Emusan:


This is what Matt 11:25 says "At that time Jesus answered and said, I thank thee, O Father, Lord of heaven and earth, because thou hast hid these things from the wise and prudent, and hast revealed them unto babes."

What is your point, Mr Janosense?

LebenNG:

Then it does not preserve its original form of texts, why should you change words in the bible, Thy, thou, sayeth, shew etc were words spoken in those times. why should you ridicule that, am sure Christ spoke that way too, must you mock him in that manner. Your bible is just a century old, broda rest.

jantman:


@Janosky
Open your own thread concerning (John 1:1) if you failed to explain it more better, then go look sun and get lost

Janosky:


Mr LIENUS, exponent of Jesus is God Almighty, is asking what's the point of Matthew 11:25?

Bros, it is the same point Jesus made in Matthew 27:43,46 and John 20:17

Matthew 11:27 na rocket science to Mr LIENUS
DECEIVING himself

Janosky:

Shuoooo !!

For your mind , Christ spoke "thy, thou, sayeth, thine, thee, shew" .
Is Jesus Christ an English man ?
.

Wetin Musa no go see for gate ?

Janosky:


2 Simple questions for you:
John 20:17 & 17:3, did Jesus agree with your claim on John 1:1?

John 20:21 & Matthew 10:40, did Jesus Christ agree with your claim on John 14:9?


Bros, answer am

Janosky:
Shuoooo !!
For your mind , Christ spoke "thy, thou, sayeth, thine, thee, shew" . Is Jesus Christ an English man ? .
Wetin Musa no go see for gate ?

LebenNG:

Then it does not preserve its original form of texts, why should you change words in the bible, Thy, thou, sayeth, shew etc were words spoken in those times. why should you ridicule that, am sure Christ spoke that way too, must you mock him in that manner. Your bible is just a century old, broda rest.

LebenNG:

Neither did he speak the modern english, stop being dull.

Emusan:


John 1:1 "...and The Word was God"

This put your demonic translation into hell where it belongs to.

Emus Mumu

" The Word was God.... Which means
The person of the Word is DIFFERENT from the person of the God....."

Read the shaded portions of the Screenshot of your post and RECEIVE SENSE.

Any John 1:1 Translation (NWT, Moffatt bible Emphatic Diaglott etc) which means
"The person of the Word is DIFFERENT from the person of the God" are very very ACCURATE.

The Word was divine" , very good & accurate.
The Word was a god, very good & accurate.
Ho Logos was divine, he is NOT ho theos. (John 20:17, John 14:1 & John 17:3 confirmento. Na Jesus talk am )
Bros ,cry me a river

Kobojunkie:
You need to stop reading the Bible Upside down.

God made His name(s) clear from the beginning...
Now what God is known to do is assign a Name to each of His covenants... To the Old Covenant, which He gave the people of Israel through Moses, a man, God assigned the name YHWH, the name by which the covenant can be, for lack of a better word, "invoked".

When it came to His New Covenant, God sent His own word, the very Voice/Word that comes out of God's mouth to stand as His avatar on earth, and assigned Him a name by which He can be invoked and that name is Jesus Christ .

YHWH spoke " the Word" (a spirit Creature came into existence in the same manner that YHWH spoke light into existence).


Bros, do you now agree that YHWH created the spirit being HE called "the word" ?

Emusan:


The lying liar Janosense the deluded Jesus is not God but Angel Michael.

Matt 11:27 is still up there for the lying liar the son of his father the Devil to tell us what is his point of referencing it.

[s]Shameless lying liar like your father the Devil.[/s]

Daniel 10:1,13 Jesus Christ is Michael the archangel (leader of angels,2 Thess1:7-9. Matthew 25:31 .). who fights for Jehovah's people.
(The scriptural truth which many bible Scholars who are 3 idol spirits devotees have confirmed .
)

Matthew 11:27 = Matthew 27:43,46 & John 20:17 Emus Mumu +LIENUS, continue shouting upandan to reject the words of Jesus Christ

Janosky:
Emus Mumu

" The Word was God.... Which means
The person of the Word is DIFFERENT from the person of the God....."[/b]
[b]Read the shaded portions of the Screenshot of your post and RECEIVE SENSE.

Any John 1:1 Translation (NWT, Moffatt bible Emphatic Diaglott etc) which means
"The person of the Word is DIFFERENT from the person of the God" are very very ACCURATE.

The Word was divine" , very good & accurate.
The Word was a god, very good & accurate.
Ho Logos was divine, he is NOT ho theos. (John 20:17, John 14:1 & John 17:3 confirmento. Na Jesus talk am )
Bros ,cry me a river

Janosky:

Daniel 10:1,13 Jesus Christ is Michael the archangel (leader of angels,2 Thess1:7-9. Matthew 25:31 .). who fights for Jehovah's people.
(The scriptural truth which many bible Scholars who are 3 idol spirits devotees have confirmed .
)
STOP DECEIVING yourself ;

Michael the archangel appointed to resurrect the dead ,1 Thess 4:16, John 5:26-28 .

Matthew 11:27 = Matthew 27:43,46 & John 20:17 Emus Mumu +LIENUS, continue shouting upandan to reject the words of Jesus Christ

Janosky:

Daniel 10:1,13 Jesus Christ is Michael the archangel (leader of angels,2 Thess1:7-9. Matthew 25:31 .). who fights for Jehovah's people.
(The scriptural truth which many bible Scholars who are 3 idol spirits devotees have confirmed .
)
STOP DECEIVING yourself ;

Michael the archangel appointed to resurrect the dead ,1 Thess 4:16, John 5:26-28 .

Matthew 11:27 = Matthew 27:43,46 & John 20:17 Emus Mumu +LIENUS, continue shouting upandan to reject the words of Jesus Christ

Janosky:

Bros, You missed the point.

Jesus spoke Greek , Hebrew and Aramaic not English.
You have no cogent , genuine reason to ridicule the Bible's modern English Translations , more so, when you have NEVER spoken/written "shalt, thou , thee, thine" etc. Those archaic words don't exist in any Greek or hebrew manuscripts.

Any English language substitute for " thou, thee , shalt, thine" etc, should NOT be vilified nor ridiculed for any reason.
It's HYPOCRISY to ridicule Bible Translations in modern English because of thou, thee etc.

Emusan:


See the lying liar JWs like your father the Devil rejecting the word of God and following the word of men talking nonsense as usual.

Is it today you've been providing screenshot which eventually shows your lying mouth and exposed your dubious cherry-picked text as your demonic organization does?

You said MANY SCHOLARS but you can only present TWO from your MANY, you see the reason your father the Devil won't be proud of you? because you don't represent him well. If you want to lie, lie unimaginable lies so that your father the Devil can be so proud of you.

Lastly, the lying liar JWs can't provide where scripture emphatically called Christ Jesus the Angel Michael but he has to use the same people who he classified as idol worshippers as witnesses.

so pathetic for the follower of the 8 men man made gods.

Emusan:


The great Janosense, I hail oooo



Yes the person of the word is different from the person of God, but the "WORD WAS God" and there is ONLY ONE GOD.

Lying liar like your father the Devil.



See the oponu,

Did Trinitarian ever say, the person of the word is the same with the person of God before

O ma se oooo for this brain dead lying liar.



What is the essence of Apostle John introducing Christ as "A God or divine" when your father the Devil and his servants who impregnated people before Noah's day (according to your theology) and human are said to be "A God"?

Definitely, the term of John 1:1 means Christ is not just a god but the very Eternity God who created everything.

But will your father the Devil allow you to have sense to see this?

Barristter07:


" a god " is not a wrong translation of Theo's. Fact!

For anyone who have a God, they are a god.

Didn't Jesus have A God in heaven ?

Janosky:


Emusan LIENUS would REMOVE John 20:17 and Revelation 3:12 from his own Bible if he could.

Emusan:


[s]See the lying liar JWs like your father the Devil rejecting the word of God and following the word of men talking nonsense as usual.
[/s]
Is it today you've been providing screenshot which eventually shows your lying mouth and exposed your dubious cherry-picked text as your demonic organization does?

You said MANY SCHOLARS but you can only present TWO from your MANY, you see the reason your father the Devil won't be proud of you? because you don't represent him well. If you want to lie, lie unimaginable lies so that your father the Devil can be so proud of you.

.

Mr LIENUS has ZERO proof for his False claims.
Na the New Catholic Encyclopedia volume 13 still dey give you sifia pains like this .

In the previous post, I gave you 3 different screenshots authored by your 3 dogheads believers & Bible Scholars.

Did you see John Calvin's Daniel 10:13 Commentary in that screenshot?

Did you see John Giill's Exposition on Daniel 10:13 in that screenshot?

Did you see Trapp's Commentary on Daniel 10:13 in that screenshot?

Did you see Biblestudytools Commentary on Daniel 10:13 in that screenshots I posted?

I challenge Mr LIENUS to post their full screenshots on this thread, if he get liver

Your fellow 3 dogheads believers have exposed your GIBBERISH.

Bros, kpele

freshboi88:


Mumu. It is modelled after the anti Christ. One who is here to ridicule the Christ!.

That's why they tell all sort of lies and change scripture to ridicule Jesus.

Satanic sect

Janosky:


2 Simple questions for you:
John 20:17 & 17:3, did Jesus agree with your claim on John 1:1?

John 20:21 & Matthew 10:40, did Jesus Christ agree with your claim on John 14:9?


Bros, answer am

LebenNG:

No one is ridiculing anything, u guys started that first... i wonder how texts matter now, what happened to the message conveyed?, did he speak the modern English of that time?, why is the NWT bible not translated in the original language of that time?, since u people are so desperate to be Assistant Jesus.

LebenNG:

No one is ridiculing anything, u guys started that first... i wonder how texts matter now, what happened to the message conveyed?, did he speak the modern English of that time?, why is the NWT bible not translated in the original language of that time?, since u people are so desperate to be Assistant Jesus.

Emusan:


The great Janosense, I hail oooo



*1
Yes the person of the word is different from the person of God, but the "WORD WAS God" and there is ONLY ONE GOD.

[s]Lying liar like your father the Devil.

[/s]

See the oponu,

*2
Did Trinitarian ever say, the person of the word is the same with the person of God before

O ma se oooo for this brain dead lying liar.



What is the essence of Apostle John introducing Christ as "A God or divine" when your father the Devil and his servants who impregnated people before Noah's day (according to your theology) and human are said to be "A God"?

*3
Definitely, the term of John 1:1 means Christ is not just a god but the very Eternity God who created everything.

[s]But will your father the Devil allow you to have sense to see this?[/s]

The essence of John introducing Christ as a god or divine is the same reason John 10:34-36 and 1 Corinthians 8:5 is in your Bible .
Greek Theos also means a god.
Greek John 14:1, John 1:1, John 20:17, John 17:3 , ho theos (g3588 g2316, the God) is NOT Jesus Christ .I challenge you to disprove this .
The first sentence in 1 Corinthians 8:7 says Mr LIENUS can NOT understand this.

Bros, In your statements *1, *2 & *3, is a repeat of Bingbagbo/Presciousgirl GIBBERISH ,your fellow 3 dogheads believers. LYING dullards like Mr LIENUS. (See their GIBBERISH in screenshots , repeated in your statements *1, *2 & *3).

Mr LIENUS,

Barristter07:

He provided scriptural evidences.
1Thesalonians 4:16 , Whose Voice will raise the Dead ?

Barristter07:


" a god " is not a wrong translation of Theo's. Fact!

For anyone who have a God, they are a god.

Didn't Jesus have A God in heaven ?

DappaD:
Emusan’s conscience has been thoroughly beaten.

It’s usually he and his bandwagon of trinitarians who claim that Jesus split into two from his Father and sent one part of himself to the earth[basis not found in the scriptures]

But how come Revelation 1:1 & 3:12,21 is now saying something different? So after ascension, why did Jesus did not merge back into his Father?
Why was he still was calling somebody
“My God, My God” @Rev 3:12 if he himself is God biko?

Emusan:


Says the deluded JWs who has sold his conscience to those 8 old fool men.

This is because you lack indepth of the Word of God and refused to learn simply because your dull brain is left in the hands of those 8 men.
Facts from the scripture!
1. God is unlimited and His ways are unsearchable.Then if God is unlimited and His ways are unsearchable, who are you to claim you God can't split Himself? Even though that's not what Trinity is all about but just from your dark understand of what Trinity entails just as your demonic organization always misrepresents the teaching of Trinity.
2. Only God is Eternal Yet from scripture we read thatHoly Spirit is eternal The Word (Jesus) is eternal.Lastly, you won't receive sense until the day you'll be able to differentiate between when scripture is talking about preincarnation of Jesus Christ and when He became part of creation.

Janosky:
The essence of John introducing Christ as a god or divine is the same reason John 10:34-36 and 1 Corinthians 8:5 is in your Bible .
Greek Theos also means a god.

Greek John 14:1, John 1:1, John 20:17, John 17:3 , ho theos (g3588 g2316, the God) is NOT Jesus Christ .I challenge you to disprove this .
The first sentence in 1 Corinthians 8:7 says Mr LIENUS can NOT understand this.

John 17:3 and John 20:17, in your Bible, who is "the ONLY ONE GOD "?

[s]b]Bros, In your statements *1, *2 & *3, is a repeat of Bingbagbo/Presciousgirl GIBBERISH ,your fellow 3 dogheads believers. LYING dullards like Mr LIENUS. (See their GIBBERISH in screenshots , repeated in your statements *1, *2 & *3).

Mr LIENUS, [/b][/s]

DappaD:
Your salvation depends on you acknowledging those “8 old men”. Matthew 25:34-40
You go dey there think say na play.

Okay. You’re just making spurious claims with no scriptural basis and you want someone to validate them for you? Miss me with that.
Simple question—who was Jesus referring to at Revelation 3:12 as “My God”?