₦airaland Forum

TR0UBLeMaKeR:
nerf guns don't splash anything

please are you the owner of that ass on ya DP?

RIP

harakiri:
Dont thank me. Thank the slave traders who not only enslaved your forefathers but also enslaved their minds plus the minds of their future generations as well e.g YOU. Ever asked yourself if you would be christian today if you were born in kuwait or malaysia? My guess is nil...not everyone's brain is wired to think outside the box.

Shut up

Hahaha This thread is freaking hilarious! keep it up OP I'm enjoying it. *grabs popcorn*

prediction gone bad

Tinubu is gradually becoming a political godfather.

Lala247:
Dimples is loaded look at her smile
On,y rich ppl smile like that

please are you the owner of that asss on your dp?

Sai Buhari

Vice President Namadi Sambo, an
indigene of Kaduna State and running
mate to the PDP presidential candidate,
said President Goodluck Jonathan’s
administration has performed well in all
sectors of the economy to deserve the
votes of Nigerians.
He also added that with the
overwhelming support that the PDP
currently enjoys in Kaduna State and the
north-west zone, he is expecting an over
overwhelming victory for the party on
Saturday.
Although the All Progressive Congress
(APC) Presidential Candidate, General
Muhammadu Buhari is from Katsina State
also in the north-west zone.
The Vice President, who spoke through
his Senior Special Assistant on Media, Mr
Umar Sani, at a youth empowerment
programme in Kaduna, maintained that
the zone is up for grab by the PDP,
having achieved similar feat in the 2011
elections.
Sambo has literately relocated his office
to his home state where he has been
meeting with different groups across the
state.
The purpose according to Sani, is to woo
electorates to vote for the PDP in the
coming election, stressing that the Vice
President does not want to lose anything
to chance in securing victory for
President Jonathan and PDP.
One of such strategies is the distribution
of cars, tricycles, sewing machines,
wrappers and cash to PDP members in
the state by his aide.
This is aimed at boosting the morale of
party men and women and to reassure
them of President Jonathan’s
commitment to alleviate the sufferings of
Nigerians if voted into office for another
term.
However, as Nigerians go to the polls this
Saturday to elect their next president,
political pundits are watching to see how
the different strategies adopted by
politicians will translate to victory,
especially with the amount of resources
so far deployed for the exercise. http://www.channelstv.com/2015/03/25/sambo-assures-2million-votes-for-pdp-in-kaduna/

golddust6000:
NO IGBO MAN WILL VOTE FOR BUHARI, I KNOW MY PEOPLE.

I'm an Igbo man and i must vote for Buhari. Amen

I've read the speech like five times and I'm still yet to see where he made such statement or is it not the same post I'm reading

Horus:
"Only fools duck when the truth is thrown at them."

You just "confessed" that you know very well that the word "Jewish" is not in the bible

Titus 1:14 Not giving heed to Jewish fables, and commandments of men, that turn from the truth.

Why did you miss this Leviticus 14:3 And the priest shall go forth out of the camp; and the priest shall look, and, behold, if the plague of leprosy [/b]be healed[b] in the leper

davien:
Apparently you're the one who doesn't know your bible....perhaps you need to read the verse below...



Next thing you know you'll claim the bible doesn't say you can trample on stars...

As usual by atheists quoting out of context Leviticus 14:2 This shall be the law of the leper in the day of his cleansing: He shall be brought unto the priest: 14:3 And the priest shall go forth out of the camp; and the priest shall look, and, behold, if the plague of leprosy be healed in the leper; 14:4 Then shall the priest command to take for him that is to be cleansed two birds alive and clean, and cedar wood, and scarlet, and hyssop: 14:5 And the priest shall command that one of the birds be killed in an earthen vessel over running water: 14:6 As for the living bird, he shall take it, and the cedar wood, and the scarlet, and the hyssop, and shall dip them and the living bird in the blood of the bird that was killed over the running water: 14:7 And he shall sprinkle upon him that is to be cleansed from the leprosy seven times, and shall pronounce him clean, and shall let the living bird loose into the open field. 14:8 And he that is to be cleansed shall wash his clothes, and shave off all his hair, and wash himself in water, that he may be clean: and after that he shall come into the camp, and shall tarry abroad out of his tent seven days.

davien:
lol, birds blood'apparently doesn't cure leprosy anymore as it did allegedly in the bible...

You must have been reading the bible upside down. The bible NEVER said that birds blood could cure leprosy but it was a procedure used after the person must have been cleansed more like a sacrifice done by the priest to pronounce the person clean and to be allowed into the camp.

jboy73:
Thanks dear. This proves u have big nipplles

screw you

ellad2k4eva:
Same sh*t happen with mine also. Somewhat like a fast blackout of d screen. Tot am alone.

It happens to mine too. Do you know what could be the cause?

Muhammad ( piss be upon him) was a paedophile and raving lunatic. I would choose Jesus over Muhammad any day.

Liekiller:
Learn biology.

Your ignorance is nauseating.

Liekiller:
They agree on it because of the massive, overwhelming amount of EVIDENCE various fields of science have accumulated over the past 150 years. So, what I was saying is: if you want to "disprove" it, then you ought to deal with that evidence. It's not about making this claim or that claim based on personal preferences or beliefs.

Massive, overwhelming amount of evidence like?

Liekiller:
What makes you say that my unbelief is based on science?!? That statement is not accurate at all.

As for the science thread: The burden of proof is on you when it comes to evolution. If you think you can disprove something that the entire scientific community agrees on then go right ahead.

Wow! fantastic logic! because the "entire" scientific community agrees on evolution proves it's correct right?

Joshthefirst:
Don't mind this deluded man. He hijacks definitions to suit his own propaganda of eliminitating any belief in any deity and even statingthat belief in deity can hamper scientific development. That is the imperative of these guys who fight any concept of a godly worldview. They keep forgetting that The very masters of science believed in God. They won't tell you that there are even contemporary scientists of very reputable achievements that believe in God.

They purport an idioti.c philosophy of macro cellular evolution as fact and try to make the general public believe that godlessness and science go hand in hand. They will be stopped.

Romans 1:20 For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse:

plaetton:
Isaac Newton was not a creationist, , if at all you know what a creationist is.

And secondly, who is not allowing creatonists to publish a scientific paper?

There is no such thing as creationists science. It is either science or Not science, no half science, creationist science.
If we have creationist science, then we an also have juju, science, magic science, fairy science,etc, etc..

Science is an established and evolving system to observe, investigate, analize and catalogue natural laws and phenomena .

Creatonists are unable nad have been unable to publish peer reviewable scientific papers simply because their entire creationist worlview relies on nothing but unexplained magic.
No one has ever or could ever prevent creationist and goddist to show scientific proof of goddit.

I don't understand the cause of your paranoia but i'll still humor you. Sir Issac Newton believed in the literal biblical account of creation. here is a link. en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religious_views_of_Isaac_Newton ......I don't even know were to attempt in your remaining post so I'll leave you to wallow in your ignorance.

davien:
lol....can you demonstrate "creation science" is there such a thing that can be called "creation science"?
What methods would be used?

Sir, your premise was quite outlandish. I get it that most secular scientists use the term "pseudoscience" to classify creationist/intelligent design arguments forgetting that evolution, big bang, abiogenesis and all "origins" theories are all pseudoscience to say the least. firstly, the biogenesis theory that life can only come from life was proved by Louis Pasteur a creationist hearby dispelling the theory of spontaneous generation which was partly the bedrock of abiogenesis. Now back to evolution, the so called TOE hasn't been able to explain obvious "missing links" and the so called transitional fossils most notably the Archaeopteryx was proven to be a fraud. In a nut shell, creationist have made the greatest impact in science so it is foolhardy to term creation science as "pseudoscience" while inane theories are having a field day because they don't involve God in the equation.

davien:
There's no such thing, creationist invented words like "historical science" to blur a well defined line.....you'd see that when asked what group radioscopy is they can tell you "observational/historical" just so they can escape stop their own fallacies argument.
When asked why they call their bias "creation science" when an act of "divine creation" is not demonstrable they have no answer....
You can watch these two videos to understand better..



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=skRSrGX543M



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k9yQEG7mlTU&itct=CB0QpDAYAiITCNPDz9rr4cMCFVHXHAodCHIAaTIHcmVsYXRlZEjChNyN4ZfI1M8B&client=mv-google&gl=NG&hl=en

I get your point, but are you saying there aren't creationist who have made great impact in science. from the top of my head, Isaac Newton and Charles Babbage should ring a bell. But Talk origins would have none of that. I find it funny that creationists aren't given a chance to publish creation science in peer reviewed journals, that also strikes me as discriminating.