All Anony's premises requires there to be A God that is an objective moral giver.

Anony can not just believe in a silent God- that would make him a deist. He needs there to be an objective morality and the God that establishes that objective morality.


For him, once there is no objective morality, his God becomes useless and as he (God) would be another subjective set of rules that we humans have already come up with.

======================================


Now for the simple argument;

There is no objective morality in the bible and why should Anony claim there to be an objective morality? There are alws in the old testament that have changed in the direct opposite in the new testament just by revelation- this implies subjectivity in bible morals/laws.

Example;
The old testament had an "eye for an eye" rule but the new has "turn the other cheek" principle.


How does this not point out that God himself is subjective? One period, we should harm those who have harmed us and then, at another moment, we should forgive those who have harmed us? Is that change the eptiome of subjectivity (according to time)?

Somebody is butthurt.

Reyginus: Somebody is butthurt.

YES, unfortunately, not me