₦airaland Forum

basilico:
Found guilty with noevidence of proof.
Liberals have severe reasoning impairment.
She was accusing him of having said a few things to her while she was clerking for him.

Joe Biden was also accused of grabbing by the P and the media wrote it off

The media didn't right anything off

The plaintiff didn't pursue the case anymore

Why? Because is was a frivolous and bogus case that had literally no merit just like trumps election fraud case. Rubbish cases to taint people, everything gets thrown out of court.

feedthenation:
---Press statement by Trump Legal Team---

This is there last week

Let them keep throwing and see what sticks

Fvcking morons.

feedthenation:
--MAGA folks on Al-Q-Anon are really ranting about AG Barr---

They said he is a deep state hack. Just imagine supporting people that think like this

Everyone that talks against there insane claims, is a deep state hack.

basilico:
Welcome.At least you are not like that semi educated MBA from a college that exists in his head.
I said I may be wrong because the most difficult thing to do is to force change on people long used to a particular way of life.
Draining the swamp can get you killed.

Ok

Just know now, they are not draining any swamp, if there is a swamp they are the swamp

rudy, mcconel etc

All of this is a smoke screen. Just my own take sha

feedthenation:
---Yes there are no significant evidence---apart from the indictment of a lawyer working within FBI who was part of the investigating team--- share the evidence if you have them---

YouTube video loading in 3...2...1, Go

feedthenation:
---The same John Durham who has been investigating for 2 years now without any significant result---we are still waiting for Obamagate---

After saying rubbish, baba put

”I maybe wrong though” Like he as ever be right about anything during this election cycle

That's what we call plausible deniability.

raumdeuter:
Was Bush in charge of intelligence that he will lie about it? Was it not what CIA told him that he acted on?

Should Trump also prosecute Obama for lack of due diligence in Syria and his role in destroying Libya?
Instead of Trump covering it up

No it was not the CIA sir, bush speech of October 7 2002, claimed Iraq posed an imminent treat to security of the United States, a report was released a week to when bush mad this statement from the National Intelligence Estimate clearly saying Iraq did have WMD capabilities, it had no plans to use its weapons except in the capacity of self-defense, or if the United States threatened to attack Iraq.

Syrian attack and Libyan war, we're both civil wars going on, that was tearing the country apart already something had to be done, came the involvement of NATO ( do you personal investigation Obama was hesitant in involvement). Both were the worst mistakes of his presidency, both wars.

But no crime committed,

Both Nato and Obama made a mistake of handing Libya to wrong people after the war. But let's blame Obama.

What was the war crime committed that needed investigations state them?

raumdeuter:
Should Trump admin have pursued Obama over Syria? Or encouraging wars in Libya
Bush got intel from the CIA and acted based on it

Did Obama lie to Congress about any? Who is talking about the war?

Iraq invasion was wrong and bush lied about the intelligence, that's all

And how did Obama encourage Syrian war? There was already a civil war in the country, they begged for the involvement of nato. Syrian war I blame Obama for no due diligence

but this issue here is bush second and his administration lied about the war. The next administration didn't want too cause problems for the future and covered it up.

Simple

raumdeuter:
What did Obama forgive Bush for

Obama's admin refused to pursue them, especially his DOJ for war crimes, Bush 2 administration misled congress and the American people about the evidence of nuclear weapons which mandated the US and allies to invade Iraq in 2003 and overthrow ruler Saddam Hussein.

If Obama had pursued them, it's would have set a precedent. Which he overlooked. Mr trump broke norms, with the whole rubbish obamagate discussion.

So yeah we have it, I hope they pursue him.

Kophschmerzen:
Have you seen the communication staff picks? Fuuuckking diversity and all female picks.

Wait till confirmation and see republicans want too kill themselves

shegzhkn:
Joe biden twisted his ankle.

Playing with his dog

The kind of transparency you need.

Not the one, mr President would be rushed to walter reed at the middle of the night

Then he would sign Non discolsure documents with everyone in the hospital

Biden just appointed a Nigerian born american too as deputy treasury secretary, his name is adewale adeyemo, some call him wally adeyemo

Keyword “diversity” reach out too the minorities. Lets see what they can do.

I hope to see more immigrants or children of immigrants in the white house give or take 20-50 years time.

shegzhkn:
Trump suggests his own FBI and DoJ maybe in-on in this whole 'election fraud' saga.

Maria Bartiromo's facial expressions as Trump pushes obscene lies about election fraud are priceless pic.twitter.com/xdt5aflm2W

— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) November 29, 2020

Lol.

There is a world for people like him, “narcissist”

He thinks the whole world is conspiring against him.

Heads would brust

Kophschmerzen:
https://twitter.com/marceelias/status/1333088877343608832?s=19

Another L to the Trumptards.

Trump becomes the first president in history to lose recount in 2 different states

Womp womp.

Breaking records of losses.

edi287:
Just negodu these fools smh..

After its antifa that is the problem.

Openbusiness:
You still don't understand what my original post is about. This is not a matter of Trump needing 270 Electoral votes to win. This is about the both candidates having a shortfall to 270 Electoral votes. If you remove the votes of all the several Swing States being contested by Court litigations, both candidates are under 270. If there are sufficient faithless Electors, then none of them will reach 270, which means the Elections are indecisive. An indecisive election means the power to decide who becomes President will go to the House of Representatives. Each State House of Reps has 1 Vote. Republicans have 29 States, and Democrats have 21. It is expected the State Reps will vote along party lines, which means Trump will automatically win if it comes to this. That's why Trump said if Biden can get the Electoral College Votes, then he will leave. But if Biden doesn't get it, Trump will win. Considering the extent of voter fraud and that many States are under dispute, there will most likely be sufficient Faithless Electors. Even the Democrats are afraid of this reality. It coul happen and I believe it will. Only time will tell.

Sir, the litigation is only in pa

Georgia would vote biden, arizona would, nevada would too, wisconsin, and most definitely michigan

Add that and still tell me how biden is below 270, its a miracle for 1 state to uncertify its vote, not to mention he needs 3 !!!! 3 ooo

Lmao. As you said time would tell

AmazonTopaz:
Please watch the video on this link https://youtu.be/qpEb6LL7Ub8

Timiofak,wirinet,nateevs,ibime,budaatum,shegzhkn,salford,pdpguy,edi287,bayelsaowei and others here.
Please watch this video.
Apart from suppressing votes this is one of the ways GOP win elections by funding third party candidates that take away democratic votes.
This happened in Florida and cost the democrats in Florida senate races two seats.

Seen it earlier this week, i didnt pay attention to it because we already know how the republicans work. But the blind wont see it.

Openbusiness:
Nawa oh! Court case is DIFFERENT from State Legislature sitting processes. The Republican members of House of Representatives in Pennsylvania have introduced a resolution to declare the certification invalid due to confirmed election irregularities. The outcome is yet to be finalized. This week we will know how far.
https://pittsburgh.cbslocal.com/2020/11/27/pennsylvania-republicans-dispute-2020-election-results-resolution/

Lmao, first of all. 23 out of about 150 members claimed there is irregularities, all republicans. Nothing is confirmed like you claim

And by tomorrow a good chunck of them would be out of work, this same article said it, only if you didnt read it

And certification is done, the only way they could rescind it is by court and court already tossed out there claims

basilico:
You would prefer Ivanka in a yellow jumpsuit.
How about Hunter Biden in one too, for face meeting in the nude with his niece , the daughter of his brothers.
I always assumed you have a conscience.
Must be still single while some of us have raised kids about to get married,hence we have ethos.
Which you lack because Orange man bad.

I have always said it here, if anyone commits an offence or any wrong doing they deserve to be charged, even obama that you claim is a criminal, havent i told you here that if there is evidence, indict him by all means

About hunter biden, if law enforcement, or DOJ saw wrong doing in anything he did by all means indict him. Where i have issues with you is bringing hunter into the discussion like, he isnt 50 years old, dont try to use his own offence to taint his father. If you have evidence that joe is a criminal, indict him simple.

All this ones you are doing is unnecessary talk, you would see how democrats would swing into action come 20th of january, i pray they dont forgive his family the way obama forgave bush administration.

And you claim to have trained children, yet you arent distressed that trump that you support, treats women like trash, and assaulted various women, children included.

Arent you an hypocrite?

basilico:
Can you unequivocally say Flynn was not framed

Can you unequivocally say the earth is spherical in shape ?

budaatum:
Funny you all talking "trump pardoning himself". For what exactly? Its not as if he has conceded he committed any crimes so what would he be pardoning himself for?

I bet he's far too stupid and arrogant to pardon himself but if he does it won't be worth used toilet paper, except to magas of course.

Lol, flynn also said he is innocent but needed a pardon

So trump can claim he didnt do anything and still pardon himself, we know them

Party of family values, criminals.

Openbusiness:
PA certification is in currently in dispute by the PA State Legislature

No it isnt, it as been certified and the people that wanted it uncertified went to court on thurday. Yesterday there case got tossed out.

Please read more.

Openbusiness:
$1K fine in some States is not a big deal. And Electors are chosen by the State's Legislature not the Governors etc, and almost all the State Legislature is mixed with both Red and Blue. And for a State like PA, Republicans have many seats, so all the Electors there CANNOT lean Blue.

Sir in PA it as been certified and they have picked democratic slate of electors so dead that thought that you think all 20 would vote for trump, the case that was filed to withdraw certification was tossed out with prejudice

So all this you are saying is irrelevant, the only way the legislature could intervene as passed

By tomorrow half of them are out of there jobs. Simple

Openbusiness:
Where is the crookedness There's no similarities between their system of choosing a Presidential election winner and our system. They have Electoral College, we don't. And speaking of Electoral College, it is 100% LEGAL for an Elector to be a "Faithless Elector". There is no crookedness or amateurish behavior involved, especially when you have credible allegations and litigations of voter fraud involved. The Electors are American citizens too na, and they can see what is happening by themselves. So if they choose to be Faithless Electors, then it is justified. There's no illegality about it.

No it isn't not 100% legal to be a faithless elector. In most states they pay a fine

And secondly if you think, 20 democrat electors sent from a state like PA, would vote trump is one of the biggest jokes i have heard

In most cases they switch to in paty votes, i.e i belive 1 or 2 might vote sanders instead.

Openbusiness:
Yes agreed, with the way time is so short, the case might never get to the Supreme Court on time before the Electoral College starts voting. And that's why if you read my original post very well, you will see that I highlighted this reality there. And which is why, because the Supreme Court might end up not even being in the picture at all, this thread is not based on Trump winning via the Supreme Court; BUT based on another viable alternative to Trump winning his 2nd Term that will surely play out.

You wrote everything and kept surely

nothing is surely playing out, nothing at all

all of this is grift. And if Trump goes to the Supreme Court, with his pa loss, and they hear him out, and they agree to toss out mail in ballots in Pa, which is highly unlikely, that is basically impossible to toss half of the votes in a state

he still doesn't have 270 votes to land him the EC.

So I repeat nothing is surely happening.

Today on why conservative Republicans aren't Christians. Today my pastor was preaching about the virtue of Jesus Christ when he was on earth and how he impacted the world,

So he talked about, how Jesus housed the homeless, ministered to the sick, and feed the poor. So I tried to align it with modern day America

Housing the homeless - refuge camps and sanctuary cities, republicans are trying to end it

Ministering to the sick - free healthcare, and insurance coverage for pre exiting conditions, republicans are trying to end it too

Feeding the poor - republicans call it handouts and socialism.

I am damn sure if Jesus we're alive today, Republicans would call him a socialist

just my take, have a nice day. And happy Sunday

Openbusiness:
It is primarily an Appellate Court, BUT it can also conduct a trial, unlike Court of Appeals that are limited to appeals from Lower Courts only.



https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Procedures_of_the_Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States

That's if they are bringing a new case, they are not. Or are they?

And with the way thing is going the Supreme Court my decide not to take the case at all, agreed?

Openbusiness:
You're wrong! What you said is applicable for Appeal Courts, not the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court interprets the CONSTITUTION and the duty of the Supreme Court is to protect the Constitution. If Trump's team can prove that the voter fraud irregularities have violated the Constitution, hence Biden should not be President, they will uphold the CONSTITUTION and Trump will eventually win.

Supreme Court is not a trial court, it's an appellate court you this man.

Openbusiness:
You still don't get the MAGNITUDE of the implication of the Pennsylvania State Legislature ruling. A whole State's House of Representatives have voted that they now see reason and agree there was IRREGULARITIES in the voting that happened in their State and that certification should be withdrawn, which means Biden has LOST Pennsylvania already

Stop lying its just 28 house of reps and 8 senators. Who are all republicans

Its not even up to 1/3 or the PA congress, by tomorrow most of them would be out of there jobs.

Stop the misinformation, and stop lying.

Openbusiness:
You don't still understand. That a case is being thrown out by the Lower Courts IS NOT a disadvantage to Trump. It is actually an advantage. Because the faster they thrown it out, the more they can APPEAL and the appeals keep pushing the case up and up till it gets to SCOTUS. Trump doesn't need to present full evidence now, that will be too stupid. As of now, they even have whistleblower Democrats ready to testify to voter fraud and how they participated and carried out voter fraud. But if these things are revealed now, it puts many witnesses lives at risk, because the Dems will go for assassination or threaten them to silence through the back door behind the scenes. And then it will slow down the case from reaching the SCOTUS fast enough. The mother of all litigation and evidence will be presented before the SCOTUS, not the lower Circuit Courts controlled by Dems. Trump is teaching you Politics 101 Roulette, sit back and learn

Lmao, you know nothing about the rule of law at all. You don't claim fraud in lower court, or provide evidence in lower court because you want to get to Supreme court, you think when you reach there new evidence would be allowed? Or you think you are allowed to change your litigation?

If its so easy, everybody would go to supreme court na.


Google the word appellate court, they dont allow new witnesses and evidence

The SCOTUS is an appellate court.

Openbusiness:
It's getting thrown out mainly by lower Circuit Courts who are mostly Judges appointed by Obama under the Obama admin, that is to say, Judges that lean LEFT and favor BLUE.

The PA Supreme Court that tossed out there last case, are 3 Republican judges

The particular one that wrote the breifing to toss it out, was appointed by Trump, the remaining two was appointed by Bush

So your claims lack merit sir.

Openbusiness:
Yes, I get you clear. Your example i think is more of like the case of legalizing murder. If murder is legalized then it is legal to kill anyone without moral justification but killing would still be an immoral thing to do, whether it is legal or not. But in this case, it is totally different. There was VOTER FRAUD!

But your lawyers, none of them. Including rudy, is claiming fraud in court, why?