₦airaland Forum

CoronaVirusRelo:
Who believes this crap?

Damn! People can be really stupid.

With a verified account

Verified no mean sey you get brain, na this week I sabii. There is idiot named Adamu Garba, he is a Nigerian, ran for President last year, but lost primaries. He owns a verified twitter account, hin dey threaten jack.

No be every verified account smart, some na mumu.

Ah yeah antifa is the issue

CoronaVirusRelo:
I am speechless!

When you see this multinational moving towards green energy and someone telling you otherwise about its effect is really mind buggling.

You start searching for more crude ways to explain.

The Auto and Aero industry racing towards green and someone trying to make this big multinationals look like fools.

Its worrisome and calls for urgent and strategic enlightenment

Everything is a big conspiracy to Republicans, I remember beginning of covid they said it's 5g that is been installed, that's why we have lockdowns. Thats how they said all the doctors know hydroxylchloroquine is the cure, but the aren't speaking up because they want to destroy trumps economy. Common!!!!!

They are literally about a million doctors in america and i am damn sure atleast 200,000 of those doctors are Republicans, how can all of them be in on such a big conspiracy.

benalvino2:
NASA just playing politics. But read this
https://realclimatescience.com/2019/08/extending-the-history-of-nasa-global-temperature-fraud/

From this poorly designed website. Jeez. Now I see why y'all believe in conspiracy theories.

benalvino2:
ANOTHER TRUMP PEACE DEAL: President Trump has just announced that he brokered another major agreement, this one between Sudan and Israel - who have agreed to normalize relations. This follows two Trump peace deals between Israel and Bahrain, and Israel and the UAE.

All the Muslim countries that wants to kill Israel is now friends with them.

Lmao, first of all they weren't at war. But you do know all these peace talks around isreal, is just a way to pander to his fanatical Christian?

pryme:
Correction it's 5.4 (US) 10.6 (China) how is this "almost the same"?
So we want to talk about population density now?
Give a rest abeg

Per capita emissions America is x3 of china what the heck are you talking about? And no it isn't 10.6

But okay, China isn't going green after pointing you to various sources

Republicans make me marvel at times, imagine a senator asking what would happen to 270 million cars? Like in the next 30 years those cars wouldn't have faded away.

It's a transition gaddamit

basilico:
I agree. Texas and Florida are a match made in heaven for Trump. Without them Reps would never win.

Ehn ehn

basilico:
Your kowtowing to China who brought us the Wuhan virus. Communists want global domination it took Reagan to bring their main sponsor down.
China cares about being dominant, whether their citizens work in sweat House they can always hold leverage on the big mega corps.
Many Chinese companies with a global reach have the govt as a primary backer or guarantee.
And people like Joe Biden are held by their balls by the Chinese
The panda cares about the panda simple.

This is imbecilic at best, I already told you that if the republicans continue at this path, there worst nightmare would happen. Because they hate china and ignore science, everything is a socialist idea, it's stupidity at best.

basilico:
Without Calif votes, Trump beat Clinton in popular vote count

Calif has been saying they want to secede, a decision they cannot pull on their own. With worlds 5th or 7th largest economy It would put a dent on the Fed tax income though. The leftists in Hollywood had said they would relocate to Canada among other nations had Trump won. None except Tom Hanks who moved to The Mediterranean made good their promises. Tom Hanks was a too close guest of Epstein, Qanon has it's ridiculous explanation for that.

Lmao I can make this argument for electoral college votes too, since we all want to be mad. Remove texas 38 EC and Hillary would have won easily.

Like everything isn't part of America.

pryme:
Stick to the topic, we are talking GOING GREEN.
Am not playing that game.

China has the highest carbon emission rate, your model for America to emulate.
Do you think China care?

Lmao, point to exactly where I said America should have the same carbon emission rate as China?

And in fact us currently have almost the same carbon emissions of 5.3 billion metric tons, while China as 9.8 billion metric tons, while the us population is 330 million, while China is 1.4 billion, so what are we talking about?

And yes china care, they plans to end co2 emissions in the next 40 years, link below

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/china-says-it-will-stop-releasing-co2-within-40-years/

So china is really growing green, I know it's hard to accept, that Republicans are m*rons

basilico:
Assume you use an iPhone. Globe Awards Jan 2020 Rick tears into Apple CEO.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iTXTOGdnVzQ

What does this have with what we are talking about?

basilico:
You ain't the type that goes down taking Trump signs off people's backyard, neither would you block a MAGA hat wearing they/them service
Watch the video, you will know where I'm coming from RE Climate change junk science.

Ok

pryme:
So America should try and step up to the country with the highest carbon emission rate? Are we talking going green here or renewable energy?

Another strawman analogy, like it's not Americans that own most of the companies there.

basilico:
A popular debate moment is when the proponents of a topic invite the worthy opponents to cross the floor and join them.

Trump doing 46% is yuuge. Bigly.

He won 30 states to Clinton 20, won 2600 counties to Clinton 476 . That's how the EC was defined to function. Furthermore minus California Trump had more popular votes than her.

Lmao, now minus how much California have on the gdp since we All want to be mad. And people should determine who leads them, not lands dammit.

The first image shows population density, while the second shows how lands determine

pryme:
Sorry dude, this is not wishful thinking.
We are dealing with realty, until there is something like a global accord for finding alternative energy source, you won't place your country at a disadvantage all in the name of virtue signaling.

I don't know about the Russians of recent but we all know what length China can go to, to attain world power.

Until there is a global discussion about cutting carbon emissions to Zero, no nuclear power can be trusted to switch to wind turbines and solar energy or even nuclear energy.

Mind you, you will need manufacturing plants to build the infrastructures for the new energy sources so you will still need fossil fuel to get there.

No one said they are cutting fossil fuel

it's a transition, that can take the next 30 years, but the earlier the better.

More on China and going green

https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-02464-5

https://www.forbes.com/sites/dominicdudley/2019/01/11/china-renewable-energy-superpower/

basilico:
Climate change evidence of it being real.
Sahara, Atacama deserts et al were caused by burning fossil fuels
When you bring an argument that 99% of scientists in peer reviewed papers have said so. It's called a strawman argument.
A video of Ted Cruz grilling a Climate change scientist Sierra Club who only had that strawman argument.
Watch and be enlightened on how this guy has no proof before a senate committee.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sl9-tY1oZNw

you have said it is not real before, and NASA said it is, so why should I argue with you about it.

so enjoy.

pryme:
Wait, China is going green?
What am I missing here?

You keep claiming to know, and you know nothing sir.

China is the world's leader right now in renewable energy, link below

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Renewable_energy_in_China

The US is second to china in renewable energy, they have double the energy America produces in renewable energy, so if America wants to be great they need to beat china, and china is moving at such a ridiculous speed that if America ignores China for another 4 years, they might never meet up.

basilico:
The same people who had Hillary up.

On its final poll released Nov. 7, the
day before Election Day, Rasmussen
had up 2 points on
. Clinton won the
popular vote by 1 percentage point,
even though Donald Trump beat her
on electoral votes.
No other pollster tracked by
RealClearPolitics came as close to the
final results.
No other pollster tracked by
RealClearPolitics came as close to the
final results.
"The media created a false narrative
about the 2016 presidential campaign,
and most polling reinforced it,"
Rasmussen wrote on its website
Thursday. "Our polling showed that
issues, not the media-fed
controversies, would ultimately decide
the election."
Only one polling entity tracked by
RealClearPolitics had Trump leading
going into Election Day: A
collaboration poll between Investor's
Business Daily and TechnoMetrica
Market Intelligence that had Trump
leading by two points.
Most other polls tracked by
RealClearPolitics showed Clinton
leading by three or four points. The
Monmouth University poll showed
Clinton leading by six — the furthest
off of any poll tracked by
RealClearPolitics.

First of all I have told you, Trump winning 2016 was an unprecedented error. Second of all Trafalgar group polls predicted a trump win. So when you say Msm had it wrong, no they didn't

bayelsaowei:
...

You would see I just ignored it, when Graham was trying to design a telephone. Some people said it's magic. Everyone with an idea in tech, knows renewable energy is the way, I don't now know who it would be powered ooo, but it is.

Even trump himself knows climate change is real, he was asked yesterday, he gave a retarded answer. Assuming he didn't believe it real, he would have surely said that there is nothing like climate change. But some people that have zilch idea about climate say it's a lie okay na

basilico:
After the debate the Rasmussen polls have Trump at 46% approval among blacks.

Morning Reader Data Points:
National Daily Black Likely Voter Job
Approval For @POTUS – October 19-23,
2020
Mon 10/19 – 25%
Tue 10/20 – 24%
Wed 10/21 – 31%
Thu 10/22 – 37%
Fri 10/23 – 46%
— Rasmussen Reports
(@Rasmussen_Poll) October 23, 2020

From Rasmussen, the same people that gave him a 52% approval rating lmao. Enjoy your fabu

basilico:
Did Joe Biden lie about him and his family ever receiving Chinese Remnibi.

It never happened how is that a lie?


wait let's even be hypothetical that he did receive the money, where are the properties he got with it?

If you still believe the hunter Biden story, na you sabiii ooo

below is a report from a fox news reporter.

salford1:
The appalachian south (red states) with a high number of high school drop out think that Dr. Olu from Nigeria with MPH from Harvard or Patel from India with MSc from CalTech is coming to take their jobs. This is what the trumptard republicans feed their illiterate base.

Lol, they hate immigrants because they eventually become skilled

benalvino2:
You know what watt hours are? You know the rate at which to store current? If you pack your tesla for a month without use it will run down. Battery will die. For fuel its not the case. Do you know the amount of power draw(watts) you need to lift a Boeing 737 off the ground? All those are problems with electric batteries and to charge them... They are even looking pass batteries to super capacitors. Capacitors can be fully charged in seconds but they are bad in retaining charge. That's a problem again.

See how he said it like normal cars aren't currently using batteries lmao, bros forget all these things. Renewable Energy is the future. Republicans have to accept the truth now

pryme:
The also forget that they will need lots of batteries if they want to move on to electric cars, how do they plan extracting the materials needed from the earth without damaging it?

How many nuclear powers are even talking about going green, China and Russia are busy building up their military and these people think, China and Russia will play fair and go green.

Typical Libs, always on the LEFT side of logic.

Imagine in the early 1900s when they wanted to start mass-producing cars and jets, one idiot would have surely said. You have to damage the earth for metals etc. And China is moving sir, think mr man

salford1:
He probably doesn't even know that Tesla was an immigrant. If Trump was in power a few years ago, Tesla would not have existed.

I keep telling people, without immigration. America can never be great. Immigrants are the brains in most of this things. Most web apps and tech companies are owned by white men, but run by Asians. So when you block immigration, who runs them. ?

salford1:
A real can drive over 400km in one single charge, and it's getting better.
That's why they are called advancement in tech. They are not stagnant. As at 30 years ago, people though GSM phones were some sort of scientific fiction devices used in Hollywood block Buster's. Remember how the initial mobile phones looked like too?
Now every grade 7 and up high school students have shiny android and iPhone.

My first HP laptop in 2001 only had a 10mb ram, and 10 GB hard drive with a floppy disk insert.

Exactly.

salford1:
Canada is cold. Illiterates folks always try to paint the fact that we can't have battery powered cars with the Canadian climate. Guess what, Tesla drives well in winter. People drive it all the time in -40c degrees weather. Now Tesla and Benz have designed battery powered trucks which would be released soon.

Watch them design battery-powered, planes soon.

salford1:
Yes. In my current city, you also have the option to install solar in your home which feeds back to the grid. In summer, your bill goes to the negative (meter reads back) and you will get credits for that.

My power company also has several windmill and solar/geothermal stations. All coal fired plants are shutting down in 2030. Some are already being retrofitted for renewable energy options.

Canada right!!! Watch Americans call it socialist agenda.

Americans make me baffle, renewable energy is the way right, cost-friendly and flexible