₦airaland Forum

CoolUsername:
Counting or not counting the CW Max numbers?

I don't know. Even TK doesn't know those numbers.

CoolUsername:
Lyra can wrestle

So Nikki can't?

CoolUsername:
Nothing wrong with war games.

Also, that JDfromNY guy is a racist incel loser

I recall E fans complaining they hated a HIAC PPV for obvious reasons. Do you guys feel same about the War Games PPV?

.

LordReed:
The glaring from the beginning, the gospels claim he was born during the census of Quirinius and the rule of Herod the Great. That is impossible since Herod died years before the census.

The gospels are not documentation, they are a story meant to promote a legend.

its been said by scholars that they were multiple census and two which Quirinius oversaw. One before he was governor and one when he became one.

jaephoenix:
Its only the bible that said his tomb was empty. No other external source corroborated it
You should understand how historical evidence is gotten. Evidence are sourced from different sources not just one,and to make matters worse the identity of those that supposedly saw the empty tomb,have not been verified. From Mary Magdalene etc

guy, the empty tomb is literally a tourist site in this day's Jerusalem. You can look it up.

jaephoenix:
Whats the importance of living by his will

primarily you'll make Heaven. Secondarily you get the best quality of life possible here on Earth.

You see life is all about perspective.

I believe he was badly booked in AEW. I don't remember him doing anything of worth except winning the tag belts. They did almost nothing with his feud with Swerve. WWE's possible lapses with him none withstanding, I still think AEW fumbled Keith Lee. What boggles my mind is how he and his tag partner had completely opposite careers in terms of success, especially since he was the one with so much hype and potential.
The business.

Baby faces attacking security is bad enough and now police? Will he get arrested; why not; they need to fix these logic flaws. Great promo from Oba anyway.

What do you think?

For those wondering where they are (I don't think the inquirers will be much), this guy does a decent job answering that. It's not full proof but it's something. Only TK can give us a comprehensive answer and I believe we need it, especially for guys like Wardlow if he's done with any TV project.

LordReed:
Where is the empty tomb located?

it's literally in Jerusalem. Just Google search it.

jaephoenix:
His existence is debatable but his deity isnt. There are no evidence he did such miracles like walk on water,resurrect etc. None whatsoever

the empty tomb.

jaephoenix:
There was no eye witness. Those disciples wrote those epistle hundreds of years after Jesus supposedly lived. Even bible scholars know this

how can you even say they were no eye witnesses? Was he invisible?

jaephoenix:
There was no eye witness. Those disciples wrote those epistle hundreds of years after Jesus supposedly lived. Even bible scholars know this

the gospels were written around 40 years after Jesus died.

jaephoenix:
Do u live by God's will

yeah. Or at worst I try to.

jaephoenix:
No evidence of his resurrection

the empty tomb? Or what is evidence enough for you since you apparently don't accept historic documentation?

WatchYourSix:
Sir…it’s the pple that want to remain in sin that keep interpreting the doctrine of grace to mean that they can do wateva they like….

U will hear them ask question like is it a sin to go to club? Is it a sin to smoke?? Is it written in the bible to not pierce nose?? … their idea of being right with God is following a list of rules or the law like the Pharisees and Sadducees

I agree. I guess where we disagree is that you don't believe the screenshots I shared are highlighting the people you just mentioned.

TenQ:
A saved person is a fundamentally changed person: He's a NEW Creature with the Nature of Christ...the old life of sin has passed away.

If anyone thinks he can do anything he wants under the cover of grace, such a person is NOT saved at all.
Why!?
His old life has not passed away: he remains his old nature... NOTHING became NEW with him

exactly.

WatchYourSix:
I have not seen where any preacher said or will say u can do wateva u like because of grace ….. u are just taking the statement out of context…..ur screen shot doesnt say o…..

He even used Abraham as an example….we all know Abraham is not a man that continued in his sins…. In fact repented, obeyed God and sent the other woman away because he wasn’t supposed to be sleeping with Haggai in the first place…

I don't even want to talk Abraham because it's old testament. The details can get murky.

TenQ:
That kind of doctrine is from a person who was never transformed by Christ Jesus

I second that.

WatchYourSix:
Sir… I like sticking to context… because adding more to context changes the intent or purpose of the original speaker…. Again.. I ddnt see anywhere he said if the person died a Muslim who engaged in shariah or wateva Muslims do…
Like I said sir…..A prodigal son is still a son…with potential to repent…
and like Paul said… if u continue in sin after receiving grace… its judgement of hell that awaits you because that context of continuing in Sin means not repenting ..

that's why I said implication is a thing, meaning I don't have to quote everything he said verbatim to pass my message. I am only fleshing out what he said to occupy more examples. But since you want a direct quote, here it is.👇🏾"A born again Christian who becomes a muslim is still saved" his exact word. He didn't say "maybe saved", he didn't add any other context. Every other thing he said after was to stress this point. I don't know what else you want to see beyond this to know this is what they've been preaching since time immemorial. It's just that this period they've really been strong on it and that's why people are addressing it all over. They believe you can do what ever and still make Heaven as long as you were once saved; I've heard Damina say this time and time, I'm not misinterpreting them neither am I confused, I've heard it too many times from them, I know what I'm saying. The only thing they say to defend themselves is that they're not encouraging people to sin and a Christian shouldn't sin but my original post is a 100% reflecting their perspective on grace.

WatchYourSix:
Sorry sir…. Ive checked again … u posted 3 screen shots ….i ddnt see this part u said that if he dies without returning to the father to repent he will still go to heaven

listen, I'll just pick one (and understand that "implication" is a word), he said if a one time believer dies a muslim, he goes to Heaven. Meaning as a Muslim, he no longer believes in Jesus, maybe engages in polygamy and Sharia, maybe marries underage - according to Harrison Ayintete, that fellow is going straight to Heaven, no questions asked. Whatever explanation or reason he gave, he still believes that fellow is Heaven bound at the end of the day.
Where did I misinterpret him?

LordReed:
Does Jesus have any contemporary archeological material like Juius Caesar has? Did Jesus write any books or accounts of his works? The answer is no so they cannot be on the same level. The reason why we can say someone named Jesus lived about that time is because there were several apocalyptic preachers during the period so it was not a big deal. It is like saying there was a shoe maker in Ogbomosho in 1980, there is nothing remarkable about that.

also Jesus wasn't just any preacher. He was the most remarkable preacher. He rose from the dead. It hadn't been done before and since then.

LordReed:
Does Jesus have any contemporary archeological material like Juius Caesar has? Did Jesus write any books or accounts of his works? The answer is no so they cannot be on the same level. The reason why we can say someone named Jesus lived about that time is because there were several apocalyptic preachers during the period so it was not a big deal. It is like saying there was a shoe maker in Ogbomosho in 1980, there is nothing remarkable about that.

I don't get it. Jesus had no diary like Caesar but his life was documented by eye witnesses. What's the difference? There's still no concrete evidence of the existence of Caeser.

LordReed:
It is not a historc account because it contradicts historic facts nor can any of the specific incidents be verified by any means.

name the contradictions.

Of course the only way historic incidents that me verified is through documentation which you still disagree with. What am I to do?

WatchYourSix:
Still…. u took their teaching out of context to paint another picture because i ddnt read any of the things u wrote earlier in that screen shot

What they are saying is… a prodigal son is still a son…. and can repent of their sins…..but they never said anything like if they continue and died in their sins without returning to their father they will make heaven ??

then why is he directly disagreeing with the lady's who's literally repeating your belief? You literally saw where he said a person will go to heaven if he dies a Muslim, how am I misinterpreting him?

TenQ:
A saved person is a fundamentally changed person: He's a NEW Creature with the Nature of Christ...the old life of sin has passed away.

If anyone thinks he can do anything he wants under the cover of grace, such a person is NOT saved at all.
Why!?
His old life has not passed away: he remains his old nature... NOTHING became NEW with him

my point exactly, but some grace preachers are preaching that he can leave whatever life and still make Heaven. That's heresy.

LordReed:
I am laughing because Jewish fairytales are not real.

its not a fairy tale. It's a historical account. The least you can do is give us a reason why you don't believe the historic account is true.

LordReed:
LoLz.

when you're done laughing, the option is still open as long as you're ready to live by God's will.

LordReed:
That is not archaeological evidence. Evidence that a place exist doesn't mean somebody that was said to live in that place must have existed too. Otherwise Spiderman is real because New York exists.

so what do you want, because i don't have videos or pictures. Do you give same standard for other historical figures like Cesar?