For Intelligent Design Proponents Why Were Inert & Radioactive Elements Created? - Christianity Etc (4) - Nairaland
Nairaland Forum › Nairaland General › Christianity Etc › For Intelligent Design Proponents Why Were Inert & Radioactive Elements Created? (4949 Views)
| Re: For Intelligent Design Proponents Why Were Inert & Radioactive Elements Created? by IamMichael(m): 9:54am On May 26, 2020 |
gensteejay:Of course you are a religionist. Only religious people believe in the afterlife, something you have already said you believe. @bolded, common sense is the art of using your brain (for simplicity purpose.) Apparently, you have left Christianity, but somehow you are still here trying to find meaning where there is none. Why not use own common sense, and follow the advice you are giving me yourself. |
| Re: For Intelligent Design Proponents Why Were Inert & Radioactive Elements Created? by Nobody: 10:03am On May 26, 2020 |
IamMichael:What's my religion? Say it with a proof and expose your ignorance. To even think that I have anything to do with Christianity shows that you've no idea about what what you're saying. When a person has no purpose in life and sees no point in existence, it's such shallow people that engage in mass shootings and commit other atrocities like some terrorists do. Leading a life of no purpose is no life; that makes you even worse than slaves that worship early beings (gods and goddesses) of religions. |
| Re: For Intelligent Design Proponents Why Were Inert & Radioactive Elements Created? by IamMichael(m): 10:05am On May 26, 2020 |
shadeyinka:It's not rocket science. Once the right conditions for a thing sets, that thing start's existing. Does it rain in space? No, because there is no conditions that can facilitate raining in space. Does a woman get pregnant on her own? No, because nature gave the other components to another. How does weed grow in a farm despite everything to keep it away? Because the right conditions for it to grow exists there. How does weed grow on a wall? Because the right conditions has existed for it to grow there. How does fuel form? Because the right conditions exist for it to form. Why does it rain on earth? Because the right conditions exists for it to rain on earth. Why does it rain diamonds on Jupiter? Because the right conditions exists for it to do so. None of this things happened overnight, they took years to happen. When you plant a seed, it takes the right conditions for them to germinate. If those conditions are not met, nothing will happen! You guys just cannot accept the simple truth, always asserting things you cannot prove. |
| Re: For Intelligent Design Proponents Why Were Inert & Radioactive Elements Created? by Nobody: 10:06am On May 26, 2020*. Modified: 1:26pm On May 26, 2020 |
IamMichael:I have no time to waste on a purposeless person. Good luck with your nihilistic ideals i.e. leading a useless, purposeless life. Some things even sound so unreasonable a right-thinking person should look at them with disdain. |
| Re: For Intelligent Design Proponents Why Were Inert & Radioactive Elements Created? by IamMichael(m): 10:13am On May 26, 2020 |
gensteejay:You lack the capacity to argue reasonably obviously. The truth is bitter, you can't counter it so you resort to debasing yourself... like every other religionist. That you decided to find something worthwhile doing while still riding your flesh does not change the ultimate fact that life is meaningless. Everyone is simply living to die. It's not my business if you decide to live life joyriding on fantasies and make beliefs. But, it is my business to tell you the truth. |
| Re: For Intelligent Design Proponents Why Were Inert & Radioactive Elements Created? by shadeyinka(m): 10:14am On May 26, 2020 |
IamMichael:Unfortunately, you have to jump far into the future after all the fundermental particles have been formed and after all the elements have been created and the physical laws have been established to begin to argue how cement and steel assembled themselves into a functional skyscraper. In the beginning according to science, there was NOTHING! Somehow, "the nothing " suddenly snowballed into generating fundermental particles like electron, neutron, protons and several subparticles. These suddenly started self "assemblying" according to some certain rules to form Hydrogen, Helium, Lithium , Beryllium etc and at a point the sizes where getting too high for the elements to remain stable. So, the issue is not how the elements reacted together to form compounds BUT how from NOTHING, fundermental particles came out! What right conditions will make nothing to become something? |
| Re: For Intelligent Design Proponents Why Were Inert & Radioactive Elements Created? by IamMichael(m): 10:19am On May 26, 2020 |
gensteejay:You are a religionist! No straw grabbing for you, and no escape. You already talked about your belief in the afterlife. By the way, you need to start understanding simple grammar. I'm talking about life, I'm not talking about humans... Humans are not the only being with life on earth! Stop being shallow minded, that's why you never see the whole picture! |
| Re: For Intelligent Design Proponents Why Were Inert & Radioactive Elements Created? by IamMichael(m): 10:26am On May 26, 2020 |
gensteejay: Says the person who believes in the afterlife... and who also says he is not a religionist. You should really give yourself that advice. Your bubble has been bursted today, now you are running like a scared dog with tails behind its hinds!!! Try and be reasonable...Stop using your brain to assimilate junks which is obviously destroying your life. Heed the advice on the signature of your moniker!!! |
| Re: For Intelligent Design Proponents Why Were Inert & Radioactive Elements Created? by IamMichael(m): 10:30am On May 26, 2020 |
@LordReed, sorry i invaded your thread. |
| Re: For Intelligent Design Proponents Why Were Inert & Radioactive Elements Created? by IamMichael(m): 10:44am On May 26, 2020 |
shadeyinka:It's "Fundamental" not fundermental. As to your question, you always have this habit of stating as fact, what science didn't say. Science never said in the beginning, there was nothing. We have had this argument before. This is what science said below: The next thing now, you jump to Singularity and start claiming that Singularity is the Unknown Cause...then you say the Unknown Cause is God! If i ask you now where then did this God come from, you tell me he created himself. When i ask you that that means that he came out of nothing, you start running around. |
| Re: For Intelligent Design Proponents Why Were Inert & Radioactive Elements Created? by shadeyinka(m): 11:09am On May 26, 2020 |
IamMichael:I believe you've not read this about the supposed Quantum Fluctuations preceding the singleton. Hear one of your apostles https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vwzbU0bGOdc See how you jump to big bang which occured a mere 13.8 billion years ago!? 1. In the beginning, (let's start from 200billion years ago) before the big bang the singleton was a constant THEN there wouldn't be any Inflation or big-bang. 2. In the beginning, (let's start from 200billion years ago) before the big bang the singleton was a unstable THEN Inflation or big-bang should have occured much earlier! How was the universe trillions of years before the big bang? |
| Re: For Intelligent Design Proponents Why Were Inert & Radioactive Elements Created? by LordReed(op): 11:11am On May 26, 2020 |
CHARLOE:You are just a dunce. If I assumed monopoly of knowledge would I ask a question? You are just a ridiculous dunce. |
| Re: For Intelligent Design Proponents Why Were Inert & Radioactive Elements Created? by LordReed(op): 11:12am On May 26, 2020 |
shadeyinka:This is the most honest answer. |
| Re: For Intelligent Design Proponents Why Were Inert & Radioactive Elements Created? by LordReed(op): 11:12am On May 26, 2020 |
IamMichael:No p. |
| Re: For Intelligent Design Proponents Why Were Inert & Radioactive Elements Created? by Nobody: 11:14am On May 26, 2020*. Modified: 12:13pm On May 26, 2020 |
No time to engage a fool that feels gensteejay has anything to do with Christianity. It shows you've zero idea about me in the first place. You can type any trash you want; you're merely demonstrating your ignorance. Good luck with your living without a purpose (nihilism). The day is still young, and now is work time. Not wasting time debating tripe on Nairaland in the morning. Hope you get paid for winning arguments on Nairaland; well, life has no purpose to you any way, so you can afford to whirl away time on Nairaland. Some of us can't. So, no point in engaging you in meaningless back-and-forth in the morning to win an argument that adds nothing to my account. |
| Re: For Intelligent Design Proponents Why Were Inert & Radioactive Elements Created? by IamMichael(m): 11:53am On May 26, 2020 |
shadeyinka:I already shown you how this discuss will go with you, no matter the disguise you twist your posts. It is baseless, a fundamentally pointless argument with no basis whatsoever. Your argument will always beg the Question, "Who created the creator?" Something i know you cannot answer or resort to infinite regression is impossible. By the way, the Physcist you are quoting for me made nonsense of religion in the book you are referring to (which necessitated the lecture on YouTube.) Have you even read the book? I doubt. Incase you decide to, it's free on PDFDRIVE.
|
| Re: For Intelligent Design Proponents Why Were Inert & Radioactive Elements Created? by shadeyinka(m): 2:08pm On May 26, 2020 |
LordReed:But the question isn't as honest. The poster seem to understand why God made the stable elements |
| Re: For Intelligent Design Proponents Why Were Inert & Radioactive Elements Created? by shadeyinka(m): 2:12pm On May 26, 2020 |
IamMichael:Note: I didn't invent the notion that the universe spang up from nothing. Some of your apostles did. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_h43G83o5kc 2. I've always said that an infinite regression of Cause and Effect is impossible with respect to creation. Hence the Uncaused First-Cause will always be there to stare you at the face. |
| Re: For Intelligent Design Proponents Why Were Inert & Radioactive Elements Created? by IamMichael(m): 3:10pm On May 26, 2020 |
shadeyinka:Lol... Can you remember the hypothetical question i asked you? Remember i asked you that if you believe that God is the Uncaused First Cause, why do you dismiss the notion that the Universe itself is an Uncaused First Cause of itself? |
| Re: For Intelligent Design Proponents Why Were Inert & Radioactive Elements Created? by LordReed(op): 3:14pm On May 26, 2020 |
shadeyinka:` That's your business, I asked the question because I don't know what you guys think. If you feel that's not honest, I don't give 2 rat bleeps. |
| Re: For Intelligent Design Proponents Why Were Inert & Radioactive Elements Created? by CHARLOE(m): 3:39pm On May 26, 2020 |
LordReed:And you're a compound fool! Idiot, you're not interested in any answer cos ur mind is set, go n look for ignorant religious zombies to play with. Been an atheist does not make u in any way smarter than others. |
| Re: For Intelligent Design Proponents Why Were Inert & Radioactive Elements Created? by LordReed(op): 4:35pm On May 26, 2020 |
CHARLOE:Your inferiority complex is shining through you dummy. Where have I claimed to be smarter because I am atheist? See how much of a bumbling ridiculous nincompoop you make yourself? |
| Re: For Intelligent Design Proponents Why Were Inert & Radioactive Elements Created? by onlyfacts: 5:02pm On May 26, 2020 |
IamMichael:It's not my fault you didn't follow through with where the conversation started from, but rather you came in at a later stage to comment. The previous commentator stressed that the "human body design is flawed", referring to how it is "structurally fabricated" as flawed, saying a human designer could have done a better "job" in designer a better body, which isn't true! So the argument with him is in the "design". Seeing he could not find a flaw in human design he then brought up diseases that may affect the body as a proof of a flaw. I pointed out to him that in a production plant, defective products are not used as gold standard in examining the products rather it is that which is in a good working condition. Now to the fact that a human body can be affected by diseases, it's an anomaly caused by various factors. Humanistic factors includes: Poor or unhealthy diet, lack of exercise, harmful and damaging habits(excessive smoking, drinking, drug abuse etc). This are self destructive behaviours that go against how the body is supposed to be used and maintained. Intrinsic factor: Aging is yet another factor that causes our bodies to wear and tear. Scientist believe our bodies have the ability to live forever, all the information needed for the renewal of the cells are stored in the genes, but as we grow older "somethings" snaps in our genes and causes them to stop playing their roles and we slowly but surely start to age. Aging is abnormal based on the abilities of our genes and this has been the reason behind many scientific studies. God's design of the body is a work of art but he tells us that because of "sin", the human body lost its perfection. Due to that lost perfection of the body aging occurs which causes wear and tear of it. |
| Re: For Intelligent Design Proponents Why Were Inert & Radioactive Elements Created? by onlyfacts: 5:21pm On May 26, 2020 |
IamMichael:Evolution is a theory that cannot be scientifically proven, although it is paraded as science, it is actually pseudoscience. Too many missing links in the evolutionary tree. Falsified missing links inclusive. Fossil remains that doesnt show structural resemblance in sizes are often published as vital missing links in the evolutionary tree, amongst others. Lastly mathematical models does not support evolution. The probability that life came from outer space into the chaotic prehistoric harsh earth environment in the form of microorganisms or vital molecules necessary to form DNA and life are astronomically slim, the odds are seemly impossible. And to believe the odds still favoured the diversification of all life forms into their male and female kinds even if it's trillions of years ago is still mathematically an impossible odd. It is less than one chance out of a billion trillion, the chance that a 200-component organism could be formed by mutation and natural selection is less than one chance out of a trillion, trillion, trillion, trillion, trillion! My head hurt just think about the numbers! |
| Re: For Intelligent Design Proponents Why Were Inert & Radioactive Elements Created? by IamMichael(m): 5:35pm On May 26, 2020 |
onlyfacts:Read this excerpt below: From the above excerpt, it's clear that aging is normal, and that it must catch up with you whether you eat healthy or not. Human body didn't lose perfection because it sinned, because human body was not perfect to begin with. There is only so much detoxification your liver can do before it tires itself. There is only so much the eyes can do before it succumbs to environmental degradation over time. All the parts in your body is designed to follow the rules of wear and tear over time. The human body can only last as much as the type of rest and what you feed it, to continue to burn it's fuel. At a point, it breaks down. If the human body is as perfect as you thought: - then wear and tear should never affect it. - Invasive organisms and diseases shouldnt be able to harm a person. Also - There will be no need to sleep to rest your body. - It should not need food to sustain itself. - If the body of Adam and Eve were so perfectly made, what else did they need organic food for? ( The bible said they were placed in the garden of Eden with varieties of edibles.) This again lends credence to the fact that the body is not perfect, and evolved to seek out what it needs for survival over time. You can imagine the number of wild poisonous foods that has been consumed by the early people before most of the none-dangerous ones were found. Most of this none-dangerous ones have also been scientifically modified over time to provide specific nutrients to our body. So, no, the body wasn't perfectly made!!!
|
| Re: For Intelligent Design Proponents Why Were Inert & Radioactive Elements Created? by chidera39(m): 5:47pm On May 26, 2020 |
gensteejay:How can one get this books ? |
| Re: For Intelligent Design Proponents Why Were Inert & Radioactive Elements Created? by onlyfacts: 5:48pm On May 26, 2020 |
IamMichael:"There is no scientific reason, however, to think that aging cannot be cured (reviewed in de Magalhaes, 2014a). After all, curing aging does not violate any law of physics".https://www.senescence.info/aging_cure.html "All around the world, scientists are trying to beat the most debilitating condition known to humans: aging". https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20181211-how-science-and-medicine-could-cure-ageing "Age reversal technology will be a reality soon. Our bodies will be kept biologically younger for longer, regardless of our chronological age." https://atlasbiomed.com/blog/ageing-can-you-reverse-it/amp/ The above sources show that aging isn't "normal" to many people of science and a reversal is being pursued! But a reversal will be useless if they all agree that the human body is fundamentally flawed or does not have the "capacity to live forever". But they know the body has that capacity and they are willing to push it to its limit! |
| Re: For Intelligent Design Proponents Why Were Inert & Radioactive Elements Created? by IamMichael(m): 5:54pm On May 26, 2020 |
onlyfacts:Evolution is not Pseudoscience. To understand evolution better, take yourself as the example in the scenario. How many of the things you did as a child are you still doing now as an adult? There could have been a point in your life when all that mattered to you was just to suck your mom's brêast or to lick lollipop/sweet or the best Christmas clothes. But, as your cells are fed with substances that it needs, it starts growing. With that growth, it starts to develop more and expand. What you feed your cells, they automatically grow with. With time, most of the things it doesn't need, you become allergic to it. Some of the things your body no longer needs, you automatically cut it off, sometimes without even knowing. Whatever you feed your cells, they will decipher it and eventually decide what is good for you and what is not good for you. That's evolution. Watch some of the bigger traits you have, try and remember how you got them. If it wasn't in your gene already, then it will manifest from the things you mostly associate yourself with. That's evolution! Unlike Pseudoscience, Evolution is observable everyday, and can be proved beyond reasonable doubt. |
| Re: For Intelligent Design Proponents Why Were Inert & Radioactive Elements Created? by onlyfacts: 6:00pm On May 26, 2020 |
IamMichael:Evolution is still pseudoscience. The evolutionary tree is make shift at best. The odds life survived prehistoric earth conditions and diversified into different species male and female is also an impossibility, amongst others. What else is pseudoscience if not evolution? And the illustration you mentioned should be about "maturity" and not evolution. |
| Re: For Intelligent Design Proponents Why Were Inert & Radioactive Elements Created? by CHARLOE(m): 6:14pm On May 26, 2020 |
LordReed:Calling u a goat is an insult to goats! Mannerless indomie generation, u can't be more than a few yrs older than my 1st child but u feel entitled to throw insult at anybody cos u think nl is faceless. No be ur fault. |
| Re: For Intelligent Design Proponents Why Were Inert & Radioactive Elements Created? by IamMichael(m): 6:20pm On May 26, 2020 |
onlyfacts:I think you misunderstand the whole age reversal thing. Human body does not have the capacity to live forever bro. |
| Re: For Intelligent Design Proponents Why Were Inert & Radioactive Elements Created? by shadeyinka(m): 6:24pm On May 26, 2020 |
LordReed:Too bad! |
Intelligent Design: Who Created God? • How Is One An Intelligent Design But Not The Other? - Pic • What Makes The World An Intelligent Design? • 2 • 3 • 4
I Hope We Are Not Making Mistakes About Jesus Christ. Take A Look • Pastor Tries To Import An Electric Shock Machine! • Does This Even Make Sense?