carefulme:

Please don't make it sound like it a favor.....no it's not...
It's lack of opportunity........
The human brain can easily discern of when to attack and when not to whether reprisal or not..........
Muslims are minority in the USA, so it is not expected that they become violent in the recent " Muhammed video" protest.......we know what would happen if such video were released in a countries like Pakistan, Afghanistan etc
Northern Nigeria is predominantly Muslims so xtians didn't have to be too intelligent to know that a reprisal attack by a xtian minority would be futile..........they didn't just fold their arms because they chose to but rather their brain told them otherwise............
..........if a religious war broke out in or Onitsha, we know who would win............
.........just as our discerning brains tells us that Burmese Muslims can not almost retaliate.......unless they want to be completely wiped off..........they are a minority
............a ban on minaret in Pakistan will set off a violent protest......predictably........
But such in a country like Switzerland , will almost be in effect unhindered..........

So the xtians didn't retaliate in those regions of the north because they couldn't technically do so.........
.......if it were a riot in a place like Onitsha, we would be discussing " Muslims retaliating"
In jos where there are sizable amount of xtians, we hear of reprisal attacks.......mosques also get burnt and Muslims suffer casualties too
Yeah that's why it's called a RIOT.....both sides fighting
.............

GBAM

[quote author=Baba Alaji]

Bros you are own yourown, for saying what u said. So bros be wise.[/quote
is ether you have a mental illness with a very long lain name or you have more sand dust than brain under you skull

[quote author=Mee234][/quote]

SubhanAllah, bros this is my last reply 2u, InshaAllah. Cos u'r going were I can't go bros.

Baba Alaji:

SubhanAllah, bros this is my last reply 2u, InshaAllah. Cos u'r going were I can't go bros.

fine but next time don't post reply that suggest threat. :x

[quote author=tiarabubu]@ OP

Your anger about the terms such as "Islamist" or "terrorist" are understandable. However, your anger can be best directed if you know the facts of the matter.

When terror acts are committed in the name of a religion, or to further a religious cause, or in defense of a religion, the world will appropriately term it such. However, you cannot term acts that have not being committed to further a religious cause, or in defense of a religion so.

Consider that Gen Abacha, a Muslim, stole money, ordered people killed, made his men organized bombing that innocents were framed. Has anybody called him an Islamist terrorist? Major Al Mustapha was the director of the terror squad then - has anybody called him an Islamic terrorist? NO. Because his actions were not to further a religious cause. There are thousands of examples where people do criminal acts not because of religious motivation and nobody labels them as such. There are appropriate terms for them such Juntas, kleptomaniacs, anarchist, despots etc and these are used quite often enough.



Now consider others who carry out crimes and quote scriptures to justify their acts, or make clear their aim to create some puritan religious society while carrying out cleansing usually directed at people of other faiths. Do you really think that the world will try to be politically correct to such? Oh no.....


Now that you know, direct your energies at countering such dangerous and despicable acts some people carry out in the name of God and give Islam a bad name. Whining about this real and present danger to all will only make you part of the problem.[/quote
Ably seconded.intelligent write up