Sagamite:
[s]

You are a cretinous fuuktard!

On what basis did you call LinkedIn "Business-orientated"?

What "business" is being done on LinkedIn?

What proportion of people with profiles on LinkedIn are on it to do "business" or actually do "business" on it, fuuktard?


I have told you that you have mental health problems as a feminist.

Let me educate you on normal life.

Even in the West, surveys show that meeting your spouse at work is one of the most popular ways that married couples meet. It accounts for between 18% to 40% of all marriages (depending on the survey). The only other way more popular or competing with this is meeting through friends/family.

Another survey even shows couple that meet at work have the most successful marriages.

So any cretin like you saying"People should not meet in a professional setting" is just a mentally ill fuuktard!

Normal people meet through work.[/s]

Sackashytw/mites "The Time Vampire's" agenda for today the last MONTH and counting:

1. Look up the term "business-oriented" (a term already explained to you at time and time throughout this mind-numbing shyt charade of yours, BTW).

2. Cite where I stated the red-herring argument I conveniently outlined for you in red above, which was bolstered with comically inflated figures like "up to 40%" and vaguely 'cited' with words like "depending on the survey" for support, when no survey in sight pertaining to the US breaks so much as an even 20%.

Also, keep this in mind: Meeting through work =/= dating a coworker necessarily, as I should know.

Sakes:


BUT,

Are they always this WISE >: WISE!!!! HAHA

Of COURSE you can't ever expect a RAT to spare krefish!! Throw the crumbs, & you have a scuttling RUN!!!!
! Or did I just hit a point of essence
Wonderful!!!!!

Alright. Now this is cause for worry.

EnlightenedSoul:


Sackashytw/mites "The Time Vampire's" agenda for today the last MONTH and counting:

1. Look up the term "business-oriented" (a term already explained to you at time and time throughout this mind-numbing shyt charade of yours, BTW).

2. Cite where I stated the red-herring argument I conveniently outlined for you in red above, which was bolstered with comically inflated figures like "up to 40%" and vaguely 'cited' with words like "depending on the survey" for support, when no survey in sight pertaining to the US breaks so much as an even 20%.

Also, keep this in mind: Meeting through work =/= dating a coworker necessarily, as I should know.

You are a cretinous fuuktard!

I could not be bothered to provide a link of something I read weeks ago to a mentally-ill psycho feminist that is running from questions to defend her moronic assertions. Typical of the psychos that call themselves feminists.

Fuuktard, so you dumb arsse said "when no survey in sight pertaining to the US breaks so much as an even 20%"?

http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052702303325204579463272000371990

"Unlike Ted, many Americans meet their spouses at work. That phenomenon only took off around 1960, when women entered the labor force in larger numbers. About 10% of Americans who found spouses between 2005 and 2009 met at the office or through co-workers, according to Dr. Rosenfeld—down from around 20% in 1990."

http://www.popsugar.com/smart-living/More-Couples-Meet-Work-Than-College-1002109
http://www.eharmony.com/blog/how-you-meet-your-spouse-matters/
http://mic.com/articles/112062/the-way-most-people-meet-their-significant-others-is-not-what-you-think


http://www.yourtango.com/201066239/the-number-one-place-meet-your-future-husband
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2437181/Relationships-begin-workplace-likely-result-marriage-new-study-reveals.html
http://jobs.aol.com/articles/2011/02/10/more-on-dating-at-work/

Fuuktard, or in your Kismayo English Dictionary Afghanistan is USA?

You can rant so much but cannot explain what "business-orientated" means?

Sagamite:


You are a cretinous fuuktard!

I could not be bothered to provide a link of something I read weeks ago to a mentally-ill psycho feminist that is running from questions to defend her moronic assertions. Typical of the psychos that call themselves feminists.

Then stop playing the broken record, @sshat. 'Cause neither am I looking back to rewrite, yet again, something I explained weeks ago, which your lazy @ss couldn't comprehend and now refuse to investigate and fact-check for yourself through the use of a common effing dictionary. If there's any psycho here, its you.

Fuuktard, so you dumb arsse said "when no survey in sight pertaining to the US breaks so much as an even 20%"?http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052702303325204579463272000371990
"Unlike Ted, many Americans meet their spouses at work. That phenomenon only took off around 1960, when women entered the labor force in larger numbers. About 10% of Americans who found spouses between 2005 and 2009 met at the office or through co-workers , according to Dr. Rosenfeld— down from around 20% in 1990."

Let's explore your the stats from your various sources...

20% Work (past) - At office or through co-workers.
10% Work (now) - At office or through co-workers.

And....

http://www.popsugar.com/smart-living/More-Couples-Meet-Work-Than-College-1002109

18% Work

http://www.eharmony.com/blog/how-you-meet-your-spouse-matters/

37% Work/School

Combo. Need I say more?

http://mic.com/articles/112062/the-way-most-people-meet-their-significant-others-is-not-what-you-think

17.9 Work

http://www.yourtango.com/201066239/the-number-one-place-meet-your-future-husband

No Data Work/School

Combo. Also a school/work model and provides no standing data, but refers to a Match.com survey with no citation.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2437181/Relationships-begin-workplace-likely-result-marriage-new-study-reveals.html

DailyMail tells us that 14% of people who met at work ----> Marry

The main claim of this DailyMail article is to compare the likelihood of couples who met through work to marry to the 11% who met through friends, and others still who met at night out on the town at the local club, whilst barhopping, or on holiday resorts. My favorite portion throughout has to be:

"Another 22 per cent of couples who met in a nightclub didn't get any further than the first night"


Oh-Em-Gurd, so one night stands at nightclubs don't typically lead to marriage? A moment of shocked silence!

http://jobs.aol.com/articles/2011/02/10/more-on-dating-at-work/

At 38% Work, but offers no citation...and CareerBuilder. This is your best "source", lol.

Conclusion: Your pure "Work" stats range from 10%-20(past)% (within the estimated range of my previous comment). Your "Work/School" combos come in at 37-38%. And then, there's that last AOL "Work" stat that not only completely contradicts every other survey you've presented, but remains dubious at best in its accuracy/representation. Yeah...I'd say my observation stands.

Fuuktard, or in your Kismayo English Dictionary Afghanistan is USA?

Say what? Should you, Sackashytw/mites, even talk of dictionaries since you've clearly shown yourself to have something against their use??

EnlightenedSoul:


Then stop playing the broken record, @sshat. 'Cause neither am I looking back to rewrite, yet again, something I explained weeks ago, which your lazy @ss couldn't comprehend and now refuse to investigate and fact-check for yourself through the use of a common effing dictionary. If there's any psycho here, its you.



Let's explore your the stats from your various sources...

20% Work (past) - At office or through co-workers.
10% Work (now) - At office or through co-workers.

And....



18% Work


37% Work/School

Combo. Need I say more?


17.9 Work



No Data Work/School

Combo. Also a school/work model and provides no standing data, but refers to a Match.com survey with no citation.



DailyMail tells us that 14% of people who met at work ----> Marry

The main claim of this DailyMail article is to compare the likelihood of couples who met through work to marry to the 11% who met through friends, and others still who met at night out on the town at the local club, whilst barhopping, or on holiday resorts. My favorite portion throughout has to be:

"Another 22 per cent of couples who met in a nightclub didn't get any further than the first night"


Oh-Em-Gurd, so one night stands at nightclubs don't typically lead to marriage? A moment of shocked silence!



At 38% Work, but offers no citation...and CareerBuilder. This is your best "source", lol.

Conclusion: Your pure "Work" stats range from 10%-20(past)% (within the estimated range of my previous comment). Your "Work/School" combos come in at 37-38%. And then, there's that last AOL "Work" stat that not only completely contradicts every other survey you've presented, but remains dubious at best in its accuracy/representation. Yeah...I'd say my observation stands.



Say what? Should you, Sackashytw/mites, even talk of dictionaries since you've clearly shown yourself to have something against their use??

You are a cretinous fuuktard!

I have not read this.

So you ca write all this but you are running from explaining:

On what basis did you call LinkedIn "Business-orientated"?

What "business" is being done on LinkedIn?

What proportion of people with profiles on LinkedIn are on it to do "business" or actually do "business" on it, fuuktard?

Or you thought this was your chance to deviate from that?

EnlightenedSoul:


Alright. Now this is cause for worry.

>

At Last!!!!!!! That so?

Well, very Few people THINK much of Ladies who LIKE RESPONDING to so-Called MAD, Psychotic MEN.... ;DD ;DD ;
Many would WONDER at what that makes THEM...so

You stopping the CHARADE yet...

Bottom Line!!!!

NICE DAY!!!!! ;DD ;DD

Sagamite:


You are a cretinous fuuktard!

I have not read this.

So you ca write all this but you are running from explaining:

On what basis did you call LinkedIn "Business-orientated"?

What "business" is being done on LinkedIn?

What proportion of people with profiles on LinkedIn are on it to do "business" or actually do "business" on it, fuuktard?

EnlightenedSoul:

Stop playing the broken record, @sshat. 'Cause neither am I looking back to rewrite, yet again, something I explained weeks ago, which your lazy @ss couldn't comprehend and you now refuse to investigate and fact-check for yourself through the use of a common effing dictionary.

Or you thought this was your chance to deviate from that?

Hahaha. So destroying the red-herring argument you so desperately presented = I, Enlightenedsoul, deviating?? Perhaps you should fact-check your sources from here on out. Perhaps you'd have better luck engaging someone who isn't up to snuff. Someone who doesn't know what they're talking about. Someone like yourself.

EnlightenedSoul:






Hahaha. So destroying the red-herring argument you so desperately presented = I, Enlightenedsoul, deviating?? Perhaps you should fact-check your sources from here on out. Perhaps you'd have better luck engaging someone who isn't up to snuff. Someone who doesn't know what they're talking about. Someone like yourself.

You are a cretinous fuuktard!

Destroying?

What did you destroy?

If I read it and get into it, as usual, I would destroy.

Cut the crap and answer the waiting questions you are struggling with and trying to deviate from.

As I said, I never let cretins deviate.

This is your red goat.

On what basis did you call LinkedIn "Business-orientated"?

What "business" is being done on LinkedIn?

What proportion of people with profiles on LinkedIn are on it to do "business" or actually do "business" on it, fuuktard?

https://www.facebook.com/StRemyNigeria/app_451684954848385
please vote for rosemary iheonye in this competiton

Sagamite:


You are a cretinous fuuktard!

Destroying?

What did you destroy?

If I read it and get into it, as usual, I would destroy.

Cut the crap and answer the waiting questions you are struggling with and trying to deviate from.

As I said, I never let cretins deviate.

This is your red goat.

On what basis did you call LinkedIn "Business-orientated"?

What "business" is being done on LinkedIn?

What proportion of people with profiles on LinkedIn are on it to do "business" or actually do "business" on it, fuuktard?

CC: PP

EnlightenedSoul:


CC: PP

You have recoiled again?

All of a sudden you are not brazen about ranting?

Sagamite:


You have recoiled again?

All of a sudden you are not brazen about ranting?

CC: PP = Carbon Copy: Previous Post.

I never professed to having the same remarkable penchant for regurgitate you do. Besides, you've already lost, and more importantly, you know it.

EnlightenedSoul:


CC: PP = Carbon Copy: Previous Post.

I never professed to having the same remarkable penchant for regurgitate you do. Besides, you've already lost, and more importantly, you know it.

You have no remarkable penchant for defending your moronic assertions.

I teased you with the marriage stuff to show everyone that you were avoiding to defend your stupidity and everyone can see how excited you were and started writing when you thought you could deviate from the point.

You are not smart enough.

Admit you were chatting complete rubbish that LinkedIn was business-orientated, cretin!

Sagamite:


You have no remarkable penchant for defending your moronic assertions.

I teased you with the marriage stuff to show everyone that you were avoiding to defend your stupidity and everyone can see how excited you were and started writing when you thought you could deviate from the point.

You are not smart enough.

Admit you were chatting complete rubbish that LinkedIn was business-orientated, cretin!

Now, This is PATHETIC!!!!

The IRONIC thing about the HUMAN EYE is that it cannot INDEPENDENTLY See its own HEAD as it does that of others OTHERs!!!!!

Sagamite:


You have no remarkable penchant for defending your moronic assertions.

I teased you with the marriage stuff to show everyone that you were avoiding to defend your stupidity and everyone can see how excited you were and started writing when you thought you could deviate from the point.

You are not smart enough.

Admit you were chatting complete rubbish that LinkedIn was business-orientated, cretin!

Au contraire, you're incredibly transparent. Hence the reason I expressed exactly why I wasn't responding to your repetitious tirade directly BEFORE I shoved your pathetic red-herring down your throat where it belongs. Your attempt to strong-arm your way out of the position you're in is almost admirable. But alas, you're not as observant as you should be, nor are you, even remotely, as smart as you think you are.

When the futility of your stance finally dawns on you, the "rubbish" you actively refuse to accept will be right there in any dictionary you can get your hands on, above reproach.

EnlightenedSoul:

Then stop playing the broken record, @sshat. 'Cause neither am I looking back to rewrite, yet again, something I explained weeks ago, which your lazy @ss couldn't comprehend, and now refuse to investigate and fact-check for yourself through the use of a common effing dictionary. If there's any psycho here, its you.
Let's explore the stats from your various sources...

EnlightenedSoul:


Au contraire, you're incredibly transparent. Hence the reason I expressed exactly why I wasn't responding to your repetitious tirade directly BEFORE I shoved your pathetic red-herring down your throat where it belongs. Your attempt to strong-arm your way out of the position you're in is almost admirable. But alas, you're not as observant as you should be, nor are you, even remotely, as smart as you think you are.

When the futility of your stance finally dawns on you, the "rubbish" you actively refuse to accept will be right there in any dictionary you can get your hands on, above reproach.

You are a cretinous fuuktard!

I should investigate and fact-check for you an opinion you made?

You sound like the product of a failed education system we have abundantly in Nigeria.

No, you are a cretinous mooron who just cannot defend her daft statement.

Remember that I don't use the Kismayo English Dictionary, so I will understand the meaning of business and can differentiate it from professional.

Based on your Kismayo English Dictionary, tell us what "business" takes place on LinkedIn for it to be Business-orientated?

1) There is hardly commercial (i.e. business) activity being undertaken on it.

2) It is mainly for individuals (i.e. professionals), not corporations (i.e. businesses).

So, fuuktard, how is it business-orientated?

You thought you could manufacture rubbish to butress your moronic stance?

Do you understand the meaning of business?

Do you know the difference between business and professional? And between fitness and sports?

Sagamite:


You are a cretinous fuuktard!

I should investigate and fact-check for you my benefit an opinion a FACT you made you've stated that I vehemently refuse to accept?

Appropriated.
[size=14pt]YES![/size]

You sound like the product of a failed education system we have abundantly in Nigeria.

No, you are a cretinous mooron who just cannot defend her daft statement.

Remember that I don't use the Kismayo English Dictionary, so I will understand the meaning of business and can differentiate it from professional.

Based on your Kismayo English Dictionary, tell us what "business" takes place on LinkedIn for it to be Business-orientated?

1) There is hardly commercial (i.e. business) activity being undertaken on it. - Irrelevant.

2) It is mainly for individuals (i.e. professionals), not corporations (i.e. businesses). - Irrelevant.

So, fuuktard, how is it business-orientated?

You thought you could manufacture rubbish to butress your moronic stance?

Do you understand the meaning of business?

Do you know the difference between business and professional? And between fitness and sports? .

[size=14pt] Merde! Circling, yet again.

Although I remain impressed that you've room for an exotic word like Kismayo, especially considering your limited depth on ordinary elementary-level English vocabulary terms like "business-oriented", there is no "Kismayo English Dictionary" - nor would that make any more sense than, say, the existence of a Beijing English Dictionary, Guadalajara English Dictionary, Mykonos English Dictionary, and ETC, seeing as Kismayo is a port city on the coast of Somalia, and not a language (or publication). In any case, I'm not from Kismayo, and I most certainly am NOT a product of your 'failed education system' (Are you? That may explain a few things??).

Your entire argument relies on a wanton attempt to play around with the edges of a word's definition. Since you refuse every explanation and continue to argue FACT, my advice to you remains the same: if only for your own benefit, CRACK OPEN A DICTIONARY! [/size]

EnlightenedSoul:


Appropriated.
[size=14pt]YES![/size]



Merde! Circling, yet again.

Although I remain impressed that you've room for an exotic word like Kismayo, especially considering your limited depth on ordinary elementary-level English vocabulary terms like "business-oriented", there is no "Kismayo English Dictionary" - nor would that make any more sense than, say, the existence of a Beijing English Dictionary, Guadalajara English Dictionary, Mykonos English Dictionary, and ETC, seeing as Kismayo is a port city on the coast of Somalia, and not a language (or publication). In any case, I'm not from Kismayo, and I most certainly am NOT a product of your 'failed education system' (Are you? That may explain a few things??).

Your entire argument relies on a wanton attempt to play around with the edges of a word's definition. Since you refuse every explanation and continue to argue FACT, my advice to you remains the same: if only for your own benefit, CRACK OPEN A DICTIONARY!

Fuuktard, you are so freaking thick, you are too dumb to know when I state "Kismayo English Dictionary", it is a disparagement to show that you are using the wrong source to learn your English. Not that I believe one exists.

Damn! You are thick!

I am poking fun at you that that is where you got your definition of business from, no wonder it is warped.

For you to call LinkedIn "business-orientated" means your grammar must have been from a fake source without authorisation or the competence to teach English.

If you were Nigerian, I would have said "Okrika English Dictionary" (like the one the obese monster calling herself Nigeria's First Lady uses).

By the way, before your dumb arsse goofs again, I know you are not from Somalia, I just felt Kismayo solds better than Djibouti. I could have used Baidoa too.

As for my knowledge of Kismayo, don't be impressed. I have said several times on NL that I have dated Somali girls without their Aabbe and Hooyo knowing.



Now back to the point, fuuktard:

Based on your Kismayo English Dictionary, tell us what "business" takes place on LinkedIn for it to be Business-orientated?

1) There is hardly commercial (i.e. business) activity being undertaken on it.

2) It is mainly for individuals (i.e. professionals), not corporations (i.e. businesses).

So, fuuktard, how is it business-orientated?

You thought you could manufacture rubbish to butress your moronic stance?

Do you understand the meaning of business?

Do you know the difference between business and professional? And between fitness and sports?

Sagamite:


Fuuktard, you are so freaking thick, you are too dumb to know when I state "Kismayo English Dictionary", it is a disparagement to show that you are using the wrong source to learn your English. Not that I believe one exists.

Damn! You are thick!

I am poking fun at you that that is where you got your definition of business from, no wonder it is warped.

For you to call LinkedIn "business-orientated" means your grammar must have been from a fake source without authorisation or the competence to teach English.

If you were Nigerian, I would have said "Okrika English Dictionary" (like the one the obese monster calling herself Nigeria's First Lady uses).

By the way, before your dumb arsse goofs again, I know you are not from Somalia, I just felt Kismayo solds better than Djibouti. I could have used Baidoa too.

As for my knowledge of Kismayo, don't be impressed. I have said several times on NL that I have dated Somali girls without their Aabbe and Hooyo knowing.



Now back to the point, fuuktard:

Based on your Kismayo English Dictionary, tell us what "business" takes place on LinkedIn for it to be Business-orientated?

1) There is hardly commercial (i.e. business) activity being undertaken on it.

2) It is mainly for individuals (i.e. professionals), not corporations (i.e. businesses).

So, fuuktard, how is it business-orientated?

You thought you could manufacture rubbish to butress your moronic stance?

Do you understand the meaning of business?

Do you know the difference between business and professional? And between fitness and sports?

Lollllll. I don't even know where to start. Even in disbelief, you've given me fodder enough to last me for days without even realizing it. I'm not above it, but I won't just go there 'cuz its pointless, really, and I'm not in the mood anyhow.

IDGAF what you think "solds" better. Just stop flying all over the place with bullshyt. Leave Djibouti, Baidoa, Kismayo, and whatever unrelated imaginary city/country-dictionary you'd have "disparaged" next in your seemingly perpetual dream-state, and deal with the real I've been referring to and referencing all along the while: Merriam-Webster, the OED, Cambridge, etc.

As for the rest, CC:PP.

If there's anything impressive about you at all, it's your tenacity, and your propensity for deflecting and propagating falsities, lol.

EnlightenedSoul:


Lollllll. I don't even know where to start. Even in disbelief, you've given me fodder enough to last me for days without even realizing it. I'm not above it, but I won't just go there 'cuz its pointless, really, and I'm not in the mood anyhow.

IDGAF what you think "solds" better. Just stop flying all over the place with bullshyt. Leave Djibouti, Baidoa, Kismayo, and whatever unrelated imaginary city/country-dictionary you'd have "disparaged" next in your seemingly perpetual dream-state, and deal with the real I've been referring to and referencing all along the while: Merriam-Webster, the OED, Cambridge, etc.

As for the rest, CC:PP.

If there's anything impressive about you at all, it's your tenacity, and your propensity for deflecting and propagating falsities, lol.

You are a cretinous fuuktard!

Show me the part of Merriam-Webster, the OED, Cambridge, Kismayo, Baidoa, Bura-Bura, Shiki-shiki, allahtothelah dictionary that qualifies LinkedIn as "business-orientated".

What is impressive about me is the imperious penchance to humiliate people with logic and strike fear into them. That is what I am known for.