jihday:
and how do you know this? Mistake can happen anywhere

andrew444:


South Africans and HIV

theblackjack76:
I didn't watch the match, but if the stats are anything to go by, then it seems we ought to have been spanked silly. 28% possession and 1 shot off-target throughout the entire encounter. Sounds to me that we were very fortunate. I know stats don't win games, but did we play well? Or maybe the stats are not telling the whole story?

andrew444:


South Africans and HIV

CaptainStephen:
watch the match ogbeni

Starboytwo:
I hope no south Africans dey this thread sha, I can tolerate our junior sisters Dem, but southi mba...

jihday:
hmmmmm, e dey make una vex now. if we had managed to hold Argentina in Russia it would have been because of var o

Jarus:


Exactly. Nigerians have forgotten we have also been a beneificiary of a VAR penalty call.

chucs:
She has been amazingly below average to say the least.

klexycole:
And the calculations continue...

The Chief Mathematician - Sir Icon4s - I hail you sir.

comodo:
Oparanozie is no longer on d same wavelength with Oshoala & Ordega. If we scale to d next round, I expect Kanu to come in her stead to partner Oshoala & Ordega. Just my thinking tho. If we must use the defence & counter style.

Jarus:


Exactly. Nigerians have forgotten we have also been a beneificiary of a VAR penalty call.

Icon4s:


Yes Sir!

Reporting for duty. The calculation will resume today.

If we don't qualify from the field of play we will qualify from the calculators. Qualify na qualify.

Naso baba. I bend down for you.

Jarus:


Exactly. Nigerians have forgotten we have also been a beneificiary of a VAR penalty call.

mostob:
let us for argument sake agree that the goalkeeper was off her line, but she
didn't not make the save, she didn't touch the ball. You played the ball out
yourself, so why should you be given another chance to replay the penalty. It's
just like a player in an offside position if he doesn't touch the ball or interfere
with play then game on, no offside.




chai..people dey para o

jihday:
This year's world cup is high on quality. brilliant goals, wonderful keepers and the fans have really come out to watch games

wayodude:


VAR remains controversial. In that Argentina game, Rojo's handball which would have been a penalty went to VAR and wasn't given. If we had that penalty at that time in the game we would have knocked out Argentina. The argument was that the ball bounced off Rojo's body and onto his hand..

Fast forward to champions League final and within a minute of kickoff the ball bounced off a spurs player and onto his hand ...VAR says penalty and Liverpool score.

So there we had similar circumstances go to VAR with different results

iSlayer:




This is the only reasonable angle you've brought into the discussion. The others are still smarting and are not thinking straight. I commend you for this. You might not believe it but this recommendation of yours might be considered in tweaking the new rule. I commend you once again.


"If the Goalkeeper appears to have left the line but does not interfere with play during the penalty take then the goal stands and a Review in not necessary".

- Mostob Recommendations 103 on New FIFA Statutes.


"If the Goalkeeper appears to have left the line and does interfere with play during the penalty take then a Review may be carried out and the Penalty Kick is retaken".

- Mostob Recommendations 104 on New FIFA Statutes.

iSlayer:




This is the only reasonable angle you've brought into the discussion. The others are still smarting and are not thinking straight. I commend you for this. You might not believe it but this recommendation of yours might be considered in tweaking the new rule. I commend you once again.


"If the Goalkeeper appears to have left the line but does not interfere with play during the penalty take then the goal stands and a Review in not necessary".

- Mostob Recommendations 103 on New FIFA Statutes.


"If the Goalkeeper appears to have left the line and does interfere with play during the penalty take then a Review may be carried out and the Penalty Kick is retaken".

- Mostob Recommendations 104 on New FIFA Statutes.

theblackjack76:
I didn't watch the match, but if the stats are anything to go by, then it seems we ought to have been spanked silly. 28% possession and 1 shot off-target throughout the entire encounter. Sounds to me that we were very fortunate. I know stats don't win games, but did we play well? Or maybe the stats are not telling the whole story?

Icon4s:
This new FIFA penalty and Goalkeeper's line rule, if dem introduce am to the NPFL na ambulance go dey carry referees comot for stadium.

safarigirl:


It is only on this thread nobody said that. That argument has been stated on thw internet sincw yesterday

rabzy:


The penalty taker reacts to moves by the keeper when taking a penalty. When you leave the line, you are able to cover more angle, the penalty taker reacts by kicking the further wider to compensate and then it goes out. That definitely is interference.

iSlayer:



This is too elaborate for a spot kick.

Again, the penalty taker doesn't react to movements by the keeper. The penalty taker picks his spot and smashes it in that direction. if the kick is off target that is up to the taker not the Goalkeeper so I don't agree with your position.
You are both right.
Everything thing depends on the penalty taker.
Some pick their spots others allow the keeper to move before kicking the ball

Icon4s:
This new FIFA penalty and Goalkeeper's line rule, if dem introduce am to the NPFL na ambulance go dey carry referees comot for stadium.