₦airaland Forum

⁷

LordLicifer:
But it is still killing someone, which you are arguing against..

Soldiers go to war and kill so many other soldiers and innocent people. Is that murder or defending themselves?

You started talking about Putin and Zelenski wars, remember?

If anyone is mad enough to make an attempt on another person's life, the person should be able to defend himself with all possible means.

Don't you think Ukraine Russia war is a waste of human life on frivolous matters?

War should be abolished.

Every conflict should be resolved in court

How long will humanity continue to kill one another like animals?

We should outgrow that

Imagine you're one of the 400,000 soldiers that died in the Ukraine Russia war

Does it make sense for one Zelensky or Putin to sit in his office and decide the fate of thousands of soldiers?

They should also be in the battle field and risk their lives too

LordLicifer:
Really? So now you agree with killing, what about humanity? You see? Your silly argument about humanity is nonsense!

Defending yourself is not the same as executing a death sentence

LordLicifer:
More nonsense! it is not related at all. But if you want to bring death up or that people kill each other my father was killed by a drunk driver i bet it's okay in your view that he shouldn't punished for driving receklessly while drunk. ,let's also go back to world war 1 and 2, how about the killing of thousands of South africans during the apartheid? The Americans killed thousands of native Indian Americans, the british murdered many africans, Russia killed Hitler so which death or killing is worse than the other?

Is it even physically possible for me to kill you? We are on a faceless forum. Besides.


You are living in a cukooland yapping about humanity, humanity doesn't exist humans are created to kill each other if they need to, if you turn up at my house door threatning to kill me or my children will keel you first. If any man does that to you remember to lecture him on humanity. while he is murdering your children. Don't do anything just stand there and watch

Defend yourself and your family with arms if necessary

LordLicifer:
Senseless talk..

You don't need to know me, good, so how did.you KNOW that i will clap for Putin and Zelenski for killing 400,00 people. That is not even an opinion that is you claiming to KNOW what i would do..

Besides,.what has Ukrainian war got to with this topic on death penalty or me? Yet you are believing that you made sense.

Ukraine Russia war is related to the death penalty topic because both involved death

You're becoming upset already by already

Hope you're not going to kill me

The point is that humanity should do away with killing one another by all means

Kobojunkie:
Why is it wrong for the state to kill a human who has killed another human? Why is it wrong to justly and equally apply the same punishment to those who deprive others of their right to life? 😒😒

Because the state actors are not free from crime

If they were free from crime, then they should have the right to kill murderers

And killing another human does not proffer any solution.

It rather multiplies killings


And the cycle continues without ending

Kobojunkie:
The Law says justice is only served if the punishment of death is applied. You are literally against the law while claiming not to be against the law. 😒😒

2. For the umpteenth time, justice DOES NOT and has never served the purpose of deterring crime. So, why insist that because the death penalty does not deter killings, it should be reigned in?😒

3. So what makes sense to you is applying ideas to things to which they do not apply, and then concluding from that that you are right and everyone else is wrong? 😒😒

Any law that promotes killing another human cannot be right

Isolating the criminal and correcting him sounds better

Humanity should outgrow killing one another for any reason. Not even as a means of punishment

Hope you're not going to kill me for disagreeing with you

You may not think along that line, but religious fanatics do

LordLicifer:
Anything sensible your want to add? you come on here yarning dust about Putin and what not. And that you know me.

Have You and I ever met?

I shared my opinion on death penalty and killings and you shared your own.

I didn't call your opinion foolish

Why call mine foolish?

I don't need to know you

LordLicifer:
Good! I am glad you are not against the law.. which death penalty is part of. At least in America suspects go through the law unlike in our country here where a shout of tiff tiff! means the life of the suspect is taken in few minutes by ignorant mobs.


Believe it or not death penalty has detered many from crimes it may not have stopped crime but detered many from committing murder

Killing another human under any kind of law is wrong.

Not by death penalty, not by war.

I know you will clap for Putin and Zelensky for killing over 400,000 people in their stupid war.

Or Natenyahu for killing over 75,000 Palestinians.

These presidents are innocent and are celebrated while this poor woman deserves to be murdered.

Killing can never stop killing

Only forgiveness and love can stop killings.

The law should play a role in isolating criminals and leading them to realizing they are wrong and correcting them to becoming useful.

Why are prisons called correctional centers?

What are you correcting when you kill?

Juanmike:
The girl she crutches her skull deserves to be useful too, dont you think?

The murderer committed a crime and deserves a life jail... But not a death sentence.

Because no one is qualified to execute her..


We're all criminals

Just that you were not caught doesn't make you innocent

LordLicifer:
Tell this to the family of the poor innocent girl she murdered.


You ignored the part where i said the law is the law, without laws we have nothing. Another example, I could just take your lands, your children, your wife your house and leave you with nothing! but because I fear the law i would think again before doing anything to you or anyone.

Killing her would deter so many mad people who are thinking of murdering someone's child today. You may not know that but it's true

I'm not against the law...

But against Death Penalty

How many people has been deterred from killing because of death penalty?

It doesn't make sense

LordLicifer:
The law stands, without laws we have nothing! Everybody would be doing anyhow and killing anyone they want.

Someone kills your family member maybe your son after toturing them cut off part of their brains and keep for survenire.


And your statement would be the same one above?

Has your laws stopped crime?

Both the judiciary, legislature and executives are all criminals

The person that sentenced her to death and the person that administered the death injections are not free from crime.

Sentence the culprit to life jail


But no human is qualified to kill another

Find a way to keep her useful as she serves her life jail

That way she'll not be a threat to others

MarkNsukkaBread:
Thunda fire you and this your stuupiid recommendation!

What's the benefit of killing her?

Will killing her raise the dead?

rayopt:
Fr ooo. Any trigger loving somebody can just kill your loved one or family member for fun and then regret their actions. And you won't mind the society allow them roam round the street na. Your world must be beautiful. Lol

Life jail is good.

But prisoners can be put to good use while serving life sentence

Bwilliam:
If the U.S fumbled this woman's execution, they will be setting a precedent that will be exploited by future death row inmates.
Let them aside the fact that she's a woman and do the needful, before Nancy clancy will be up next.

Since she regrets her actions, why waste her life?

why not engage her in something useful to the society?

What if dangote bought expensive cars with his money?

But he chose to build industries which in return employed many people.

How many people are employed in Burna Boy's company?

Olofofo247ng:
The two surveillance aircraft bought by Governor Seyi Makinde for N7.7 billion have arrived in Ibadan.

The two aircraft will boost aerial security and track criminal activities in forests in Oyo State.

Source:

The two surveillance aircraft bought by Governor Seyi Makinde for N7.7 billion have arrived in Ibadan.

The two aircraft will boost aerial security and track criminal activities in forests in Oyo State. pic.twitter.com/B4xeTnY5KE

— Just Event Online Publication (@justeventsonlin) July 28, 2026

https://www.thecable.ng/oyo-takes-delivery-of-n7-7bn-surveillance-aircraft-to-boost-security/

chai!!

That amount is too much

As a Christian, I won't feel comfortable with a Muslim forcing his message on me while in a bus.

In the same way, I believe Muslims won't feel comfortable with me forcing the gospel on them in the bus

Permission should be sought before the preaching.

If everyone in the bus gives their consent, then you're good to go

I wish you good health and prosperity and many more years of fulfillment

Rapmoney:
Which of the following countries DOES NOT belong here?

A) Nigeria
B) Ghana
C) India
D) Brazil

Give the correct answer with a concrete reason.

Ghana is not a member of BRICS

sleek214:
Bunch of unprofessional soldiers. Use drone to comb the place.... Clowns

Maybe Nigeria Army doesn't know how to use drones

Efuaye:
What would a cutlass do to a terrorist that is carrying an AK47 rifle?
We too like cruise in this country.

If every student comes with a bow and poisoned arrows, and learns how to shoot on target, those terrorists won't get away easily

emperor4love:
Why even God giver of ur life in this,one day u will stop breathing and go meet your creator, I believe you won't deny such statement on that day

Wike will pay for this statement

Until he realizes that he's absolutely nothing without God

I've been trying to build APK file on GitHub using GitHub action.

Has anyone done it before?

7

Bahamas95:
Asking this baby if she loves him, what does this child know about love?



The man is really an animal, if not for video evidence he would have denied it.

Yet under sharia this is not a crime

Pootle:
the zip come all the way from the front to the back or vice versa

Easy for ladies when they want to urinate

Why Iran Targets Gulf Countries Instead of Directly Attacking the United States
The recent warning by Iran—that no port in the Persian Gulf or Sea of Oman will be safe if its own ports are threatened—has raised a key question: why would Iran focus on Gulf countries instead of directly attacking the United States?
The answer lies in strategy, geography, and power balance.
1. Avoiding Direct War with a Stronger Military
The United States remains the world’s most powerful military force. A direct confrontation between Iran and the U.S. would likely escalate into a full-scale war, something Iran seeks to avoid.
Instead, Iran uses an indirect strategy:
Avoid head-on military confrontation
Apply pressure where the U.S. is vulnerable
This approach is often called asymmetric warfare—fighting smarter, not stronger.
2. Targeting U.S. Allies and Economic Interests
Many Gulf countries—like Saudi Arabia and the UAE—are close allies of the U.S. and host key energy infrastructure.
By threatening or attacking these countries, Iran:
Indirectly pressures the U.S.
Forces U.S. allies to reconsider their involvement
Expands the conflict beyond just two countries
Recent reports show that energy routes and infrastructure in the Gulf have already been disrupted, affecting global oil supply. �
Reuters
3. The “If We Can’t Trade, No One Can” Strategy
A major reason behind Iran’s threats is economic survival.
If the U.S. blockades Iranian ports:
Iran loses its ability to export oil
Its economy suffers heavily
So Iran responds with a broader warning:
If we are blocked, we will disrupt everyone’s trade
This includes threatening shipping routes and ports across the region, which are critical for global oil supply. �
Reuters
4. Control of Strategic Chokepoints
Iran has a major geographical advantage: it sits next to the Strait of Hormuz.
About 20% of global oil trade passes through this narrow route �
The Guardian
Disrupting it affects the entire world economy
Rather than attacking the U.S. mainland, Iran can:
Threaten ships
Disrupt oil flow
Create global economic pressure
This gives Iran leverage without direct war.
5. Creating Global Pressure on the U.S.
By targeting Gulf infrastructure and shipping:
Oil prices rise sharply
Global markets react negatively
Other countries get involved diplomatically
For example, oil prices have already surged amid the tensions. �
Reuters
This creates pressure on the U.S. from:
Its allies
Global markets
Domestic economic concerns
6. Expanding the Battlefield (Strategic Diversion)
Instead of concentrating conflict between Iran and the U.S., Iran spreads it across the region:
Ports
Oil pipelines
Shipping lanes
This makes the conflict:
Harder to control
More expensive for all sides
Riskier for global stability
Experts note that Iran does not need to win militarily—it only needs to raise the cost of the conflict. �
CSIS
7. Political Messaging and Deterrence
Iran’s threats are also meant to send a message:
To Gulf states: “Stay out of this conflict”
To the U.S.: “Your actions will destabilize the whole region”
By doing this, Iran hopes to prevent further escalation while showing strength.
Conclusion
Iran is not attacking Gulf countries instead of the U.S. out of weakness alone—it is a deliberate strategy.
By focusing on the Gulf region, Iran:
Avoids direct war with a stronger opponent
Targets critical economic systems
Uses geography to its advantage
Forces global attention and pressure
In simple terms, Iran’s strategy is:
“We may not fight you directly, but we can make the entire region—and global economy—feel the impact.”

uvie66:
this your arguement does not hold water, people pay house rent because that's the bulk money they have at that time, how many Nigerians have ₦5 to 10 million to buy land, not many.

I've an upstairs built on a quarter plot of land

muyico:
Congratulations 👏🎉 to you

If you pay house rent for 10 years, you would have spent enough money to buy a plot of land.

Better for them to use the rent money to complete the house in the next 5 years

They can even use the house to take a bank loan to fix it

She can start a small farm in her backyard even a poultry farm and no landlord will stop her

Congratulations to them

They're far better off than the people they're asking for help

franchasofficia:
Is this lady damn serious? This must be mental issues, goodness




She needs to be arrested and prosecuted for misleading the public with a serious issue



Yoruba people and wahala

Tomorrow someone that really needs help for cancer may never get it because of her actions

This is wrong

With all the attention, likely that Tinubu is about to sell Nigeria to the UK

GasAndOilTheory:
Very easy case to win in court

how?

validplanet:
if you have a business name, try register the trade mark...

trade marke is more important than business name

Registering a trademark on another person's existing registered business name can lead to legal conflicts, especially in Nigeria where trademarks often take precedence.

Trademark Precedence
In Nigeria, a registered trademark generally has stronger protection than a Corporate Affairs Commission (CAC)-registered business name. Courts have ruled that trademarks take priority, as seen in Sanofi S.A. v Sanofi Integrated Services Ltd, where later business names using "Sanofi" were ordered cancelled due to the prior trademark. This stems from the Trademarks Act and Companies and Allied Matters Act (CAMA), which allow CAC to direct name changes if conflicting with an existing trademark.

Owner's Remedies
The business name owner can challenge the trademark via opposition during registration, passing off claims if prior use is proven, or court action for cancellation if it causes confusion. Trademark owners, however, can seek injunctions, damages, or CAC intervention to force the business to rebrand. Prior use by the business name holder may support defenses like common law rights, but registration shifts exclusivity to the trademark holder.

Practical Outcomes
The outcome depends on timing, prior use, and industry similarity—first-to-register often wins unless fraud or deception is shown. Both parties risk litigation; business name owners may need to change names, while invalid trademarks can be cancelled. To avoid issues, search both CAC and trademark registries before registering either.