₦airaland Forum

Timbuktou:
Erm, RoyalRoy, abeg this thread should be moved from the family section biko

edwife:
See as you like weekend

fellis:
No.
Its everyone's section.
I really didn't write that to offend anyone, I am just happy that the endless personal attacks will stop.

apache1883:
what is the cost of the hybrid battery and how can it be sourced? thanks

TV01:
I won't question your aims or challenge your remit as moderator. We are at your mercy !

However what blanking posts/locking threads achieves is in some cases questionable. It's always good if there's a record for posterity - if we can see for ourselves what was and was not said.

And like Coogar noted above, use of blanking/deleting/locking is somewhat inconsistent. My first - and only - post on the current abuse thread (in response to a mention by coogar) was blanked. There was no violation - that I was warned about or banned for - and I did not tell any untruths.

It was done at the behest of someone that was butt-hurt/running scared. In an open forum the correct recourse is a rebuttal - put up or shut up. Pandering in that manner allows people to say what they like and run whinging to the mods when they get served. More worringly it allows them to deceitfully change the historical narrative. I never complain. I accept, rebut or ignore - as pe okunrin now !


TV

[color=#000033]Hmmm....well noted!!!!


Oya am all ears.... I could do with some Gbenga and his Ijesha inducing "weapon"

[/color]

coogar:
the ones who start the trouble are also the same ones who run to the moderators to lock threads. my problem with the moderators is how they act in favour of the first whistleblower they come in contact with. the action should be balanced.

A curses B, B curses A in retaliation.
A runs to the mods, the mods ban B or hides his comment & A is roaming free to troll C or D. that's the usual cycle about the beefs on NL. the moderators are like nigerian police men - the person who reports first is automatically innocent!

TV01:
RoyalRoy how far?

I have 8 mentions all suppressed and I see that Coco' thread has been deleted. I've also seen your "call for calm" thread, and am putting 2+2 together. What happened? Was it that bad?

There will always be beefs and wars - be they on the basis of personality or world-view differences. Not only can you not change that, to many of us it would be a poorer (read duller ) forum without it.

They always settle and if it gets too bad people typically ignore each other - with of course the occasional flare-up . I really don't think this suppression of speech/censorship is for the best.

This board is largely self-moderating, we try not to stress our moderators . And in any event you can't expect hypocrisy (not to mention, tribalism, bigotry, posturing, demagogic behaviour, attention whoring and the like) not to be called out. Just saying.

How do I know who needs advice, or who is in need of a good rinsing if mentions are blanked !

To be honest it won't settle differences, they'll just get parked.


TV

Timbuktou:
Remember telling a white knight here the very same thing in the bolded a couple of days ago. Don't mind being a 'slave' in my role, as long as my partner performs her own 'slave' role we're all good.

Cooljoe1:
he is now playing in turkey(fenerbache)