Asakel:
Mornin Romanticboy
Hope ur mornin iz goin gallant?
:-)

ya aldou m strugglin wid ma nose
WBU?

Hmmm! 12th

Romanticboy1:

u r rite! Den d gals wn't av 2 wear revealin show-me-ur-tommy top nd short skirts cus we wud av seen nd even touched al dt is der 2 touch freely wifawt avin 2 pay bride price of 1m nd b rich b4 d gal marries u
nd 4 d boiz-we wn't av 2 wear suit nd stil sag on it! Exposin boxers,we wn't av 2 peep gals nd lie2 dem b4 de gve in 2 us




cud say mur bt


















i dn't wana b crucified
















so i wil end it here
#peace#

In a nutshell u sayin it will be beta dis way and view anytin viewable.
Hmmmm!
Buh thank God Adam chop d apple o....b'cos women 4 dan dy take us do yeye.
Lol!

Good morning JESUS
Good morning LORD






Good morning y'all

Romanticboy1:

ya aldou m strugglin wid ma nose
WBU?

Owh!
Sowi bwo.
Jes dan't let it fall off.
.
Mine z jes gallant.
:-)

[quote
author=Preciousguyx]

my man. . . engr tino is confused & u jst allowed him confuse u. He
defined viscosity & he is absolutely right and i want to assume dat
was y u congratulated him.

The fact here is dat, he hasnt bin able to prove that ''without
viscosity there will be motion'' can u help him out ? [/quote]i dont know hw else i wud xplain 2 u 2 make u undastand.....have u hrd abt d temp at wich a fluid shud be 4 it 2 have a volume of 0(check charle's law), n we all knoe dat znt possible practically buh 4rm charles' law graph, it is possible(theoretically), d same goes here, it might not b possible 2 get a fluid wich is not viscous, but 1 tin u shud knoe is dat if u try 2 plot d graph of viscosity against d speed of d fluid, u wud c dat d speed wud b highest when viscosity is 0.......capiche?

Asakel:
In a nutshell u sayin it will be beta dis way and view anytin viewable.
Hmmmm!
Buh thank God Adam chop d apple o....b'cos women 4 dan dy take us do yeye.
Lol!

IPO
av u 4gatten dt God made man in control
so it cn't happen
nat like nwades wen 'some' women
fink de r in control

sylvalord: Good morning JESUS
Good morning LORD






Good morning y'all

Morning!

Sir-Tunechi:

newtons third law of motion has ntin to do wit friction or viscosity. Am sori ure jst beatin abt d much u havnt explained anytin

Read well.. He said Newton's "1st" law

Adex097:
I hereby crucify you!!!

I beg sir!

Romanticboy1:

IPO
av u 4gatten dt God made man in control
so it cn't happen
nat like nwades wen 'some' women
fink de r in control

Lol!

Any Education aspirant here, indicate

Asakel:
Owh!
Sowi bwo.
Jes dan't let it fall off.
.
Mine z jes gallant.
:-)

it fell bt its bck nw! I glued it 2 prevent further casualties
enjoy d rest of ur day *zooms off*

Romanticboy1: good-morning pals
hw r y'all doin?
D patient dog eats d fattest bone






bt do dt stil exist 2dae?
*admission list loadin*

.
Sure
U̶̲̥̅̊‎​ will c a lot Öѵ fat bones after d 'oda dogs' r thru wid d meat.

Gudmorning my beloved Landers. The Holy Trinity Bless you all with favour, luck and steadfastness.

So who's gonna be my running mate in the office today? I guess Madam. And to all opposition and false Lordships, Im gonna Ether you all with my wits. Salutations to Swaggerlord, Snave, Dinatale, Ojingbe and Mclise as Medicine's Registration beckons on us.

Eng. Tino:
bro n daz where u are wrong, force is a property of solids, havent u heard abt gravitational force, every solid has dat ryt?........im nt sayin dat fluids dont have viscosity as a property, what im jes sayin z dat if it were possible 2 remove d force (viscosity) 4rm a fluid, dat fluid will continue 2 move wifawt stopping

in my previous post, i meant to say frictional force & not jst force

but I would wanna assume u undastood dats y u posted dis. . & metioned gravitational force. . .b4 i proceed do u still agree wit ur post above if I said i made a mistake & dat I meant frictional force ?

@Detivo, I see you o.

#Anti-spam-bot.

Eng. Tino:
i dont know hw else i wud xplain 2 u 2 make u undastand.....have u hrd abt d temp at wich a fluid shud be 4 it 2 have a volume of 0(check charle's law), n we all knoe dat znt possible practically buh 4rm charles' law graph, it is possible(theoretically), d same goes here, it might not b possible 2 get a fluid wich is not viscous, but 1 tin u shud knoe is dat if u try 2 plot d graph of viscosity against d speed of d fluid, u wud c dat d speed wud b highest when viscosity is 0.......capiche?

bro I got ur point. . . I made use of friction . . .ur correct

Viewing this topic:
.
Didi 5(m), white raven , Monsieursuave(m), readonenaire(m), Psycho Pea (m), mhizz_bernie, karenkinky (f), Adex097 and 2 guest(s)
.
White Raven....nice name bwo/sis. I no knw sey ravens dey white o. Lol!
Karen...i see u
Adexie...always gallant.
Lol!
And the rest...
Beautiful People

Adex097:
I hereby crucify you!!!

Seconded.

Asakel:
Morning!

good morning oga mi






@adex.. Oga CSO u don 4get to update 2day's dat abi

Where exactly is this thread heading to?

y2k62: Where exactly is this thread heading to?

YABA!

[quote
author=Preciousguyx]

in my previous post, i meant to say frictional force & not
jst force

but I would wanna assume u undastood dats y u posted dis. . &
metioned gravitational force. . .b4 i proceed do u still agree wit ur
post above if I said i made a mistake & dat I meant frictional
force ?[/quote] i might say yes, because friction and gravity are 2 forces dat makes an object stay @ rest or reduce its chances of movement......friction occurs between 2 surfaces in contact, viscosity as well occurs btwn layers of d fluid which are also in contact.....u cant try 2 move an object wifawt overcomin d frictional force, dat z because 4 an object 2 move, 2 surfaces must always b in contact, either d floor, air, etc......daz y i keep referrin 2 newton's 1st law wich states dat 'an object will continue in its state of rest or uniform motion, provided an xternal force z nt present'.....d xternal forces now are friction and viscosity. both oppose motion of solids and fluids, even a layman lukin @ dis xplanation will xay dat since dey prevent motion, den dere absence will enhance motion.....av u even plotted a graph 2 c wat im tokin abt

Bro I tire oh, let's slow the pace abeg. Any education aspirant here.

Preciousguyx:

bro I got ur point. . . I made use of friction . . .ur correct

at last.......mehn niwaiz its wat we do as scientists...argue abt a fact until its proven, thanks xha 4 puttin dis brain of myn 2 work

Eng. Tino:
i dont know hw else i wud xplain 2 u 2 make u undastand.....have u hrd abt d temp at wich a fluid shud be 4 it 2 have a volume of 0(check charle's law), n we all knoe dat znt possible practically buh 4rm charles' law graph, it is possible(theoretically), d same goes here, it might not b possible 2 get a fluid wich is not viscous, but 1 tin u shud knoe is dat if u try 2 plot d graph of viscosity against d speed of d fluid, u wud c dat d speed wud b highest when viscosity is 0.......capiche?

u r right bro.. Viscosity is higher in oil than in water .. That is y water move more rapidly than oil.. U r very correct

i need the defination of 'LIFE' i've been thinking abt it, bt i still cant find it.
Gud morning bros and sis

Adex097: @Detivo, I see you o.

#Anti-spam-bot.

waz he banned?

karenkinky:
Seconded.

why ni?

Asakel: Viewing this topic:
.
Didi 5(m), white raven , Monsieursuave(m), readonenaire(m), Psycho Pea (m), mhizz_bernie, karenkinky (f), Adex097 and 2 guest(s)
.
White Raven....nice name bwo/sis. I no knw sey ravens dey white o. Lol!
Karen...i see u
Adexie...always gallant.
Lol!
And the rest...
Beautiful People

Yes boss.

Good morning

sylvalord:
good morning oga mi






@adex.. Oga CSO u don 4get to update 2day's dat abi

Check page 468 .