₦airaland Forum

EnlightenedSoul:
Alright. Now this is cause for worry.

>

At Last!!!!!!! That so?

Well, very Few people THINK much of Ladies who LIKE RESPONDING to so-Called MAD, Psychotic MEN.... ;DD ;DD ;
Many would WONDER at what that makes THEM...so

You stopping the CHARADE yet...

Bottom Line!!!!

NICE DAY!!!!! ;DD ;DD

EnlightenedSoul:
LOL, just look at you. And when I told you to eff off you couldn't just oblige. Well, now you have to tell me what the heck you're on goddamit - its too late

BUT,

Are they always this WISE >: WISE!!!! HAHA

Of COURSE you can't ever expect a RAT to spare krefish!! Throw the crumbs, & you have a scuttling RUN!!!!
! Or did I just hit a point of essence
Wonderful!!!!!

My Response is THIS....

If a WOMAN knows, trusts & is CONFIDENT in herself & knows WHAT SHE WANTs....
SHE WILL MAKE IT either WAY....

IF YOUR Parents' Advice Cannot be so TRUSTED to be relatively TRUE or DEPENDABLE....as is the case in some instances...
Do not be MISLED into thinking that of any ARBITRARY HUMAN FACtor(Here or Otherwise) without any considerable interest in your LIFE will BE....

Bottom LINE:

Believe in YOURSELF & know what YOU WANT from LIFE!!!!

That's what you need!!!!!!!!!

Do not Slave & depend on a man without a Station, simply because you WISH to get married or have a CHILD else of course that's what you WANT.

Get a Life, you can then marry in LOVE, RESPECT, HAPPINESS & Peace.....
Best Still: You can grow with your MAN!!!!
BUT you must have your own life & MEANs.....



Then read BELOW:

EnlightenedSoul:
You don't know what the term "brand" entails, pete? So between Sackashytw/mites and yourself, you're asking for the meaning of the term "brand", and tho its been nigh on a month, he's still square one on the term "business-oriented"? At this juncture, I'd suggest you two rub heads together if the futility of the idea wasn't so painfully obvious.

And yes, I am proud and not ashamed of it. And yes, I have been 'impolite', but I don't apologize for it. Good luck with your "purpose", but don't ever make the mistake of "feeling" for me. I did not seek your feelings. I sought to see your mind, and all I saw was a sea of incoherence. And you should take it easy on the drugs. Good luck!

GOOD GIRL....
That's what I meant....
A goat must always eat Grass..... I don't mean you're a Goat anyway!!!!! But, you can make a good & passionate Lab-Subject, not a LAB-Rat...Mind you..Just a willing contributor to making a better world....
I would really want to compensate you for all the Odds... But, seeing you don't consider this base/ROOM as REAL enough to exert any considerable mischance...on your Person; I then assume we're EVEN...on that basis.
But, you're much too PREDICTIBLE than I supposed...

Your..
PRIDE.. I doubt it's been too apparent, believe me when I say THAT!!! I wish it IS/Was!!!!!! It would have given you an odd lift!!!!
I think a great lot here is better than seeing you in PERSON..Really... I can tell you among the flints now.... Ha-ha...... That makes you Great & UNIQUE , CLAP FOR YOURSELF!!!!!
You need Help!!!!!
I apologize for making YOU care this much!!!! Though.... At least you ALREADY saved me half my CARE & feeling Ha-ha....

But I will make up with this bit in PIC BELOW;

DON'T CARE TO RESPOND AGAIN!!!! PLEASE!!!!

EnlightenedSoul:
So you're saying you took the leap without knowing the side effects? That wasn't very wise of you, pete.

Now, I'll be a little plain & Honest with You....
Again... I return the question to YOU?
What brand of PSYCHOTHERAPEUTIC DRUGs do you mean.... BRAND, not even the sort, range or purpose...but mere brand.. The question doesn't mean much, at least to YOU!!
And clearly I asked as a means not an end, that served my PURPOSE & still does, not as you imagined a mere musing or an invitation for a tiresome CHARADE...or directionless CHIT-CHAT....

So The question did not mean much really...
But, knowing how you will respond to it does...
For while you amuse yourself with impolite & supposingly logical dictions, I feed my Evaluative Data- Base, for my PURPOSE only, my PURPOSE...
And I won't have REVEALED such if I've not garnered more than half what I need..But, there's a little bit more that you MUST no doubt feed me now!!! to complement my stance!!!!

I SAY YOU MUST!!! No doubt... Because you don't even know how you will... You're that predictable!!!
That's something you may never understand about your PERSONALITY as is the PROUDMAN Lady in the POST....
I fELT for you at a JUNCTURE!!!!

I enjoyed our LITTLE CHIT-CHAT though....

Now, burst your wings again!!!!!!! Exhibit?

EnlightenedSoul:
So you're saying you took the leap without knowing the side effects? That wasn't very wise of you, pete.

Now, I'll be a little plain & Honest with You....
Again... I return the question to YOU?
What brand of PSYCHOTHERAPEUTIC DRUGs do you mean.... BRAND, not even the sort, range or purpose...but mere brand.. The question doesn't mean much, at least to YOU!!
And clearly I asked as a means not an end, that served my PURPOSE & still does, not as you imagined a mere musing or an invitation for a tiresome CHARADE...or directionless CHIT-CHAT....

So The question did not mean much really...
But, knowing how you will respond to it does...
For while you amuse yourself with impolite & supposingly logical dictions, I feed my Evaluative Data- Base, for my PURPOSE only, my PURPOSE...
And I won't have REVEALED such if I've not garnered more than half what I need..But, there's a little bit more that you MUST no doubt feed me now!!! to complement my stance!!!!

I SAY YOU MUST!!! No doubt...
Because you don't even know how you will... You're that predictable!!!
That's something you may never understand about your PERSONALITY as is the PROUDMAN Lady in the POST....
Though, I FELT for you at a Point!!!!
I enjoyed our little CHIT-CHAT though!!!!


Now, burst your wings again!!!!!!! Exhibit? >:

EnlightenedSoul:
Lacking coherence is right. Disclose the brand already, pete. And this isn't some high you need to just draw out for as long as possible. Although, from the looks of it, you're currently sobered off whatever the heck you were on, eh?

Is that your Brand yet....
Oh!!! or What a brand means to you

And "Lacking Coherence" is Psycho-therapeutic to YOU
That confirms a lot....really...
Thanks for feeding the Dragnet!!!!

I know you won't even understand that!!!!!!

EnlightenedSoul:
Oh, really? Well, aren't you all kinds of sloppy? I've administered a lot of drugs, I have plenty of patient care experience. I know a lot of "brands", I used to be a pharmacy tech. Back to the drawing board, pete.

Then you must know your brand quite well.....
Help with with a name....Please!!! I'm lacking Coherence!!!!

EnlightenedSoul:
Ay scoreboard/parttime cheerleader, don't get back at me 'til you're ready with the names of the psycho-therapeutic drugs you're on. And that's all I care to know.

Oh, really? Well, aren't you all kinds of sloppy? I've administered a lot of drugs, I have plenty of patient care experience. I know a lot of "brands", I used to be a pharmacy tech. Back to the drawing board, pete.

[i][/i] Yeah quite to the BOARD!!!!! That was.... I guess

WHY EXACTLY IS THE MH17 Issue dominating the NEWS NOW?

TO DISCREDIT SOMEONE??
I don't like DIRTY POLITICS!!!!!!

Though, we're not saying DOWNING A PLANE with 298/people is okay...

But,


The way the issue is being reported also is an ISSUE!!!!!! In itself......& at PRESENT, OF all TIMES!!!!
Almost an exclusive hour to the REPORT!!!!!

Someone must pay YES....BUT, lets get the Good out of the way FIRST....

Understanding NATURE does answer this question in a sense.....
Nothing really is in Consequence halted at the point of Action, nor is effect over Ruled overtime....
The POINT is that WHATEVER WE DO "Good or BAD" We become responsible for.....
Therefore, it is not your immediate action that matters but what you do afterwards... It applies both ways....It really has NOTHING TO DO WITH "GOOD & BAD"; RIGHT OR WRONG"

GOOD & BAD is a Game of ACCEPTABLE CONSEQUENCE, hence what is good for ONE might be BAD for another!!!! Each is actually rationed according to NATURAL ABILITY!!!! You Simply cannot say a LION IS BAD because it KILLs to FEED, It can't do otherwise!!!!!

Naturally, it will befit the NATURAL station of some people to neglect Concerned Action, but it will Condemn the inaction of those who are Naturally capable of FORBEARING LONG TERM CONSEQUENCE!!!! They will be held overtime, not by Value, but by the prick of Responsive ABIILTY!!!

Though, we think this issue a Natural, philosophical Dilemma; it is actually already principled & Programed in NATURE, SCIENCE is gradually coming ON!!!!! though....

If I save either of the Sides; I will make sure the other's LIFE compensates for it....in KIND... I MEAN practically footing the other's responsibility.The decision at the POINT will condemn me to almost a Long term Consequence of CARE!!!! for the balance of positions, the SAVED must somehow pay for the DEAD'S consignment!!! I think FIVE can more fit into this responsibility than one.....that's considering the Consequence to MYSELF IN THOUGHTs

THOSE WHO UNDERSTANDs the deeper secrets of ESOTERIC KNOWLEDGE(OCCULTISM relatively) knows this is just not a mere ISSUE!!!

IT has natural a Significance to the BALANCE of LIFE!!!! & actually exceeds mere DISCOURSE.....
That's my COVERT WAY of addressing the VALUE Question..... Yes, there are VALUES & Consequence!!!! already principled in the ORDER of things, the Transfer of ENERGY( This is no Religion please). It is still of the same Significance as the exact processes of NATURE reckon in Sciences!!!!

I apologise this POST may have been made to be STRICTLY ACADEMICAL!!!! But, its more than THAT... There are hidden ESOTERIC realities of NATURE....

Most of what PHILOSOPHY addresses are ISSUES that does not yet command CONVENTIONAL KNOWLEDGE!!!!!

EnlightenedSoul:
Alright, disclose. I'm curious to know the brand of psycho-therapeutic drug you're on.

One only YOU Can Prescribe & ADMINISTER.....
You remember the brand??

EnlightenedSoul:
Please, he needs to fess up, and stop being so full of shyt!

Sagamite: A Sag Sack-a-shyt with mites in it

Now, there's one you don't find in the dictionary

So cheap a point to score!!!!!

You should be better than THIS!!!!!
Its nothing Personal!!!!!!

Such a PATHETIC attempt...... Try AGAIN!!!!

Kay17:
Are you expecting me to define prejudice to you?? In our prior conversations you didn't have a problem with it. You seem to have perfectly understood what I meant. I will explain myself with an example.

An ugly albeit industrious and intelligent woman walks in for an interview but the potential employer looks out for her absent physical beauty - the package as you put it - and declines looking at her resume or any evidence of competence just because she is a woman, is prejudice.

This Muddled up story clearly cannot feature as an ANALOGY in this DISCOURSE....
REASON being that:
Your Picturesque explication is drooling in PROBABILITIES...

The intervieWER knows better WHAT he requires for the JOB. He might as much want the LOOKS as the SKILL....
Its not anybody's business to determine his PREFERENCE!!!!

And by the way, while the POSSIBILITY of such Occurrence is not overRULED, it really does not FEATURE in this CONTEXT!!!! Not at all!!!!!

If you understand the REALITY of BUSSINESS ORGANISATION, you won't ASK such QUESTIONS!!!!

What the heck?
Are you saying a DIRTY PERSON, DRESSED IN PUTRID RAGs for an INTERVIEW ( Though that does not Apply here) will be sent out if so on PREJUDICE? Or PREFERNCE

By the way the interviewer has the right to do what he wants.... He knows what he wants!!!!
Practically speaking I've never seen such scenery in interviews WHAT DO YOU MEAN UGLY??..
Whoever is? You just Argue.......I see....

Before you comment again on this, I will rather you answer THIS:

What is PREJUDICE, PREFERENCE?

THE DIFFERNCE BETWEEN PREJUDICE & PREFERNCE?
How the hell does it APPLY to the SAME PERSON in the case above??
Am out of here!!!!!

Kay17:
But the ugly woman is prejudiced on her looks over her professional quality, isn't she?

You see, if I merely wanted to make my stance here Argumentative, I would want to ask what you meant by:
SOMEONE BEING PREJUDICED ON hER LOOKS OVER HER SKILLS....BECAUSE ITS A LEVEL UP MISCONCEPTION, & MISAPPLICATION OF TERMs

It questions your understanding OF PREJUDICE...
IT'S like stating NOTHING against Nothing, a muddled up response....

But, I cared to know our pursuit of TRUTH is GENUINE, so that in TIME, We"ll be sure OURs was a gainful aTIME!!!!

THAT'S why I cherished the CLARIFICATION OF POINTs over the Argumentation of POINTs!!!!

Be WELL!!!!

Kay17:
But the ugly woman is prejudiced on her looks over her professional quality, isn't she?

Unless of COURSE, you don't go for an attractive Apparel when you step into a BOUTIQUE, I think I will clearly answer THAT....

You see.... We're dealing with TRUTH not FALLACY here.... You will go for a ROSE FLOWER than a CACTUS PLANT at first sight even though the latter is evidently more beneficial!!!! Its NATURAL, The physical beam of LIGHT, the attractiveness....
It is not called PREJUDICE, Its called PREFERENCE..

The point is that NATURE compensates this in Consequence.... Your Choice of Sensual Appeal over ESSENCE!!!! is your CONSEQUENCE....
However, men who knows what they need will always go for SUBSTANCE....
Do you blame GOD for creating a DOVE & a VULTURE?
That's the ANALOGY for your UGLY Woman supposition.....
The first APPROACH may almost always be based on physical APPEAL, but the INTERPRETATION overtime determines the JUDGEMENT

So your supposed UGLY Woman always wins in the LONG RUN!!!!
JUST AS THE CASE IN VIEW PROVES.....

The Young LADY'S PHYSICAL APPEAL earned her a FIRST APPROACH, But her lack of TACT disposed of it....perhaps for the WISE UGLY....WHo KNOWS!!!!
If she had the double advantage "BEAUTY & BRAIN" She just did not prove it......in that confrontation...
These are the sort of things we do in JOB interviews!!!
Any body who has the TWO has double ADVANTAGE!!!!


NOW don't tell me you don't UNDERSTAND!!!!

Kay17:
At least you agreed the man was prejudicial towards the woman and further justified it.

Isnt Prejudice a form of injustice? A prejudice against sex, against race; all are forms of injustice. Can any injustice be justified?

How can that be?

What is your understanding of PREJUDICE
What in the name of Admiration is Prejudicial?

SOME Women are exceedingly INSECURE?
That's the Problem!!!
You see while I stated that this ISSUE can be contested either way; we are not all Lacking in Judgement....

You see, I did not CONDEMN the WOMAN for her response simply because she reserve the right to understand issues anyway she deemed fit, in so far she accepts the consequence as a BALANCEd UTILITY!!!! even when it defeated PURPOSE.....her very Purpose of being there!!!!
Its Pathetic!!!! After all, it was her Personality Projection she supposed she was defending.... But, she lost it there...when she reacted to APPROACH like a JUDGEMENT!!!! There's a difference between APPROACH & INTERPRETATION... It's not what was said to her that really was a problem, it was how she reacted to it!!!! She made a mountain of an ANTHILL!!!!
You can put up a Packaged brand for Sales.... But, you can't really determine how people approach to demand for it!!!! Your Purpose should be SALES!!!
If eventually a potential CUSTOMER says:
This battered product is what?
Should you lose your head for it??
Its INSECURITY....
WITH ALL HER Professional Skills, she Lacked one thing: HUMAN RELATION....

IN CASE YOU DON'T KNOW:
Competition has made formal ORGANISATION an OUTBASE for Strict FORMAL RELATIONs.... Just to make the workPLACE efficient & HOMELY...
To think in SUCH FORMAL, STRICT, ROBOTIC sense for an organization in this AGE is damn ANALOGUE!!!! I was really SURPRISED when EnlightenedSoul raised it....aside other possibilities....but I dismissed that as mere argumentative appeal!!!!

ASK GOOGLE & MICROSOFT....
Don't argue that way again!!!!!!!

Kay17:
At least you agreed the man was prejudicial towards the woman and further justified it.

Isnt Prejudice a form of injustice? A prejudice against sex, against race; all are forms of injustice. Can any injustice be justified?

What do you suppose PREJUDICE implies??

Kay17:
You believe she was rightly judged for her looks, right?

If so, EnlightenedSoul is trying to argue that this is a prejudice against the LinkedIn lady because her actual professional quality is being IGNORED in a professional environment. LinkedIn is as much an office as any other office.

Try to look at the worst scenario that prejudice can produce. Physically unattractive women will have a hard time getting employed or progressing up the professional ladder all because of their looks. Which is unfair to anybody.

Well, its more complicated than you think....& the only thing that complicates it is the HUMAN MIND...

UNDERSTANDING IS EVERY THING!!!
HER LOOks recommended her for judgement!!!!
She should be happy for that!!!!
The supposedly Ugly Lady of which you speak has very little to recommend her SKILL
It is as much so for WOMEN as MEN...

MAN is a perceptive animal... The first impression is almost always the physical!!!!

You forgot there are people who earn simply for BODILY dispaly & that you enter WALMART mainly for there PACKAGING!!! You can make their recipe at home!!!
The woman has the RiGHT to interpret her personality the way she prefer, even if it defeats purpose as much as the MAN has the right to VOICE his impression..... So its arguable both ways!!!! The problem normally is where the action of each greatly tarnishes the other & I think they almost both achieved it...though the WOMAN initiated the Consciousness & then TARNISHED herselp!!!!!

POINT
YOU can't change much by SIMPLY talking about it!!!!
The more YOU voice your Frustration, the more Demeaned....you become

You make a SUPERIOR of one from whom you seek RECOGNITION...

FEMINISM is the WEAKNESS!!!!

At, TIMES.... WHAT YOU CONDEMN, is actually Your POWER, your FORTE...
NOT knowing how to use it is your IGNORANCE....

THANK ME LATER...

raayah:
Dylan roof attack took place under seconds. He was in and out. Before the police got there he had left the church. [/b]I don't know why you are comparing the two situations. Its Literally apples and Oranges.[b]Dylan roof is a mass murderer.

Sigh. Africans never accept that they are wrong. Its better to point fingers at people than being responsible.
responsible.I live in North America btw.
Where else do you get the news if not from tv and newspapers?
I am grown enough to not celebrate thug culture.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x1GaaMYhrw0

Tamir rice bb gun video. The only difference betwwen a bb gun and a real gun is the orange tip. Tamir brown removed the tip. Tell me how the police should have know it was a fake gun. Did they have to wait till he fired an ammunition?.

Policemen are doing their jobs by keeping people safe. You can see him pointing the gun at the police officer after being warned to drop the weapon. Policemen are human beings and at the end of the day, the want to go home to their family. You tell me, when you are in a situation with someone waving a gun at you, facing life and death , whether you would shoot or not. The officer still performed CPR on him after he was shot. Not to mention, the 911 caller had described Tamir rice as a 20 year old man. The police had no idea that he was 12.


I will admit that There are racist bigots in the U.S just like Tribalism in Nigeria. There are a lot of prejudiced indivduals out there

Out of the 776 men killed by police in 2015, 385 (50%) of them were white. Police in America have actually killed more whites than blacks.Over the span of more than a decade, 2,151 whites died by being shot by police compared to 1,130 blacks. In that respect.

Please, Watch the VIDEO(YOUR OWN VIDEO) & READ my last commentary AGAIN....
DId the POLICE act Professionally? In accordance with the FORCE Ethics?
Be Objective!!!!! Please!!!!!!
Which part of NORTH AMERICA have you been to?

What is wrong with You?
Most children did what this Child was doing....many in-house...
Anybody would have known this was a Child....
What the heck?
His body Language revealed everything!!!!
Even the passerby he confronted noticed this too....and- ignored him....
No wonder the Passerby was shedded from view!!!! in the VIDEO!!!!
The VIDEO was edited.... Almost all the videos..available now was edited...Of course the Govt controls these CAMERA.. They made sure of this before the trial WAS OVER...
BUt, everything was clear still

Now, what in the boy's actions show he had any intent? This is part of the first LEGAL Question
And in that environment TOO What exactly would be STEALING there....?

The WORSE is that he was even in a Shed when they confronted HIM.......And went Down almost as PROMPTLY as they Came..... TWO POLICEMEN!!!!
And they don't know he was a boy.... The voice couldn't Reveal that too
Why was the VOICE hushed up in the VIDEO?
What exactly would a GUN wielding thief be doing in a Shed?

This is too embarrassing... No wonder the case was muddled up!!!!

YOU UNDERSTAND LITTLE ABOUT HUMAN LAWS & SOCIETY...
Perhaps you're into material Sciences!!!! Even Human Sciences reveals some of these Behavioural response!!!!

This is just not GOOD....
BE OBJECTIVE & see the TRUTH for yourself...
I can't help you, IF YOU CAN'T HELP YOURSELF...

Also understand THIS:
When you tactically restrict a people to a certain type of LIFE!!!! through INSTITUTIONAL sanction... You seclude them to a certain type of LIFE & OCCUPATION too which becomes a GENERATIONAL TREND...
That's a Social REALITY you don't seem to Comprehend...as yet!!!

YOU've ever seen a BLACKMAN in FRANCE Is he the THUG you know
Even UK is a better!!!!!

Don't Argue for its Sake......Miss!!!

Am out of HERE!!!!!!

raayah:
Since we cannot read people's mind,how can you say that these people acted out of racism. Wecannot tell their true intentions. The law determines their innocency or guilt through evidence.
Evidence in this cases have proved this deaths to be unintentional and not premeditated.

How many White MEN.... had died under the same circumstances, especially like that of 12yr old RICE? 12YEARs..... Not even the WHITE RACIST Charleston SHOOTER!!!! Wow.... Where's your head MISS?
I need FACts!!!!

Do you know, YOUNG LADY, that the POLICE are Legally required to demand the SURRENDER of any Assailant, at least (3)THREE TIMES with a warning of Consequence before they act?? Do YOU KNOW The essence is PREVENTIVE rather than REMEDIAL!!!!
I will leave the other CASES to YOU!!!!!

LAW determines Innocence?
Which LAW in the light of the above?
The same that convicted a man for 24 yrs & released him with apologies after 10

You even said families were compensated!!!!
I will take your mother for a MILLION

What the HECK are YOU..?
Are You JOKING with THIS

The Way that issue was legally muddled up without showing these details....revealed its WRONG OVERTURN....

I now pity you in that STANCE.....You've ever been to US?
YOU know what is called INSTITUTIONAL RACISM, & PREJUDICE...?

RESEARCH THAT!!!! I may say no more!!!!
But I won't have you SPILLING fallacies here Please...
You watch a lot of Television I see....HOLLYWOOD movies perhaps.... You're in LOVE with FICTION!!!

EnlightenedSoul:
What the...?
How about this: Kindly eff off, please and thank you.

Bollinger:
Ever argued with a revolving door? I just did. That's one for the history books.

Perhaps......

Well,
That's because Questions are made to be answered, not Scaled otherwise they reappear for clarity!!!!
Whatever is not defeated still Lives & reappears!!!!!

That's Why nature REVOLVES!!!!!

You know when you said SAUDI is a MONARCHY, KINGDOM.... Recognised.....
You sold smoke....

There are different Systems of CONTROL & Administration, we both know what they have in common!!!!
You just have to look beyond the CONCEPTS...
It grossly affected how you interpreted your position & what a JUSTIFIED ADMIN should be..

Bollinger:
Nope. you are right. Whatever your point is.

"Whatever" can be ANYTHING!!!!
And "Anything" can't be RIGHT!!!!

YOUR STANCE needs to be CONCLUSIVE rather than DISMISSIVE...unless there's DOUBT!!!!

Bollinger:
So what do you suggest?

On a Second thought......

Such an INTEL can in Gladness be paid for by many NATIONs....

It can be that SERIOUS....

Why dispose of it here

Bollinger:
Lol. . . ..Saudi arabia has always had the system of government they have now. Syria claims to be democratic but only one family has ruled for half a century. You know what? you are right. Whatever your point is, you are right.

Right??
Am I? Come on....
I can't possibly be.....Not if you still have some doubts.....
You can voice them!!!!

EnlightenedSoul:
...You'd better slow down on the "excesses of psycho-therapeutic remedies" in your possession, and learn when to move the eff along, fella.

A "Thank YOU" would have açcorded you more Credit....

You didn't Pay for that THERAPY You know!!!!!
It costs a lot per session you should be aware...

But, THANKs all the same....
Nice...Exhibit!!!!

Bollinger:
There's a difference. As you said, Saudi Arabia is a recognised Kingdom with a monarchical system of government.

What exactly makes a nation a Recognised MONARCHY? KINGDOM
Natural Heritage?? Institutional Consolidation? Or Recognition by other Nations Is Control over its people a factor?

Bollinger:
The Assad family is not a monarchy and syria is not a kingdom, which is why the people were clamouring for changes. They had political parties which were basically useless. I knew you'd bring that up and I was ready for it.

Are you saying he should have INSTITUTIONALIZE his STATUS as a MONARCHY like SAUDI ARABIA, nobody is born a KING remember or you think otherwise?
What EXACTLY IS YOUR understanding of the HISTORY of RULERSHIP

Well, I have to detail these as you did not seem to understand my former response.....

To GIVE a better view of the matter:

You may have to answer this in the light of what DICTATORSHIP is and WHAT it is NOT as it concerns SAUDI ARABIA & SYRIA?
Does the Status of one exclude it from being less Dictatorial on its people.....

What exactly is your understanding of Dictatorship?

Your ANSWER will help me clarify the supposed REVOLUTION in SYRIA in the Light of existing facts....Pls don't answer off these points... I prefer you be direct rather than referential!!!!! to avoid the confusion.....My Confusion perhaps.....
But, an understanding of this internal distaste is necessary....

advocates:
What has that got to do with the issue at hand? And after many years, you still blamed the Americans for your backwardness. Like it or not, colonialism did us more good than evil, from the literal part of view. Granted that many were subjected to inhuman treatment, but that was the sacrifice they paid to have ungrateful few like you to have access to civilization. Wonder where you will be without the western invasion.

South Africans and several other African countries wouldn't share one bit your lame explanation that are direct beneficiaries of this colonialism.

Those who don't know the past are condemned to repeat it!!!!!!
When you understand Why & How you got independent...... & after that got here!!!!!! You'll be more GRATEFUL!!!! than THIS!!! Perhaps!!!?

Except YOU won't have a need to RESPOND again!!!!
Does it mean you're absolutely wrong? I doubt perhaps in the place you can't see!!!!

Bollinger:
There's a difference. As you said, Saudi Arabia is a recognised Kingdom with a monarchical system of government. The Assad family is not a monarchy and syria is not a kingdom, which is why the people were clamouring for changes. I knew you'd bring that up and I was ready for it.

You mean that they clamoured for change even with the Democractic reforms that brought ASSAD to Power...... How can that not be Change?
How exactly is this worse off in character & consequence; than SAUDI-ARABIA in the light of your former comment....?Remember you said something about Family appointments.... & a rigid approach to rule!!!! The facts in these should have been clearly consistent... with other Dictatorships....

Is the UK a KINGDOM?? or more than that?

raayah:
Exactly, Nairalanders like to ride putins Cocck. They all hate US because they were denied visa.
They forget That USA is nigeria's greatest ally.

On this ISIS issue, most of them don't know jack about it. They are four main people fighting in Syria. US supports the Kurdish and opposition against Alqaeda group to fight against ISIS. Russia supports another group that wants to fight ISIS and one of The group US is supporting. Messing up the whole thing.

Thank God US has backed out. Let the world rely on Russia.

US has sacrificed so many lives to keep world peace. They are blamed for every war.

Talk to non-islamic bigots that are living in Afghan or escaped and they will tell you how grateful they are for US support.

I appreciate your outspoken interest in these AFFAIRs....... I will want to encourage YOu....
But, then with this advice......:

LIMIT YOURSELF TO WHAT YOU ALREADY GRASP WHOLLY SO YOU DON'T SLIP!!!!
Your understanding of these GROUPS is rather Myopic from the above!!!!!
At times to know the facts is more important than making the Point.....

I really will like to encourage your efforts, but evidently you don't have full GRASP of some issues...

That's why am persuaded to respond to YOU..
DON'T BE DISCOURAGED PLS...
But, I just can't bear the remission of FALLACY here
To avoid the wrong impression!!!!!
Good LUCK!!!!

Be well.....

advocates:
How has the Americans sponsored Isis? Americans were only interested in ousting Bashir after it became clear that he was waging a campaign of Genocide against those that oppose him. Before this time, Isis were only in Iraq fighting to dispose the Iraqi government.

I wonder how chaotic the world would have been today without the interventionist role played by United state and their policing duty. History will vindicate America for its diplomacy and mediator in many countries affair that would have led to total breakdown.

So unfortunate how brutal governments like Russia and China that has cases of human abuses suddenly become a hero to many unformed people here.

U.s couldn't have trained isis knowing U.s stance against aiding terrorism. We could readily say that Isis later had access to the free Syrian army, an act that America had little power over.

You confuse yourself young MAN!!!!
I advice you go get your sources right!!!!!
While your argumentative premise may not be so out of place, you're far withdrawn from the TRUTH

CHINA & RUSSIA appear the only powers in the World that NEVER built their MEANs through Colonialism....Slavery & inhumanity to others....
If there were strict measures, it was against their own people....
The more you bleat these misinformations, the more you degrade your defences...
Pls restrict yourself to what you can fend....
THANKS