₦airaland Forum

abduleez1:
Immaculate W if you ask me....

WB cooked with this if true. Box office don sure. $1bn loading. 🙌🏽🙌🏽

WHAT STRENGTH BY PERSEPHONE!#AEWDynamite

pic.twitter.com/aAbS4HYnBQ

— WrestlePurists (@WrestlePurists) March 12, 2026

CoolUsername:
Fightful removed article "WWE Removed Ricky Saints' Concert From Social Media Due To It Being Poorly Received" due it being poorly received.


Turns out Thigh Rubber lied😭

CoolUsername:
But muh glorious joshi sturongu stylu!

Ronda Rousey just went on a rant about the UFC’s fighter pay 😳

“The UFC is one of the worst places to go. Their champions like Valentina are selling pictures of their t*tties on OnlyFans.

They just got $7.7 billion dollars. There’s no reason they can’t pay their athletes.” pic.twitter.com/TkaB6ljymb

— Happy Punch (@HappyPunch) March 10, 2026

Fit Finlay and William Regal appeared, and that’s when Charlie Dempsey betrayed Tavion Heights

Dempsey has joined Birthright#WWENXT

pic.twitter.com/pFhX5iCBwx

— WrestlePurists (@WrestlePurists) March 11, 2026

BlackManta:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AoBy5YGYhaM?si=BtBw8z9iRdBtJxAB

RONDA ROUSEY AND GINA CARANO'S FIRST-EVER FACE OFF #RouseyCarano
--
Ronda Rousey vs. Gina Carano
Saturday May 16
LIVE only on Netflix pic.twitter.com/ZAIjWIGeWB

— Netflix (@netflix) March 10, 2026

pu7pl3:
After saying you meant main event talent you still turn around to say shiiit like this just for the purpose of arguing blindly.
Some one like Jey was a midcard level talent and he beat Roman and its been up from there since. There are many more examples. No dey argue rubbish.

ValeeLove:
E reach to ask.

ValeeLove:
in rankings they may be midcarders in that moment, but they'd have main event in TALENT or performance for them to be allowed to beat a main eventer. Hence I said backstage judges should be instituted. Back in the day, they'd hurt you for real to see if you were fit to.

ValeeLove:
"main eventer" in this context is not in rankings but in talent. You have to be a main event talent to beat a main event talent.

ValeeLove:
the guy that said those 2 words rhyme...let me not say anything, my mouth no good.

ValeeLove:
it's too expensive.

Fro5t:
It's the JD siding with Judgement Day against Finn angle that messed it up. Just didn't make sense and it came out of nowhere.

ValeeLove:
😂😂😂
Acknowledge Mercedes. E remain make una acknowledge Thekla.

ValeeLove:
my argument was not about a possibility of a bad business, but your CERTAINTY that it was bad business that fueled them. Forget about Triller, the original quote was Paramount. I said "or it is innovative", and you replied "innovative indeed" claiming CERTAINTY that it was due to bad business. The very act was innovative regardless whether that was the original reason or not, let's know that.

Again, "innovative" can be used to define a personal growth and major change, regardless whether it's been done before elsewhere. I think that's where the problem in your arguement lies.

ValeeLove:
Na wa o. Okay at least accept that you were wrong when you said she won't lose to anyone.

ValeeLove:
I didn't say praise her, give her her accolades by admitting you misjudged her by calling her proud and saying she won't put anyone over. Will you do that?

ValeeLove:
no dey lie again, you dey hear me so? Abi no be you be Samistry?👇🏿 "Airstrikes his TV deal", in other words insinuating that AEW is doing bad business and it won't be profitable for Paramount to continue to promote the show. When I countered that argument you immediately swooped in with Triller forgetting that argument has holes in it as it didn't concern TK. Now you're acting as if you were just critiquing the streaming site and not actually AEW. If it had nothing to do with TK why did you bring it up? I caught you right?

ValeeLove:
AJ losing to Steen, okay. Though he wasn't a mega star then. Ospreay gave that loss as his effort for the company before leaving them (it's a wrestling tradition). Punk and Guerrero, now that's close (he wasn't in WWE at that time). That being said, that doesn't mean they should have done it and they didn't do it multiple times as Mercedes.

ValeeLove:
bro, you've not made any strong point. A main-eventer should never lose to a midcarder, Mercedes did it. A megastar should never lose to an indy wrestler, Mercedes did that! And still you all (her antagonizers) have blatantly refused to give her her accolades, instead you all choose to continually shift the goal post and give shallow points to try to buttress your claim that she is proud.
I'm not doing back and forth. I have made my point, if you have yours, let's hear it.

ValeeLove:
their streaming partner not TK. Triller not AEW. If Triller is going out of business how is it TK's (a customer) fault. This is grasping at straws abeg.
I can't shout.

ValeeLove:
you take your biggest star and give them an 80/20 loss against midcard talent, then you can critique this.

ValeeLove:
it is innovative to them, it hasn't happened before for them. Why will I say it's the first of it's kind when the WWE network came in 2014. My gripe with your argument is you seem to believe this initiative in inspired by bad business or low success in AEW when there's no evidence to back up whatsoever. Grasping at straws, being unnecessarily antagonistic, whatever; this is a good initiative and there's nothing wrong with it.

pu7pl3:
She isn't putting anyone over abeg
She is just dropping the titles she unnecessarily picked up

ValeeLove:
fine replace the word 'innovative' with 'improvement', 'success'; same point. Triller isn't owned by Tony Khan is it? Why are you placing that baggage on TK? Stop grasping at straws.