Eruditor:


Mane stepped in when a player who was in possession was going to kick the ball. The player's legs made contact with Mane and ref gave a penalty. He did not protect the defender here.

In TAA's case, your argument is that TAA had nowhere to keep his hands. So ref protected him because of that. To me, is a double standard.

If the ref would not have given a penalty would the goal have stood? Or will it be cancelled because someone's hand touched it?

How? How was Aurier in possession there? That was a 50/50 ball and all talk of protection flies out the window. Mané did not impede Aurier at all

Yes. TAA had no where to put his hands. Sterling literally aimed at his hands. That pass was from 2.5 yards out.

The ref may decide to cancel or not cancel the goal. We see refs ignore fouls on attacking players preceding a goal when a goal is eventually scored all the time.

raumdeuter:


Rules should be used fairly for everyone not Ref CAN do with one team and not another.

I wanted a fair contest not one decided by FA and refs

You wanted
FIFA

BlueRayDick:


Instead of just accepting the ref waved it aside for reasons best known to him, they are claiming what I don't know sef.

Nothing hurts you if you hate Pep.

They can still say "Ref was wrong but I am happy apari lost" or something like that.

Not all these deliberate. Not deliberate. Lol

raumdeuter:


Trent handled the ball twice

The first instance, didn't the ball Silva's hand first? Or is the rule targeted at defenders only?

A40:
How? How was Aurier in possession there? That was a 50/50 ball and all talk of protection flies out the window. Mané did not impede Aurier at all

Yes. TAA had no where to put his hands. Sterling literally aimed at his hands. That pass was from 2.5 yards out.

The ref may decide to cancel or not cancel the goal. We see refs ignore fouls on attacking players preceding a goal when a goal is eventually scored all the time.

Aurier was in possession. He controlled the ball. If he decided to dive instead of kicking the ball it would have been his foul. Refs choose when to use a rule and today the ref was wrong.

TAAs hands blocked the ball from going somewhere one of which could have been inside his own net. If the ref gave the penalty. He won't be wrong. That is why it is a double standard. Because he can pick and choose when to allow a rule.

A40:
How? How was Aurier in possession there? That was a 50/50 ball and all talk of protection flies out the window. Mané did not impede Aurier at all

Yes. TAA had no where to put his hands. Sterling literally aimed at his hands. That pass was from 2.5 yards out.

The ref may decide to cancel or not cancel the goal. We see refs ignore fouls on attacking players preceding a goal when a goal is eventually scored all the time.

Y'all forgot how Mane aimed for Sisoko hand in ucl final last season

patrickmuf:
The first instance, didn't the ball Silva's hand first? Or is the rule targeted at defenders only?

Then blow a foul

Nawa o. The way people keep a straight face to lie this days is tiring..


All I have to say is if na against us ref wave that kind ball I no go like am oo

Eruditor:


Lol

I wish you could see who you are talking to.

You guys are diggers. Read up some of the posts made last season and how it ended.

City will win the league again and I will have to suffer through the 1B squad arguments.

Alaye jor jor.

go and sit down jare. I don’t have time for your tears

raumdeuter:


Then blow a foul

Is this you saying you were initially wrong to say City deserved 2 PKs?

popizaino:



Yes he stretched his hand but never in a deliberate attempt to block off the ball. Mane put the ball on his hand and a penalty of given. Arnold too never had his hands at his back so a penalty should have been given.

Did Boateng intend on touching the ball vs Italy? Let's be real. Sissoko was literally directing traffic in box 18.

Mané was not even looking at Sissoko. Sissoko literally barged into the box directing traffic like Yellow Fever. I'm literally watching the replay as we speak. His scenario and that of TAA was completely different

Obere4u:


Y'all forgot how Mane aimed for Sisoko hand in ucl final last season

He was not even looking at Sissoko, Sissoko literally barged into the box and his arms were horizontal and away from his body. Haba you guys stop comparing Kick n Start to Jack Daniels

A40:
Did Boateng intend on touching the ball vs Italy? Let's be real. Sissoko was literally directing traffic in box 18.

Mané was not even looking at Sissoko. Sissoko literally barged into the box directing traffic like Yellow Fever. I'm literally watching the replay as we speak. His scenario and that of TAA was completely different

Hold up they the box18

Why wasn't this checked inch by inch like VAR did in Tottenham vs Leicester match?

Why dem no use the taperule dem use Dat day na?

Leyqute:


Alaye jor jor.

go and sit down jare. I don’t have time for your tears

Lol.

Fail.

BlueRayDick:
Why wasn't this checked inch by inch like VAR did in Tottenham vs Leicester match?

Why dem no use the taperule dem use Dat day na?

Cc raumdeuter.

This was the view I saw and from this, he looks off. They did not review it.

Eruditor:


Aurier was in possession. He controlled the ball. If he decided to dive instead of kicking the ball it would have been his foul. Refs choose when to use a rule and today the ref was wrong.

TAAs hands blocked the ball from going somewhere one of which could have been inside his own net. If the ref gave the penalty. He won't be wrong. That is why it is a double standard. Because he can pick and choose when to allow a rule.

How are you in possession and you have to kick Mané before kicking the ball. I'm still not understanding this your logic. Him diving without contact would have made him look even more stupid. The ref rightly adjudged Aurier to have lost possession. That ball belonged to nobody at that point

No the 'double standards' is to avoid players working the system. Like Sterling was trying to do. Trent's hands did not leave his body, they were at his side. That discretion is so that players don't exploit loopholes in blanket rules

raumdeuter:


They told every defender to hide their hand as any contact with the ball is a foul. Unless its liverpool

Why did Klopp beat Pep, like it's champions league SF

BlueRayDick:
Why wasn't this checked inch by inch like VAR did in Tottenham vs Leicester match?

Why dem no use the taperule dem use Dat day na?

I am sure they will say it was not deliberate offside it was accidental

BlueRayDick:
Why wasn't this checked inch by inch like VAR did in Tottenham vs Leicester match?

Why dem no use the taperule dem use Dat day na?

I saw the VAR analysis of this during post match analysis, Salah was clearly not offside

How are these two scenes the same? Some analysts on NL sef.

Only one hand raised by Sissoko, TAA both hands by the side. Clear difference.

Thecassanova:
How is this two scene the same? Some analysts on NL sef.

Only one hand raised by Sissoko, TAA both hands by the side. Clear difference.

aparisports pundits dem

raumdeuter:


They told every defender to hide their hand as any contact with the ball is a foul. Unless its liverpool

This is wrong. When the ball hits your hand in a natural position, it's not a foul.

I noh believe say Arnold hand dey natural position sha

Eruditor:


Cc raumdeuter.

This was the view I saw and from this, he looks off. They did not review it.

I saw the review afterwards with the line drawn. Salah was clearly ON.

A40:
How are you in possession and you have to kick Mané before kicking the ball. I'm still not understanding this your logic. Him diving without contact would have made him look even more stupid. The ref rightly adjudged Aurier to have lost possession. That ball belonged to nobody at that point

No the 'double standards' is to avoid players working the system. Like Sterling was trying to do. Trent's hands did not leave his body, they were at his side. That discretion is so that players don't exploit loopholes in blanket rules

Aurier did not lose possession. He only made contact with Mane whilst kicking the ball. The videos are online. Nobody can argue that.

There is nothing about working the system. I asked a question: if the ball deflected off TAAs hands and got into the Liverpool post would the ref have cancelled the goal?

Thecassanova:
How is this two scene the same? Some analysts on NL sef.

Only one hand raised by Sissoko, TAA both hands by the side. Clear difference.

Oga once u make Ur Body bigger with Ur arms it's handball irrespective of where Ur hands are; whether in the air or on the floor.

Trent's hands obviously made his frame bigger than it actually is. Same as Sissoko's. They are both clear handball going by what FIFA tagged handball

BikeMan:
I saw the review afterwards with the line drawn. Salah was clearly ON.

They used that same view and drew the line from Stones. That was no VAR. That was the EPL showing a replay. I am not arguing for or against the goal but it was not VAR reviewed. If it was, they should have used alternate views to verify.

BikeMan:
This is wrong. When the ball hits your hand in a natural position, it's not a foul.

I noh believe say Arnold hand dey natural position sha

Can you pull your penalty vs Ajax that got Veltman sent off? to see if his hand was not in a natural position

raumdeuter:


Most defenders jump and turn so the ball doesnt hit them in the face. His hand was right beside him or where should his hand be if not his side?

Trent hand was beside him, Kimpembe hand was beside him. One was a penalty one wasnt

Trent had no shot at getting his hands from the way because Sterling aimed at it.

In Kimpembe's case his hands were clearly away from his body and in anticipation of a long range shot. No defender jumps like that while trying to block a shot. His hands were in an unnatural position. Trent's wasn't

BlueRayDick:


Oga once u make Ur Body bigger with Ur arms it's handball irrespective of where Ur hands are; whether in the air or on the floor.

Trent's hands obviously made his frame bigger than it actually is. Same as Sissoko's. They are both clear handball going by what FIFA tagged handball

I mean it is not that hard.

Ask them if the ball had deflected into the post whether or not the ref would have allowed the goal to stand.

A40:
He was not even looking at Sissoko, Sissoko literally barged into the box and his arms were horizontal and away from his body. Haba you guys stop comparing Kick n Start to Jack Daniels

Mane wasn't looking at Sisoko?

Na wa to u bros.

Thecassanova:
How are these two scenes the same? Some analysts on NL sef.

Only one hand raised by Sissoko, TAA both hands by the side. Clear difference.

TAA shoulder is leaning forward. Lol.

He is trying to preempt the pain of the ball hitting his stomach or chest area. That was a handball that impeded with the play. Ref made a mistake. Liverpool have already won but you people should be objective.