₦airaland Forum

Welcome, Guest: RegisterLoginWith GoogleTrendingRecentNew

Stats: 3,329,923 members, 8,443,002 topics. Date: Saturday, 11 July 2026 at 12:30 AM

Toggle theme

Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . - Foreign Affairs (1366) - Nairaland

Nairaland ForumNairaland GeneralPoliticsForeign AffairsBattle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . (3718790 Views)

1 2 3 ... 1363 1364 1365 1366 1367 1368 1369 ... 2286 Reply (Go Down)

Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by youghs: 2:24pm On Sep 10, 2020
ecomog1990:
Please what is your own source of $134k cost ? Official Army published info said Ezugwu cost $200k. It's made from estimated 80% local materials.

Let me not go into the detailed specs of the proposed ARA III because comment replies will be following comment and I don't want to stay long on the thread.

Briefly, it was a war winner-game changer proposed specs, and Proforce refusal is part of problems with one man business, be didn't want to share power now that he is selling dozens of vehicles, he wants all the profit alone, and his action cost Nigeria the entrance of our first MRAP with full IFV capabilities, he just shunned off the foreign collabo.

That's part of one man business disadvantages, nobody to checkmate him and protect national interest. He keeps selling low tech ARA II to our army while ARA III hi-tech could likely win this war with it's IFV fusion.
You would find the price in this video;
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=asA_yBgKL54

Abeg just drop the specifications.

Toju200 said sometime ago that proforce is developing a 9ton version
Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by Toju200(m): 2:32pm On Sep 10, 2020
ecomog1990:
Wow! You very funny bro grin You are trying to correct what you don't understand, biko o. You are mistakingly confusing ARA II MRAPs own ORDINARY 4 sides 4 pieces nearby objects view daylight cameras that all modern MRAPs have, with a military grade one single piece for all round directions mast mounted rotating 360° view PTZ Twin Camera Station Microbolometer technology powered on Ezugwu MRAP that can see far away objects over a kilometer range

Do you know the meaning of PTZ ? Check Proforce official website again, ARA II specifications does not include any Thermal Imaging PTZ camera night vision device with Triple Stages DRI.

Look again at the Ezugwu photo I chose, I picked a pic showing its PTZ Night Vision Thermal Imager mast showing clearly, do you see such vital equipment on ARA II ?
perhaps you should watch some of their Documentary and Listen to how they discribe the Ara grin
Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by Odunayaw(m): 2:42pm On Sep 10, 2020
Hennynitan:
Ok!!! Thanks for the enlightenment, bro
I will just love the procurement to be more of a competitive advantage and performance basis rather than who is closer to the government.

I don't think there is anything wrong with a one man business. Innoson Motors is a one man business and he is doing well plus many other businesses.

Competition is healthy for the environment
I don't understand what you mean by one-man business.

I don't think these companies run as Sole proprietorship
Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by ecomog1990:
Mugiwaraluffy:
Can you give detailed descriptions with images? Personally I want to learn most of these things you mentioned and where/how to identify them, know the difference between them on MRAP, APC, IVF etc instead of just mere knowing some of the specifications without understanding the meaning and uses.
I'm sure 70% of followers of this thread are quite oblivious to some of these terms.
@komekn please help us with more details next time grin
Coz sometimes, reading on google can confuse you more than make u understand some of these terms
Well my bros, I am @ecomog1990, not at all @komekn !

It's true most people here don't understand these things, but they also argue a lot more than they want to learn, even when they are clearly wrong on facts.

I can't continue here because it will attract endless arguments, and best way to avoid arguments is to not comment much or to not stay long on the thread, just drop in a few posts and disappear for a very very long time.....while I have fun enjoying reading other people's post n comments.
Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by ecomog1990: 3:13pm On Sep 10, 2020
Toju200:
perhaps you should watch some of their Documentary and Listen to how they discribe the Ara grin
Be honest with clear facts bro, there is NO radio, TV, newspaper or internet report that says ARA II has PTZ Thermal Imaging night vision, I have watched virtually all public documentaries, read virtually all reputable published articles on ARA, I also confirmed from official website of Proforce that has final say on their own ARA II product, NONE says it has PTZ TI NV Camera.

A PTZ camera station is not something that can be hidden in a vehicle, it's a big external component on hull for surveillance, if it's there, the whole world will see it.

When you are corrected from error, instead of learning whats right and move on, you rather stick to your error for sake of ego that profits you nothing. As a young man, you are not helping yourself to develop.
Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by Hennynitan(m): 3:20pm On Sep 10, 2020
ecomog1990:
grin Ah, bro, no get me wrong oooo!!! grin

I no talk say one man business is bad o, I only said Nigeria cannot depend on them ALONE for national security equipment, and I also said all of them government & private one man business SHOULD all enter competition for military contracts.

That is a wise way to develop our local Def-Sec industry. Proforce as a monopoly with no rival is not a wise situation for Nigeria's defense.
Okay!!! No monopoly... No favouritism...
Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by Toju200(m): 3:24pm On Sep 10, 2020
ecomog1990:
Be honest with clear facts bro, there is NO radio, TV, newspaper or internet report that says ARA II has PTZ Thermal Imaging night vision, I have watched virtually all public documentaries, read virtually all reputable published articles on ARA, I also confirmed from official website of Proforce that has final say on their own ARA II product, NONE says it has PTZ TI NV Camera.

When you are corrected from error, instead of learning whats right and move on, you rather stick to your error for sake of ego that profits you nothing. As a young man, you are not helping yourself to develop.
i never said they Had PTZ cam.. grin
Is PTZ the only 360° cam..
I don't know the spec but I rewatched Tvc Doc on Ara just now and the Journalist said it clearly that it has a 360° camera though not PTZ..
So try to understandgrin
Maybe you got me wrong
Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by ecomog1990:
youghs:
You would find the price in this video;
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=asA_yBgKL54

Abeg just drop the specifications.

Toju200 said sometime ago that proforce is developing a 9ton version
The video says 42 units at =N= 2 billion, but no dollar price was stated, different people will use different dollar rates as FOREX rate varies widely. The $134 k is your personal conversion at a rate you chose for July 2020 contract of 42 units, but I quoted the NA published $200k for November 12th 2019 contract of 28 units.

Further design changes, buying more units per contract, increasing bulk sourcing of raw materials, all can make cost price reduce year to year. Pricing of the Ezugwu is now clear.

Old ARA I MRAP reportedly did not do well vs IED in N.E. War, causing need for ARA II. NA ordered 30 ARA II but plan 130 Ezugwu. I think night vision and armour resistance to DShk 12.7mm is very important to the NA against insurgents DShk.

++

The ARA III proposal specs, is it worth it splashing that here? One it was rejected by Proforce owner, two the comparison ARA II VS Ezugwu I posted is already dragging into long discuss, and I wish I never posted it, cuz people just act funny here. I am not sure its worth splashing what you know where it is not valued.

I have more fun here by reading other people's comment, maybe I am a like a mosquito feeding on others in this forum grin
Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by ugo4u: 5:37pm On Sep 10, 2020
In my opinion honestly speaking Ezugwu Mrap is no match for Proforce MRAPS or other Armoured vehicles from them. For me the NA have like 3 to 5yrs to catch up with Proforce. At the moment not even Innoson can match them, the CEO of Proforce really did his home work before setting up that plant, he drafted some of the best engineer from all over the world and brought them to Nigeria not only that, he and his team met with the end users of these products where they sat down and talked about the cons of what was on ground which they now use as a template to manufacture theirs. That's why the results from the field have being spectacular that can't really be said for Ezugwu's version which I see as more of experimental though not taking anything away from them but they still have alot of work to do and we shouldn't think of mass producing them in the interim.
Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by ecomog1990: 5:41pm On Sep 10, 2020
Toju200:
i never said they Had PTZ cam.. grin
Is PTZ the only 360° cam..
I don't know the spec but I rewatched Tvc Doc on Ara just now and the Journalist said it clearly that it has a 360° camera though not PTZ..
So try to understandgrin
Maybe you got me wrong
Be sincere and stop this your too late damage control, you said ARA has Night Vision - NV, and you were 'correcting' me grin

Toju200:
Correction...
PF Ara Has 360° camera with NV mode
It has 4 hatches for troops to return fire when necessary that's aside the side ports
Kindly cease lying now, ARA has no night vision that you boldly said it has. You failed to prove it has, I proved it does not, you are too young to copy this habit of telling lies for ego sake that is common here, unless you want to say you dont know the meaning of night vision when you mentioned it and you thought all cameras are also night vision thermal imagers grin grin grin grin
Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by Toju200(m): 6:01pm On Sep 10, 2020
ecomog1990:
Be sincere and stop this your too late damage control, you said ARA has Night Vision - NV, and you were 'correcting' me grin



Kindly cease lying now, ARA has no night vision that you boldly said it has. You failed to prove it has, I proved it does not, you are too young to copy this habit of telling lies for ego sake that is common here, unless you want to say you dont know the meaning of night vision when you mentioned it and you thought all cameras are also night vision thermal imagers grin grin grin grin
yep I said With NV but I didn't State the ARA has PTZ which you said I did state with I didn't sooo... how am I lieing
Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by ecomog1990: 6:04pm On Sep 10, 2020
ugo4u:
In my opinion honestly speaking Ezugwu Mrap is no match for Proforce MRAPS or other Armoured vehicles from them. For me the NA have like 3 to 5yrs to catch up with Proforce. At the moment not even Innoson can match them, the CEO of Proforce really did his home work before setting up that plant, he drafted some of the best engineer from all over the world and brought them to Nigeria not only that, he and his team met with the end users of these products where they sat down and talked about the cons of what was on ground which they now use as a template to manufacture theirs. That's why the results from the field have being spectacular that can't really be said for Ezugwu's version which I see as more of experimental though not taking anything away from them but they still have alot of work to do and we shouldn't think of mass producing them in the interim.
Let me try if I can make a last comment and return to enjoying this forum quietly.

ARA I failed NA on battlefield with poor mine resistance, thats field report. Proforce had to improve to ARA II, same way DICON starts first with Ezugwu and their next one will be better. Nobody gets on top of the market with first product they make.

See my dear brother, when Boko Haram or ISIL WA start firing DShk HMG, all soldiers inside ARA II MRAP will die while all soldiers in Ezugwu survive 100% safe. After a 12 kg TNT of two arty howitz 155mm shell made IED destroys ARA II, the Ezugwu will survive that blast. DICON did field explosive TNT trials of 12kg with army ordnance then obtained quality assurance test certification for landmine explosive tests both in N.E. and in Birnin Gwari with which Ezugwu passed QAT, confirmed info.

ARA II looks finer- better than Ezugwu in auto-body beauty aspects, and has better American Cummins engine + Allison transmission while Ezugwu uses Chinese WS engine, BUT BUT & BUT when real live combat starts and heavy machine gun fire starts from Jihadi insurgents Gun Trucks in Borno battle theatre, ARA II is dead on arrival with all our soldiers dead inside, while Ezugwu will save our troops and keep our vehicle asset safe.

Some of you here are not thinking of real war, you are up for a vehicle beauty contest of body + engine performance comparison. Nigerian army is busy fighting a real war of life and death.
Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by Mugiwaraluffy: 6:06pm On Sep 10, 2020
ecomog1990:
Well my bros, I am @ecomog1990, not at all @komekn !

It's true most people here don't understand these things, but they also argue a lot more than they want to learn, even when they are clearly wrong on facts.

I can't continue here because it will attract endless arguments, and best way to avoid arguments is to not comment much or to not stay long on the thread, just drop in a few posts and disappear for a very very long time.....while I have fun enjoying reading other people's post n comments.
Ok, I wasn't confusing you for komekn I was trying to copy to him
Next time I'll use
Cc komekn
Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by ecomog1990: 6:13pm On Sep 10, 2020
Toju200:
yep I said With NV but I didn't State the ARA has PTZ which you said I did state with I didn't sooo... how am I lieing
Your saying ARA II has night vision is one lie, your trying to say you didnt say so make two lies.

I never said you claim it has PTZ, your claim is NV - Night Vision which is a lie, and you are not honest enough to admit. Too bad !
Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by Toju200(m): 6:17pm On Sep 10, 2020
[quote author=ecomog1990 post=93784312]Your saying ARA II has night vision is one lie, your trying to say you didnt say so make two lies.

I never said you claim it has PTZ, your claim is NV - Night Vision which is a lie, and you are not honest enough to admit. Too bad ![/quote/]SMH agree to disagree

We move brother
Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by LTGEN: 7:40pm On Sep 10, 2020
Love the discussion as long as it doesn't degenerate into name calling. this is my two kobo . Nigeria's genuine foray into the Military industrial Complex is barely 20 years old (I don't count the OBJ years) the reasons why I refer to the ARA I &II because they are still prototypes and were more critically even though they had the best minds in the biz were designed by Civilians.
DIFFERENCE
The EZUGWU prototype I and possibly prototype II were designed by ARMY guys aesthetics was not a consideration- survival was and it shows : it is top heavy armor wise ( to resists the rounds from as dshk) and high of the ground so as to allow occupants inside to survive .
Eventually the EZUGWU will still be worked on it will never be pretty infact its trademark might be butt ugly because it is not designed to look good but to save the folks inside.
ARA III &IV will probably be heavier and with that they will have to change the ARMOR MATERIAL .
Keep the discussion going folks leave out the personal stuff y'all both mean well.
Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by FieldMarshall06(m): 8:03pm On Sep 10, 2020
ecomog1990:
The video says 42 units at =N= 2 billion, but no dollar price was stated, different people will use different dollar rates as FOREX rate varies widely. The $134 k is your personal conversion at a rate you chose for July 2020 contract of 42 units, but I quoted the NA published $200k for November 12th 2019 contract of 28 units.

Further design changes, buying more units per contract, increasing bulk sourcing of raw materials, all can make cost price reduce year to year. Pricing of the Ezugwu is now clear.

Old ARA I MRAP reportedly did not do well vs IED in N.E. War, causing need for ARA II. NA ordered 30 ARA II but plan 130 Ezugwu. I think night vision and armour resistance to DShk 12.7mm is very important to the NA against insurgents DShk.

++

The ARA III proposal specs, is it worth it splashing that here? One it was rejected by Proforce owner, two the comparison ARA II VS Ezugwu I posted is already dragging into long discuss, and I wish I never posted it, cuz people just act funny here. I am not sure its worth splashing what you know where it is not valued.

I have more fun here by reading other people's comment, maybe I am a like a mosquito feeding on others in this forum grin
I actually asked the question about Ara and Ezugwu and I honestly appreciate your response. I have gotten the answer I need, thanks bro.
Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by FieldMarshall06(m): 8:04pm On Sep 10, 2020
ugo4u:
In my opinion honestly speaking Ezugwu Mrap is no match for Proforce MRAPS or other Armoured vehicles from them. For me the NA have like 3 to 5yrs to catch up with Proforce. At the moment not even Innoson can match them, the CEO of Proforce really did his home work before setting up that plant, he drafted some of the best engineer from all over the world and brought them to Nigeria not only that, he and his team met with the end users of these products where they sat down and talked about theed cons of what was on ground which they now use as a template to manufacture theirs. That's why the results from the field have being spectacular that can't really be said for Ezugwu's version which I see as more of experimental though not taking anything away from them but they still have alot of work to do and we shouldn't think of mass producing them in the interim.
It is not about your opinion bro. I asked for fact based answer. No one needs your guess opinion.

That is the problem with posters here, they argue without facts.
Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by BlackBaron: 8:04pm On Sep 10, 2020
Call me the day NA would understand there's such a thing as consultation. Dicon or NA would almost always be restricted to a certain pay structure which might mean they only can recruit from a limited pool of engineers.

Sometimes, you'll have to hire the best whose salary might be a burden but the experience and knowledge transfer you'll achieve means its money well spent.
Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by Nobody: 8:15pm On Sep 10, 2020
Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by timay(m): 8:17pm On Sep 10, 2020
seankafor:
NGOs sponsoring terro lipsrsealed

https://twitter.com/PostMastaGen/status/1304076293181452296?s=19[/quote]NGOs might not be a direct sponsor, but it is definitely the means by which the real sponsors use to funnel resources to these terrorists
Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by FieldMarshall06(m): 8:18pm On Sep 10, 2020
ecomog1990:
Your saying ARA II has night vision is one lie, your trying to say you didnt say so make two lies.

I never said you claim it has PTZ, your claim is NV - Night Vision which is a lie, and you are not honest enough to admit. Too bad !
The Ezugwu would make a solid structure for an indigenous IFV.

I or someone should make a case for Ezugwu Tracked IFV armed with 2* 30mm auto cannon, 1* 12.7mm HMG, 1* 7.62mm coaxial gun and a chinese ATGM.

The IFV would be an all-purpose monster to any terrorist group now and forever. With 250 of these IFV scattered in Borno, it is bye bye to terrorists forever.
Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by ugo4u: 8:30pm On Sep 10, 2020
FieldMarshall06:
It is not about your opinion bro. [b]I asked for fact based answer[b] No one needs your guess opinion.

That is the problem with posters here, they argue thoughtlessly.
I stated my points and made it clear that it is was opinion (which may be wrong) you can counter what I say with facts just like ecomog did we are all learning and I never claim to be a rapporteur of knowledge. You can make your points without bringing your idiocy to bare and FYI I wasn't responding to your question I was only expressing an independent opinion on a subject matter. So don't think too highly of your deluded self.
Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by FieldMarshall06(m): 8:42pm On Sep 10, 2020
ugo4u:
I stated my points and made it clear that it is was opinion (which may be wrong) you can counter what I say with facts just like ecomog did we are all learning and I never claim to be a rapporteur of knowledge. You can make your points without bringing your idiocy to bare and FYI I wasn't responding to your question I was only expressing an independent opinion on a subject matter. So don't think too highly of your deluded self.
I started the question of Ara & Ezugwu and it was clear, I said "fact-based answer". Go back and read bro. No one needs opinions of your "Ara is better lies". No evidence given by you of weapons systems or tests conducted,,, just trash talk.

People like you who post shitty opinions "Ara is better", you mislead everyone with your insolent views and cause arguments.

Because of your type, educated folks like @Ecomog1990 might not answer our questions here. He even regretted posting.

Again, keep you junk opinion away from a question that says "fact based answer".
Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by youghs: 8:43pm On Sep 10, 2020
ecomog1990:
The video says 42 units at =N= 2 billion, but no dollar price was stated, different people will use different dollar rates as FOREX rate varies widely. The $134 k is your personal conversion at a rate you chose for July 2020 contract of 42 units, but I quoted the NA published $200k for November 12th 2019 contract of 28 units.

Further design changes, buying more units per contract, increasing bulk sourcing of raw materials, all can make cost price reduce year to year. Pricing of the Ezugwu is now clear.

Old ARA I MRAP reportedly did not do well vs IED in N.E. War, causing need for ARA II. NA ordered 30 ARA II but plan 130 Ezugwu. I think night vision and armour resistance to DShk 12.7mm is very important to the NA against insurgents DShk.

++

The ARA III proposal specs, is it worth it splashing that here? One it was rejected by Proforce owner, two the comparison ARA II VS Ezugwu I posted is already dragging into long discuss, and I wish I never posted it, cuz people just act funny here. I am not sure its worth splashing what you know where it is not valued.

I have more fun here by reading other people's comment, maybe I am a like a mosquito feeding on others in this forum grin
Abeg na just the specifications, I'm just trying to learn
And please do you know about the 9 ton version Proforce is developing?
Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by FieldMarshall06(m): 8:44pm On Sep 10, 2020
FieldMarshall06:
Both are Nigerian products and we are proud of them. So, its a win win for us.

But please o, Ezugwu and Ara MRAPs, which has better protection. Someone should please enlighten us with facts, not opinion or guesses.[b][/b]
@ugo4u

That is the question I asked. The last statement is clear.

Someone should please enlighten us with facts, not opinion or guesses.[/size][size=8pt]
Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by ugo4u: 9:07pm On Sep 10, 2020
FieldMarshall06:
@ugo4u

That is the question I asked. The last statement is clear.

Someone should please enlighten us with facts, not opinion or guesses.[/size][size=8pt]
Epistolary tale of a coward hiding behind a fog of jargon, you need not edit your initial comment that escalated issues. Low brow Wikipedia amanuensis.
Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by komekn(m): 9:41pm On Sep 10, 2020
FieldMarshall06:
Both are Nigerian products and we are proud of them. So, its a win win for us.

But please o, Ezugwu and Ara MRAPs, which has better protection. Someone should please enlighten us with facts, not opinion or guesses.
I don't have facts but circumstantial facts to underpin my opinion.

For Pro Force to participate in international trade fairs, they absolutely have to meet international standards assessment.

So the ARA is able to achieve STANAG level 4.

I do not think, correct me if l am wrong, but it seems the Ezugwu had not been subjected to independent international inspection.

So my view is that the ARA is considerably superior.
Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by FieldMarshall06(m): 10:11pm On Sep 10, 2020
komekn:
I don't have facts but circumstantial facts to underpin my opinion.

For Pro Force to participate in international trade fairs, they absolutely have to meet international standards assessment.

So the ARA is able to achieve STANAG level 4.

I do not think, correct me if l am wrong, but it seems the Ezugwu had not been subjected to independent international inspection.

So my view is that the ARA is considerably superior.
Ok, thanks. Someone who had facts had settled the matter. Now, we know that Ezugwu is better protected. Thanks bro.
Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by FieldMarshall06(m): 10:12pm On Sep 10, 2020
ugo4u:
Epistolary tale of a coward hiding behind a fog of jargon, you need not edit your initial comment that escalated issues. Low brow Wikipedia amanuensis.
You mean I edited the quoted post. Read the last sentence that youghs quoted long before your post.
.
.

Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by ecomog1990: 10:48pm On Sep 10, 2020
youghs:
Abeg na just the specifications, I'm just trying to learn
And please do you know about the 9 ton version Proforce is developing?
Sir, I will drop some, please abeg don't ask me to post all here.

Added first line protection before blast hits monocoque underbelly – collapsible sandwich structure blast deflector against mech IED.

Miniaturized hull mounted electro IED Jammer – against RCIED to disable at range.

Light weight composite material RCWS 20mm or 30mm options as new primary weapon with coaxial 7.62mm, all stabilized dual-axis.

LRF for ranging mount main weapon cupola.

Anti-blast mine suspended seats.

Theatre long range digital encrypted comms : 300+ km UHF radio.

New hull armour technology : easy applique sandwich & sponge plates resistant to 14.5mm AP ammo.
Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by fabselad(m):
Cameroonian Gendarmerie Special force

1 2 3 ... 1363 1364 1365 1366 1367 1368 1369 ... 2286 Reply

“If Mugabe Dies, We Will Field His Corpse As A Candidate For Election” - WifePhotos: What Some Countries Gives Their Soldiers To Eat On The Battle Field.Video Of Frightened Black Man Forced Into A Coffin By White Man Sparks Outrage234

Who Has The Strongest Military In Africa?African Militaries/ Security Services Strictly Photos Only And Videos ThreadKenya Is Ahead of Nigeria In All Aspect (Facts Don't Lie)

Viewing this topic: 2 guest(s)