The tale of Faust and Mephistopheles can be read as a tale of a man being offered a chance to travel down the dark path of the “fallen angels” (the Archons).
Faust was the genius who would do anything for ultimate knowledge, to know the final secrets and mysteries of existence, to enjoy a single moment of divine perfection. He was willing to pay any price –
metaphorically described as “selling his soul to the Devil”.
What this refers to, of course, is not some
diabolical transaction but the willingness to endure hell to get to heaven, to undergo the most horrendous suffering and pain if, on the other side, heaven and divinity lie.

“Last men” would never tolerate any discomfort. They’d sacrifice nothing and take on no arduous tests, trials or quests. They want the easy life, the path of least resistance, a world where they always have their feet up, and all the petty and trivial comforts all around them, within easy rich. That, for them, is the “good life”.
These people are spiritually dead. They are the human undead, an insult to humanity, a disgrace and abomination.

The Faustian religion demands that we never shirk the greatest challenges. We must embrace them, seek them out, glorify them.
In the Faustian Age, science, religion, mathematics, philosophy, psychology, sociology, politics and economics become one grand Faustian synthesis, the full
expression of the Faustian Man: the Superman.

We’ll build an Earth fit for gods. We’ll build bridges to the heavens. We’ll travel to the stars and beyond.
We’ll acknowledge no limits. We won’t stop until we are actual Gods, know everything and have infinite power. Is that not the only legitimate aim of strong, intelligent human beings? Who cares what the pathetic, weak, ignorant, superstitious masses think? Only the Gods count.

If you subscribe to the Faustian Pact then you are one of the gods-in-the- making. You have embarked on your own divine alchemical transformation.
The future is ours and ours alone – because we are the illuminated ones, the divine ones, the Gods themselves, and we shall have no other Gods.
Humanity is made in the image of Godhood only insofar as humans have it within
themselves to be Gods.

What’s the Faustian Age all about? It concerns the supreme quest for knowledge. It’s all about the Philosopher’s Stone and the transformation of lower forms (“base metals”) into their ultimate, perfect form (“gold”). It’s about the attainment of the Holy Grail that makes us Gods.

The supreme Faustian religion is Illumination, the religion of the Illuminati. It’s about building heaven on this Earth and making every one of us Gods.

iamwilliamsfx:


Source: https://www.vanguardngr.com/2022/09/kumuyi-to-ushers-stop-imposing-persistent-head-covering-on-ladies-it-causes-odour/

I am really having a hard time getting to
understand how some of this preachers are
reversing and denouncing some doctrines they have used to subject their congregants to untold miseries for ages in the name of religion.

Like seriously,how do they come up with such ideologies for ages,messed up a lot of minds and lives and then wake up one fine morning to renounce those same ideologies?
My concern is with the multitude of people who are going to go through a much more hard time trying to adjust to the new ideas being sold to them. Kai! Abrahamism is pure Satanism.

The world is defined by what it most values.

In ancient times, simple power was valued most, and the leaders of society were strong, brutal tribal leaders. These graduated into merciless kings and tyrants. Then came the rise of religion. Faith was valued most, and so the kings were joined by priests and prophets, and the kings could reign only with God's approval. Then came the rise of
capitalism. Priests were pushed to one side, and replaced by businessmen and usurers. Mammon took the place of God. Then monarchs and emperors fell and were replaced by bankers and chief executives.
Money is now what humanity values most. Money is power. Money is success. Money is prestige. Money is status. Money is influence. Money is sexy. Money is sex. Everyone wants money. Everyone worships money. Everyone wants MORE money, even those who already have more than enough, they barely know what to do with it. Everyone lusts after money. They desire it above all other things because it's the gateway to all other things. Money is the supreme gateway drug - the gateway to everything - and that makes
it the Ultimate Drug.

In the Islamic world, religious faith is still prized more highly than money. Muslims would die for their faith. It's unthinkable that Christians would die for theirs. Christians would, however, die fighting to protect their property and wealth, thus showing who their real God is (and it isn't Christ!).

Money is the supreme drug, the ultimate crack, the bluest meth, the divine junk. It delivers the highest highs of all.

When you have a world that values itself according to something whose only value lies in acquisition, possessions, and consumption then, in fact, you have a world with no values at all. That's why psychopaths rule the world. They have no values and they have no interest in values. They are interested in power, manipulation, intimidation and exploitation, and nothing is a great enabler of those than money.

Imagine a world that, instead, valued intellect, reason, spirituality, artistry and creativity. It would be a totally different world. Bankers and CEOs would not be respected, and would have no power or influence. Nor would they be rich.

All attempts to change the world will fail unless what the world values most changes.
While money reigns, we will never get rid of the kind of people in charge right now. They are the best money-makers, the best at theft, deception, intimidation, of tossing scruples away, of screwing over the opposition, of trampling over bodies to get to the top. And if you have people like that in charge, what can you expect except a shallow, lowest-common-denominator, dumbed down, amoral society of junk and trash?

It would be miraculous if amoral and immoral leaders - totally out for themselves, totally into self- service rather than public service - created a moral society.
It would be miraculous if greedy, selfish leaders gave rise to generous, selfless, altruistic philanthropists.
It would be miraculous if leaders completely
ignorant of science, mathematics, engineering and technology presided over a technocratic, technological wonderland.
It would be miraculous if leaders without an artistic, creative bone in their bodies produced an artistic, creative society.
It would be miraculous if anti-intellectual, irrational leaders generated societies full of geniuses ready to solve the problems of the world.

There's no mystery about the world. Psychopaths are in charge and they have created a world ideal for them to rule and exploit. They have created a world of pathetic slaves and submissives - human dogs - that love their masters and will do anything for them.

The last thing that psychopaths want is a world full of smart, strong, talented, creative, competitive people who stand up for themselves and instantly retaliate against wrongdoers in their midst.

Psychopaths require sheep in order to fleece them. YOUR purpose is to be a sheep. Your place in society is as a docile, sedated zombie, too lazy, too pathetic to do anything, too dumb to know what's happening to you, too in thrall to celebrities, popes, queens, princes, princesses, presidents, prime ministers, the super rich, too mired in consumerism, too addicted to bread, circuses, video games and
gadgets, too uncreative to imagine a better world. We've got your number. And so have the psychopaths.

In a world that values money more than anything else, then, quite literally, rich people are more valuable than the poor. So, how can you complain when the rich walk right over you? That's the world you chose. That's the value-system you chose: one that makes you a second-class citizen in a two-tier society, one that makes you a less worthy and valuable person, one that makes you INFERIOR. And you know you ARE inferior, don't you? That's why you go along with a system that inherently degrades you.
This is a rich man's world, but you aren't rich. You worship money, but you don't have any. No one is worshipping you. You're the one doing the worshipping.

Only a New World Order can save the world from itself.
We need a Revaluation of all Values.
We need a Revolution.
We need a New Enlightenment.
We need a New Age of Reason.
We need a Post Money World where a wholly different value system prevails: that of merit, intelligence, creativity, and the desire to transform humanity into a divine race.

Abrahamists have an essentially criminal psyche, a diseased and anarchist psyche. They hate the State of enlightenment so much because it would finally take action
against them. They want the Confederate freedom to mutilate babies and teach Satanism FOREVER.

There is no task more difficult than attempting to reform a berserk, irrational religion such as Islam. Anyone who has the guts to try immidiately takes their own life in their hands.
Consider the case in the Uk of imam Dr Usuma Hasan, a physics lecturer at middlesex university and a fellow of the Royal
Astronomical society. When he made the claim that Darwin's theory of Evolution is compatible with Islam, he immediately recieved death threats from Islamic fundamentalists who declared that Darwin's
theory contradicted the koran's unambigous statement that Adam and Eve were the first humans and were directly created by Allah. Hasan's claims were deemed blasphemous and deserving of the death penalty.
How can you have a debate about anything when one group immediately sentences the opposing group to death?
Hasan was compelled to retract his claims, and he posted a wretched note on the door of his mosque saying; "I seek Allah's forgiveness for my mistakes and apologise for my mistakes."

So, there you have it - a practising British scientist has been compelled by threats to declare a superiority of a bizarre book of desert revelations (made to an illiterate and brutal tribesman) over Darwin's methodical 19th century research which has been accepted, in one form or another, by every credible scientist on earth. If such things can happen in Britain, one of the most advanced
nations on earth and not under islamic rule,
imagine what would happen if the muslims were actually in charge!
At the lecture he gave supporting his claim of
compatibility between Islam and Darwinism, Hasan said that he was interrupted by "fanatics"who handed out leaflets declaring that Darwin was a blasphemer. One of the men said to Hasan; "you're an apostate and should be killed."
Hasan's views were described at his mosque as a "source of antagonism in the muslim community." He was dismissed from his role as Imam. He has stated, "Darwinism is not a matter of iman (belief) or kufr (disbelief), and people are free to accept or reject a particular scientific theory."

In Saudi Arabia, clerics still commonly teach that the sun revoles around the earth, as it says in the koran. So, don't expect any Islamic Enlightenment.
The fundamentalists have got their strategy
perfectly worked out - just kill anyone who
disagree with you, and say you're doing it in the name of Allah. Anyone who challenges you is a blasphemer and apostate and must be killed. That's lesson 101 in how to ensure you remain retarded for eternity.

Islam is the religion for retards, the religion forever stuck in the Arabian desert of 1,400 years ago.

Islam is not part of the dialectic of freedom and progress. It's a permanent antithesis. The rational people of the world have no option but to pull up the drawbridge against Islam.
Muslims cannot be allowed to infect non-muslims with their irrationality and fanaticism.
It's not Muslims themselves who are the problem, but Islam as an ideology. It lends itself to mania. It encourages and demands fanaticism and intolerance.

All three Abrahamist religions should be regarded as an illness, as an infectious disease; a contagion.
If you remain in contact with them, they'll keep re-infecting you and you'll never be cured. But if just one generation were freed from Abrahamism, this hateful religion would perish. All Muslims, Jews and Christians could be cured if they were released from the relentless brainwashing machine that grips
them from the moment they're born.

The forces of irrationality are growing with astonishing rapidity. The time is short for the
rationals amongst us to change the world. Within forty years, it may be all over. The dialectic of freedom will grind to a halt, and even be reversed, and we will end up living in a world groaning under the tyranny of sharia law. Imagine the whole world ruled by the Taliban.

Islam is the greatest threat the world has ever known. It's even more toxic than the Old World Order. Don't kid yourself that liberal muslims will triumph. Pakistan was designed as a modern liberal democracy - look at it now. It's a failed state full of Islamic extremists.
All liberal societies, unless they take explicit and severe countermeasures, invariably succumb to the more committed, forceful
and determined fanatics in their midst.
In the west, the fanatical capitalists of super greed swept the liberals aside. In Islamic nations, lacking capitalism, the mad mullahs were the ones who grabbed power. Now the Muslims are outbreeding the Westerners and, if the present trends persists, first Europe and then America will fall to Islam.

Before long, Darwinists in the West will be executed for blasphemy. There will be dead camps for non- muslims, or they will be made to serve as slaves for Islam - as was done for many centuries in Islamic countries. There will be no drugs, alcohol, rock 'n' roll, casual sex or bacon sandwiches. There will be no freedom. All women will have to wear burqas. Science and Philosophy will be made illegal because they contradict the koran. All food will be halal. "Moral" police will roam the streets, strictly enforcing sharia rules and regulations. Thieves will have their limbs amputated, and fornicators and adulterers will be flogged and even stoned to death. There will be endless executions for the mildlest transgressions.
You think this is scare mongering? Then you have never heard what is been preached in countless mosques all over the world. You just need to look at Afghanistan, Yemen, Pakistan, Iran, etc. to see that this behaviour is already been carried out day in and day out in Islamic nations. Many liberal Muslims will ridicule such thinking, but they will not
be the ones in charge when the Darkest Hours comes. The fanatics - the dorminat few willing to kill others and even themselves - are the ones who will be running the show. Only the biggest fools on earth cannot see what is coming.
Nietzsche foresaw that the 20th and 21st centuries would be the most cataclysmic in history. There can be no doubt what
defining issue of these countries will be, have been and has always been - ISLAM.
Europe has several times in its history almost
succumed to the millitary power of Islam. Desperate, last-ditch battles were fought several times to hold back the Islamic tides. Had any of these battles been lost, Europe might well have fallen to Islam. The key battles were Poitiers in 732, Vienna in 1529 and 1683, and the naval battle of Lepanto in 1571. Now the same outcome may happen via immigration and higher birth rate rather than force of arms.

The West was delivered from Christian tyranny thanks to the Renaissance, the Reformation (which split christianity into warring factions) and, especially, the Enlightenment. What if this had never
happened? Europeans and the rest of the world could be living under a Roman Catholic dictatorship with the Pope at its head. Scientist would be forbidden from contradicting the Bible and handed over, like Galileo, to the inquisition if they dared to challenge scripture. It was such a tyranny under which the Gnostic Cathars faced. They were subjected to the first inquisition and then a holy crusade to exterminate them.
That's the type of world that's coming our way if Islam is triumphant.

There has been no Islamic Renaissance, Reformation or Enlightenment and there will never be one because the Islamic
fundamentalists have demonstrated that they will kill anyone who dares to disagree with them. It's the 21st century and Islam still refuses to modernize itself. Infact, it is more extreme and intolerant now than it was fifty or a hundred years ago. It is going BACKWARDS.

Pakistan, Yemen, Somalia, Iran and Afghanistan are a vision of the future of the world, only if the non-islamic world acts now can the world be saved from Islamic hegemony. It's the most important issue of all.
Only reason can save humanity. Otherwise we will be plunged into the Ultimate Endarkenment.

Just bumbed into an ancient manuscript by a Gnostic sect known as the Ophites. They got their name from the greek word "OPHIS" - Serpent. They were snake handlers and practically worshipped snakes. The remarkable thing about them was that they had an entirely different take on the story of what happened in the Garden of Eden.
In this version of the story, a stranger arrived in Eden bearing an extraordinary birthmark - a double serpent on his forehead. Through time, the myth became confused and people came to believe that an actual serpent appeared in the garden of Eden. The stranger spent all of his time with Eve, telling her amazing things. He said he had secret knowledge of the true nature of the universe. He called this special knowledge "GNOSIS", and the tree of knowledge was his symbolic way of representing Gnosticism. Good and Evil, were entirely different from what Adam and Eve were taught by Jehovah.

So the legend arose that Eve was tempted by a serpent to eat the forbidden fruit of the tree of knowledge of good and evil. In fact, what happened was that she was taught Gnosticism by the serpent stranger. There was no literal tree of knowledge in Eden, and no forbidden fruit. After all, why would Jehovah create a tree, put it in the middle of the garden of Eden and then stop Adam and Eve eating from it? That made no sense, even for Jehovah. If he had done that, he himself would have been guilty of tempting Adam and Eve. What was forbidden was any knowledge that challenged Jehovah. Gnosticism was the forbidden knowledge, forbidden because it was the very first heresy - Original sin.
Eve managed to persuade Adam to listen to the Gnostic ideas; hence the myth that Eve tempted Adam to join her in eating the forbidden apple. What she kept secret was that she was pregnant, and Adam wasn't the father. The first person born on the earth, according to the old testament, was Cain, the first true human being. His brother Abel soon followed, and this time Adam was the father.
When they grew up, the difference in appearnce between Cain and Abel was obvious. They fought over their parentage, and on Cain's birthday, Abel tried to kill Cain - with an old spear he'd found. Cain wrestled the spear from Abel and slew him. He knew he could no longer live with Adam and Eve and fled eastward. The Old Testament said he was banished to the land of Nod, but there is no such place. Nod simply means wondering. In other words, he began a nomadic life. He eventually settled in Canaan, Cain's land, the same territory Jehovah later promised to Cain's mortal enemies: the Jews, Jehovah's chosen people.
The Old Testament also says Cain was branded by God. That too was false. Cain, like his true father, had a double-serpent birthmark - the so-called mark of Cain. For some reason, it only became distinct once a year: April 30, Cain's birthday, and, following Abel's death, the Anniversary of the first killing in human history.

SS
The Nazis are linked to Cain, that's why the SS adopted two sig runes for their insignia. The Ss represented the two serpents. They also had the Death's Head symbol, just like the knights templar. And the Swastika, an ancient Hindu symbol for reincarnation. The Gnostics called reincarnation Metempsychosis - the transmigration of souls. Any soul, trapped in a human body, that failed to achieve Gnosis was condemned to be reincarnated in a new body, and live again in the material world. So, the Nazis chose the Swastika to show their Gnostic allegiance and their belief in reincarnation as the penalty for remaining wedded to this world. The Swastika is just two square Ss stuck together at right angles, another form of the Mark of Cain.

Cain and his people became famous for technological accomplishment, and they spread far and wide from Canaan, building great cities wherever they settled. Their most famous city was an architectural and engineering Marvel, full of people from all over the world, speaking different languages - Babel. Which became Babylon.

Centuries after Canaan fell to the Hebrews, becoming the land of Israel, the Babylonians invaded, sacked the Temple of Solomon in Jerusalem, and carried off all the treasures it contained, including, perhaps, the Ark of the Convenant. Some Babylonians took to ships and went looking for new lands to settle in, and rumour was that they took the Ark with them. They went to the far North, to a land that legend said lay beyond the north wind. It's called Hyperborea in Greek. The Latin name was Ultima Thule, or, usually, just Thule: the land at the end of the world.
The people of Thule made another great journey, to the most famous Island of all... Atlantis. According to the legend, Atlantis was destroyed over two and a half thousand years ago on none other than April 30, following an apocalyptic religiuos ceremony. The rumour was that the Ark of the Convenant was the centrepiece of the ceremony.
The few survivors then spoke of finding a new Atlantis, a lush land marked by a special star called "Merica" - America. America wasn't named after Amerigo Vespucci. It got its name because the people who discovered it thought it was the mythical Gnostic land that lay under the shining star "Merica".

SO WHO DID DISCOVER AMERICA?
The knights Templar. The Templar fleet that sailed off in 1307 to escape the Catholic church's persecution had no choice but to find a new land, beyond the reach of the papacy. Once they discovered America, they kept it a closely guarded secret. They made sure no word got back to Europe, knowing that if anything leaked out, the Pope would send an armada against them to conquer them and seize their new country.
It wasn't until the end of the fifteenth century that they changed their strategy. They had lost many men in wars against the native Americans, and the knights were unhappy about having to take squaws as wives. Their settlements were failing. They needed an influx of Europeans to make America viable. The Templar they chose for their most vital mission was one of the most famous men in history - Christopher Columbus.
Christopher knew exactly were the New World was for the simple reason that he already lived there. That's why no one is quite sure whether he was Italian, Spanish, Catalonian or Portuguese. In fact, he was American. Isn't it the ultimate irony? The so-called discoverer of Americas was an American all along.
When the ships 'Santa Maria', Nina and Pinta embarked from spain in 1492, they changed their sails as soon as they were out of sight of the land, and raised a new sails emblazoned with the red cross pattee of the knights Templar. A Scottish Templar called Sir John Drummond was the man who drew up the maps and charts they used on the voyage.
The history of America is largely the history of persecuted religious minorities, and the very first were the Templars. America is the country of the knights Templar - a Gnostic country, Freemasonic. It's the new Atlantis, the cherished home of the IlLuMiNaTi, their bulwark against the power of the Vatican.

A New Politics - The Replacement of Democracy by Meritocracy.
A New Economics - The Replacement of Predatory Free-Market Capitalism with Productive Social Capitalism.
A New Religion - The Replacement of the old, failed and false Mythos religions by the world's only rational Logos religion: the religion of ontological mathematics that delivers a dialectical metamorphosis (via mathematical optimization) of all human beings into gods.
A New Social Order - The Replacement, through 100% Inheritance Tax and the abolition of all means for private individuals to pass on overwhelming financial advantages and privileges to other private individuals (family members) at the expense of the Commonwealth, of the Dynastic Family Elites that rule the world. Any transaction
between private individuals that involves a vast transfer of wealth which allows unelected, unaccountable people to wield decisive influence over the Commonwealth is a subversion of the Commonwealth, and the precise means by which the 1% have come to rule the 99%.
Anyone who is on the side of the people must oppose private inheritance. If you support inheritance, you are a supporter of the dynastic elites, a traitor to, and an enemy of, the people. You believe that people
should get something for nothing, that people should be rewarded not for their own efforts but for those of others (their parents). You believe in parasitism and rewarding failures, incompetents, people with no backbone who can't stand up for themselves and make their own way in life.
No one who accepts an inheritance has any self-respect, or is worthy of any respect. They are family versions of welfare scroungers, taking money for nothing.

A New Dispensation: The World must be Rebooted. The only way to reboot it is to bring to an end the control of the vast bulk of the world's assets by a tiny private elite who stand outside the political process and yet completely dominate that process.

Capitalist Democracy has nothing to do with
democracy and everything to do with the capitalist control of the people. In other words, capitalist democracy is rule by rich capitalist oligarchs.
The ancient Athenians invented democracy precisely to overthrow such people. They would be spinning in their graves if they could see what "democracy" now is - rule by the super rich cynically and wickedly being presented as rule by the people.
Capitalist democracy is the biggest con since
Abrahamism, the other primary means for deceiving and enslaving the people.

A New Science - The replacement of Scientific
Materialism by Ontological Mathematics.

What is ontological mathematics? Mathematics is not a human construct like the English language. It's the language of existence itself and is a precondition for human life. Human beings don't invent mathematics, they tune into it, they discover
it, they are everywhere immersed in it. We exist in a cosmic ocean of mathematics.
Mathematics, ontologically, is energy - precise
mathematical energy defined by analytic sine and cosine waves. These constitute the ultimate dynamic information system.
Energy comes in specific bundles known as
monads. There are countless monads, and each of them is an uncaused, uncreated, autonomous, immortal, indestructible information system - a soul! A soul is a 100% mathematical entity. It's a pure sine and cosine energy system. It's a self-optimizing
information system.
A soul is both an object and a subject. To other souls, each soul is an object. To itself, a soul is a subject. It subjectively experiences information.
A computer - a human mathematical construct - processes information but does not experience it (because a computer is not alive). A monad is an eternal, natural, living, mathematical entity. It does not only receives, generates and processes information, it also experiences all of that information. It senses it and feels it, and it seeks to optimize it - ultimately to solve its own inner equation and become God.

The Old World Order has utterly failed. It's time for the New World Order. Anyone who opposes a new way of doing things is a conservative, a reactionary, a counter-revolutionary, and a friend and ally of the
ruling elites. The current world is designed in their image. If you want a new image that reflects you, you must support the Meritocratic New World Order that ends inheritance, nepotism, cronyism, privilege
and "who you know" and replaces these with talent, "what you know" and "what you can do".

Free-Market Capitalism - rule by the rich (by the 1%).

Abrahamism - rule by the Devil (a "God" that orders fathers to perform human sacrifice on their sons as a "test".

Democracy - Dumbocracy: rule by dumb asses.

Freedom - Freedumb to be the slaves of the Devil and the rich capitalists.

Fvck *******
Fvck *****
Fvck *****
Fvck Karma
Fvck the 1%
Fvck the "Market"
Fvck Privilege
Fvck Nepotism
Fvck Cronyism
Fvck Inheritance

The New World Order delivers the second and final Enlightenment. It enshrines reason, not money or God-worship, at the apex of human values. It's about guaranteed equal opportunities for all.
The Meritocratic State makes a social contract with every citizen to optimize each and every one of them.
The Meritocratic State is committed to positive liberty and the transformation of humanity and the world.
It's time to cast down the old Gods and rulers and, for the first time ever, build heaven on earth for the whole human race.
The super rich and the Devil-worshipers (the Jews, the Christians and the Muslims) are the obstacles to rational human progress. It's to the problem constituted by them that Logos humanity (HyperHumanity) must find the Final Solution.

You are told you live in a democracy. Democracy means “people power”. So, here’s a simple question – do you feel powerful? Has your political system empowered you? Do you feel that your views are taken into consideration, that you can stop things you don’t like, that the government has your back and is doing its utmost to improve your lot in life? If none of that is true then how can you
be living in a democracy?

Do you imagine that voting for Peter Obi, Tinubu or Atiku is going to change anything? Why would it? Don’t you want your vote to actually count, to make a difference, to make life better for you and yours?

Here’s the reason why “democracy” doesn’t give the people any power;
In a nutshell, democracy is harnessed to capitalism. Capitalism has nothing to do with the people. As the word says, capitalism is about capital. Capitalism is run by and for the people with capital: rich folks, corporations, and, above all, banks. No democrat can influence capitalism. Only those with capital –
the 1% – are in the game. The 99% are
permanently locked out of the capitalist game. Their job is to serve capitalism, to be its functionaries, its drudges, its drones, its bureaucrats, its enforcers, its slaves. They have no control whatsoever over capitalism. They are its victims, not its masters.
Do you see how brilliant the elites have been, how ingenious? They have given people the illusion of democracy, but ensured it came with no power. All the power remained where it has always been…with the rich.

Capitalism is simply plutocracy, i.e. rule
by the rich. The rich were so clever that they
rebranded plutocracy with the neutral name of capitalism so that the dumb masses wouldn’t notice the contradiction at the heart of “capitalist democracy”. If people had to refer to “plutocratic democracy” or “democratic plutocracy”, they would immediately see the fatal flaw at the heart of
the concept. Either the people are in charge, or the rich are in charge. It can’t be both.

The original form of democracy, introduced by the ancient Athenians, was designed to take power from the rich oligarchs and give it to the people. Capitalism is designed to do the reverse: power flows from the people to the rich. Capitalism is the formal opposite of democracy. Capitalism is exactly what the Athenians, the inventors of democracy,
would never have accepted.
Was there ever a greater con than “capitalist democracy”? The “democracy” is the nice
illusion, the “capitalism” is the brute reality.

The story we the people are told day in and day out is that we are in charge. The reality is that we are emphatically not in charge. All of the power resides with those with capital. It never matters who you vote for. Your vote doesn’t count and you don’t count. There are no votes that make any difference to capitalism. No capitalist is elected by you, and no capitalist is accountable to you, so why do you still cling to the fantasy that you have power, that your vote matters, that elections matter?
Why would putting either Peter Obi, Tinubu or Atiku in Aso Villa make any difference whatsoever? It’s not as if either of them is going to do anything about capitalism. They themselves are rich capitalists.
Wealthy capitalists are always the kind of people that get into power, never the likes of you. Can you imagine a simple, ordinary person in Aso Rock, who never earned more than N5,000,000 Naira a year but was a decent, capable, hard- working, intelligent teacher, for example? It’s impossible, isn’t it? So much for “democracy”.

Capitalism, naturally, puts capitalists in power. It never allows non-capitalists to have any power. Capitalism is anti-democracy. How stupid would you have to be to imagine otherwise? You are ruled by the “free market”. When have you ever elected the market? When have you ever
elected those who run the market? What power do you have over the market? The market rules you. You don’t rule it. Elections make no difference to the market.That’s why the elites allow elections. They would be illegal otherwise. The market – the engine of capitalism – stands permanently outside democracy. Democracy can’t touch it. It doesn’t care who’s in Aso Villa.
You are allowed your elections every four years because elections are meaningless. Whatever the result, the market will screw you, the capitalists will screw you, and the elites will screw you. They are, after all, masters at screwing the people. They have
been doing it for thousands of years. Why would they change now? Capitalism gave the plutocrats the chance to masquerade as the champions of the people while screwing over the people harder than ever before.

Capitalist “democracy” relies on the construction of a false consciousness. The people must be able to engage in perfect doublethink: believing that they have power even as they know for a fact that they
don’t. That’s how the system works. It’s the most elaborate charade ever. It’s a play that has been in progress for centuries, and everyone knows their lines by heart.
If people were serious democrats, they would never tolerate capitalism, which is pure plutocracy and oligarchy. So, they are pretend democrats, sham democrats, fake democrats, faux democrats, ersatz democrats. They know every which way to
play the game of impersonating democrats, while at all times allowing all of the power to stay with the plutocrats.
There are only two ways things can go. Either the people are in charge or private elites are in charge.
Capitalism puts private elites in power. What do you want? For the private arena to rule the public arena? Or for the public arena to rule the private arena? It’s one or the other. You are either a supporter of the private or the public. Democracy is about the public, capitalism about the private. They are inherently opposed.
The task of the plutocrats, and they’re very good at it, is to fool you into believing that capitalism and plutocracy are perfectly aligned.

Thomas Jefferson, the most intelligent and
farsighted President America has ever had, said, “If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around them will deprive the people of all property until their children wake up homeless on the continent their Fathers
conquered.... I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies.... The issuing power should be taken from the banks and restored to the people, to whom it properly belongs.”
Jefferson has been proved chillingly prophetic. If the people are not in charge
of capital then they are not in charge of anything.
Abraham Lincoln, the most moral American President, wrote, “Labor is prior to, and
independent of, capital. Capital is only the fruit of labor, and could never have existed if labor had not first existed. Labor is the superior of capital, and deserves much the higher consideration.”

Capitalists would be nothing without the workers. There can be no such thing as capital without workers. It’s an inversion of the natural order for capital to be regarded as superior to labor. Yet the plutocrats have engineered exactly that perverse outcome.

The tail is well and truly wagging the dog.

LikeAking:



True talk.

But y smartness,logic, Philosophy,etc, when even stupidity can produce beta results in your society?

If u apply too much smartness, logic, philosophy,etc in this world you may be doomed. I feel smartness, logic etc must restricted to non humans, eg product dev, biz strategy, in the lab, etc.

When dealing with humans we must activate/use emotions.

For example, asking a girl out with the greatest emotional punchline "I LOVE YOU" and the deep falling in love thing is logically impossible, but dis simple trick will produce great results than d highest logic.

There is no where in the world were you'll find perfection in tyranny. Stupidity yields nothing but chaos. Look at the current human race and tell me any trace of perfection in it. Rationality replaces emotion!

There are things which we as a people have
celebrated in rhetorics and comedy but for which we are NOW paying the price. Suicide is on the rise among our youths and we wonder why? Eish!! - the answer is not far-fetched!:
My mother used to beat me like crazy but I turned out OK - LIES Eh!!!

Who are YOU to talk back to my father and
live But see me now? - LIES

YOU had NO choice growing up, YOU just did what YOU were told but we turned out ok - LIES

What is 'I LOVE you' doing in our house? But we turned out ok - LIES

My Father will NEVER hug you o, soldier like him, but we turned out ok - LIES

Chaiii back then, you make a single mistake like this ehn, the beating you'll get but I turned out OK - LIES

YOU did NOT turn out ok. You're still battling the fake perfectionism our parents handed down and you would know this if you could sit quiet for a while and try to KNOW what YOU feel? Do you know what YOU feel? Can
you articulate YOUR feelings without drowning in a sea of nervous ignorance and uncomfortable silences? Looool - of course you can't.

Growing up in homes where OUR emotions were a nusiance?? Where what YOU felt had NO bearing in the affairs of the house? Where HOW you felt ... what is that Was NEVER discussed or raised? Where you had NOT the liberty to make mistakes and even less room to brood over them
YOU know what you feel? What is it called?
YOU do NOT know what you feel! That's why
emptiness plagues us now more than ever and NOW our children!!! Our range of emotions so limited and sadly a reflection of those our predecessors had! Any new emotion is strange to us and uncomfortable! Empathy Looool - you've got to be kidding me! What?? Which is why Most of us find it hard to articulate our feelings without roping another person in or blaming someone Loool.
Years of being blamed for things you had NO idea of has made us think we cant possibly be SOLELY responsible for how we feel,
someone must have caused it or someone must have made us do it ... but you turned out ok?? Most of us are able to speak now because we have a platform which allows us to say "what's on YOUR mind" and details of even the most trivial things come spilling out of a pent up silence Cos WE ARE NOT OK
You still quake and tremble whenever you need to present an idea to your family for 'approval' cos the inscription of FEAR from yesteryears has left an indelible dent in OUR OWN decision making abilities, we still need that thundering presence to make us
feel secure ~ we thrive in DYSFUNCTION
We are NOT OK! YOUR fear of hurting YOUR mother has left you in a paralytic clasp where you hyperventilate every time you go to see her cos the guilt of being born, of being the reason for her so and so has NEVER left
YOU... and you say YOU turned out OK?
That insensitivity to how someone TRULY feels has become a culture and this because YOU had NO choice but to 'feel ok' else you would be caned or yelled at.

Tell me, were you ever asked what YOU
FELT about anything? Wasn't it command and obey? Hasn't that insensitivity persisted IN US so much we no longer can sense when our own has given up on LIVING? Isn't it why we assume everyone battles the same variables as us and as such should react to things in EXACTLY the same way we do?? Looool - And we turned out OK?

The very last thing Alchemist were seeking was something that literally turns base metals into gold.
They were highly religious people seeking true knowledge of the universe, hence their obsession with obscure experiments.
The "Base Metal" they were talking about were ordinary people. The "Gold" was what people became when they discovered the true God.
When they talked about an elixir of life, the Alchemist meant the promise of eternal life offered by the true God (i.e; UNLOCKING
OF THE NEOCORTEX AND BECOMING OF PURE MINDS=MONADS). Similarly, when they spoke about finding a cure for all human diseases, they meant heaven, where no one suffers any illness.

The Alchemists were part of the super-conspiracy too... Kindly note this; Anytime you come accross the group of people attacking the hostility of the Catholic church, even the whole of Abrahamism, you can be sure they're part of the super-conspiracy.

All you have to bear in mind is that whenever
christians are faced with a choice between a literal and a Metaphorical interpretation of something, they'll invariably accept the literal interpretation even when it's absurd. Especially when it's absurd.
I'll give you a few examples; The Johannite sect in ancient Judea refered to John the Baptist as the 'Word of God'. So, an expression like "THE WORD OF GOD COULD BE HEARD BY ALL" merely meant that John the Baptist was speaking loudly enough for
the people at the back of the crowd to hear him. It certainly didn't mean that God was talking to the human race. Nor did it mean that they thought John the Baptist was God; simply that he was God's chosen mouthpiece. He spoke for God not as God.
Similarly, the Johannite refered to non-Johannite as "blind" because they couldn't see the light of the true God. When John the Baptist converted someone, he was "making the blind see" i.e, introducing them to the true religion. He wasn't curing actual blind people of physical blindness.

"Lepers" were Johannites who had lapsed from the true religion, making them "untouchable" as far as practicing Johannites were concerned. "Curing a leper" meant bringing such a person back to the fold; it had nothing to do with a diseased person
being cured of leprosy.

"The dead" were those who were
excommunicated from the religion for grave
offences. To be "raised from the dead" meant to be released from excommunication. Any Johannite would have regarded the idea that it signified a man coming back from actual deas as ridiculous. And, think about it, if jesus really raised lazarus from the dead, it would be one of the most well known events in history, talked about by everyone. Lazarus would be famous, invited to Rome to see
the Emperor to describe his experience. As it was, no further mention was ever made of lazarus. How could a man who came back from the dead be forgotten so easily? Obviously, he never died in the first place, and no one who was there at the time
said he did.

"The Poor" were those who'd newly joined the Johannite sect and still had much to learn; the "sick" were those who had heard the messasge and rejected it.

New Johannites were only allowed to drink water for the first year; afterwards they were permitted to have wine. So, turning "water
into wine" simply meant helping new Johannite through their initiation period.

"Walking on water" described the final part of the initiation ceremony. Johannites threw themselves in the line in front of their religious master to prove their devotion and subservience. Barefooted, he walked over them.
Christians, ofcourse, took this all too literally, as ever. Those with "Ears to hear" understood the coded language perfectly;
outsiders had no idea of what was being discussed. Christians, entirely on the outside, never tired ofgetting it spectacularly, almost criticaly, wrong.

LikeAking:
Oga calm down.

U a smart guy, but u have come to dis world too early. The world is not ready for dis vibe.

We are creature's engineer Ed by logic.

Very smart/wise people don't go anywhere in life.

Sorry.

Do you know why smart people don't go anywhere and What has held the world back?

The intelligent not engaging with the Id, not forming the necessary, even cruel, conclusions about the stupid – not having confidence in themselves, not doing what
needs to be done to bring about a Logos victory.

The intelligent must acquire a superiority complex and dictate to the barbarians. Or the
barbarians rule. Which one will it be?

"The best lack all conviction…"
"No weaklings should rule!" – Atatürk

“The Highest Man as Lawgiver [Lycurgus] of the Future.” – Nietzsche

"Until philosophers are kings, or the kings and princes of this world have the spirit and power of philosophy [within them] … cities will never have rest from their evils." – Plato, The Republic

“The philosopher must be our lawgiver. [!]” –
Nietzsche

“New species. (How the greatest species hitherto [for instance, the Greeks] were reared: this kind of accident must now be consciously striven for.) [The positive liberty regeneration of mankind.]” – Nietzsche

Only the strong State, led by the most exceptional geniuses, has the power to regenerate mankind itself into a completely new form, a new species.

The idea is to revalue all values, to re-order the human *condition* itself, not a few individuals here and there by accident, blind luck or chance, but on a grand scale, to re-order humanity’s relationship with itself.

Animals are to negative libertarians, as negative libertarians are to Statists. Just as animals lack the sufficient consciousness to completely re-order their environment, negative libertarians lack the sufficient consciousness to completely re-order the
human condition. (They believe it to be impossible: Just as animals believe re-ordering their environment to be impossible – beyond their meagre ability – so too do negative libertarians believe re-ordering the human condition to be impossible.)

“All positive liberty States (whether Spartan,
Athenian, Theban, Corinthian, Roman, Jacobin, socialist, fascist, communist, Nazi or meritocratic) are a direct threat to negative libertarian ideologies such as free-market capitalism, and, frequently, a direct threat to [backwards] religions.” – Mike Hockney

The aim of the Classic State is to use an exceptional degree of State power to transform each individual, to perfect each individual. Why wouldn’t you want to become perfect (become GOD), or attain a state as close to perfection as possible?
Perfection can only be attained by integrating
everyone into an intelligent whole (ideally, as
intelligent as possible, the more intelligent the better). That’s what civilisation is all about, although so far a true, conscious civilisation has been thwarted by the
backwards forces of Abrahamism and democracy.
You can become perfect only if everyone around you is perfect as well. You have a much better chance of becoming a brilliant individual on a Starship – where everyone is an intellectual, a Logos person, a genius – than in a jungle, or in a Purge Anarchy free-for-all, or in a “market”, a “free market”: the “free market” of course being the economic equivalent of Purge Anarchy, where
populations fight a Hobbesian war of “all against all” through money-making (the activity that Plato derided as the LOWEST value).

In Plato’s tripartite system, Reason (Intelligence, Knowledge) is the highest value. The Platonic leaders are the most intelligent, the visionary geniuses. Honour (bravery, courage, boldness) is also important, but facilitates the aim of Knowledge, the higher value. And money-making (trade, acquisition) is the lowest value.
Plato’s system – rule by the best – is the inverse of the current world order in the West et al, which revolves around the weak, almost non-existent “state” as the summum bonum. For whom? For the benefit of whom? (Cui bono?) For rich capitalists, who abhor
any regulation or oversight on their criminal
profiteering and negligence. Look closely
throughout the entire West, and you will see no economic police investigating the super-rich. Cui bono? Predatory capitalists routinely are allowed to carry out ridiculous, harmful blunders that would get them executed in any sane country – China, for instance – for their incompetence and ruining of people’s lives. It cannot be overstated that predatory capitalists commit endless crimes every day, including very deadly ones (for example,
Amazon workers literally dying due to criminal negligence, due to NEGATIVE LIBERTY), but none of these are recognised as crimes … because the predatory capitalists that rule society have defined “crime” so as to exclude them and whitewash their legal-mafia proclivities.

The strong State is the only force that can put a stop to this degenerate capitalist circus. Anyone that opposes the strong State is, whether they realize it or not, helping the capitalist class maintain its hegemony and stranglehold over all aspects of life in the West. The small state is cultural capitalism.
The strong State does not annihilate the individual (it’s actually predatory capitalism that annihilates and crushes the individual), but sets the individual free. Free how? Free as in, a higher state than what came before: to be intelligent, educated and to attain glory is true, positive liberty freedom (otherwise, everyone would go to the jungle for the negative liberty freedom of “behaviour
unrestricted in any way.”)

The very basis of civilisation is rules, laws, order and regulation. The problem is not with these things but with an ABSENCE of all these things, an absence of the degree of order and discipline required to create a
truly great civilisation, as encouraged by chaotic predatory capitalism in its race to the bottom and the Lowest Common Denominator.
Predatory capitalists are all criminals – and in
charge of the mass media – and so they energize the mass media with the ludicrous claim that civilisation has “gone too far”, that society must deregulate and let these economic criminals “do as they please”. Cui bono?

“The Highest Man as Lawgiver [Lycurgus] of the Future.” – Nietzsche

"Until philosophers are kings, or the kings and princes of this world have the spirit and power of philosophy [within them] … cities will never have rest from their evils." – Plato, The Republic

“The philosopher must be our lawgiver. [!]” –
Nietzsche

“New species. (How the greatest species hitherto [for instance, the Greeks] were reared: this kind of accident must now be consciously striven for.) [The positive liberty regeneration of mankind.]” – Nietzsche

Only the strong State, led by the most exceptional geniuses, has the power to regenerate mankind itself into a completely new form, a new species.
The idea is to revalue all values, to re-order the human *condition* itself, not a few individuals here and there by accident, blind luck or chance, but on a grand scale, to re-order humanity’s relationship with itself.

Animals are to negative libertarians, as negative libertarians are to Statists. Just as animals lack the sufficient consciousness to completely re-order their environment, negative libertarians lack the sufficient consciousness to completely re-order the
human condition. (They believe it to be impossible: Just as animals believe re-ordering their environment to be impossible – beyond their meagre ability – so too do negative libertarians believe re-ordering the human condition to be impossible.)

The Movement will suffer defections, accusations, betrayal, in-fighting, disillusionment, despair, infiltration, sabotage. As well as good, solid members, it will attract undesirables, dilettantes, the
curious and the demented. So what?
Every movement endures that. Fair-weather friends will come and go. Bandwagon people will jump on and then off again when something new comes along. So it goes. Those movements that have anything about them will grow stronger and prosper. Those that don’t will self-destruct and vanish. That’s Darwinism for you. Survival is not compulsory.
The key is to find leaders of men who are not
buffeted by the tides and eddies of the time: the world-historical individuals of whom Hegel spoke, the golden people who can change the world, the people who embody the destiny of their time.

The Power Elite have always had a reassuring
thought: the people are incapable of resistance. They are sheep. They will squabble amongst themselves rather than ever get seriously organised. They will find trivial reasons to disagree because they can never keep their eye on the main objective. They will be influenced by misinformation
and disinformation. Divide and rule. The oldest game in the book. The people don’t even have to be divided by the elite – they will do it to themselves, free of charge. It comes as part of their identity.
The Movement has no need for such people. They can only get in the way. A small group of highly talented, committed, focused people with a clear identity is far more likely to succeed than a large, disparate alliance of the disgruntled, but who have no true common identity.

The Movement, if it is to succeed, needs to recruit approximately 6,000 highly talented individuals, all of whom want to change the world. Not to ineffectually moan and groan about the Power Elite, but to actually take power from them by outsmarting them, by being more creative, by providing a superior vision and more inspirational leadership.

The key to controlling the world is controlling identity.
Politicians, business leaders, religious leaders, bankers, celebrities, advertisers, media moguls…they have full control of the means for constructing the identities of the peoples of the world. Controlling identity means controlling emotions rather than reason. Mainstream religions are not rational but emotional. People can be swayed by an appeal to their emotions in a way that can never be achieved through reason. That’s
why Richard Dawkins can’t succeed. He presents factual arguments, but they lack emotional resonance and people turn away from them. People need their emotional sustenance.

The key to freedom is allowing people to create their own identity, the one that truly expresses who they are, satisfies them emotionally and allows them to fulfil their personal talents.

The Old World Order: your identity is imposed on you by Religion, Society, the Power Elite, your parents. It doesn’t matter if the identity doesn’t “fit” you because you are the creation of others.

The New World Order: it is the duty of the state to allow you a flourishing, supportive environment where you create your own identity based on who you truly are, and regardless of all other people. All that matters is that your identity should fit you as a unique individual. You are your own creation. Which is it to be?

The Movement may or may not evolve into
something of real value. Its fate depends purely on the calibre of people it attracts. Already half of its members have fallen by the wayside – so of what use were they in the first place? They had no commitment, no strength, no vision, no will. Such people would never have taken the Movement
forward.
If the Movement perishes then it wasn’t fit
for purpose. If it succeeds then it was. It’s as simple as that.

Can you contribute? Can you make a difference? Are you a leader? Do not join the Movement if you are a follower because you will soon depart, as the sheep already have.
As things stand in this world, only 5% of the population are capable of leadership. It’s now clear that the Movement should direct its attention towards them and no others.
The initial incarnation of the Movement is already dead. Can it rise more gloriously like a Phoenix from the ashes?
Goodbye to those who departed. Waste someone else’s time in your feeble pursuit of an identity. As for those who already have an identity, are you capable of saying, as Nietzsche did, “I am not a man I am dynamite.”

The future belongs to those who can seize it by the neck. It does not and never will belong to those who whine on the sidelines, the Ignavi who can’t commit themselves to anything, who drift through life like motes of dust in the air, transient and pathetic, at the mercy of the currents.

If you find yourself in a movement that seems to revolve around the personal lifestyle of its leader, get out. You’re in a cult.

You know you’re not in a cult when the leadership’s personal tastes are irrelevant to the Cause and the Cause is always committed to universal themes concerning the bulk of humanity, not particular causes dealing with the particular concerns of exotic minorities, and exotic leaders.
Cult leaders are always exotic, idiosyncratic
individuals dealing with personal issues and
traumas. They make everything personal. The camera is always trained on them. No one else is ever allowed into shot. Know any movements like that? Then get out! It’s not a movement. It’s a cult. You know it is.

Here’s another simple way to identify a cult. Could the movement continue seamlessly with a meritocratic individual from its ranks promoted to the leadership role? Or would
the movement collapse instantly if the current
leader were no longer around? If so, it’s a cult.
A movement can replace its leader – the Cause is what counts. A cult cannot replace its leader – the Leader is what counts. Because it’s a cult.
In a cult, the leader makes every member adopt his personal causes. Because it’s always all about him. Everyone else is irrelevant. Like the Ignavi, his only cause is
his own, but he makes others adopt his causes and then he claims he is the leader of a movement and not a cult. It’s always the same. Every influencer is in the cult game. Imagine a different world where influencers weren’t cult leaders but were actually
communicating brilliant messages. Go to YouTube and check out Nietzsche’s Critique of Christianity: The Genealogy of Morals by Michael Sugrue. There you have someone committed to communicating a message. Sugrue is not selling himself, selling his
own personal tastes and kinks, asking you for stars and super chats and subscriptions. Sugrue’s cause is philosophy and he is brilliantly communicating the message of a great philosopher (Nietzsche).
That’s his job. His job is not to promote Michael Sugrue and his personal opinions, beliefs, tastes, choices and identities. That’s all irrelevant.

Do you find difficulties in purchasing any smart devices of your choice?

Why not give us your trust for accurate market flow @ CHRISGRACE PHONES NIG. ENTERPRISES.

Contact us with these mobile digits: 07040650376.

Email: sparrowjexx@gmail.com

Give us your trust and we won't let you down.

"Where China has 100-year plans, the West can barely see beyond 100 minutes." – David Sinclair

Future-orientation is a determinant of intelligence. The more intelligent you are, the more you look to the future – the further you plan into the future. We Could literally design an intelligence scale based entirely on future-orientation.

The Genius State will have 1000-year plans; plans to transform the entire galaxy; plans to become Gods harvesting the energy of the entire universe.
1000+ years = geniuses. And the work of geniuses is true eternally, relevant eternally. Geniuses are ahead of their time, outside of their time-zone, a fish out of water, a potential God among the rest of humanity. They are a rare glimpse of divinity. They
are ATEMPORAL: they could exist anywhere in time and be just as relevant, just as brilliant. All that is genius has about it an air of the eternal.

The pygmy, modern man, by contrast, can barely see beyond his own nose. He is blind. He has the attention span of a goldfish. The internet – as misused by predatory capitalism – makes people as short-termist as possible.

Woke liberals make a great play of "living in the present moment". Their timescale, their intelligence, is literally zero – by their own admission. They don't look to the future. They are creatures of the present moment, like animals.

As for conservatives, they might as well be fossils. Whereas liberals have no future – they shun the future to be creatures buffeted by the winds of fashion in the present moment – conservatives are glued to the anti-intellectualism of 1400, or 2000 years ago. They are walking skeletons, incapable of
reaching the future as well. They have a negative time-scale. That's why the Logos future depicted in Star Trek seems so alien to them. Conservatives dismiss Star Trek as "fake" or "utopian". They prefer the "real" dystopia of financial tyranny, financial slavery. That seems "natural" to them – as hell seems natural to demons, and so on, and so on.

Conservatives and libertarians are literally hell-spawn. They are natural servants of the Demiurge. They will fight to be slaves and make others slaves. The Confederacy
literally did. Capitalists and their lackeys do too.

An employee – what is that but a glorified slave, a slave with airs and graces? They have no say. They must obey their bosses – the privileged star children of the Old World Order – or they won't be able to survive. The formula is "Obey or die", "Work for the
Old World Order or die". It's an offer that can't be refused from the Legal Mafia. So how are they not slaves?

Liberals and fake "leftists" (for example, Islam- supporting woke communists – what kind of a pathetic leftist apologises for a woman-hating, intellectual-killing grotesque social injustice?) are too agreeable to EVER create such a future. They are craven weaklings. Sure, they may want a better future – they may even speak of it – but they are far too pathetic to ever bring it about. They ask, "What has strength ever done for us?" If Spartacus requested their help, they would rail against Spartacus for "coming off too strong". They are slaves, pacifists, love and lighters, Christians without Christ, Buddhists and New Age fragile snowflakes, always catching a cold even at the slightest use of HARSH LANGUAGE (and of course, harsh language will not be enough to overthrow
the Old World Order...).

As soon as you place love, peace and pacifism – naive, insipid, faux "relatedness" over reason, logic and intelligence – "not offending anyone" over the truth – then that is a corruption, a symptom of decline and decay. What kind of pathetic worms
have we been reduced to, if we know the truth but we are afraid to speak it?
Liberals – in fact all slaves, and there are so many slaves – praise the faux "underdog" – the anarchist Christian, the Jew, the Islamist, the stupid, the slave AS slave (instead of joining Spartacus, they would
have him love his slavery), the fat, the unhealthy (it
is now politically incorrect to say that health is
better than unhealth), the decadent, the lowest common denominator.
(It would not be unfair to characterise
conventional-leftism as a cult of ugliness
(moderation as ugliness) ... it wants to tear down
beauty, not to make beauty a universality. It's
"Protestant" – a tirade against merit, expertise and "Catholic" beauty; it's not "Catholic" i.e. constructing
the magnificent citadel of the Gods.)
As Nietzsche predicted, "The hatred directed
against the privileged in body and spirit: the revolt
of the ugly and bungled souls against the beautiful,
the proud, and the cheerful. The weapons used: contempt of beauty, of pride, of happiness: "There
is no such thing as merit," …"
Liberal slave morality: intolerance of the best,
extreme tolerance of the worst. How do you think
that will work out for you? It is the purest anti-
meritocracy. It is the Peter Principle. It is the Dunning-Kruger effect. It is the Idiocracy,
surreptitious and dishonest. As Nietzsche wrote,
"The mortal enmity of the herd towards all order of
rank ... Towards all strong individuals ... it is hostile,
unfair, intemperate, arrogant, cheeky, disrespectful,
cowardly, false, lying, pitiless, deceitful, envious, revengeful." It is "democratic": the mob decides.
"Well-meaning" simpletons can outvote every
genius.
Liberals can't even "go after" one Islamist, let alone
all of them. Do you have any idea how Statist the
New World Order would be? Wearing a burqa is now illegal (because it is an indicator of Islamic
fundamentalism and separatism – wearing it
implicitly declares war on the State, on everyone
"non-Muslim". If you see someone wearing a
burqa on the street you immediately call the police
(the philosopher-Guardians). Where are the noble, strong people? Where are the people today who
are strong enough to carry out such a program?
Abrahamism is a crime. Predatory capitalism is a
crime. The "free market" sans regulation is a
runaway criminal enterprise, administered – badly –
by greedy shysters. Greed is a crime. Stupidity is not a crime but a disease to be cured. Someone
persisting in their stupidity – contrary to the genius
State – is a crime.
Owning a Bible or a "book" by Rand – except as a
museum curiosity, as a salutary "warning from
history" – is a crime. All Bibles and everything by Rand should be burned. To not do so is to risk the
re-infection of stupidity, to only go "half-way". Half-
solutions are for hollow men. We must incinerate
every last trace of the old world. None of it is worth
saving! The dinosaurs must became extinct. The
dialectic demands it. It cries out for succour – for heroes to fill the void, to illuminate the noosphere.
WE are the dialectic. It speaks through us. In
Illumination, you can grasp a glimpse of the
glorious Tomorrowland future that awaits New
Humanity. We are the Nova Bomb, at once bright
and brilliantly destructive. More light! More power! More knowledge! These are the Faustian ideals.
Liberals can't create a better world because they
cannot JUDGE what is wrong with the current one.
They are Buddhists or cows in a field. They are
mindless in the moment. They are not human, but
grazing cows (it's what they aspire to be, in the end). It's only fair to accurately represent their
"aspiration". They would no doubt reincarnate as
grazing cows, but the excess of human bodies to
link to means they are "promoted early" (the Peter
Principle as it occurs in Nature).
Conservatives are hardly human either. They are sharks and crocodiles. There is no neocortex, no
reason, no intelligence. Only eat or get eaten. The
jungle – purge anarchy – is what conservatives
dream of. They want to kill their neighbours or
"socially kill" them by the disease of money.
Conservatives and libertarians make asinine videos about how "The general good is a tool of sinister
social control", how "Any taxation is theft". They
have no Superego. They have no Angelic
component. They are libertarians, anarchists,
subversives. They will be nailed to crosses on the
Appian Way. They have infinite energy for attacking the state – the one path to Salvation – and none for
attacking predatory capitalism. They call Statism
"the most dangerous religion".
Dangerous to whom?
Yes, the State is dangerous – to predatory capitalists
and their fellow travellers (which is why they hate and revile it so much). The State will put predatory
capitalism out of business. It's the only thing which
can do so. The State – of militant geniuses – will
triumph over retarded, entitled parents, triumph
over the greedy individual, triumph over negative
liberty decadents, emotionalists, traditionalists, tax- evading subversives, anarchists and libertarians,
over the debasement of the human race to money.
To this, we are highly dangerous: as an immune
system is dangerous to a virus, as a lawmaker or
judge is dangerous to a criminal or an anarchist. As
Ranty McRanterson wrote, "The Freudian Superego is the policeman, judge and lawmaker inside all of
our heads. ... The Superego concerns reason, logic
and the General Will. It is expressed through the
neocortex."
You viruses are right to recognise the danger – of
your extinction. What is the purpose of dinosaurs, their only purpose? TO BECOME EXTINCT. You will be
dialectically eradicated. It is our duty to the human
race. As Agent Smith said, "Evolution, Morpheus,
evolution. Like the dinosaur. Look out that window.
You've had your time. The future is our world,
Morpheus. The future is our time." If viruses could speak, what would they campaign
for? "No immune system. Immune systems are the
most dangerous religion. Contribution of cells to
the body is theft. Cells are not to work together
under any circumstances."
And now we can understand – not admire, but understand – why Abrahamists, anarchists and
libertarians, Christians and predatory capitalist
criminals all campaign against their bane, their
Achilles Heel, the State. "No State. Statism is the most
dangerous religion [TO US]. Minimise the State.
Minimise the immune system. Let us run wild, wildly over the people. Let us have "freedom" [freedom
for the Old World Order, no freedom for anybody
else]."
Mike Hockney wrote, ""Freedom" is one of the
central reasons why the world is such a bad place.
The rhetoric of freedom goes hand in hand with the Freudian Id, with pleasure-seeking, with instant-
gratification, with capitalist consumerism, with
getting to do whatever you want [at the expense of
the people]. ... The "freedom" agenda has created
an anti-social world of selfish people participating
in a game theory version of life." It's always degenerates that talk incessantly about
"freedom". Freedom for what, zombie? Freedom to
shop? How can a zombie ever be free?
Rather than prattling on about freedom from all
duties and obligations, why don't you instead talk
about human evolution? But you wouldn't know how, would you?
When a people turns against the Positive Liberty
State, it is finished. It is over. It is moribund. Back to
the shopping mall – your graveyard.
Baudrillard said of America (and by extension the
West, which is now Greater America) that it "lives in a perpetual present". This is exactly true of the
liberal hegemon. They can't see the consequences
of relativism, "anything goes", Magian
multiculturalism, and so on. They have no
transcendent vision to pull them forwards.
Conservatives live in a perpetual past. They hate the liberal present and the Faustian future.
Liberals live in a perpetual present. They are blasé
about the conservative past (but are too weak to
eradicate it!) and shun the Faustian future and call it
"fascist" because we do not tolerate anti-statism,
Islam, Judaism or Judaeo-Protestant capitalism. (Only Christianity is "allowed" to be attacked – a hit
ratio of one out of four – and even that, only half-
heartedly.) (Conservatives attack Islam while
defending Judaism, Christianity and capitalism – a
hit ratio, again, of one out of four.)
As for Faustians, we live in a perpetual FUTURE. We live in the future in relation to everyone else. We
despise the liberal present and the conservative
past. The past we do not need, nor do we need the
present – a drastic failure by all counts. Why aren't
we in the Space Age yet, the Star Trek Age? It’s not
as if it’s impossible; it’s easily reachable. If we are not there, it means there is something
fundamentally wrong with the current humanity – a
lack of vision, a lack of scope, a lack of the
intellectual-totalitarian impulse. Westerners are
blind, narrow, desiccated, “moral” fellaheen
incapable of uniting, incapable of imposing themselves, incapable of placing the glory of
humanity above moralizing. They lack a sense of
destiny and have an entirely insufficient timescale.
They tolerate the past and cling to the present, but
loathe the future, the glorious spacefaring future.
Liberals and conservatives are beasts in the field. They are human vegetables, not active contributing
citizens of a polis. Liberals are passive cows in a
field waiting for the abattoir, for the first potent
force to come along and slaughter them.
Conservatives are "eat or get eaten" predators who
have failed to evolve, who have no notion of the general good.
Is this "dehumanising" liberals and conservatives?
They have dehumanised themselves. They have
failed to evolve. They are an evolutionary dead end.
A human world, a conscious world, is not this
world. This is an animal+ world, a bicameral+ world, an increasingly animalistic world – a twilight
Idiocracy, an Idiocracy of zombies.
Nietzsche thought the Id – the Dionysian – had lost
out. He was right. Steve Madison wrote, "Real
Dionysians aren't moderate. ... There are no
Dionysians in today's sanitized world. They were abolished first by Christianity and then by liberal
political correctness. ... The essence of the Dionysian
is the illiberal and the immoderate, the going way
too far, beyond all good sense, beyond all
acceptable standards. ... Dionysus wasn't some
feeble, drooling idiot. He had an incredible Will to Power and always destroyed his enemies without
mercy."
This world is not Apollonian, nor is it Dionysian. It is
neither. It is neither strong nor wise. It values
honour at nil. It is neither intelligent, nor alive. The zombies are everywhere, making endless excuses for themselves.

What has held the world back? The intelligent not engaging with the Id, not forming the necessary, even cruel, conclusions about the stupid – not having confidence in themselves, not doing what
needs to be done to bring about a Logos victory. The intelligent must acquire a superiority complex and dictate to the barbarians. Or the barbarians
rule. Which one will it be?
"The best lack all conviction…"
"No weaklings should rule!" – Atatürk

Crime, justice, and law and order. These are words that we continuously hear spewed from the mouths of the right-wing media. Calls to rein in crime, imprison criminals, to deliver justice to those who deserve to be punished. World leaders such as US and Nigeria Presidents nearly all run on a message of being tough on crime. They tell us that individual good people must be prepared to step up and rid society of the criminal menace. Or is this just propaganda to
fuel the for-profit industrial prison complex?

The law creates an arbitrary category of crime. Those things and actions which are criminalized are illegal within the law, mirrored by those which are legal. People often conflate illegality and legality with goodness and evil in their understanding of
the world. However, it is important to note that the state of the law is not related to morality, but to the arbitrary dictates of those who created it. Slavery, for example, was once perfectly legal. Nevertheless, this conflation often determines public response to crime. We deal with criminals as bad people, and our attitudes towards them are shaped by comparing ourselves, law-abiding folk, who we see as good people, to the criminal fringe, who are bad.

For the most part, our response to crime as a
society has been to use authoritarian brute force. We wish to scourge the world of what is seen as evil so we take steps to remove all of the criminals, drug addicts, gang members, etc to make our world a better place. The problem with this mentality is that we must understand that it’s not the people themselves that are inherently bad. There are many factors, other than personal moral
failings which may motivate people to commit crimes.

Multitudes of situations are created in current
society in which an individual may find themselves in a position where they feel forced to do something that they normally wouldn’t do. Economic factors play a substantial role in the crime rate, including job availability, median income, and poverty levels. Additionally, there is also the fact that many illegal things, simply should not be.

Look at the ‘war on drugs’ in the United States, Nigeria, etc where multitudes, usually low-income minority non-violent drug offenders are imprisoned for many years for possession of drugs like cannabis, despite cannabis being widely known to have
beneficial medicinal qualities. In fact, when we examine the history behind why cannabis was made illegal in the US, we find that it was driven by capital gain and utilized racist agendas. But perhaps more on that another time.

Conceptually, crime and morality are often
confused as being intrinsically linked. But even if crime and what is considered morally good were bound at the hip, would this even be desirable? What can be viewed as a negative action by some may not be viewed in the same sense by others. For example, homosexuality can be viewed by some as
bad, and by others as entirely normal. As the saying goes “what is normal to the spider is chaos to the fly.” The concept of morality is not a reliable arbiter of what should be legal or illegal since it is a completely subjective concept based on personal beliefs.

So, if we can’t rely on morality to help us craft a rational criminal legal system, what should we use? Well, we need to develop a joint view of what society is for and what a perfect society looks like. Then we must detail the types of behaviors and actions likely to promote that society’s goals and those likely to be a detriment to them.

Legalize the former and criminalize the latter. So the question of legality becomes less about what is good and evil, and more about what is measurably beneficial and detrimental to a shared vision of society (ahem, a Meritocracy). So something like
murder should be illegal because it harms both the individual and society, but with something like cannabis use, are the overall benefits of its use greater than its detriments? If the data shows a net positive, it should not be illegal.

Once the law has decided you are a criminal, the most common means of dealing with it is by removing an individual entirely from society, locking them up, and throwing away the key. This often doesn’t work, unless you’re the owner of privatized prisons in which case it makes you very rich. Take for example drug users, hundreds of
thousands are held in state and federal prisons in the United States for drug-law violations.

Does locking these drug offenders away from the public do them as individuals any good? Or should we be providing a supportive environment with rehabilitative resources to those that have found
themselves cycling within the suboptimal
circumstance of drug addiction? As the overdose epidemic is on the rise, clearly locking them up is not working.

The inverse of things being illegal, which should not be, are things that are legal and should be banned. For example in a sane and safe society, it would be wise to heavily control guns. Take the Robb Elementary Shooting in Uvalde TeXas, this could not have happened if it was not so easy for the shooter to buy a gun. Sure, removing such easy access to firearms will not take away the
motivations for wanting to commit mass murder, but it is the first step to substantially decreasing active shooter events.

Current society treats crime as the product of
individual moral failings versus societal
shortcomings. To properly address the issue of crime, we must first identify the root of the problem. If there is an increase in crime in any given community we must analyze the situation as a whole, not just the individual criminals. Think of crime as the mythical Hydra, with every head removed from the monster two more would grow in its place.

Every time you lock away a criminal, and fail to fix the circumstances in society which produced that criminal, more will replace them. The socio-economic issues in society are what produce criminality. The best way to fix the problem of theft, for example, is to make sure everybody has enough money and food to live well and happily. What motivation is there to steal in a society without want?

A rational meritocratic society will effectively make crime redundant. It is set up that the basic needs of all citizens are met, while at the same time, the state nurtures its citizens for greatness from the day they are born. This combined with Meritocracy’s rational
approach to law-making will effectively eliminate the vast majority of reasons why crimes occur: arbitrary laws and an unfair malfunctioning economic system.

We are Meritocrats. We will end crime. We will build a fair and just society. We will make a better world. We will Immanentize the Eschaton!

Why is the West certain to die? Or, certain to enter a drawn-out, twilight period of mediocrity and decline, to be replaced by China as the world’s new superpower?
Because the “culture” of the West, its bloodstream, is defective.
There is no impetus in the West to sacralize the State, or to sacralize intelligence (the
Platonic Catholicon) … only to do the inverse.
On the one hand you have libertarians, anarchists and liberals who undermine governance on principle, who hate civilisation, and want no obstructions or barriers in the way of the stateless super-rich. On the other hand you have bizarre,
mindless hippie cults of anti-intellectuals who hate mathematics and embrace relativism, who despise mathematics and the NWO project to create a glittering civilisation, but instead retreat inward via “meditation” and retarded books such as “Feeling is the Secret”, where you must close your eyes,
subjectively feel and then . What is notably
absent? THINKING. Thinking is absent. Thinking is divine.

These two “Second Religiousnesses” (the individual as the religion, and non-judgmental Feeling as the religion … so the individual as the religion once again) are the opposite direction from what is needed, bringing the West further into negative
liberty hatred of the state, and into individualism, narcissism, relativistic psychopathy and mindless “Feeling” as the solution to all problems.
The future is in the opposite direction: in the Authority of Godlike Philosopher-Kings, the Genius State, mathematical absolutism and THINKING.

The Anglo-American, Protestant mode of capitalism makes people more stupid, more relativistic, more psychopathic and more libertarian. Robespierre said, “The secret of freedom is in educating people.” That’s exactly right. We need to switch from relativistic psychopathy, where wealth is the
sole criterion of success (from the worship of
Mammon) to a civilised species where intellect and THINKING is regarded as the highest good. Power must be placed, not with morons, but with Rule by Godlike Philosopher-Kings who rule on behalf of humanity. Action must be taken against
negative libertarians, who, in the face of a
pandemic, believe it’s a “rebellion” to defy the General Will for the sake of negative liberty freedumb, and who think it’s a “rebellion” to support the super-rich in their Protestant campaign to demonize the State, any governance on principle. And for what? For “individuals”. For “moneymakers”. And most of all for the “market”.
Honestly, who would fight on behalf of the market? Individualists do, in the name of “freedom” (the Confederate freedom of marketeers to have no state intervention).

Western nations, occupied by global capital, would need complete overhauls to bring them into a Star Trek era, a spacefaring era which valued mathematics, intelligence and Thinking. They would need to sacralize the State as the shield of the people against super-rich profiteers. This, increasingly, looks more and more that it would not be done by persuasion (since morons can’t be persuaded), but through force – a primitive solution for a primitive world. This is not lamentable but a necessity and the birthright of all intellectuals who don’t want to “stand by and do nothing” (“Psychopathy triumphs when Goodintellectuals do nothing.”).

As Adam Weishaupt wrote, “When the God Project is complete, we expect to use it to transform the world. Above all, we expect to be able to set up a meritocratic Plato's Republic for rationalists, to build paradise on earth [heaven* on earth, to Immanentize the Eschaton] for all those with[Thinking] values ... and also to provide absolute protection against all of the enemies of [Thinking]
values (our enemies will be legion).”
*Heaven = heaven on earth = Immanentize the Eschaton:
Heaven is what you get when there are no stupid people, no stupidity … when imperfection and stupidity are exterminated. To that end we are absolutely ‘heaven’ people where heaven is the Repository of Knowledge and ‘Good’ means being a high-functioning NT (a Nietzschean thinking
intuitive who not only values knowledge, but is strong enough to exterminate stupidity). NTs are Angels.
In the same vein, ‘Purgatory’ people are Neutrals (Feelers), i.e. spineless liberals, who have no standards and hope for a “balance” between knowledge and stupidity, a “balance” between Good (knowledge) and Evil (psychopathy) … they are relativists and muddling compromisers.
‘Purgatory’ people = Neutrals, Feelers, Ignavi, Compromisers, spineless slaves who say “Sure, stupidity and psychopathy might be bad, but who are you to exterminate stupidity?! Psychopaths have rights too!! The psychopaths (evil) and the knowledgeable (Good) have to get along because neither is more valuable than the other.” (Relativism, placing Good intellectualism and Evil psychopathy on the same level, hence …
Neutral.)

Finally, ‘hell’ people are quite obviously psychopaths, i.e. right-libertarians, Randists, etc. Anyone who worships “greed” or “selfishness” or“hates taxation” or “hates governance” is only revealing their innate psychopathy.
Scientific materialism is a psychopathic worldview(reducing humanity to machines or meat: “human resources”). “Randomness” is psychopathic. Casinos (casino capitalism or a casino universe) are psychopathic.
The psychopaths and the stupid are in hell.
The Neutrals (Feelers) are in purgatory.
The Philosopher-Kings (NTs) are in heaven and will CREATE heaven. Which translates to:
Right-libertarianism = Hell
Spineless liberalism = Purgatory
Intellectual Authoritarianism = Heaven
*****

As Mark Romel wrote, “...there's no point in being naive...[the NWO] will have to come equipped with a mighty fist to knock out any primitives that seek to attack it...
Our position is that humanity is radically
retarded (thanks to [negative liberty] religion,
monarchy, capitalism, consumerism, privilege, cronyism, nepotism, and so on). Once a portion of humanity throws off this retardation, they will be the greatest power ever known ... Humanity Unleashed. They will be [superhumans] of the strongest will and intelligence.
Moreover, they will be capable of devising the most powerful weapons to defend themselves. No one will stand a chance
against them. When the brutes attack, it will be like tribespeople throwing spears at [futuristic] tanks. They won't have a chance, and they will either surrender, or be exterminated. Their choice. ...
Imagine a Star Trek crew landing in medieval Europe. Would they conquer Europe, or would Europe conquer them? The fact is that they have vastly more force. Europe would have to capitulate.
The Star Trek crew would be the new Gods! ... We will produce the ideal weapons of mass
destruction. Anyone who attacks us will be annihilated.”

A nation, to move forward, must place the State over the “market”, Thinking over “feeling”, intelligence over stupidity, geniuses over the Lowest Common Denominator, intervention over laissez-faire apathy, a monoculture over a scattering, dissipation of energies and confusion. A
monoculture is a brilliant, red laser beam which can cut through anything; it has coherence, focus, absolute unity of purpose.

A multiculture is a disco ball, perhaps fun, maybe pretty to look at, but scattered in every which way, in every direction, with no unity of purpose, no aims and no ability to
cut through anything. (Government MEANS
‘steering with intelligence’, i.e. direction, aim,
purpose.) A monocultural laser is Judging (J) and holistic. A multicultural disco ball is Perceiving (P), atomistic, relativistic and individualistic. “Disco ball” (party) societies can’t achieve anything. Laser (focused) States can construct a magnificent, spacefaring civilisation.

It is not “enlightened” to tolerate stupidity, disease (mental or physical) and overall backwardness. It is enlightened to exterminate stupidity with the brilliant laser-beam of intelligence, the greatest
intelligence ever known. Enlightenment has
nothing to do with toleration. Enlightenment has everything to do with judgment.
Geniuses have the obligation to perfect humanity (noblesse oblige: ‘nobility obligates’) or they are not ‘Good’! Toleration is nihilism; judgment is enlightened.
Intelligence must go from being despised and ignored to being the most cherished quality, literally priceless. Humanity must go from “price tags” and the chaotic randomness of the “marketplace” (which benefits no one but psychopaths: arch-marketeers), to an organised State with the intention to ‘Immanentize the Eschaton’ (to create heaven on earth).

The State will be awakened – aware – completely transformed – when it is 100% dedicated to positive liberty SOCIAL ENGINEERING. The State will ask, “How do we
improve our civilisation and everyone within it?”,
“How we give people the best education possible and disseminate the highest Thinking everywhere?”, “How do we become Gods harvesting the energy of the entire universe?”, “How do we give everyone an IQ of 1000?”
The intelligent have, hitherto, not been intelligent enough, not been strong enough, have been too weak, too narrow-minded, too Christian, too parochial and not ‘totalitarian’ (radical) enough to seize power and to acknowledge it as necessary – that Thinking – that intelligence, for the first time in history, must rule, and exterminate stupidity. The problem of stupidity is the No. 1 problem facing humanity today. The most heinous crime of the super-rich is making everyone more stupid.

Intelligence, for the first time in human history, must be placed at the forefront of human existence, so that humanity can finally become a civilised species, a divine species, a Godlike species of intellectuals.

“Wherever there is number, there is beauty.” –Proclus

“It’s true *because* of its incomparable beauty.” –Mike Hockney

“God used beautiful mathematics in creating the world.” – Paul Dirac

What is the universe?! The universe, as per Occam’s Razor (ensuring maximum economy, maximum elegance) is ONE THING. It cannot be “two irreconcilable things” since that
instantly runs afoul of Cartesian substance dualism. (How would they interact if they were truly disparate, and not nodes of the same underlying arche? It would be impossible for two disparate substances to interact.) It cannot be “zero things” since the universe cannot be founded on sand, on shaky foundations, on “non existence”, on an absence of order, structure, organisation. The universe is a Cosmos (ordered) not a chaos (randomness, or unintelligible non-language; a universe cannot be founded on the *absence* of knowledge).

Why does physics appear to work so WELL?! Because of the mathematical equations it uses. Mathematical equations are the engine of physics, not sensory Mythos narrations of “atoms”.

What is chemistry pre-occupied by? Observations and “colour changes” (sensory details), not on the foundations of reality. It is a sensory subject, not a rational one.

Science is “botched mathematics”. It is a materialist “philosophy” pretending not to be, while appropriating a mathematics which it does not understand. ALL the results of science are thanks to mathematics. Without mathematics, science would be powerless, unable to predict anything at all.

Mathematics is the core, the engine of existence. Everything that you think *isn’t* mathematics *is* mathematics. The Classic “blueprint” that underlies everything is mathematics; mathematics is the form underlying everything. When you construct a starship, every aspect of that is mathematical. The “chemical” elements are mathematics, the geometrical form of the starship is mathematics.
Try thinking of something that’s “not” mathematical (that doesn’t have geometry, form, structure). It’s IMPOSSIBLE. Nothing non-mathematical exists. Simply put, mathematics – complete mathematics! – is the answer to everything. The entire universe is mathematical, ordered, structured according to mathematical laws.
As Pythagoras (a predecessor incarnation of Leibniz, and THE MOST INTELLIGENT MIND IN HISTORY) said, “All is number.”
As Galileo, a genius polymath, astronomer and mathematician said, “[The universe] is written in mathematical language, and the letters are triangles, circles and other geometrical figures, without which it is
humanly impossible to comprehend a single word.”
It’s astounding that so many people line up to attack the reality of mathematics. In doing so they are blocking the forwards evolution of the universe. (There is nothing but mathematics, which is the blueprint of everything. If you attack mathematics, you are attacking yourself!) All these things are essentially the same ONE PRINCIPLE:
Mathematics
Order
Beauty
Symmetry Coherence
Intelligence
More complex forms of organisation (a Leibniz, not an amoeba)
Evolutionary level (predominantly MENTAL
evolution)

What is the aim of mathematics? To maximise its evolutionary potential, to become God.

Mathematics (the FORWARDS dialectic) seeks to increase order, intelligence, altruism in the universe.

The Satanism of Mammon-Yahweh (the
BACKWARDS dialectic) is defined by its opposition to the forwards dialectic. Satanists (everyone opposed to the Philosopher Queen Abraxas) want to decrease order in the universe, spread stupidity (the stupid are easier to hold down), encourage slavishness, and preach the gospel of greed, selfishness and individualism.

To reiterate, the forwards dialectic, the New World Order, involves: Mathematics. Intelligence. Ordered, coherent minds. Understanding of dreams and the mind (inner space). Higher, more complex
evolutionary forms. The increase of knowledge. The strengthening of lifeforms. Collectivism. Altruism. Order and organisation. LIFE.

The backwards dialectic, the Old World Order,
involves: Anti-mathematics. Stupidity. Disorganised, chaotic minds. Rejection of mind and the inner space (grim materialism). Regression to bestial, less evolved forms. The decrease and burial of knowledge. The torching of sacred libraries. The weakening and diminishment of lifeforms. Individualism. Selfishness. Chaos and entropy. Death, a living death.

We take the Platonic axiom seriously that
Knowledge is the true good, and stupidity is the real evil. We honour Robespierre who said, “The secret of freedom [true, positive liberty freedom] is in educating people.” We the IlLuMiNaTi honour the Logos axiom, “Know thyself”, the command to understand your own mind (the inner space), and to understand the universe. Knowledge is everything. The forwards dialectic increases knowledge, increases intelligence, increases order, gives rise to higher evolutionary lifeforms, increases coherence, symmetry and beauty.

Above all, the New World Order must, and will be, beautiful. Why are people intrinsically attracted to beauty? Because beauty is a symmetrical state, a higher-ordered state. Beauty connects with intelligence, order and the Abraxian heaven, with the “Catholic” impulse to reach God; and ugliness connects with disorder, stupidity and hell, with the
“Protestant” impulse to tear down everything “divine”.
The aim of the universe is to generate more and more beautiful mathematics, more and
more perfect mathematics. The universe is striving – it has a goal! – to become perfect.
People raised in ugly, shabby, low-calibre
environments BECOME ugly and low-calibre people. They internalize the environment. People raised in beautiful, refined environments become beautiful.

We are not Luddites who despise luxury, great achievements and a world-historic civilisation. Beauty is not a problem – what a Protestant psychosis! – but the problem with predatory capitalism is that it DENIES beauty to everyone.
The New World Order, far from tearing down beautiful works like a drab Protestant minister, aims to inspire beauty EVERYWHERE, to raise everyone in a beautiful, high-calibre environment where they will then reflect the high quality of their environment.

Psychogeography and psycho-architecture – the science of how the environment affects people’s consciousness, will, and must be, one of the core pillars of the New World Order.

- You were born human, void and clueless.

- The only thing you knew was breathing,
response to stimulus and of course feeding.

- You never knew the world is good or bad.

- Wrong or right, you were told everything you know.

- East or West, cradle and milk was best.

- Then as you started growing you were told a story.

- A story about humans who lived many years ago.

- A story that changed a lot about you

- Not only does it change you, it also reshape your thoughts.

- Thinking that you're the in best place.

- Your once void mind is now filled with abstract tales, beliefs and promises.

- You don't know about the accuracy of the tales written, but you believed that book totally because you were made to do so.

- Seeing is believing, but you believe what you never saw or witnessed.

- Should I remind you that the person preaching to you and telling you about the tales never saw or witnessed it too

- Promises that there's someone and in charge of your life and you must live according to its dictates and wishes.

- Heaven it is, a place meant for humans like you.

- A place of afterlife.

- Now you look at the person beside you, who doesn't believe in the tales you were brought up with in a different perspective, and all you see is a burning soul.

- A soul that won't be part of your heaven.

- Do you still recall that soul came from the same place as you. Void and clueless, and that the both of you were only told stories?

- Then you meet another person with the same perspective as you. You've finally found the one, the one who's going to share heaven with you. But, something is certain.

- You either make it to the land of promise as you were told, or that other person makes it to his own land or promise as he was also told.

- Chances are neither of you won't make it or both of you makes it to the other side.
Ask yourself.

- What if it's a lie?

- What if you make it to heaven and don't get
inside?

- What if you've been lied to all these while?

- What if you've been on the wrong side?

- What if you don't get a second chance?

Above all, remember that you were born void, and you were only indoctrinated with a faith.

Q: "...what is spirituality? do you think it exists? can you touch on this...?"

What is spirituality

First, what does it mean to the common folk
Then before that, what is meaning' itself

"MEANING" is something invented by human intellect to give words/sounds life.

Look around, the trees do not know 'meaning,' the wind does not understand 'meaning,' the Cheetah does not understand 'meaning.'
IT'S STRICTLY HUMAN NONSENSE!!!

Now we have bent certain sounds and given life to them, we now have *SPIRITUALITY* as a word with meaning.

So to the common man, what is spirituality?!

Basically, it means an attempt to make one's existence here on earth and elsewhere probably, more fulfilling than it already is.

This is pursued through various means:

1: the worship of certain deities

2: beliefs

3: religious rituals

4: other humans who represent the earlier mentioned ideas.

Spirituality to them means, reaching out to something that they believe exists, but don't know if it actually does, then putting certain modalities in place to maintain a relationship between them and this belief and deity. But in all reality, SPIRITUALITY then means, ONE
TRYING TO *IMPROVE THEIR LIVES* by keeping on the right side of some deity. Because the whole basis for spirituality is this sole
reason;

THAT THERE IS SOMETHING THAT EXISTS OUTSIDE OF THE POPULAR EXISTENCE THAT CREATED THE WORLD AND CONTROLS IT.
AND THE NEED TO BE ON THE GOOD BOOKS OF THIS CREATOR IS THE SOLE PURPOSE OF SPIRITUALITY.

For them not to suffer at the hands of this creator, and live a sad, unfulfilled life. IS IT THEN NOT ABOUT THEM

Spirituality is not a being or deity, it is an idea from the ill MIND of the homo sapiens.

Don't ask if it exists, rather, see how the idea functions in the lives of humans.

LET ME TELL YOU A STORY. "Mankind looked up into sky thousands of years ago, when the brain had mutated to an illness called *INTELLECT* and wondered, something must have created this whole thing, this creator must be powerful. Then he thought, THIS CREATOR must be like humans, a bigger version of humans. (Read the Bible and tell me how God has hands and
can breathe?)

I am telling you, if monkeys had any intellect, their God would be a big monkey in the sky.
If it was eagle, God would have wings. If it was a cheetah, God would be faster than usain
bolt. It's the bigotry effect of the *me myself and I* syndrome we humans have trapped ourselves with.

So man said, if this God was so powerful and so big, God could destroy him and all creation just like that, and it could also make him suffer in his life.

He then said: "Oh no, it then meant, it was wiser to be on its good side."

And so spirituality was born, and today, we burn
people just to please an idea that ancient hominids created, and even as brilliant as we are now, modern humans still think as stupidly as ancient men did thousands of years ago.

Yep, this is spirituality!

The excuse to live better here, and may be else
where. Have you noticed, ALL THESE HYPOCRITES DO NOT CARE ABOUT THESE GODS

THEY ARE ALL ABOUT THEIR OWN SELFISH NEEDS,
"HE WILL DO FOR ME, MY FAMILY, MY NATION, MY THIS, MY THAT," *SELFISH CREATURES...* Not one of them cares if its God has eaten for the last 5
billion years or if he has changed his clothes since the days of Moses.

Did I say "eaten? changed clothes?" Yes I did!

Read the Bible and all the holy books, and tell me you don't sense that the God in there, is human with eyes

God is human after all.

C: "...I want to keep my viginity till I get married."
(In conversation with a young adult seeker!)

ME; "you may keep it beyond marriage still. You
don't know what 'viginity means'..."

In ancient times, ladies as young as 13, where ripe for marriage.The traditions that existed in those days left no room for what we call *dating/
courtship* in this age. These young women were known as "maidens" in most cultures. Meaning; "A GIRL WHO WAS OF MARRIAGEABLE AGE," SHORT FORM; "VIRGIN." This was the language used by Jews, for an unmarried female daughter of those days.

Obviously she would not engage in any sexual activities, because THE ONLY WAY A YOUNG GIRL OF THAT ERA COULD EXPERIENCE SEX WAS INSIDE OF MARRIAGE.There were no dating relationships, the other alternative was if she was born poor, she may unfortunately end up a "courtesan," SORT OF A LADY OF EASY VIRTUE (A PROSTITUTE), BUT A MORE RESPECTABLE PROFESSION REALLY. MORE RESPECTABLE THAN WHAT WE HAVE TODAY. Even KINGS or RICH IMPORTANT PERSONS used to have ONE OR TWO, that they paraded in public. (Mistresses!)

So young maidens had to wait to get married, to
have sex for procreational purposes. NO WHERE
THEN DID "VIRGINITY" EVER MEAN *UNBROKEN
HYMEN WAS HOLY!*

Now the way supposedly intelligent parents teach virginity is all about "keep your HYMEN before marriage!"

VIRGINITY IS 'PARTHENOS' IN ANCIENT GREEK.
Meaning girl of marriageable age, "MATURE" NOT A GIRL WHO KEPT HER HYMEN FOR JESUS TILL SHE GOT MARRIED.

Now churches bring 'HELL' into the whole equation, they bring sin, so NOW VIRGINITY MEANS: YOU HAVE SINNED FOR BREAKING YOUR HYMEN BEFORE MARRIAGE.

So what is virginity in men?

If you ask your local PASTOR, he would say it's a sin, because the bible says: *thou shall not commit adultery.*

WHEN AND HOW DID 'ADULTERY' EVER
MEAN "VIRGINITY?"

The place where people are "advised against immoral acts" is in "Apostle Paul's" letters to the *CORINTHIANS!* And immorality at that time meant "married and sleeping with a Lady that you had no intentions towards!" *NOT THE ACT ITSELF!*

See men in those days, WERE THE ONLY ONES WHO COULD COMMIT ADULTERY. WHEN THEY SLEPT WITH UNMARRIED MAIDENS. But Apostle Paul was advicing the Corinthians about they way they lived.

So one quick question: ARE YOU A CORINTHIAN THAT PAUL WAS WRITING TO?

NOT EVEN JESUS WAS EVER REPORTED TO HAVE
TALKED ABOUT "FORNICATION!" HE ONLY
ADMONISHED *ADULTEROUS ACTS!*

Now since I was a teenager, all I know is that
*sleeping with a girl was a sin called fornication, and it was a sin that would send me to hell!* That the "HYMEN" was the girl's pride. C'mon... What of sports women who lose it during sports? What of ladies who were born without a hymen?! (There are a few!) Virginity has just been COMPLETELY misrepresented.

True Virginity is never lost, EVEN WHEN ONE HAS SEX ALL DAY, EVEN AS MARRIED PEOPLE, TRUE
VIRGINITY IS SOMETHING THAT YOU CAN STILL BE.

For the atheist, let's forget atheism for a minute, even "Mary mother of Jesus" could still be called virgin even when Jesus was 30 years of age! (At that time, Joseph had known her sexually!) BUT she MAY still be called a virgin! (If her thoughts weren't sexual)

BRAHMACHARYA: True "Virginity"

When you don't soil your thoughts/mind with "sexual thoughts!" You are chaste! In mysticism, we say you are a virgin!

Even married people can practice "virginity: brahmacharya!" Even if you have sexual intercourse on a daily, every hour, if your thoughts are not full of sexual interests, YOU ARE A VIRGIN!

To fully understand this, your body and your mind are NOT YOU, they are your tools for this earthly existence. The real you, HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH SEX. YOUR BODY IS AN ATTACHED FILE TO YOUR EXISTENCE, IT'S JUST ONE (1%) PERCENT OF YOUR EXISTENCE. See all the mental strain they put on you, that you are passing down to your kids.

If a married couple practice brahmacharya, they only have sex to procreate, then remain chaste in mind throughout sex and no sex. But many ladies right now think THEIR UNBROKEN
HYMEN IS HELPING JESUS IN ONE WAY OR ANOTHER. How does your flesh which is going into the earth to rot helping GOD? IF GOD BE SPIRIT, HE HAS NO BUSINESS WITH SEXUAL INTERCOURSE, HOW IS THE UNUSE OF YOUR GENITALS HELPING HIM?

*SUCH A NAIVE GENERATION.*

IF YOUR OWN SPIRIT (IF WE ALLOW RELIGION
SPEAK) WHICH IS THE *YOU* HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH GENITALS, HOW IS PENETRATION SEX A SIN TOWARDS YOUR SPIRIT?

Only your thoughts of sex can harm you, by making your mind perverted. BECAUSE I HAVE SAID IT BEFORE: *SEX BELONGS TO YOUR GENITALS, NOT YOUR MIND* Mind has it's own duties.

MONEY AND SEX DON'T BELONG TO YOUR MIND, You can make all the money in the world, have all the sex in the world, but if you don't pervert your mind with these, then you are a *VIRGIN!*
AND MONEY AND SEXUAL THOUGHTS DO NOT MAKE YOU A SINNER. THEY ONLY BUILD A NEW LIFE OF KARMA FOR YOU WITH THESE.

YOU ARE AN INTELLIGENCE OF THE COSMOS. SEX IS JUST A TOOL YOU *NEED* TO EXPERIENCE THIS
PLANE. But telling people, sex is sinful before
marriage is an abomination of your existence.

Man created marriage, not HEAVEN, so why don't they say, *not having sex inside a marriage is sinful?

* Your consciousness which is the *YOU* has no
business with sexual thoughts, talk less of sexual
intercourse, ADDING SUCH THOUGHTS TO YOUR MIND IS JUST UPLOADING "VIRUS" INTO YOUR "CPU"

"VIRGINS ARE CHASTE MENTALLY, NOT PHYSICALLY."

YOU CAN TAKE THAT TO THE BANK!

C: "...I want to keep my viginity till I get married."

(In conversation with a young adult seeker!)

ME; "you may keep it beyond marriage still. You don't know what 'viginity means'..."

In ancient times, ladies as young as 13, where ripe for marriage.The traditions that existed in those days left no room for what we call *dating/courtship* in this age.

These young women were known as "maidens" in most cultures. Meaning; "A GIRL WHO WAS OF
MARRIAGEABLE AGE," SHORT FORM; "VIRGIN"
This was the language used by Jews, for an unmarried female daughter of those days.

Obviously she would not engage in any sexual
activities, because THE ONLY WAY A YOUNG GIRL OF THAT ERA COULD EXPERIENCE SEX WAS INSIDE OF MARRIAGE.There were no dating relationships, the other alternative was if she was born poor, she may unfortunately end up a "courtesan," SORT OF A LADY OF EASY VIRTUE (A PROSTITUTE), BUT A MORE RESPECTABLE PROFESSION REALLY. MORE RESPECTABLE THAN WHAT WE HAVE TODAY. Even KINGS or RICH IMPORTANT PERSONS used to have ONE OR TWO, that they paraded in public. (Mistresses!)

So young maidens had to wait to get married, to have sex for procreational purposes. NO WHERE THEN DID "VIRGINITY" EVER MEAN *UNBROKEN HYMEN WAS HOLY!*

Now the way supposedly intelligent parents teach virginity is all about "keep your HYMEN before marriage!"

VIRGINITY IS 'PARTHENOS' IN ANCIENT GREEK.
Meaning girl of marriageable age, "MATURE" NOT A GIRL WHO KEPT HER HYMEN FOR JESUS TILL SHE GOT MARRIED.

Now churches bring 'HELL' into the whole equation, they bring sin, so NOW VIRGINITY MEANS: YOU HAVE SINNED FOR BREAKING YOUR HYMEN BEFORE MARRIAGE.

So what is virginity in men?

If you ask your local PASTOR, he would say it's a sin, because the bible says: *thou shall not commit adultery.* WHEN AND HOW DID 'ADULTERY' EVER MEAN "VIRGINITY?" The place where people are "advised against immoral
acts" is in "Apostle Paul's" letters to the *CORINTHIANS!* And immorality at that time meant "married and sleeping with a Lady that you had no intentions towards!" *NOT THE ACT ITSELF!*

See men in those days, WERE THE ONLY ONES WHO COULD COMMIT ADULTERY. WHEN THEY SLEPT WITH UNMARRIED MAIDENS. But Apostle Paul was advicing the Corinthians about they way they lived.

So one quick question: ARE YOU A CORINTHIAN THAT PAUL WAS WRITING TO?

NOT EVEN JESUS WAS EVER REPORTED TO HAVE
TALKED ABOUT "FORNICATION!" HE ONLY
ADMONISHED *ADULTEROUS ACTS!*

Now since I was a teenager, all I know is that
*sleeping with a girl was a sin called fornication, and it was a sin that would send me to hell!*
That the "HYMEN" was the girl's pride. C'mon... What of sports women who lose it during sports? What of ladies who were born without a hymen?! (There are a few!)

Virginity has just been COMPLETELY misrepresented.

True Virginity is never lost, EVEN WHEN ONE HAS SEX ALL DAY, EVEN AS MARRIED PEOPLE, TRUE VIRGINITY IS SOMETHING THAT YOU CAN STILL BE.

For the atheist, let's forget atheism for a minute, even "Mary mother of Jesus" could still be called virgin even when Jesus was 30 years of age! (At that time, Joseph had known her sexually!) BUT she MAY still be called a virgin! (If her thoughts weren't sexual)

BRAHMACHARYA: True "Virginity" When you don't soil your thoughts/mind with "sexual thoughts!" You are chaste!

In mysticism, we say you are a virgin! Even married people can practice "virginity: brahmacharya!"

Even if you have sexual intercourse on a daily, every hour, if your thoughts are not full of sexual interests, YOU ARE A VIRGIN!

To fully understand this, your body and your mind are NOT YOU, they are your tools for this earthly existence. The real you, HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH SEX.

YOUR BODY IS AN ATTACHED FILE TO YOUR EXISTENCE, IT'S JUST ONE (1%) PERCENT OF YOUR EXISTENCE.

See all the mental strain they put on you, that you are passing down to your kids.

If a married couple practice brahmacharya, they only have sex to procreate, then remain chaste in mind throughout sex and no sex. But many ladies right now think THEIR UNBROKEN
HYMEN IS HELPING JESUS IN ONE WAY OR ANOTHER.

How does your flesh which is going into the earth to rot helping GOD? IF GOD BE SPIRIT, HE HAS NO BUSINESS WITH SEXUAL INTERCOURSE, HOW IS THE UNUSE OF YOUR GENITALS HELPING HIM?
*SUCH A NAIVE GENERATION.*

IF YOUR OWN SPIRIT (IF WE ALLOW RELIGION SPEAK) WHICH IS THE *YOU* HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH GENITALS, HOW IS PENETRATION SEX A SIN TOWARDS YOUR SPIRIT?

Only your thoughts of sex can harm you, by making your mind perverted. BECAUSE I HAVE SAID IT BEFORE: *SEX BELONGS TO YOUR GENITALS, NOT YOUR MIND* Mind has it's own duties.

MONEY AND SEX DON'T BELONG TO YOUR MIND, You can make all the money in the world, have all the sex in the world, but if you don't pervert your mind with these, then you are a *VIRGIN!*
AND MONEY AND SEXUAL THOUGHTS DO NOT MAKE YOU A SINNER. THEY ONLY BUILD A NEW LIFE OF KARMA FOR YOU WITH THESE.

YOU ARE AN INTELLIGENCE OF THE COSMOS. SEX IS JUST A TOOL YOU *NEED* TO EXPERIENCE THIS PLANE. But telling people, sex is sinful before marriage is an abomination of your existence.

Man created marriage, not HEAVEN, so why don't they say, *not having sex inside a marriage is sinful?*

Your consciousness which is the *YOU* has no business with sexual thoughts, talk less of sexual intercourse, ADDING SUCH THOUGHTS TO YOUR MIND IS JUST UPLOADING "VIRUS" INTO YOUR "CPU" "VIRGINS ARE CHASTE MENTALLY, NOT PHYSICALLY."

YOU CAN TAKE THAT TO THE BANK!

I will go straight to the point...

How come Mvslims don't find it strange to kiII for their Prophet, and still be saying "Peace Be Upon Him" whenever they mention his name?... How do mere mortals come to see it as a "Virtue" to fight for a God they called the Most Powerful, Most Gracious & Most Merciful??... How do adherents of a Religion'of'Peace engage in the mvrderous act of kiIIing a fellow human being while screaming "Allah Akbar" (God'is'Great) to a benevolent and beneficent God... Absolutely HOW!!!
Because... Blas'phemy.
Oh the perplexing irony!

I always struggle to reconcile the fact that Mvslims can freely call other people derogatory names like Kafir, Arne, Pagans, Infidels, Unbelievers, Idol Worshippers, etc... but if the favour is returned, that's Blas'phemy!.

This is nothing but a blatant exhibition of Cultural
Supremacy. And do you know the worse part? The so-called Moderate Muslims will not speak out publicly against the terrible things being done under the cover of their preferred religion. You have such people on your friends list in facebook, go and check their walls whenever an
attrocity is committed under their religion...TOTAL SILENCE... But when they are at the receiving end, they are quick to scream "Islamophobia!" If you ask them for their opinions on any horrible incident perpetrated in the name of Islam, they say "Oh we don't support such things"... so WHY remain
silent That is the REAL Danger... because that is the same way they will bvry their heads in the sand and say nothing if the victim was YOU.

Perhaps the moderate Mvslims are victims, too?. Case in point is Atiku who was forced to take down his posts yesterday. Because they know that they are expendable, when in opposition to fanatical fundamentalists... if push comes to shove, they can be gotten rid of, if they dare to speak out. Yet they deceive themselves that they practice the Religion'of'Peace.

That day's horrible incident in Sokoto is not the first time that such atrocities has been committed, neither would it be the last time that such would happen. And this is because the government have set a precedent of doing NOTHING about it, you know, the perpetrators
always go scot-free. In fact, some are praised and celebrated, even become like heroes.

We all remember the case of Deaconess Eunice
Olawale, about 6 years ago (July, 2016) who was
mvrdered by "suspected religious extremists" while preaching in Abuja, Nigeria. They slit her throat, and placed her head on her Bible. Where are her kill'ers? Her death case remains unresolved.

When the death of the Deaconess was trending, I remembered vividly that I blocked someone, a friend from my university days, just because he said "Why Did She Go & Evangelise Near A Mosque?". But before blocking him, I asked "Would You Have Asked That Question If She Was Your Mother?".

That is how religion stealthily robs people of their Humanity, such that they tend to overlook the horrible things done in the name of their preferred Religion. If something does not affect them directly, they will try to excuse, rationalize or even justify it to fit their shameless bias.. even in heinous cases, like Mvrder.

Yes, people would argue in support of Mvrder,
especially when it's in defense of their religious
agenda, narrative or sentiment. Which is why I don't care how close we are, or what
you mean to me... once we begin to have friction
because of Religious issues, I will just cut you off. That is NOT negotiable, on my part. It's better safe than sorry.

That is how dangerously divisive Religion has
always been. It never unites the ideological differences we all have as a people or race.

So going forwards, if you don't want Religion to be the reason why we go our separate ways, learn how to see others the way you see yourself... as a Human Being! Because honestly, all the stress and strain of trying to prioritise unknown dead Jews and Arabs over your known living fellow citizen is not worth it.

WHY would you prefer to kiII yourselves, and destroy your relationships, here on Earth... only to die, and you will still not make Heaven. Because the clever people who packaged Religion ab initio have made the qualifying requirements too impossible to attain.

Just imagine... no matter how well you live your life now, ancient people who have died centuries ago made very difficult rules to ensure you cannot qualify to enjoy their idea of an imaginary Afterlife.

We all know that every time there is an issue that brings about public outcry, we all become emergency Experts. And social media gives everyone a voice, which is not a bad thing in itself. But that means we also are exposed to lots of ignorance, lots of stupid defenses, lots of false equivalences, and what have you.

Religious differences aside...the issue here is not even about Blas'phemy. We all know that is some contrived bullcrap, in a secular nation. The actual issue here is the brazen, macabre and reckless confidence with which that mob kiIIed a harmless, subdued young lady in Broad daylight.

Fact is, that young lady would still be alive today if Religion is a good thing. Any objections to this claim? No? You see, that is the whole point of this lengthy epistle...

Religion poisons everything!

And the Fan'atics giving Islam a bad name are just a minority. But the spineless, cowardly "Moderates" who are the clear majority are either too afraid to speak out, or maybe they are secretly in support of the suppression, subjugation and annihilation of the "Unbelievers".

Religion will kiII us all, if we don't kiII Religion first...

I rest my case.

(5 mins read)

I wanted to make a post today about the book of
revelation …but some of the comments on the post I made yesterday by “enthusiastic Christians” on How the impulses that made adherents of islam stone a girl to death and burn her corpse are the same impulses that Christians have when they make statements like
“you cannot try that with Islam” diverted my interest to make this post instead.

Their arguments were basically …. “Christians would never do something like that” , “it’s a non sequitur, how would you equivocate someone who acts on their impulses and someone who don’t?” At first glance, this argument seems reasonable.

Christians today do not stone people to death for questioning their beliefs (ignoring the facts that that’s not even entirely true) … but then again , neither do Buddhist , or Hindus , or Taoist or Jews. Trust me, each of this religion have individuals who publicly criticize them as
false... so a Christian cannot say “but but but they don’t criticize them like us”.

Now when a Christian says “Christians cannot do that” in this context, they are oblivious to the reason why. And the number one reason is because they CANT. They don’t hold that political power anymore.

I have on numerous occasions been verbally attacked by Christians on social media and in person for criticizing and questioning the credibility of their beliefs… Christians have wished I died and suffered… they have wished evil befell me so I can know their god… this I have experienced on numerous occasions
even among some pastors. Because I questioned.

The mind that that kind of wish could come out from is a mind that could murder me if they could and had the luxury.

We fail to realize with the story yesterday that the only reason those boys could act on their impulses and murder that poor girl was because Islam has political power in those parts... The government there is almost theocratic in nature... why else would they have sharia laws?. And the boys believed they would walk away with their actions as a result.

When Christianity had such political power starting from the time when the Roman emperor Constantine made Christianity legal in the begining of the fourth century and when emperor theodosus the first at the end of the same century made Christianity the official
religion of the Roman Empire... The largest empire in the world at that time... they did much much worse than what we see by Muslim fundamentalists today and for a much longer time... we are talking as much as 1500 years.

Christianity was brutal because they had that political power... the same most Muslim cultures today have. You dare not say anything against the church... even scientists and philosophers with ideas and facts that contradicts Christianity ended up at the wrong end of christian love.
Stoning people and burning people at the stake was a very very common sight. It takes me to the story of the pagan female philosopher Hypatia who was dragged to the church by Christians, stripped naked, beaten to death and burnt… why? Because she was a pagan and held philosophical ideas that went against the church… and this was just a few years after
Christianity became the official state religion.Examples such as this are in abundance all through Christian history.

So, when I see Christians trying to play the game of innocence today I laugh… any non Christian or even Christian who have ever questioned the Bible would at some point been cursed by an enraged Christian to suffer and die… so they can see god.

The only reason why these Christians have not lynched you as they have all through history is because they don’t have that political power anymore to run free if they did… but that impulse still remain.

One would then wonder what is it about religion that make adherents have knee jerk reactions towards people who criticize or question it.

Nothing is above criticism and question... no idea or belief... either political , social or religious is above questioning.

Science thrives on the tool of criticism and questioning... that is why we have the breakthroughs we’ve had in different scientific fields.

Only false beliefs that cannot be objectively
substantiated would breed fanatics ready to allow evil befall you and even act to make it so for questioning it.

Saint holy Christians should stop acting like they
deserve a Medal of Honor for not having the luxury to stone people to death like their Muslim counterparts.

Jesus never existed!

OurTruth:
What I want to say is very important.

Information like the one I just shared is usually top secret and this means that the public isn't supposed to be aware of it, for obvious reasons: Information like this once released and made public and confirmed by the government and reputable people as legitimate, would distablize society and lead to not just unrest but complete confusion and fear.

So usually when information like this is leaked, there is always a cover up; First the information is deleted everywhere it's been posted and then people are paid to publicly claim that they invented the information and everything is fake

This was what happened when classified videos and pictures were leaked from the Apollo 20 mission: A French artiste came forward to claim that he created everything in the video and everything was fake.

Now the question is why and how would some random broke French artiste spend so much money and time creating everything in the video, even as far as sculpting a fake alien moon girl with this degree of detail and sophistication and creating a spaceship with this even greater level of detail?

Again, I implore you to examine the video yourself and juxtapose what you see with any claim of it being a hoax that you will find on the internet.

They're known to be occult knowledges... Meaning; They're hidden from plane sight of the masses. (Hidden/Occult.)

Truth is always hidden but can't be fought nor killed.

Omooba77:


http://saharareporters.com/2022/05/09/nigerian-university-lecturers-ASUU-confirms-extension-strike-3-months

"School teaches us to listen to our superiors.

Instead, it's important to be wary where you get your advice from.

You can't take advice from people who have failed at what you want to accomplish."
~ELON MUSK

Public schools are atrocious these days because of their agenda. It's more important that they indoctrinate you to be a socialist, than on how to think critically and be objective, to use reason and logic. If you're descent with your opinions and
views, you will be called all kinds of nasty slurs.

"be wary where you get your advice".
I understand Elon's statement perfectly. There are tons of resources and programs to educate kids that are parent dummy proof.

Homeschooling has come a long way in supporting families to educate.

It's a psychological issue, let's deal with it.

The answer to existence must have the following
ten characteristics: It must be

1. eternal
2. necessary
3. a priori (prior to any experience)
4. complete
5. consistent
6. maximally coherent
7. maximally stable
8. maximally analytic
9. maximally simple
10. maximally general

Only Ontological Mathematics qualifies. It is the unique solution to existence.
If mathematics is the Archetype of Order - order being the sine qua non for everything else - then the more conscious we become of this Archetype, the more we understand fundamental reality.

Total consciousness of the Order Archetype means total understanding of reality. That's what ontological mathematics yields. Ontological mathematics is the science of the Archetype of Order.

The development of mathematics reflects the progressive development of consciousness of order within the psyche, and its consequent ability to connect the the ultimate order of existence.

If you think poverty is a natural thing... Well, f*ck you! You're a rotten egg, a son and a daughter of a b**ch. Yeah, you heard me right? Durrrh!

There is nothing like poverty. Yes absolutely
nothing. It's a sick retarded game created by
predatory capitalists. Their strongest weapon is "WINNER TAKES IT ALL" idea! The rest can f*ck off, who cares.

Infact, wealth and poverty is a game of predator and prey.

Who in da heck told you that money is the hallmark of survival? Money is a p**sy for d*ckheads who are stuck in that hole. No friction, yuck!

Nature is not responsible for the creation of wealth or poverty, sick psycho-pathetic morons are responsible for such nonesense.

We need a meritocratic system in order to do away with this old decayed system.

#AC
#ILLUMINISM

KingMack:
He's a real niggarr...we need one good nigarr like this in sambisa..then we'll all remember him as THE LION OF SAMBISA

Chaiiii... Lol!

robosky02:
So we begin the official countdown less than a week
To the all important clash between the Super Eagles and the black stars of Ghana.
To determined who wins the sole ticket to represent Africa at the 2022 FIFA world cup in Qatar






Let's go there

amotolongbo, paulolee, ojeemah, fergie001, Omicron007 Totilopussylick. safarigirl TheSuperNerd...

Bubu shouldn't make any attempt on calling these dudes before the match please...