₦airaland Forum

1025: uncle, whatsoever you quote or discuss here, u learnt from ASUU. that group be them pressure or treasure group deserve to be paid for at least making u know how to express urself. don't leave the the object for shadow.
the govt are group of men and women elected or selected (as nigerian case may be) to run the affairs others. they make laws, interpret these laws and then punish the law breakers. sir, what laws are these govt ppl making? how are they interpreting these laws and how many of the so-called law breakers get the necessary punishments? the govt must be blamed and they should be ready to accept responsibilities in case of any break down in the system.
u are at home today because ur govt blindly signed agreement with ASUU in 2009 only to come in 2013 to say oh, did we sign this actually? sorry, we tot it was our usual political rallies where we say anything that comes to our mouths.
to make it another night of a thousand laughs, ur govt has now increased the so-called N600B to N1.1T. with the next 5 years when the women in charge of money is saying the govt is broke. maybe it has not come to their mind because that is the last resort, the govt will soon tell u that ASUU is yet to be paid because of the fuel subsidy so there is the need to remove the fuel subsidy to enable them pay ASUU.

I get your point. I am not trying to exonerate the FG, infact I am all for better governance. All I am saying is, there are better ways to resolve the issue than a strike that runs for half-a-session. People don't have to suffer because ASUU has an axe to grind with the FG. We are all on the receiving side of this bad governance, they shouldn't make our lives worse.

A pressure group is a number of people that come together with the aim of influencing government decisions to suit their interest. Emphasis here on 'their interest', not necessarily the interest of the population who are not members of the group, how selfish?.

Over four months ago, the academic staff union of universities (ASUU), embarked on an indefinite strike that has since seen activities in universities grind to a halt. The union cites insincerity on the part of the FG to implement their agreement of 2009, as the reason for their decision. This is the same ASUU whose members has worked independently to stiffle student unionism; the same ASUU expects the sympathy of the FG. This is the same ASUU whose members collect bribe to alter examination results; the same ASUU expects the sympathy of students. This is the same ASUU whose members employ 1975 syllabuses to lecture (not teach) in 2013; seriously, do you need government intervention to keep up with developments in your field of specialization, when information is available online? Nevertheless, I won't dwell on the moral right of this action, I am more concerned with its legality.

ASUU claims that in 2009 it reached an agreement with the FG contained in the memorandum of understanding signed by both parties. Now the pertinent question is, why can't the leadership of ASUU take a copy of this agreement to court and sue the FG for breach of contract? Surely that would not take over four months to drag a resolution, and students wouldn't be away from school during this period. No? Is there more to the saga?

Scanning through the contents of this agreement, you find out (some if not most) of the demands are preposterous and downright selfish. Why should ASUU coerce the FG to allocate to universities a given percentage of the education budget? So let's say everything works out just fine, and in two years the NUT suddenly realises that our primary and secondary schools are in regression, and demands for a formula in contrast with ASUU's; what happens then? Maybe, we would just go back to ASUU to decide, as they have taken the powers of budgetary allocation from the national assembly.

There are other such ridiculous demands (not requests); increase in the official retirement age of lecturers (in a country abundantly blessed with unemployed persons, churned out yearly by universities, overseen by same lecturers) and the autonomy of universities (while still receiving budget allocation -receiving without giving back, who wouldn't love that?).
So today's nagging questions are; why should ASUU run my life? Why should ASUU determine when I start or finish my education? Why should a group less than 50 000, determine the fate of hundreds of thousands of students? Why should ASUU be the sole decider of the activities of universities funded by taxes from the entire populaton? Why sould ASUU negotiate for other stakeholders in the education sector?
It is very disgusting that a few number of persons, hijacks a sector of the economy, in a nation of about 170 million. It should be noted that some folks depend on the market of the community in public schools, for their livelihood and so have contributed to our economy. Why should they suffer now? Why should our economy suffer? Why should the nation suffer, due to the interest of this union?

A lot has to change - and fast too. Democracy gives us liberty, but it should not come at another man's peril; the right to swing your arm stops right where my nose starts. My life, your life and the lives of millions of Nigerians, whose best interests are not represented by ASUU, shouldn't be decided by their (probably political) antics.

payless: The same INEC came out last week to claim they were duly accredited INEC observers. The 183 were already brought court, what about the INEC officials and APGA politicians who sabotaged the Anambra election? Have they been arraigned in court yet? Rubbish from an incompetent electoral body.

So you believe INEC when they admit that their official is corrupt but rebuff claims from the same body on fraud, different strokes for different folks, how convenient.

'Kukere' was massive mostly in Nigeria and sold-out a major dance step while 'Do me' was a hit across Africa, you could verify from the number of international awards. I go for 'do me' just because of the visuals, not to take anything from 'kukere'.