand this I don't know what else to do. I keep trying to educate you little small fries on this thread but it seems my time here has been futile. Never before have I ever seen a group of hopeless nonentities like the lot who fill this thread.

NictisZorander:
You keep saying dumb things and then keep backtracking when you get exposed. You brought them up has his best, possibly only option to beat the warriors. Now you're trying to deny that or claim you were be facetious. Yeah right!

Who is backtracking? Is this phool dyslexic? I know quite a few 21 year olds and non are this stewpid!

Like it matters where I suggest LeNomad plays!

A40:
Who is backtracking? Is this phool dyslexic? I know quite a few 21 year olds and non are this stewpid!

Like it matters where I suggest LeNomad plays!

LOL. You're like a mule wearing high heels the way you're awkwardly sliding all over the place

NictisZorander:
I'm just saying just because one shitty team is better than another shitty team it doesn't automatically make them good.

If Burnley > Brighton (both s.hit)

New Cavs > Old Cavs (both s.hit)

If you can't understand this I don't know what else to do. I keep trying to educate you little small fries on this thread but it seems my time here has been futile. Never before have I ever seen a group of hopeless nonentities like the lot who fill this thread.

Lmaooo! This jelosinmi product does not know when to stop disgracing himself.

Burnley finished 7th in a 20 team league, Brighton 15th

Old Cavs - 3rd in the East as at when the trade was made.

The Old Cavs didn't complete the season so it is moot and pointless comparing them to the new Cavs! since I've been waiting for you to show how the additions improved the Cavs but you can't defend zilch

E say 'trying to educate' Lmaooo werey alaso. The naked man is trying to give someone clothes

A40:
Lmaooo! This jelosinmi product does not know when to stop disgracing himself.

Burnley finished 7th in a 20 team league, Brighton 15th

Old Cavs - 3rd in the East as at when the trade was made.

The Old Cavs didn't complete the season so it is moot and pointless comparing them to the new Cavs! since I've been waiting for you to show how the additions improved the Cavs but you can't defend zilch

E say 'trying to educate' Lmaooo werey alaso. The naked man is trying to give someone clothes

But you literally just said the old Cavs were better even though their win record given the sample size says otherwise.

Shameless confused hypocrite.