₦airaland Forum

femianski:
Iheanacho not starting again in the FA cup. This will be the second time Rodgers will be formatting his team without a striker. I knew that penalty he missed against Crystal palace will still come down to hunt him. If Iheanacho is serious, he should arrange with his agent on how to get a new club. I don remove my hand from his matter.

Subzero047:
I was joking tho

femianski:
Iheanacho not starting again in the FA cup. This will be the second time Rodgers will be formatting his team without a striker. I knew that penalty he missed against Crystal palace will still come down to hunt him. If Iheanacho is serious, he should arrange with his agent on how to get a new club. I don remove my hand from his matter.

femianski:
Iheanacho not starting again in the FA cup. This will be the second time Rodgers will be formatting his team without a striker. I knew that penalty he missed against Crystal palace will still come down to hunt him. If Iheanacho is serious, he should arrange with his agent on how to get a new club. I don remove my hand from his matter.

JohnBullMySon:
he will soon become like Isaac success. In a way, it's not bad sha. At least he will give space for the new strikers coming up now. Rohr better not invite him in March.

BascoVanVeli:
Sadiq Umar scores

andrewbaba44:
He will soon become Isaac success as how ?

You want him to get injured like Isaac success or what ?

Please explain

JohnBullMySon:
not in terms of injury, in terms of irrelevance. hope his career gets better but for now, other strikers should replace him in the team. that his spot is very competitive. you get it now right?

Meliforme:
We are talking about the CB role.

I am one of the few that kept saying that Balogun is our best CB, and now It is very clear for all to see.
When it comes to the CB role, i can't comfortably say that Balogun is even better than Akpoguma.
Akpoguma might even turn out to be our best CB.

komekn:
Let's not get emotively biased with our preferences.

Let's look at matters objectively.

Porto is in a league rated way lower than the EPL, l believe that is without dispute.

Rangers is in a league that is likened to the English league one and at the very best optimistic assessment comparable to the English Championship.

This same Rangers held Porto to a draw at home and flogged them 2-0 in Glasgow. Ranger is no where near Fulham in Quality.

And you assume that Porto has a better quality team than Fulham, I disagree.

By what unit of measurement individual value, pedigree, ratings l seen no basis.

andrewbaba44:

Dem like anything white skin

andrewbaba44:
Lol you Dey talk like say you no no Wetin Dey Sup

Rohr prefer akpoguma instead of ebuehi and aina

Please why is ehiz not playing for naija yet ?

Olulong:
I don't think I've read a write up more stupid than this in a long time.

So rangers beating Porto makes them a better team than Porto bah.

In 2011/2012 Season Bilbao defeated Man Utd(then EPL champions) home and away. Does that make Bilbao a better team quality wise than United

Olulong:
I don't think I've read a write up more stupid than this in a long time.

So rangers beating Porto makes them a better team than Porto bah.

In 2011/2012 Season Bilbao defeated Man Utd(then EPL champions) home and away. Does that make Bilbao a better team quality wise than United

mostob:
I like your sarcasm

BascoVanVeli:
Sadiq Umar scores

Olulong:
I don't think I've read a write up more stupid than this in a long time.

So rangers beating Porto makes them a better team than Porto bah.

In 2011/2012 Season Bilbao defeated Man Utd(then EPL champions) home and away. Does that make Bilbao a better team quality wise than United

Subzero047:
The way Ndidi keeps improving on the ball day by day makes me not to doubt his age

komekn:
I agree the MRI scan he failed in 2013 points to the scanner being defective and the radiographer being incompetent.

andrewbaba44:
Everything wey you talk for here na rubbish

Just see the criteria wey you take Dey judge team

Fulham and Porto should not be on the same sentence ,so because rangers beat Porto and Fulham better pass rangers mean say Fulham better pass Porto ? Or what are you saying self

If we are to be sincere only about 6 epl teams are better than Porto

nairalandankrah:
Osimehn!!

komekn:
Thats not what my deductions are anchored on.

And the core subject was Sanusi better than the existing Wing backs at Fulham, IMO he is not. The three players he is contending with one plays for the USA, the other for the Netherlands and then our own Aina.

The question that has arisen in the course of the deduction is Porto better than Fulham❓ ln my opinion, NO.

If the EPL is 4 places ahead of the Portuguese league that's an indicator of quality. If you look at market value of Fulham and Porto players in addition to pedigree they are almost on par.

If Fulham played in the UCL where would be they be, l don't know. But l can say conclusively they will do alot better than clubs in much lower league like Celtic and Rangers.

West Bromwich beat Wolves against all odds are they therefore better ❓

So what will you anchor your proposition on SENTIMENT ❓ . Because, using your proposition Porto is better than Chelsea, Arsenal, Wolves Crystal Palace, etc

Karlovic:
Dude Fulham is not better than Porto, this is not PlayStation or EA Sports. If both teams play each other in your here and now which team do you think will come out victorious?

BascoVanVeli:
Bruno just scored this same goal on one the best keepers in the world. I don't want to hear the Akpeyi slander ever again



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zU61iPM14NQ

JohnBullMySon:
it's not the same goal.

JohnBullMySon:
My brother, don't waste time arguing with komekn unless you want to drag this matter till October.