vedaxcool: ^^^^^




the compound fool said I don't know is the basis of what he follows (he definitely is a disgrace to the community of scientist), yet we don't know what evidence he looked at to conclude that God does not exist having actually know nothing. The compound fool again believes in evolution yet till date it has never been demonstrated in real time for him to observe, the compound fool of compound proportions is still deceiving himself that in his fooleric dreams he has somehow address the issues raised in the thread.

MacDaddy01:


Fortunately, that is not the atheist position.

MacDaddy01:






When Mendel was investigating variations in plants did he know the law of segregation? No. He didnt know and he investigated.


Vedaxcool, you sir are a fool to say that evolution has no evidence and has never been observed. It betrays a huge ignorance on science.


Deepsight, are you proud of your new companion?

vedaxcool: up till now they all have failed to even address the pink Unicorn, the funny thing is wiegraf claimed atheist known nothing,since you know nothing i think shutting your wide mouth when people with their own ideas who believe these ideas are valid speaks will show you can maintain minimum levels of decorum.

vedaxcool:

Mumu of epic proportion, where did i say Evolution have no evidence? daftom, I said it has never been demonstrated real time since fools like you who act like paraplegics whose brain posses an unrestricted levels of genetic incompetence aggravated by unevenly love for stupidity claim you believe only what you can see, then we find your mild display of dawn's syndrome very amusing indeed . when will you start addressing the issues of the tread? hope it isn't when you become unbearably dumb that you cannot no longer handle using the toilet?

Mr. I don't know, yes you don't know, so please keep shut when those who know are discussing!

Deep Sight:

And what is the atheist position?

DO NOT SAY THE ATHEIST POSITION IS "WE DON'T KNOW": THAT IS NOT THE ATHEIST POSITION: THAT IS THE AGNOSTIC POSITION.

So tell me, what is the atheist position? ? ? ? ?

MacDaddy01:

There is no evidence for God and therefore no reason to believe in him

vedaxcool: ^^^

And you saw evolution occur with your nake'd eyes?

omo, which kind atheists nl get nah!!!

vedaxcool: Since the atheist cannot address the Pink Unicorn argument we are left to draw the following conclusion:

The man who woke one day to meet a Pink Unicorn in front of his house believes logically that someone made the unicorn and someone placed the unicorn front of his house.

That it goes against common sense for anybody to believe that matter can simply appear from nowhere.

Because of the above, We then draw the following:

Something must essentially come from another

Nothing can only produce nothing

The Pink Unicorn could have been formed from random process.

It was formed from clearly defined process.

These simple facts essentially remains the reason why atheism cannot be my style.

Deep Sight:

You have said it all. If I were you I would not bother to respond to logicboy after such an excellent summary.

Devise a means to make the moderators lock the thread, such as posting pornorgraphic images or some other such sh**t

vedaxcool: Since the atheist cannot address the Pink Unicorn argument we are left to draw the following conclusion:

The man who woke one day to meet a Pink Unicorn in front of his house believes logically that someone made the unicorn and someone placed the unicorn front of his house.

That it goes against common sense for anybody to believe that matter can simply appear from nowhere.

Because of the above, We then draw the following:

Something must essentially come from another

Nothing can only produce nothing

The Pink Unicorn could have been formed from random process.

It was formed from clearly defined process.

These simple facts essentially remains the reason why atheism cannot be my style.

wiegraf:

Illustrates your simple and rather dishonest mind. Ignoring the other nonsense, who made the man that made the pink unicorn?

vedaxcool: Since the atheist cannot address the Pink Unicorn argument we are left to draw the following conclusion:

The man who woke one day to meet a Pink Unicorn in front of his house believes logically that someone made the unicorn and someone placed the unicorn front of his house.

That it goes against common sense for anybody to believe that matter can simply appear from nowhere.

Because of the above, We then draw the following:

Something must essentially come from another

Nothing can only produce nothing

The Pink Unicorn couldn't have been formed from a random process.

It was formed from clearly defined process.

These simple facts essentially remains the reason why atheism cannot be my style.

wiegraf:

Illustrates your simple and rather dishonest mind. Ignoring the other nonsense, who made the man that made the pink unicorn?

MacDaddy01:


1) But Allah came from nothing?


At least the scientist have the proof of quantum physics on their side.

vedaxcool:

frustration you are showing is typical of people of your intellect, rather than being frustrated prove the contrary? smh

Deep Sight:

Why dont YOU answer the question ? ? ? ? ? ?

Deep Sight:

What proof of what quantum physics shows that something comes from nothing? And yet, you would later say that's not what you are saying? Okay, if that not what you are saying, can you concisely tell me exactly why you have referred to "proof of quantum physics on the side of scientists"?

Please answer.

[b]Krauss The astounding progress of the last forty years has led us to highly developed physical theories. Why, there is M-theory, quantum field and loop theories, even relativistic quantum field theories. We have field theories for everything. Fields are responsible for all that you see: it’s fields all the way down. All these field theories taken together clearly show that stuff can arise from nothing, from natural processes. In fact, nothing can create something all the time due to the laws of quantum mechanics.

Empty space is a boiling, bubbling brew of virtual particles that pop in and out of existence in a time scale so short that you can’t even measure them. Gravity allows positive energy and negative energy, and out of nothing you can create positive energy particles, and as long as a gravitational attraction produces enough negative energy, the sum of their energy can be zero. God just isn’t necessary.

MacDaddy01:

But Allah came from nothing? Answer the question.



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YUe0_4rdj0U




"Nothing" is not exactly easy to define.


http://wmbriggs.com/blog/?p=5418




I am not a scientist but that is the position of a well know scientist using quantom physics

MacDaddy01:

But Allah came from nothing? Answer the question.

Empty space is a boiling, bubbling brew of virtual particles that pop in and out of existence in a time scale so short that you can’t even measure them. Gravity allows positive energy and negative energy, and out of nothing you can create positive energy particles, and as long as a gravitational attraction produces enough negative energy, the sum of their energy can be zero. God just isn’t necessary.

Deep Sight:

That's a load of escapist gibberish. O, and nothing is not hard to define: for people who are not trying to lie or obsfuscate issues. Nothing simply means what the word says: NO THING at all. Simple.

Deep Sight:

Can anybody spot the glaring contradictions between the red, blue and green in the above?

Christ! It beggars belief that supposedly educated persons could write such horrendous gibberish.

Worse: that others could credit such as worth anything. Peeps like learned brother Jayriginal and olodo-boy would rush off to copy and paste such whooping nonsense and sit back and expect to be taken seriously.

I am yet to meet a religionist this da.ft, by the way.

Krauss is one of the few living physicists referred to by Scientific American as a "public intellectual",[11] and he is the only physicist to have received awards from all three major U.S. physics societies: the American Physical Society, the American Association of Physics Teachers, and the American Institute of Physics. In 2012 he was awarded the National Science Board's Public Service Medal for his contributions to public education in science and engineering in the US.[12]

vedaxcool: ^
Dude sometimes shutting up is better and a more respectable position than revealing the depths of your dishonesty.

Deep Sight:

And what is the atheist position?

DO NOT SAY THE ATHEIST POSITION IS "WE DON'T KNOW": THAT IS NOT THE ATHEIST POSITION: THAT IS THE AGNOSTIC POSITION.

So tell me, what is the atheist position? ? ? ? ?

Deep Sight:

Can anybody spot the glaring contradictions between the red, blue and green in the above?

Christ! It beggars belief that supposedly educated persons could write such horrendous gibberish.

Worse: that others could credit such as worth anything. Peeps like learned brother Jayriginal and olodo-boy would rush off to copy and paste such whooping nonsense and sit back and expect to be taken seriously.

I am yet to meet a religionist this da.ft, by the way.

wiegraf:

You haven't answered your incoherentness, who made you the person who made your pink unicorn?

vedaxcool: ^
Dude sometimes shutting up is better and a more respectable position than revealing the depths of your dishonesty.

vedaxcool:

And the roaches must always creep off the wood work. Atleast you could have been human enough to answer the questions raised rather than hiding behind another question which is diversionary at best. All the points drawn I see remains unrefuted.