₦airaland Forum

davidylan: I wrote a sentence, you responded with a meandering diatribe that seems to be more an exhibition of your own internal bitterness than an attempt to make a salient point. Yeah you sure have a strange way of showing that you do not care about my "dog".

I'm sure there are more appropriate threads to discuss your burning "social issues". Frankly you seem to have issues that go way beyond any help you can get here. Anger problems being a part. Best of luck.

Hmm, as usual, you didn't address anything here. Like I said, I tire of your foolish, random accusations, and I'm not particularly patient. I write diatribes all the time, what's new? I also piss on your beliefs all the time, nothing new there as well. Why I do that? I've stated above. But do feel free to delude yourself into thinking you dog is somewhat more relevant than it is. And if the source of stoopidity is religious doctrine then I'll be here when I see fit, deal with it my good eediot.

onyfrank: i knw u wil talk abt 'steam.'
so lets assume ur 'theory' is correct - water 'evaporates' and leaves the sweat and urine.
According to u pple, this 'evaporated' water now rains down as 'pure' water without d urine and sweat.
D question nw is, what hapend to all the sweat and urine? Did it disapeared? Or is it 'conservative mass?'
ok, dat 'pure' water nw falls down and mixes with d left behind urine & sweat and we are jst back to where we started.
Ehhh

Ok

davidylan: what a strange way to show "indifference"... by spending 90% of your time here.

wiegraff: He's not our responsibility, no how. We aren't some cult/self help club/etc. We don't have doctrine, etc. We all just share a certain disbelief, indifference, whatever you want to call it

I didn't even say I particularly was indifferent, but I'm indeed indifferent to your fairy tales or whatever you want to call them. I'm not indifferent to social issues though.

Or do you see me arguing about say which version of delusion is superior, 3 people as one or just the one who was the son who was the father who died for your sins that you did not commit but will suffer for an eternity for? And you claim I'm incoherent.

I've not even read a single chapter of your bible, yet you think I particularly care about your dog. They're all equally foolish (perhaps yours more so than others, considering omnixxx and the amount of whargarbl involved), don't flatter yourself. Certain eediots from your camp insist on mixing their rank foolish beliefs with state, or mixing church and state if you will, and those are the eediots I tend to target. I give you credit for not really being one of those, afaik. I also engage those who approach atheists foolishly as well, I enjoy those as well. You of course, luckily for me, fall into this category.

I tire of your blind, silly attacks from out of the blue david. Always blind, always silly, always wrong. I admire your tenacity, but don't you tire of getting b1tch-slapped every time you do this?

onyfrank: .
Just get a bible, ask God to teach u, He wil personally do so. U dnt need to google anything. He within u.
Have u seen water going up?

What do you think happens when water boils?

And you've seen god?

christemmbassey: bros u no go kill me with lafta o, ok from 2day even if i ignore other atheists, i will b checking on u, cheers. I still de expect ya bros ooman's response.

Heh heh, no oh! Abeg, I'm a thoroughbred heathen (or fool in biblical parlance), next time we meet we'll probably be at each others throats.

Ooman's case is an extraordinary occurrence, hence I think all sides can agree on a truce until we resolve the issue. Similar to when 9ja paused the civil war to watch pele's brilliance, we've also paused to acknowledge ooman's unnatural stoopidity.

In order to save yourself the embarrassment @op, I'd recommend you pretend you were trolling.

Meanwhile, think of cycles/recycling, regeneration, etc. Eg, consider the effects of photosynthesis, rains, etc. Buy biology books. Use google. Etc etc

christemmbassey: ask him if he needs healing,. And in which area of his life?

Oya @ooman, and consider this seriously. It might be the only viable option at curing your re.tardation, so ansah him seriously. And don't forget, BELIEVE

christemmbassey: iso this una atheism is fair weather religion, u abandon ya bros when he needs u most, remember dem oyinbo say "vicisitude spare no one", ya turn is coming.

It's not a religion, and don't worry about me. If you must though, do one thing at a time. The major concern here is ooman. I think all atheists, theists, whatever can agree on that, so concentrate on curing him first.

christemmbassey: thats to say he's foolish? This is operation atheists storm, a pot calling a pot black. Una craze don enter market, where is David, pls come separate fight here o. Mosquito and logicboy etc, una bros don form boko haram for each other hia o!

Heheh, fight where? You don yab me finish with that statement...

On another note, you guys still have miracle workers like tb joshua, etc. Can't you take ooman there to cure his stoopidity pls?

christemmbassey: i thought its only the bible that calls the man who doesnt believe in God 'foolish', if an atheist is calling an atheist ?foolish' it means his condition is hopeless.

Perhaps. This is possibly the first time I'm encountering an atheist this foolish, so I can't say...

Personally, I think he needs jesus

christemmbassey: an atheist in other fora but nontheist in Nl who have some beliefs and doesnt believe in God. This is my 1st time to see some1 suffering from mad cow disease. Its a shame that the atheists cant even help their kind..

He's not our responsibility, no how. We aren't some cult/self help club/etc. We don't have doctrine, etc. We all just share a certain disbelief, indifference, whatever you want to call it. The same way all you theists; muslims, xtians, jews, hindu, sikhs etc, have only belief in god(s) as the common denominator. As a result, despite his nonsense, ooman sadly qualifies as an atheist

But ooman is indeed a remarkably foolish creature, genuinely so. I agree with you there




Random ramble; generally, atheists I know full well take personal responsibility/accountability seriously sef, so we generally don't blame some organization/external factor for our personal co.ck ups. If things fail, nobody forced us to screw up and one should have known better, questioned authority if need be, etc (this of course depends on the situation). We tend to forge our own paths and balk at the idea of having been coerced/forced into doing something, like become foolish, because of groupthink. That's not to say all atheists are like this though

Even me wey no dey send your internal politiking...following
Don't worry, I won't say anything...I'll just

NL member: sent another one. did u get it?

I did this time. Replied, but not sure it went through...

NL member: Wiegraf please reply my email. thank you.

I don't know how to actually. It said something about not being connected, it didn't actually show the email. Perhaps we need to be following each other?

It seems this happened in january sef

As we all know, 'there is no compulsion in religion'

Islam is unadulterated, plague ridden $hit of the highest quality, in all its guises

Coming up soon, accusations of 'islamaphobia', intolerance, etc

lilcutie8916: box without hinges lid or key yet golden tresure is hid inside.

Heart?

alaric saltzman: Riddle me these:
1. I have rivers without water,
Forests without trees,
Mountains without rocks
Towns without houses.
What am I?

2. My first is in wield, sever bones and
marrow.
My second is in blade, forged in cold steel.
My third is in arbalest, and also in arrows.
My fourth is in power, plunged through a
shield.
My fifth is in honour, and also in vows
My last will put an end to it all.
What am I?

3. Which room has no door, no windows,
no floor and no roof?

4. What starts with \e\ ends with \e\ and
contains only one letter?

5. If you were pushed down a flight of
stairs, what would you fall against?

6. Born at the same time as the world,
destined to live as long as the world,
and yet never five weeks old. What is
it?

7. It wasn't my sister, nor my brother, but
still was the child of my father and
mother. Who was it?

8. What question can you never answer
\yes\ to?

1. Maps

2. Awesome

3. Sealed tombs/coffins qualify, but you'll fail me

4. E

5. Stairs

6. Months (but they weren't born with the world, technically)

7. You

8. Lots of them, like 'are you dead?'.

alaric saltzman: Well well...where do I start frm
@wiegraf...u take riddles toooo technical...the questn is just simple logic...if an aeroplane is movin as fast as d speed of sound, and u r walkin on it, then u would actually be walkin faster than d speed of sound...simple!

But you're wrong

Kayi.... What is happening here?

Folly that would genuinely make me crack........

Gaddem

Image123: are you a ritualist?

So, I need fetuses to do what exactly?

ooman: What you wrote above is total insanity then.

That was close, I was starting to worry that I wrote complete rubbish. With this, order is restored to the universe again

ooman: ^^^nice write up. you made just the right amount of sense. Did you just put your brain back on? what happened before?

Ooman brah, as usual you have no understanding of the situation. If an eediot like you finds it sensible, then there's good cause for alarm. Who gave you permission to post anyways?

Problem, where?

A fetus is just a lump of cells. No consciousness anywhere near them whatsoever. That's what he probably means when he says they're not 'human'. 'Human' here is not being used in a biological/scientific sense, but alas, people will miss the point.

And of course, dawkins et al have no morals. Their only concern is for beings that have achieved some for form of sentient consciousness, not of 'souls', etc. For instance, chimps

wiki: Great ape personhood is a movement to extend personhood and certain legal protections to the four non-human members of the Hominidae or great ape family: bonobos, chimpanzees, gorillas, and orangutans.[1]

Well-known advocates include primatologists Jane Goodall and Dawn Prince-Hughes, Richard Dawkins, former Professor for the Public Understanding of Science at Oxford University, Peter Singer, professor of philosophy at Princeton University, and legal scholar Steven Wise.[2]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_ape_personhood

Really, how silly of them? Apes don't have souls so they don't matter. Only humans can have souls. After all, this universe was custom built very specially just for us...

For most of you people who cry foul over the abortion issue the amount of suffering inflicted on conscious life, or just life in general, isn't what bothers you. Most of you chump meat with relish for instance. It would seem it's these 'soul' things no one's ever seen and supposedly just show up from conception that bothers you, as I don't see the majority clamoring for the rights of say chimps or elephants. After all, these animals have shown remarkable mental capabilities even if they perhaps just fall short of full consciousness, self-awareness, etc.

To you the suffering of these imaginary souls is more important than actual, real suffering of living, conscious people, yes? In other words, you believe these souls exist and thus you expect the rest of us indulge you despite your lack of any evidence whatsoever of their existence? To do so just because you say so? The selfishness of religious..

You've decided they have souls, where are they? I understand I could use a pigs liver, but not that of a fetus. There are even cows spliced with human genes so as to produce human milk. Since humans are somehow special perhaps those altered pigs/cows deserve some special status as well? They've got human dna spliced in there somewhere, is that not enough to qualify them as having 'souls'. Actually, considering shared ancestry...

If you can show those cells are conscious in any way whatsoever I'm very sure he'll about-turn on his stance on abortion. He's even willing to give apes a basic rights for instance. If a being is conscious, self-aware, then there is obviously the capability to have emotions, feel pain, hope, desire etc. Whether it be human or not, biological or mechanical (eg AI) is irrelevant, all that matters is it be conscious and he'd probably be fighting for their rights. The rights of living, conscious beings, not a bunch of cells. If it isn't conscious then meh...Seriously, carry your hypocrisy elsewhere.

Dog could be jewel.
Dog could eat jewel.
lol

musKeeto: Christian: Science only expresses God, it can never discover God. Scientists can never disprove God.

Atheist: Okay, so you believe those stories in the Bible? Noah' ark for example?

Christian: Yes, those stories are allegories. They hold a deeper meaning.


2 weeks later.....


Christians: Hey, do you know scientists have discovered Noah's Ark?

Yup, this one and the op are instant classics

musKeeto: A king in England has a jewel, a dog, and a crown. A thief comes in the middle of a night and takes the dog and yet the next day the king reports that he has two missing items. And there was only one robbery that happened. How is this possible?

You never actually say he took only the dog as well. Only one robbery does not mean robbed only one thing. Or did he rob just one item?

Uyi Iredia: The one about entropy meaning order made me laugh.

Che.. And other than our mentally challenged op, who said this?

@ooman, kudos. You've at least managed to become the latest religious prophet, they listen to you blindly.

ooman: Jesus Christ. What the hell is written above

This is totally pathetic. I couldnt make a sole sense out of it.

Could you just write like you were thought in your KG years? That would be better than the gibberish above!!

Wtf are you not kneeling down? Sharrap while you're at it I said. And why comment on that post, or did you miss where I stated it was beyond you?

You need some OT style bulala. As for the bold, you perhaps do need to go back in that direction....

Need to leave now. Kudos

edits

ooman: He hasnt been able to do that. Am still waiting too!

The other post wasn't for you (clearly beyound you). This one is

Kneel the fouck down, shut your eyes and raise up your hands. Think about what you've done while you're at it....

musKeeto: Lol, u still dey here? I find it hard to believe that all this began from a thread on suicide..

Na folly... e too much

davidylan: By the way... try and address ooman's point of how you achieve zero in a closed system.

I didn't notice this particular brand of foo.lishness earlier. Now I'm mad, genuinely.

wiegraf: Entropy has no effect in a closed system? Do you even know what the 3rd law is??

ooman: Silly fool! How does the 3rd law apply to a closed system? Quote the 3rd law first, then tell me how your dumb, mutated dorky brain think it applies to a closed system.

Unthinking eediot - another blind atheist.

It seems for some magical reason I suppose only ooman knows, the laws of thermodynamics do not apply in closed system. First the second, now the third. Moving on..

wiegraf: Can absolute zero be reached?

Do note I never said it could be reached. I'm asking if it could reach just to point out the rather obvious. Work is zero? Then entropy is zero. For work to be zero, temperature has to be absolute zero. As absolute zero cannot be reached...

I hope I don't have to f34343g spell everything out to a PHD...

Anyways, our hero's brilliant response was;

ooman: [size=15]"REACHING"[/size] absolute ZERO when talking about A CLOSED SYSTEM.? ? ?? ? ?? ?

I 'd rather start playing game than reply your next comment!

You sir, are a real dunce.

Let me just quote you again, to highlight your RANK FOOLISHNESS

davidylan: By the way... try and address ooman's point of how you achieve zero in a closed system.

YOU'RE SUPPOSED TO BE A FU43475G SCIENTIST FFS WTF KIND OF SUNDAY SCHOOL GAVE YOU A PHD?? WHATREUAOEEBF JKSADHFRB AKJKNFRASAEF

Bleep you...FOUCK YOU FOUCK U FUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU....RRRRRRRRRRRRWQEAD

Jokes aside, really, FOUCK YOU


edits