₦airaland Forum

PossibleG:
it’s obvious you create this memes/Gif your self ,cuz u day always get gif for everything

nairaman66:
What a birdbrain! How do you explain semblance from different parents? What about twins? Your ilks are the reason the world is getting dumber by the day.., dysfunctional wretched atheists with no bearing!

nairaman66:
You seem lost in the argument that you lost all sense of existential consciousness. So yeah, I will leave my argument to your conscience!

Workch:
after all the blabbing, you got a simple question and this is how you shamelessly tell us that you don't know the answer.

Answer the questions

FatherOfJesus:
So why don't you look exactly like your siblings?

I mean, it's common sense since you were birthed by same parents. Let me know why

FatherOfJesus:
nope, that's not what I meant. I'm not sure you understood my statement but I'm going to give you an example. Science is really hard, that's why a layman doesn't understand it but I'm going to be patient with you.


For example, we have atomic theory, atomic theory is a theory trying to explain the nature of atoms.
The first atomic theory I can remember was proposed by jj thompson, this theory accurately predicted that an atom consists of positive and negative charged particles, we tested it and it was correct but he couldn't figure how these particles are arranged with the atom. Dalton discovered that atoms formed coumounds, so we need to modify this theory, because we have new evidence. Rutherford then experimented the arrangement of atoms like planetary system, we need to update, then Chadwick discovered neutron, we needed to update. Bohr again discovered energy levels and orbits of atoms, we needed to update againtofsy we are observing new things about atoms in quantum physics, we will have to update further.
You will notice that while updating, there was never a time someone said atoms done exist, only thr explanations kept getting updated as new evidence comes.
This is the same thing with evolution, there's never going to be a time the scientific community will say that evolution doesn't exist and then replace it with creation, we can only update the theories when new evidence comes. We have updated the theories many times anyways, from lamarckian theory of evolution, to Darwin's theory of evolution and then we discovered DNA and inheritance pattern, we needed to include to what we called neodarwinian theory of evolution today. It has never told us that evolution didn't happen

That's the beauty of science, we don't stop learning and improving and this has worked so far. This is why we were able to invent many stuffs.

philiancoop:
And the ideas from those men keep changing as they find out that the old stuff they said was rubbish.
But for now, this is correct. Until they find something more correct, this becomes wrong rubbish. � great

FatherOfJesus:
dude I have a degree in biochemistry, postgraduate degrees in clinical chemistry, epidemiology and a post graduate certificate in evolutionary biology. I'm an authority in this topic, I'm not doing this to bra though.

It's not controversial, it's fact. I observe it everyday. Yes, we have a common descent. We have more evidence for this than gravity, atoms and blackholes comoind.
We can easily see it in your DNA, it's like it cannot even be hidden

illiterate, I'm going have to educate you here. There's nothing like "evolution is just a theory" that's what scientifically illiterate people say.
We have evolution and we have the theory of evolution, read that carefully because you need basic education. They are different things.

A theory in science is the best explanation for a natural phenomenon.
The theory of evolution tries to explain evolution, just like atomic theory explains atoms, cell theory explains cells and theory of gravity explains gravity. The theory can be modified but the natural phenomenon (evolution, atoms, gravity, cells are constant), we can only modify how we explain them as we get better knowledge about them. So illiterate, evolution is is fact, theory of evolution explains this fact.
BTW, because something is a law in science does not mean it's infallible. Only illiterates like yours think that theories can become a law, that's not how it works. I will give you an example, Albert Einsteins theory of gravity superceded Newton's law of gravity, a theory superceded a law, . So whether theory of evolution is a theory or a law, it doesn't matter. If it's wrong then it's wrong

I think my last statement already cured this blissful Ignorance. Go get a refund from your elementary school or maybe you didn't pay attention in class.

Senomii:
Oga! Keep your fuckin, unnecessary explanations and foolish opinions to yourself, you and useless father ain't feeding me neither did any of your family members contribute to my education, I can believe in whatever I want, debunk whatever I want , and neither do I believe in what science says or any religious bla bla whatever, I believe in nothing and no one! And this will forever remain my stance for as long as I'm alive

FatherOfJesus:
Because there's a gap doesn't mean that evolution didn't happen.
And again, because most of you are church guys and are here to stiffly defend your beliefs in your creation myths, you probably do not do your reseech properly before making any comment.

There are no gaps or whatsoever when you study the geological aspect of evolution, the fossil records and radiometric dating explains all the gaps. The gaps you talk about can be seen in the gradual skull:body ratio in fossils of other extinct apes. We have evidence that the brain/skill/body ratio consistently increased over years from the austrolopithecus species until date when you follow the evolutionary branch of homoninis. The amazing thing about this fossils of results we got is that, they are consistent with radiometric dating and the geological timeline. We were able to extrapolate that the size of our neocortex in relation to other apes made the difference. BTW, neocortex is repsonsible for higher cognitive activity which brought about consciousness in humans.
We have extanct species of hominids that are way more conscisous than chimpanzees and gorilla, we could figure this from their brain/body ratio. The most recent are the neantherdals, they were much more conscious than chimpanzees and less conscious than humans, early homo sapiens actually saw them. So that's the gap dude, they are in the fossil records.

Lastly, humans are apes, your statement is a goof in biology.
You cannot campare humans to apes when humans themselves are apes

FatherOfJesus:
this comment is wrong in biology because humans are animals by all standards, even to cellular level. A simple observation of human cell under a microscope bears all the hallmark of an ideal animal cell. Get this basic education
It's not stupid, you re just scientifically illiterate

It's not a calculation, like I said earlier, you re scientifically illiterate and not willing to be educated, evolution is an observed fact and we observe it every minute in science, you don't need maths or calculations to do so.

They are not assumptions, they are facts but you need atleast a degree in science from a reputable university and not mushroom Nigerian universities and then go further to study a postgraduate in the field of biology to be master and properly ubderstand how it works. The fact that a layman like you don't understand it is why it's called science and why people have to get doctorate degree in this specialty.

By the way, it doesn't mean that you cant have peripheral knowledge like I do and then learn how to observe the evidence with a scientific mind and not like a church rat mind who always see everything from a belief point of view

Biglittlelois:
Yeah it happened millions of years ago based on the scientists and their paper research, so we should believe their hypothesis, but we should not believe biblical scholars and researchers with their evidenced and facts, or you think they don't exist? you see the double standard?

Last year, was it not the same scientists that confirmed the creation story of the earth filled with water and darkness before creation started? We should believe scientists of today instead of what has been said and confirmed 2000 years ago? Funny lots.

MrJaay:
Despite being fictions, it interestingly isn't as easy for many (including Americans) to decipher some of the exaggerations in many western movies. This has been proven overtime by numerous scholars of media cultivation.

Ever since George Gerbner introduced the cultivation theory in the 1960’s as part of the Cultural Indicators Project to examine the influence of television on viewers, the theory has continuously proved effective in explaining how long-term or consistent exposure to media shapes the way consumers of media perceive the world and conduct themselves.

The cultivation hypothesis specifically states that: "the more television people watch, the more likely they are to hold a view of reality that is closer to television's depiction of reality"

Heavy television viewers who were respondents in a cultivation analysis survey research in America were shocked to learn to learn that policemen in US were less than 1 percent of the total population, given their prevalence in films.

To many individuals, these distorted and partial reality portrayed on television represents what the world is 'really' like.

Gerbner also coined the term mean world syndrome to describe the cognitive bias whereby television viewers exposed to violent content were more likely to see the world as more dangerous than it actually is. Good examples of these are our mental pictures of how life in dictatorship countries are.

In more recent times, researchers have delved into other forms of media such as reality TV and video games, to study the effects of the misconceptions therein on consumers.. you night want to explore that in your topic too...

Senomii:
I'm confused by both the scientists and the bible, the hardest part to believe is that human evolved from animals, like some kind of magical transformation, just like that

Senomii:
I'm confused by both the scientists and the bible, the hardest part to believe is that human evolved from animals, like some kind of magical transformation, just like that

Lakeview:
A True sorcerer will not say this garbage!

Panda7:
op what would human look like in 10billion years??

franklingud:
OP @sourcerer... All am seeing here are faces of how mad men look like.

michlins:
there has been no evidence of intergalactic travels,in terms of wit and strength, the dinosaurs are still stronger than us and so is the other species that came before us.

Man has survived not by physical strength but on mental capacity.

About the pyramids, it's still a mystery and I don't like to think about it

engrchykae:
don't say such of science, science is infallible.
It is the church and government who already have their own truth that is trying to make science look incompetent in order to cover up opposing evidences.
The government has what they think you must believe in
The church also have their dogmas.
How do you reconcile the presence of UFOs with the church's stand that we are the only beings in the universe?
If the sun is understood scientifically as a nuclear power plant undergoing nuclear fusion of hydrogen to give helium and lots of energy.
How do you reconcile this scientific explanation with the religious body who sees the sun as a sacred religious object?
Some astronauts from a distant star came here and made us .

Jeon:
BORING CAPRICORN...

Capricorn humor is either absurd and over-the-top or dry.

THEY TRY SO HARD TO SOUND FUNNY..
mtchwee.

leave this funny aspects to
the half house, half human, scale, the twins and ram..

because goat is not funny also serious.

luminouz:
Yes bro...I'm good


I'm a scientist so I enjoyed your post.