₦airaland Forum

Men, due to upbringing, think certain sex styles/kinks/sex acts are for hòes/bad and spoilt chicks while good and decent girls greatly limit themselves to certain simple and mundane ones. For women, both the good and bad girls, this classification doesn't exist; it is either they enjoy it or not. If they enjoy it and can physically take it, then they have no problem doing it.

The acts, kinks and styles that men for whatever reasons see as extreme, depraved, reprobate, perverted, ungodly and as the stuff of hòes, spoilt chicks & bad chick/slay queens are not seen in the same way by women. If they enjoy it and can physically take it, doing it is just like drinking water from a tap and having harmless fun. This is one of the reasons why some acts men think are uncommon are actually common. This only thing that will stop a woman is if she is not just into it (ie. doesn't enjoy it). Men who don't know this are in for a rude awakening and likely won't get the sexual best from the women they are dealing with.

Women know most men think like this so they pretend and play along to build and preserve their angelic, chaste, moral and prudish reputation and veneer in the eyes of these men. This is very understandable since this is one of the ways men judge women and pick them for commitment. If you are judgemental and operating under the mindset of your upbringing towards a particular girl, you will have a hard time seeing the inner hòe and sex freak beast in her as she will try maintain her righteous image. Guys who do the opposite see a different result. Reputation is important to women in the dating market.

To make things worse, the way you start with her is the way you end with her. If you started the conventional way with the sexual classification I highlighted earlier and you married her thinking she is chaste and angelic and not a bad chick sexually and she played the part with you, you will find it hard to unleash her inner hòe and sex freak beast. This is because if she does bring out the inner hoè, it will cause problems in your relationship and your conventional mind because you will ask and tell yourself "I never knew she was capable of this hoè stuff or into this. Where did she learn it from? Has she always been like this? Do I really know her? This is why wives and girlfriends who started this way monotonously stick to the mundane and simple styles for life with the men they are committed to... they won't go further. Besides, most the time, their husbands are not their sexual choices.

If a your wife or girl friend is acting holy and prude, telling you "I can't suck d!ck, that's disgusting", "I don't do doggy, that's for hòes", "I can't do this, it is too degrading" etc, just have itbe at the back of your mind that you are being shortchanged and you are not among the guys who get her sexual best; if you insist on getting it you will meet resistance because she will want to defend her image (women do this a lot). Besides, what a woman isn't getting from you sexually, she will seek it elsewhere from the right guy if the opportunity (which I once discussed) presents itself. If she can have the best of both worlds without any consequences, she will. All women are sexual freaks to the right guy in the right situation. Don't bother with those that are not sex freaks to you.

when you're cheating, your side Chick will always make every effort to expose your cheating by leaving her things (earrings, bangles, panties etc) in places in your house she knows your main chick will find them,, your side Chick will even try popping up in selfies (see pic below),,,
But when a woman is cheating, her side dude will never expose her and he always stays in his lane ,hidden and unseen. the reason side chicks feel the need to expose the man is that they want the main chick's position, they're not there for sex but wanna use sex as a way to get the man to leave his woman. they envy the main woman's relationship.

but a side dude will never expose a cheating GF/wife because he's there just for sex nothing more ,he's not trying to steal the woman from the other man. he just wants easy sex without a relationship. a relationship is very costly for a man in terms of time, money and effort, so dealing with a woman already in a relationship with another man is far easier and cheaper than having his own GF/wife

women will never change their sexual nature to suit the morals of men or to align with men's own sexual nature,,,, what women will do, however, is put a facade of mild sexuality to put men at ease, but then proceed tp unleash their raw untamed lust in the shadows, far from the disapproving eyes of men. Hence it's called the sexual SHADOW world. It's sexual activities women do in deep secrecy that no man must ever witness. Only a few selected thoroughly vetted men who can handle the perversions as well as keep a secret are invited into this world. The sexual shadow world is 100% created and run by women and no amount of money can buy you an invite cause it's about a man's physique and sex skills coupled with discretion.Being able to screw women's brains out. Being so good in bed women will even give you gifts of appreciation. There are guys out there who are so good at sex women share their number and they pass these guys among themselves as a toy. These are the guys whose dicc women actively chase. If you hear women complain about such and such a guy being stingy with his dicc, just know it's that kind of dicc. They call it "the good good". This has nothing to do with a guy's looks or money, just pure sex skills. And such guys are in a perfect position to be male prostitutes.

Sex BEFORE a relationship= power to the man and the woman stays chasing.

Relationship BEFORE sex = power to the woman and the man stays chasing.

in other words consider yourself single until sex. don't even trust your own feelings for a girl you have never slept with cause it can happen that after sleeping with her you may feel different. Post Nut Clarity is real.

men are built in such a way that they don't know whether their love for a woman is genuine or not until they sleep with her. Its what remains after the sex has happened that shows a man if he loves a woman or not. if you feel hot for a girl and you sleep with her but after sex you feel cold, it was never love just lust. if you feel hot for a girl and you sleep with her and after sex you still feel hot for her, its love.
it is a woman's difficult task then to work out which guys love her and which guys lust her WITHOUT sleeping with any of them. and a woman's default method is to push sex further and further into the future -delaying it as much as possible- as a way to separate the Wheat from the Chaff. but that's an amateur move. veterans in the game make the man spend on them in addition to denying him sex, leaving everything in the hands of the infallible sunk cost fallacy.
what is the Sunk cost fallacy? when someone is too invested in something to walk away.
examples of Sunk cost fallacy? when you sit at a bus terminus waiting for a bus. the longer you wait the harder it is to move cause you figure you've already spent too much time waiting you may as well sit until the very end. its a psychological trap. resources (costs) already sunk (invested) prevent a person from giving up and starting over elsewhere. sunk cost fallacy is another way of saying "invested costs fallacy" where fallacy means a "lie". the lie being that you can't start over elsewhere. yes you can. but it will cost you plenty.

when a woman makes a man spend money on herself without giving him sex, the man becomes trapped in a similar psychological situation. its the key to gold digging and getting a man who has money to commit. another example of sunk cost fallacy, If a company constructs a million dollar building but then just before finishing the roofing a grave error is discovered in the building plan, will the company scrap the problem and demolish the building? no. most times they'll conceal the mistake and finish the project. cause scraping the project would mean heavy losses. a man with money is trapped into a relationship/marriage the same way. gold diggers make him spend heavily until he's too invested to leave that even when a woman's liabilities start popping up (eg it turns out she's older than previously mentioned or she has a child etc) the man is forced to accept it cause to back out now will mean all the monies he's spent on that woman have been money down the drain.

if women show love through sex it's because they're choosy with who they fukk, which is the reality hence the best woman is a virgin who has never been fukked.

now since prostitutes fukk every man then their pussy is worthless so the equation runs backwards..... there's only really 2 things that are exchanged between the genders: sex and money. a man accepts sex as an expression of love from a woman on condition that she fukks only him. now if she's fukking many men then her pussy has no worth , her worth then tranfers to MONEY. everything is now running opposite normal relationships. so a man dating a prostitute, because a prostitute is sleeping with many men for money, he can't show the prostitute his love through money but through SEX. while other men pay the prostitute for sex she herself pays her man for love through that same money. that's why when a girl starts selling sex she stops asking for money from her boyfriend and instead starts GIVING him money. while her boyfriend then starts to play hard to get by denying her sex since his dicc is now his expression of love for her, so he only fuccs the prostitute when and if she gives him money. which is the basis of pímpíng. while a prostitute is a prostitute to men, the pímp himself is a prostitute to the prostitute. what a prostitute is selling to men (sex) the pímp himself is selling to her. so in effect the pímp is a prostitute's prostitute. that's why a pímp never fukks for free and he's forbidden from dealing with normal (square) women cause to take money from a prostitute and spend it on a non prostitute is the ultimate sin in the game.

Understanding The Sexual Market Place

The game is ruthless. I always tell people when it comes to these girls "sex first, any other business after", but people say I'm promoting hedonism. Look now you're salty another guy has gone ahead of you and tasted the cookie while you "bid your time ". And you'll be dumb to think he's the only one. He's just the only one YOU KNOW.
Women have only one thing to offer, and thats puccy, if you act like you're special and you don't want it, guess what? Guys with no shame who know their worth and go after what they want will jump you and hit it and you'll be left behind " still bidding your time". And it's not even about being thirsty but being clear with a girl that with you there's nothing for free. If sex is too immoral for you to get in exchange for favors then she better square you by doing you solid favours that may not include sex, but guess what again? You'll still be salty and angry when you learn other guys are getting that puccy while you get mere favours. So its just best to go for sex straight....but there's an art to this or else you come across as a perv.
No matter how useful a woman is and how much she can bring to your world, begin with sex. Get the sex. But then don't stop there. But get the sex first. At the very least that will remove unnecessary tension between the two of you and make you at ease around her. While attaching her to you. But imagine doing business with a lady and you act like you dont wanna hit it but you're always spying on her cleavage and thighs wondering how she tastes cause you can't bring yourself to go after that puccy cause you've positioned yourself strictly as a platonic business partner! That's rather sad.
Yes we don't mix business with pleasure and we don't bring our girlfriends into our business affairs, but if some girl comes to you with a business proposal she better bring that puccy to the table as well.

Understanding the Sexual Market Value

If this was the case then Broke women will deal with Broke men. But broke women want rich men cause we're all looking for a partner who brings to the table what we don't have.

Women marry up financially. Men marry up morally.

A broke woman and a rich man works (Cinderella)
A morally pure woman and an evil man works (Beauty and the Beast)

Its easy for men to save a woman from her financial defects but next to impossible for men to save a woman from her CHARACTER defects. No amount of love and money can change a hoe into a housewife.
But it's easy for women to change a man's character defects. With enough love and fidelity from a woman,, even the most brutal barbarian can be domesticated. What's very hard for women to do, is save a man from his FINANCIAL defects. Its an uphill battle against a man's own ego and a woman's own utter disinterest in using her own money to uplift a man.