He did exactly what he should do, the journalists were asking gotcha questions and he dropped the mic on them like a boss. They can come back when they have serious questions to ask.
GalaticHorde: oh really? Indefinite as compared to Mitch McConnell's total refusal to even entertain the thought of screening Obama nominees?
Do you realise how hypocritical you sound
And oh, the investigation will resume when tRump is gone and Barr is out of office, he will be impeached! Count on that
Lol, malaria induced dreams can be very funny. You should concern yourself about RBG that looks like she would quit soon thereby giving Trump another supreme Court pick. As for Kavanaugh, he is going nowhere!
Nobody gives a damn about what slimy douchebags like Comey and McCabe thinks. They should be packing their bags and getting ready to spend a long time behind bars by the time Special Prosecutor John Durham brings down the hammer on those two idiots and the gang of criminal bedfellows
An additional 3.2 million Americans filed for unemployment insurance last week as the fallout from the coronavirus crisis continues, the Department of Labor said Thursday.
This brings the total number of people who have lost their jobs and filed unemployment claims since the pandemic began to at least 33 million.
Moreover, the seasonally adjusted insured unemployment rate for the week ending April 25 was a staggering 15.5%, the government said.
Nonsense!! The coronavirus epidemic is causing an economic downtown all over the world. It's stupid to try to pin the economic problems on one person. Is Trump also responsible for the downward economic trends in other countries of the world?
GalaticHorde: well, I am calling for a thorough investigation, does that count? And yes , the FBI investigation of kavanaugh was a total sham and was just for appearances, so what do you say? A thorough investigation of biden, kavanaugh and tRump? Are you in or out? I'm in
So the FBI investigation was a sham because it didn't give you the results you wanted? You wanted Kavanaugh to be guilty but the investigation found otherwise therefore it must be a sham. What do I say? I say you can believe whatever you want to believe, the world will not stop because you refuse to believe the reality of things. As for your other question, of course I am in, I have always been for granting everyone the presumption of innocence until a thorough investigation is done and evidence of guilt is presented before the courts. It is you libs that want us to believe the accuser even before any investigation is done. You did it to Kavanaugh, you did it to Trump and now that it's your candidate that is being accused, the liberal hypocrisy has not only become obvious, it's stinking to the high heavens
ijedeikorodu: Tara Reade's allegation against Joe Biden mentioned 'sexual assault' and not 'rape', (both of which are serious crimes) so where did your information about 'credible rape allegation' came from. The seriousness of the allegation calls for a swift and thorough unbiased investigation - one which has been mentioned in previous posts.
Difference between 'rape' and 'sexual assault' All rape and sexual assault is serious. The terms rape and 'sexual assault' are used simply to differentiate between two types of offense. So what's the difference?
Rape is when a person intentionally penetrates another's vagina, anus or mouth with a penis, without the other person's consent. Assault by penetration is when a person penetrates another person's vagina or anus with any part of the body other than a penis, or by using an object, without the person's consent - (in the allegation against Joe Biden, Tara Reade said he penetrated her with his fingers).
Not all cases of sexual assault involve violence, cause physical injury or leave visible marks. Sexual assault can cause severe distress, emotional harm and injuries which can't be seen – all of which can take a long time to recover from - (feel sorry for what Tara Reade and other women whom Trump have grabbed either their private anatomy or butt must be going through everyday of their lives)
So in your opinion grabbing a lady's butt (against her consent) is fine as long as your last name ends in Trump?
No, I didn't say grabbing a lady's butt against her consent is fine, I said I believe in the wisdom that every accused person is innocent before the law until proven guilty.
The Mayor of Philadelphia is Jim Kenney, he's a democrat. Trump doesn't control The Philadelphia Police Department, Jim Kenney does. You should be worried about Jim Kenney's America not Trump's
Seriously? coming from you? You that have been all over this thread running defence for Joe Biden over a credible rape allegation, I mean real rape!!! You now want to complain over an allegation of a butt grab? You should be hiding your head in shame, that is if you had any shame. Unlike you liberal's silly campaign of believe all women, we believe in the wisdom that you are innocent before the law until proven guilty.
GalaticHorde: the FBI that was hamstrung in the number of witnesses they could accept and the time frame in which they could do that? Bross, sofree dey lie nau! I pointed to bill Clinton's case so that you would see that the the Republican party's is the hypocrisy! But somehow you exist in an alternate reality where correlation for both cases is irrelevant so good luck with your disillusionment
At least you admit that Republicans asked the FBI to investigate Kavanaugh and they brought him before the Senate to face his accuser on national TV. Which one has your hypocritical Democrats done? None!!! Instead they did everything possible to bury or make the story go away. Now that they can't ignore it anymore, they are trying to run a smear campaign against Tara Reade in conjunction with their fake news allies instead of calling for a thorough investigation and presuming she is saying the truth like they did with Kavanaugh. Even Biden himself is on record saying during the Kavanaugh case that whenever a woman makes a rape allegation, we should presume she is telling the truth. That was the standard he set for Kavanaugh so what is happening now that he is the one accused? Kiss the bitter truth, you're a party of shameless hypocrites!!
GalaticHorde: I am responsible for what I say/write, you are responsible for what how you interpret/understand what I write, don't project your failure to understand the point I was making unto me, the argument was about party standards in approaching allegations of sexual misconduct, my point was and is that the Republican party that impeached Clinton on charges of perjury over allegations sexual impropriety was one that took allegations of sexual misconduct very very seriously not the one that treated kavanaugh with kid gloves, do you understand what I am saying about cause and effect now? While you're focussing exclusively on the effect(impeachment) in order to make a null argument, I am simply telling you to start from the cause chikena! Pls don't make me explain stuff again, it is exhausting
You're the one exhausting yourself, instead of simply admitting the hypocrisy of the party you're supporting, you're busy making irrational arguments. Look at you saying the Republicans handled Kavanaugh with kid gloves, someone they hauled before the Senate on national television to face his accuser and asked the FBI to investigate? the FBI investigated and found no evidence against him still you hypocritical liberals were still calling for his head because "we must believe women". Now can you contrast that with your "saintly" party's approach to the Biden allegations? Crickets everywhere. Not even one person in your hypocrisy personified party is standing up for the standards you set during the Kavanaugh saga. You can't explain this away by writing lengthy but meaningless posts. The only person you need to explain to things to is yourself because you are refusing to come to terms with reality. Stop exhausting yourself and simply tell yourself the truth.
People like you foisted that idiot in aso Rock on this Nation. This country has gone to the dogs since his reign of mediocrity and impunity started. May the pains of that 70 year old man and others suffering under this dictatorial regime be inflicted on you and your type hundred folds. Nonsense!!
mimimile93: Always talking about black man. Have you traveled outside to see what's happening?
The black man does have a serious problem, there is no pretending about it or sugar coating it. You can choose to feed your ego by denying the obvious truth but the truth will remain the truth nonetheless
GalaticHorde: take your blabbering rubbish and stuff it up your ***** so this was your grand opportunity to own up the ignorant lib in your tiny little mind! sorry oh, in your rush to school me on my assumed ignorance perhaps it is your own possible ignorance you exposed! I know you know it but let me just remind you, cause and effect, we are talking about sexual misconduct so if you can't figure that the standards of approaching sexual misconduct allegations against an opposition party member is what i am alluding to, kindly go an spray your spittle elsewhere and stop spreading your e-corona
You twisted yourself writing many words but making no sense whatsoever. Why would I want to "own" an ignorant liberal when you can't be of any use to your owner? . As for the rest of your post, I can see Raumdeuter has given you a very precise and accurate response up there and If you still can't see the big difference between these two cases, then kindly go and spray your spittle elsewhere and stop spreading your e-corona
Tara Reade, the former Senate staffer who alleges Joe Biden sexually assaulted her 27 years ago, says she filed a limited report with a congressional personnel office that did not explicitly accuse him of sexual assault or harassment.
“I remember talking about him wanting me to serve drinks because he liked my legs and thought I was pretty and it made me uncomfortable,” Reade said in an interview Friday with The Associated Press. “I know that I was too scared to write about the sexual assault.”
Reade said she described her issues with Biden but “the main word I used — and I know I didn’t use sexual harassment — I used ‘uncomfortable.’ And I remember ‘retaliation.’”
Reade described the report after the AP discovered additional transcripts and notes from its interviews with Reade last year in which she says she “chickened out” after going to the Senate personnel office. The AP interviewed Reade in 2019 after she accused Biden of uncomfortable and inappropriate touching. She did not raise allegations of sexual assault against Biden until this year, around the time he became the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee.
But Reade is suggesting that even if the report surfaces, it would not corroborate her assault allegations because she chose not to detail them at the time.
Despite the latest news, I still believe a proper and thorough investigation must be done to establish the truth.
Tara Reade has said this story first reported by AP is false.
Tara Reade is disputing a report that says her complaint against Joe Biden didn't refer to sexual assault or harassment
The Associated Press reported Saturday that Tara Reade, the former Biden staffer who says he sexually assaulted her 27 years ago, said her decades-old complaint to a congressional personnel office didn't contain the words "assault" or "harassment."
In a tweet Saturday, Reade said the Associated Press report was "false" but did not elaborate.
She last year accused Biden of inappropriately caressing her, but didn't publicly allege Biden had sexually assaulted her until March 2020. Reade alleges Biden assaulted her in a Senate corridor in 1993 when he put his hands under her skirt and underwear without her consent.
GalaticHorde: oh shut the eff up and get lost of my mentions! Trying to be clever by half! You republicans are either mentally and cognitively retarded or worse! The democrats made those rules indeed! That is why I said your hypocrisy is too brazen that is why it riles me up, so riddle me this repugnantcan, by what Republican rules was bill Clinton impeached then?
You are the one that should shut the F up!! Always quick to resort to insults while wallowing in ignorance. Clinton was impeached for lying under oath to a grand jury thereby committing perjury. Lol, This is the kind of half baked knowledge most of you liberals have, You won't take the time to research things for yourselves, all you do is regurgitate whatever you hear from the media whether it's true or not. Well if you want to know Republican standards, Clinton was actually accused of Rape by some women, Juanita Broaddrick being one of them, Republicans chose to grant him his presumption of innocence before the law. Fast forward to Kavanaugh and it was the liberals turn to do same but your side chose to behave like a bunch of lunatics that just broke out from a mental asylum. You concocted a new standard of guilty until proven innocent. Now we are simply asking you to stop making noise and live by the same standards you set. Simple!!
fieryy: I don't think you understood my comment. Everyone found guilty should be held accountable, either Republicans or Democrats! Joe Biden now being accused doesn't mean Kavanaugh's innocent
On the contrary, Kavanaugh is absolutely innocent until proven guilty by the law. That's what the law says and that's what Republicans have always stood by. You liberals decided to introduce a new language very strange to the law by arguing that kavanaugh should be punished because we can't presume his innocence until he clears himself. Even after the FBI investigated and found nothing to prove the allegations against him, you still insisted he should be punished so what's all this acrobatics you people are doing now? By your standards, Biden should also be punished, even if the FBI investigates and finds him innocent, he must still be punished for being accused.
GalaticHorde: isn't that the point? On biden's and the democrats behalf I am ready to live by it as should every body else after all fair is fair! Isn't it rich of you to criticise democrats for double standards and in the same argument attempt to practice double standards? Only republicans can be so brazen with their hypocrisy! The democrats you are trying to call out recognise their hypocrisy that's why they make little to no noise about it hoping it would die a silent death but you republicans are world renowned to be illogical and silly to the core! Owning military grade assault rifles are rights, we hate socialism but collect relief cheques and so many moronic arguments I don't care to go into and this is just another example, because I choose to hold you and myself to a higher moral standard it should apply to me alone while you are left free to be as immoral as can be
Stop making unnecessary noise and live by the rules you made. Republicans never subscribed to that rule so you can't impose it on them, it was you liberals including Biden himself that made those rules so we are just asking you to stop being hypocrites and live by the same rules you set. Simple!!
BTW, there is no higher moral standard in believing any woman who alleges rape even when they haven't proven their case against the accused, it is plain stupidity. That's the stupid rule liberals decided to set so they should live by it.
fieryy: This is ridiculous. Nobody ever said that. Those who are guilty should simply be held accountable period!
I come with receipts oh, here is the Biden you're defending talking during the kavanaugh case
Joe Biden: When a woman alleges sexual assault, presume she is telling the truth
“For a woman to come forward in the glaring lights of focus, nationally, you’ve got to start off with the presumption that at least the essence of what she’s talking about is real, whether or not she forgets facts, whether or not it’s been made worse or better over time. But nobody fails to understand that this is like jumping into a cauldron.”
So you're admitting now that Joe Biden sounds ridiculous but you were surely applauding him when he took this stance against Kavanaugh. Now it's his turn, all were saying is he should be held by the same standards that he held kavanaugh by
wirinet: Even when the accused declared on live TV that he "grabs them by the pussy"? What will Republicans believe then? Even if he rapes them in the middle of 5th avenue in broad daylight, will Republicans believe?
You're a liar, Trump did not say he grabs women by the pussy. He says when you're a celebrity women will allow you do anything, they will even allow you grab them by the pussy. That's his statement, stop twisting it into something he didn't say
I remember when liberals were all about "believe all women" and "women don't lie about things like this". Along comes Tara Reade and their silence is deafening. That's what you call Hypocrisy with a capital H
I hope everyone is following the unbelievable developments in the Michael Flynn case. Corruption and wickedness in high places is being exposed. I have no doubt in my mind that all these people, Michael Flynn, Roger Stone, Papadopulous, Manafort e.t.c were all framed in order to get at Trump. It was a desperate coup attempt by the deep state to get rid of Trump but they failed woefully.
Lysol, Dettol Warn Against Using Disinfectants to Treat Coronavirus
Lysol and Dettol maker Reckitt Benckiser Plc has stated that “under no circumstance” should its disinfectant products be administered into the human body, through injection, ingestion or any other route.
The company issued the advice on Friday morning, after being asked whether internal administration of disinfectants “may be appropriate for investigation or use as a treatment for coronavirus”, amid recent speculation and social media activity.
On Thursday U.S. President Donald Trump had expressed interest in research presented by Bill Bryan, an undersecretary at the Department of Homeland Security on whether exposure to humidity or heat kills the virus at a faster pace. Trump had also mentioned the potential use of disinfectant for the coronavirus.
@bolded, Why are all of you liberals and the fake news media deliberately leaving out that Trump was talking about this research and what they found? You're trying to make it sound as if Trump said people should be injected with disinfectants when you know that's a blatant lie.
socialmediaman: Attached is a paragraph from the link you sent. Does that look like the task force was suggesting injecting people with chemicals and UV or Trump was suggesting?
We’re all aware that chemicals kill the virus, that’s no news, that’s why we’re using hand Sanitizers and disinfectant wipes... what was preposterous was that the president himself was suggesting something that has no scientific backing whatsoever
So in your English, Trump asked about an injection means the same thing as Trump suggests injecting people with it?