₦airaland Forum

buharitill2023:
that is how you always deceived those idiotic pigs that thief atiku must win the election, but today is buhari till 2023.

the likes of you were all over nairaland saying that wike will lost the governorship election, at the end he won the poll. Besides the presidential election petition legal issues is in the tribunal, let's be patient for the court to decide on the outcome of the election.

garfield1:
arguing with you is a waste of time.but ask yourself what does section 140 2 says?

stop been childish here, you were jumping from one thread to another defending Apc and their AAC concerning the rivers state governorship election, in the end, Apc/AAC lost woefully. Besides Niger delta region is been populated by pdp. Your rant is beyond control. Check your self.

Johnnyessence:
stop been childish here, you were jumping from one thread to another defending Apc and their AAC concerning the rivers state governorship election, in the end, Apc/AAC lost woefully. Besides Niger delta region is been populated by pdp. Your rant is beyond control. Check your self.

My boy,we are talking of osun and you are jumping to rivers? I ask again,what does section 140 says

Johnnyessence:
the likes of you were all over nairaland saying that wike will lost the governorship election, at the end he won the poll. Besides the presidential election petition legal issues is in the tribunal, let's be patient for the court to decide on the outcome of the election.

What concerns this issue with osun? In ekiti,did eleka win?

garfield1:
What concerns this issue with osun? In ekiti,did eleka win?

Ademola Adeleke won the election in osun state ,Infact it was keenly contested election , upon harassment and intimidation by the police, still he won the election. On eleka case, it's in Supreme Court. Likewise Ademola Adeleke case is in supreme court too. Let's allow justice to take its course.

garfield1:
My boy,we are talking of osun and you are jumping to rivers? I ask again,what does section 140 says

read section 140 subsection 3 part or 4, you will see what I'm talking about.

garfield1:
Guy,you clearly have comprehension issues and i cant help you.seems am wasting my time on you.this will be my last comment here.
That pdp called thousands of witnesses or brought several evidences means nothing if they cant be compelling or damning.whether apc bring witnesses or evidences doesnt matter.it is now left for pdp the accuser to prove its case and they didnt beyond doubt.only the testimonies of 5 pdp witnesses were taken and they were even originally termed speculstivs and hearsays.adeleke only concentrsted on proving over voting which he failed to prove.
Section 140 says tribunals cannot declare a winner or subtract votes.yusuf alli during the hesring at the appeal coúrt ssid a full supreme court panel has affirmed this section before.the judge asked if the tribunal were aware.this was the turning point.engineer boat was the op who opened that thread.him and the rest of you were mocking me but now all of you are tearful.
Non appearancr or absence of a judge at the sitting is enough to nullify the case.this particular op opened this thread to show us how the supreme court have been ruling when a judge is absence yet you said its rubbish.
the judges did not rule only on non absence but on the 17 units,rerun and other matters.stop wasting my time.commonsense should tell you that for 4 judges out of 5 to rule agsinst Adeleke means that he lost well

. You know where his problem lies.....Kudos to you...Good analysis

garfield1:
arguing with you is a waste of time.but ask yourself what does section 140 2 says?

. It is a complete waste of time arguing with an intolerant person.You can know everything .People s opinion must be respected....I agree with you my brother.

Johnnyessence:
read section 140 subsection 3 part or 4, you will see what I'm talking about.

Regretabky. many can read. but they do not know the meaning of what they are reading even when it is glaring.

The indigent and capricious judgement sold by justice Zainab Bukhachuwa to Tinubu and APC can not stand a test of time.How can you cancelled in entirety the proceedings of tribunal?Somebody should tell Tinubu and APC that supreme court is not a music studio,so there is no collaboration whatsoever when we pursue our case at the apex court. How and where on earth will you base your judgement on the absence of a judge?The appellate court did not base her judgement on a reasonable evidence,but on absence of a judge.Does absence of a judge out of three for just a hearing,proved the election was not rigged and manipulated by the APC in conjunction with INEC?This is conspicuous corrupt judgement that millions of dollars have gone down the drain for.

I have maintained that our judiciary has no standard and its call for total reformation,going by the different recipe for cooking a particular food for their litigants. That is why a person who lost at the high courts win at the supreme court using same evident.Something is seriously not normal with our judiciary and the trend if unchecked, would eventually plunge our judicial system into perpetual quagmire and malady.

A bitter truth is that almost all judges are extremely,fantastically and rapaciously corrupt.The judges are not doing everything with the fear of God,not knowing that this present government will use and later penalise them by setting them up and mess them up.This really call for an urgent attention and the appropriate authority should as a matter of alacrity do something to Savage the situation, so our judicial system will not go astray.

People of Osun state truly, unrelentingly, indefatigably casted their votes for Ademola Adeleke as the man to govern the state. But,its just quite worrisome and disheartening that our so called academicians allow politicians to use them as a blanket to cover their irregularities and use them to rig an election. APC and Tinubu want to impose oyetola on Osun people by all means. As God liveth,Oyetola and APC shall be disgraced out of Osun state very soon.
#InAdemolaAdeleke'smandateIshallstandalways.

ejimatic:
. It is a complete waste of time arguing with an intolerant person.You can know everything .People s opinion must be respected....I agree with you my brother.

lol your epistles here is trash. Supreme Court will rule based on the tribunal judgment. Save this post .

But the fact that justice obiora didnt attend sitting that day cant be confirmed. That's the basis of the minority judgement of the appeal court. Justice Mbaba called it hearsay evidence because it was based on a paper he didnt sign. He said since he wasnt called to testify,or a sworn affidavit from him confirming his absence then it cant be proven as fact. That it could be as a result of mischief of the people transmitting the written record of appeal. The OP was writing his as if justice obiora absence wasnt contentious. I wonder the logic these rats use at times

ucheicon:
But the fact that justice obiora didnt attend sitting that day cant be confirmed. That's the basis of the minority judgement of the appeal court. Justice Mbaba called it hearsay evidence because it was based on a paper he didnt sign. He said since he wasnt called to testify,or a sworn affidavit from him confirming his absence then it cant be proven as fact. That it could be as a result of mischief of the people transmitting the written record of appeal. The OP was writing his as if justice obiora absence wasnt contentious. I wonder the logic these rats use at times

Do you remember that 12 of the 13 Grounds of Appeal were resolved in favour of the APC?

ucheicon:
But the fact that justice obiora didnt attend sitting that day cant be confirmed. That's the basis of the minority judgement of the appeal court. Justice Mbaba called it hearsay evidence because it was based on a paper he didnt sign. He said since he wasnt called to testify,or a sworn affidavit from him confirming his absence then it cant be proven as fact. That it could be as a result of mischief of the people transmitting the written record of appeal. The OP was writing his as if justice obiora absence wasnt contentious. I wonder the logic these rats use at tim es

. 10/of the 12 issues raised were determined in favour if APC.Besides Olanipekun knee Obiora was absent when APC was presenting its witnesses.He mentioned this after the judgement and wondered why Obiora assessed witnesses he did not see..PDP lawyers did not deny this in their oral submission.

ejimatic:
. 10/of the 12 issues raised were determined in favour if APC.Besides Olanipekun knee Obiora was absent when APC was presenting its witnesses.He mentioned this after the judgement and wondered why Obiora assessed witnesses he did not see..PDP lawyers did not deny this in their oral submission.

The evil judgement was built on the unconfirmed absence of Justice Obiora. They allowed Oyetolas appeal on a technicality and didnt delve into the facts of the case. None of the facts of the case was contested. The majority judgement said they would have returned the case to the tribunal if not for constitutional limitations. So the those grounds of appeal were allowed based on a technicality. Stop twisting the case to make it look as if justice was served. It wasn't

On your claim that Olanipekun knew that he was absent is hearsay evidence. That claim was contested by the defense. For the appeal court to go ahead and rule for the appellants on challenged facts is evil.

List of Supreme Court Judges In Wike/Dakuku Case And Justice Mary Odili.

1) Justice Muhammad Mahmud (CJN)
2) Ibrahim Tanko Muhammad,
3) Nwali Sylvester Ngwuta,
4) Kumai Byang Akaahs,
5) Kudirat Motonmori Olatokumbo kekere-kun,
6) John Inyang Okoro
7) Amiru Sanusi.

Justice Mary Odili excused herself from the case considering that she is from Rivers State and her husband is a PDP member.
This post is only putting to rest the misinformation that Justice Odili was among of the judges in the Wike/Dakuku’s case.

For those making excuse for Justice Zainab Bulkachuwa whose husband, 2 brothers and son are members of the ruling party and have cases in her court and her constituting all the election Appeal court tribunals is not only a conflict of interest but the infliction Of biggest injury on our judiciary and democratic values.

Justice Bulkachuwa must excuse herself from all election related cases and disbanding all the tribunals she constituted as their independence, objectives and fairness to all parties is grossly impaired.