oilyngbati:
Tigers were never native to Africa,,,they couldn’t have survived the African jungle. What your grand father must have told you about are Leopard, which most Africans at the time mistook for Tiger. Tigers aren’t built for the African terrain/wildlife….if in doubt, let’s see how these two tigers released into the wild would fare in a few months time.

candelahria:
That is still true. This post says that the Tigers are native to Bengal in India but being kept in
Africa for some reason. There are no tigers native to Africa.

1Alex:
they may not even have the tactics to hunt.

richiemcgold:
That's a great freedom!

... but I've read it severally before that there are no tigers in Africa.

NFBI:
Leopard not tiger

Thomasankara:
[/color]no be hunger dey maake u chop fowl or goat, or what crime has goat committed that tiger is immuned to?[color=#770077]

Tallesty1:
I can't share a local government with a tiger even if it has a Ph.D. in good behavior.

Crucialgem:
Tigers are naturally friendly to human they are like bigger cat unlike lion

judedwriter:
Lions are generally regarded as king of the animals, but their distant cousins _tigers are truly the undisputed kings.

Tigers are bigger than lions and more stronger, however lions are more popular probably because of their unique manes. (bushy hair around the neck)

judedwriter:
Lions are generally regarded as king of the animals, but their distant cousins _tigers are truly the undisputed kings.

Tigers are bigger than lions and more stronger, however lions are more popular probably because of their unique manes. (bushy hair around the neck)

YourKarma:

There isn't much difference between the African jungle and that of India. Tigers will survive just ok here, though you're right on what you told that guy, his grandfather was referring to leopards and not tigers

judedwriter:
Lions are generally regarded as king of the animals, but their distant cousins _tigers are truly the undisputed kings.

Tigers are bigger than lions and more stronger, however lions are more popular probably because of their unique manes. (bushy hair around the neck)

Johnboom:
Your last statement is wrong. Lion is bigger than Tiger though I agree with you that Tiger is more dangerous.

Lagosianswag:



Lions are the King of the Jungle not because of their physicality or strength but because of their domineering traits, No animal can engage a pride of Lions because Lions are not easily subdued in the face of adversity.
Tigers hunt their preys for survival while lions hunt their preys for survival, pride and control.
Tigers are more reclusive wild cats and are commonly not interested in controlling the Jungle, but in a forest full of Lions, the Lion is King.

There's a reason historically Great Figures like King David, Jesus Christ and Emperor Haile Selassie have been ascribed the title of The Lion of the Tribe of Judah; The Lion is a symbol of Royalty & Power. 🦁

BBIA:


But we have to deal with wild animals everyday .


the female creature God made became wild after befriending a snake.

Quest7777:

Haba! Na you dey talk like this?
You can easily rear goats/fowl na. Unlike Tiger.

poshestmina:


What kind of wild animal is your mum?

judedwriter:


Exactly what I'm trying to say...

Lions are a symbol of royalty and dominion....

However, tigers are more stronger and fiercer than them.

Arda1000:
no they can't survive,Tigers are solitaire creatures and in the African savanna they are many threats,Hippos,Hyenas,Rhinos infact the tiger will be at mercy of so many animals

Lagosianswag:


There are other animals physically stronger than Lions, but Lions have one unique trait to them; dominion over their territory.
They are totally territorial in nature and that is why they retain the kingship over all Land animals.
Tigers may be stronger than Lions but in the battle for territorial dominance, Lions usually prevail.
More reason why Tigers do not cohabit with Lions in the African Jungle but migrate to other places where they can fend for food and keep their peace while at it.

judedwriter:


Exactly what I'm trying to say...

Lions are a symbol of royalty and dominion....

However, tigers are more stronger and fiercer than them.

Johnboom:
No Sir. Tiger is even more dangerous than lion. I remember head of Oau Zoo that was killed by lion of recent told me. The reason no Nigeria Universities Zoo keep it. If you go to oau zoo they did not cover the head reason is that Lion can not climb very far up but if is Tiger they must cover everything.

BnQoyyim:


I had tried to drop sth on this 21 9 0 4 8 6 2 0 6 only to discover that you're just trying to defame someone's religion.
May what is more than this happen to you if you're actually disguising.

Go and fetch firewood in the bush and be selling if you're not lazy.

Nemesis will soon catch up with you, even your enemies will pity you if you don't desist from this.

YourKarma:

In a one-on-one fight, a full-grown Siberian tiger will best a full-grown African lion. Easily.

Most animals tend to avoid confrontation because even a single scratch can lead to their death by infection. And they know this.

Lions will fare better if they have a fight with a tiger in the wild because the price of the lion will still be able to provide food for the lion unlike the tiger who are always solitary, except during mating season when a male and female might pair up

YourKarma:

There isn't much difference between the African jungle and that of India. Tigers will survive just ok here, though you're right on what you told that guy, his grandfather was referring to leopards and not tigers