Today In BBC news, Saudi King Abdullah blamed Muslim Brotherhood of Egypt as terrorist.
This king is a puppet of USA and Jews. His father Abdul Aziz broken Uthmania Khilafat with the help of British imperialists.
If Abdullah had minimum Iman and fear of Allah or belief on the existence of Day of judgement he should raise his voice against massacre done by General Fattah Sisi's regime on Egyptian people. But I am doubtful whether this self proclaiming 'Khadimul-Haramain' actually believe in Allah.
Let us pray that the martyrs of Egypt relive the hearts of all Arab's so that all of them join in a revolution which will free holy Mekkah and Medina from Munafiqs like Abdullah.
May Allah allot most terrible hell for Saudi King and his allies.

Here we go again...
A man refused to be subjective and his fidelity is questioned!

Politics. Whilst I am not in the business of cursing or name-calling, I pray that Allah blesses the innocent people of Egypt and give those who have lost loved ones the fortitude to bear the loss.

I was so angry... These monarchs are a major problem in the ummah.

Ameen to the mac's prayer.

@OP,u are being biased and sentimental with ur religion.the King kept quiet since,they complained he's silent,now he talks.he said the absolute truth,now he's a puppet of US and the Jews.c'mon.

there's no analyst in the world that wouldn't blame the Muslim Brotherhood for what happened in Egypt,cause Egypt may be a muslim-dominated nation.it still respects secularity and the citizens fought dearly against the imposition of of extremist islam in the nation.they were desperate and radical in promoting this,thereby aligning themselves with terrorist.

Saudi has a lot at stake if Egypt enters into civil war and its citizens oppose the ruling govt.its only supporting the Egyptian people and not his Religious doctrines.

thirty: Today In BBC news, Saudi King Abdullah blamed Muslim Brotherhood of Egypt as terrorist.
This king is a puppet of USA and Jews. His father Abdul Aziz broken Uthmania Khilafat with the help of British imperialists.
If Abdullah had minimum Iman and fear of Allah or belief on the existence of Day of judgement he should raise his voice against massacre done by General Fattah Sisi's regime on Egyptian people. But I am doubtful whether this self proclaiming 'Khadimul-Haramain' actually believe in Allah.
Let us pray that the martyrs of Egypt relive the hearts of all Arab's so that all of them join in a revolution which will free holy Mekkah and Medina from Munafiqs like Abdullah.
May Allah allot most terrible hell for Saudi King and his allies.

May Allah forgive you. You better be careful with your utterances and leave the Saudi king for Allah to judge and determine if he is fit for Aljannah or jahanam. Shey you don know where you go enter?

maclatunji: Politics. Whilst I am not in the business of cursing or name-calling, I pray that Allah blesses the innocent people of Egypt and give those who have lost loved ones the fortitude to bear the loss.

E ku ilaakaye jare.

tbaba1234: I was so angry... These monarchs are a major problem in the ummah.

Ameen to the prayer.

criticize the monarchs and their policies for the wrong decisions they make and the un-Islamic actions they follow-not for opposing an intolerant and extremist led salafist muslim brotherhood government.just within a year,over 30 million Egyptians went on the streets demanding morsi step down.he refused even after he was warned by the military to do what would avert a civil war in Egypt.the military did what pleased the majority of Egyptians by arresting morsi.brotherhood members should go to rest and play clean.the least expected of the brotherhood if they are in support of democracy as they claim,and not hijackers of democracy as they truly appear,is to shun violence,and call for early elections.early elections can settle all the problems Egypt is going through.i heard sisi's speech today when he swore to protect the right of egyptians to choose their leaders and how they want to live their lives as they please.you don't kill people (Shia and Christians) and destroy their places of worship because you are elected into political office,and you intimidate others (sunnis) for wanting to live their lives contrary to what you want.you don't impose your views on others because you have power.the brotherhood in Egypt should get that clear.the brotherhood is not a regime/governing system in Egypt,but a single political party like any other that can be voted in/out of power.that (imposing on others in a dictatorial manner) is not the spirit of democracy and the respect for human rights and the rule of law.

it is very ironic though that the Saudi king is calling the salafists in Egypt "terrorists" but supporting them in Syria to overthrow assad and spill the blood of innocent people.perhaps,there are no Shia Muslims and alawites in Egypt playing a major role in Egyptian politics.after all Abdul Fattah al-sisi is sunni,and the Saudi king is scared that challenge by salafists/Wahhabis to the military in a majority sunni country like Egypt can set a bad example for his own Wahhabi subjects back in Saudi Arabia.

finally it is really nice to know you were angry,after you've promoted salafism/wahhabism in this forum,and you denied being a salafist out of sheer ideological reason rather than truth.i'd advice you not to be angry because there is no way and no how salafism/Wahhabis would thrive in the muslim ummah even with all the Saudi petro-dollars fuelling Wahhabi/salafist takfirism and terrorism in the muslim countries.it is so ironic and ignorant that the OP mentioned that the founder of the Saudi monarchy/kingdom (the father of the current king Abdullah) destroyed the othoman sunni caliphate with the aid of the british imperialists.he forgot to mention or does not know that Muhammad Ibn Abdul-Wahab (a successor to Ibn Taymiyyah) who is the founder of Wahhabism/Salafist teachings was the mufti that legitimized the rule of the saud clan/monarchy in Arabia.ibn Abdul-wahab labeled all those who opposed the house of saud as "mushrikeen" (idolaters/polytheists).the fact remains that wahhabism/salafism is a tool that keeps dividing muslims (via takfirism),and is only meant as an instrument in the hands of the west to shape the political landscape in muslim countries.the Saudi king is opposing the brotherhood in Egypt because supporting them would place him at odds with the Egyptian army which is not something good for the Saudi army and the Saudi people as an example to follow.the king is indirectly sending a warning signal to those who might try to oppose his own rule in the kingdom,and a note of encouragement to his army to be loyal to him and not to salafist/Wahhabi forces-he has labeled as "terrorists"-within the kingdom that may oppose him in one way or the other.its all politics,and its dirty.

Sad! Very sad.

let us just exercise some little patience and wait for Allaah's judgement. let's see how Allaah will deal with Sisi and his cohorts. i am sure Sisi would be shedding tears in private over the path he has taken Egypt. Too sad for him cos i know consequences of his actions would forever haunt him and his cohorts. To the Brotherhood, just go home and see how this illegal goverment ends. There may be another coup. To Dr. Mursi, renounce your claim to the presidency to prevent further loss of live cos these generals have lost all morals. my two cents

Iraq backs Egypt crackdown on Morsi supporters

(AFP) – 12 hours ago

BAGHDAD — Iraq's premier backed the Egyptian military crackdown on supporters of ousted president Mohamed Morsi in a statement Sunday, the latest Arab leader to back the operation.

Nuri al-Maliki appealed for "self-restraint" but said Baghdad stood with the Egyptian government, describing its moves against the Muslim Brotherhood as efforts to impose law and order.

"We stand strongly with the Egyptian government in its steps to impose the rule of law and install security and peace across all of Egypt," the Iraqi prime minister said in a statement on his website.

Maliki said the ongoing violence in Egypt, which has killed more than 750 people in four days, was the result of a "conspiracy targeting the desires of the Egyptian people."

He also called for "maximum self-restraint" and appealed for the country's political groups to take part in dialogue in order "to avoid sectarian divisions."

Arab countries have openly backed the crackdown, with analysts saying most of their leaders tacitly support Egypt's deadly moves as they fear the Brotherhood's growing regional influence since the Arab Spring.

Egypt's army, directly or indirectly in power since 1952, ousted Morsi as president in a popularly backed July 3 coup and installed an interim civilian government in its place.

Morsi's supporters set up protest camps in Cairo and promised to stay put until the former leader, now in custody, was reinstated.

The government ordered them to disperse and, after a number of delays, police backed by troops stormed the camps on Wednesday.

The death toll from ensuing clashes, in the capital and across Egypt, has topped 750 people.

Copyright © 2013 AFP. All rights reserved

http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5hXK6vZZf2HU56-nYQEJ2DMBkcRUw?docId=CNG.de9ec67dc14610898c11d0930b2bb768.3d1

(let us hear from the horse's mouth.below is an Egyptian newspaper report)

Why Egypt’s army overthrew Morsi

The Egyptian army sees itself as the last bulwark against external or internal threats that could collapse of the state. In their view, Mohamed Morsi became such a threat, and so had to be remove


Hicham Mourad , Saturday 13 Jul 2013

In fact, the army had not really left the political scene since Morsi dismissed the defence minister and head of the Supreme Council of the Armed Forces, Mohamed Hussein Tantawi, and Chief of Staff Sami Anan, in August 2012. Under the latter duo, the army had first run the country since the fall of Mubarak, in a transition period of 16 months, and then, after the election of Morsi in June 2012, wanted to maintain an extremely dangerous duality of civil-military power that would inevitably lead to a collision between the presidency and military institution. This confrontation was quickly ended, against all odds, with the dismissal of Tantawi and Anan less than two months after the inauguration of Morsi.

Since the appointment of the current defence minister, Abdel-Fattah Al-Sisi, to replace Tantawi, everyone thought that the army returned to its barracks. Al-Sisi himself does not want the army to play a political role. He was aware that its interference in politics during the transition period seriously tarnished its image and reduced its prestige among the population. The army, under Al-Sisi, would therefore merely preserve its multifaceted privileges. This was done in the new constitution approved last December. In addition, Morsi tried a rapprochement with the army to ensure its support in his conflict with the liberal opposition.

The army command remained nevertheless suspicious of the intentions of Morsi and the Muslim Brotherhood and opposed to their policies. This involved attempts to infiltrate or to “Brotherhoodise” the army. The rumour was so persistent that Al-Sisi had to reply on 14 February stressing that he would not allow the Muslim Brotherhood, or any other political group, to dominate the army. The command was also unhappy with criticism from leaders of the Brotherhood, including Supreme Guide Mohamed Badie, on past military support for the Mubarak regime.

On the other hand, the religious and sectarian dimension of President Morsi's policies was inconsistent with the strategic thinking of the army on national security issues. This involved first the rapprochement, by religious affinities, with the Islamic resistance movement Hamas in Palestine, which controls the Gaza Strip and adopts armed struggle against the Israeli occupation. For the army, this rapprochement is extremely dangerous for the security of Egypt, especially for that of the Sinai Peninsula, which occupies a particularly important place in the strategic thinking of the army, because it borders Israel and the Gaza Strip.

This region is considered the east frontier of Egypt, the source of the most serious threats to its security. The army was carrying, at least partially, the responsibility of the security vacuum and increased threat of jihadists in Sinai, in connection with Palestinian militants, since the fall of Mubarak, to the laxity of political power with Hamas and Islamist groups in this province.

The army was also dismayed by the support of Cairo to the idea of Islamic jihad against the regime of Bashar Al-Assad in Syria. This position, announced with great fanfare by Morsi 15 June, was dictated by the needs of rapprochement with Egyptian Salafists to counter the growing pressure from internal opposition. It went up to encouraging Egyptians to join the armed rebellion against Damascus. The army considered it a thoughtless and reckless policy that will have a very negative impact on the security of Egypt after the return of Egyptian jihadists to the country, as was the case with the "Egyptian Afghans" who fought Soviet forces in Afghanistan, and fed after their return to Egypt a wave of terrorist attacks in the 1990s.

What aggravated the case of Morsi in the eyes of the military was a series of errors in its handling of the affairs of the country, some of which directly related to the army. This was the case with the opposition and popular protests on the occasion of the 1st anniversary of the January 25 Revolution. The president asked the army to impose a curfew in the three cities of the Suez Canal region — Port Said, Ismaïliya and Suez. Upset by this policy of confrontation with the population and wanting to avoid the same and stay away from the maze of politics, the army said it would not use force against inhabitants of the three cities to impose a curfew, which was massively violated by the population to the chagrin of Morsi.

The multiplication of errors related to domestic policy ended up by completely turning the army against Morsi, pushing it to intervene to overthrow him. This series of episodes of serious misconduct and mismanagement exacerbated divisions in society, increased popular discontent and worsened political and security instability. A situation that greatly worried the military. The army's given mission is to preserve the territorial integrity of Egypt, but also its civil peace. It sees itself as the last bulwark against any external or internal threat that could lead to the collapse of the state.

Al-Sisi had already threatened different political players, including the president, on 29 January with possible military intervention if they failed to resolve the political crisis that could cause the collapse of the state.

The exacerbation of tension, which culminated in the giant protests of 30 June and after, led the army to decide to intervene. These massive demonstrations gave it the popular cover to overthrow the president. Al-Sisi tried during this particularly turbulent period to push Morsi to accept the demand of protesters for snap presidential elections. His refusal sentenced him to a showdown with the army, which dismissed him on expiry of its 48-hour ultimatum.

Drawing lessons from the previous transition period, where it was under fire from critics because of its direct management of the affairs of the country, the army this time highlighted the civil forces it has entrusted to form a new government and asked the head of the Constitutional Court to assume the presidency in an interim capacity. The army, however, remains the sponsor and guarantor of this new transition period, during which its influence will remain decisive. The extent of its future political role will depend on the result of the transition process.

http://english.ahram.org.eg/NewsContentP/4/76375/Opinion/Why-Egypt%E2%80%99s-army-overthrew-Morsi.aspx

^Very shallow analysis. Going by its logic, most governments in the world would be overthrown by their military because of disagreements over policies.

^^

shallow propaganda, Egyptian media is polarized, with everyone singing the tune of its masters, you would notice all Arab dictators always label their opponent terrorist from Libya to Syria to Egypt the the tactic, eventually it simplifies their mass murder.

maclatunji: ^Very shallow analysis. Going by its logic, most governments in the world would be overthrown by their military because of disagreements over policies.

when 30-40 million Egyptians (half of the population) were on the streets demanding the resignation of the president,and the president (who refused a compromise to hold early elections or resign) also has millions of supporters (no more a majority) who are militant and with a violent salafist/wahhabi ideology/orientation,it is only natural for what the Egyptian army did.the Egyptian army's role as we read in the above article includes safeguarding civil peace.today the brotherhood terrorists kidnapped and cold-bloodedly murdered 24 Egyptian police officers,lest anyone deny they are violent.

I am really amused at how radical minded foreign individuals are crying for the brotherhood at a time the Egyptians who voted them into power are rejecting them just shortly after a year.

^Keep exaggerating and spinning information to suit yourself.

maclatunji: ^Keep exaggerating and spinning information to suit yourself.

please explain your claim. I am really shocked as to why Nigerian Muslims (even if you regard yourself or choose to be Sunni) would feel attracted to and support bloodthirsty,violent,intolerant,extremist and terrorist salafist/Wahhabi muslim brotherhood in far away Egypt,when the Egyptian people (majority of whom are mainstream Sunnis) themselves are rejecting this form of "Islam".

why don't you condemn the massacres against Shia Muslim and Christian civilians this bloodthirsty group have committed in Pakistan,Iraq,Syria,Afghanistan and even in Egypt,instead of crying for a president who has been rejected by the majority of his own people just a year after they voted for him? this Morsi decided to cut ties with Syria in,and hosted a conference that was full of sectarian hatred by salafist clerics.few days later,sheikh Hassan shehata and four Egyptian shia muslims were attacked and murdered cold-bloodedly by a salafist mob that was in the "vampire spirit" as a result of the hate speech morsi hosted in that conference.egyptians were shocked by the act of barbarism in which that group portrayed Egypt to the world.as usual the salafists/wahhabis cannot stand the test of battle against combatants,as recently the battle of Qusayr revealed one more time,when the Syrian army backed by Hezbollah fighters from neighboring lebanon cleared the salafist/Wahhabi terrorists from qusayr.almost the entire world cried for the terrorists when the strategic city of qusayr was captured by the Syrian army.the salafists only are good in placing car bombs in civilians areas/churches/mosques or many of them attacking few civilians that hold different beliefs. if the arabs are rejecting these beasts,why would any sane Nigerian support these people? what is the difference between the muslim brotherhood in Egypt and the terrorist boko haram in Nigeria? they share the same ideology and motives,and have a total disregard for innocent lives contrary to Islamic teachings that places the human soul as more sacred than the holy Ka'ba.

watch:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T3qKCpTG9W4

Hezron Lorraine: @OP,u are being biased and sentimental with ur religion.the King kept quiet since,they complained he's silent,now he talks.he said the absolute truth,now he's a puppet of US and the Jews.c'mon.

there's no analyst in the world that wouldn't blame the Muslim Brotherhood for what happened in Egypt,cause Egypt may be a muslim-dominated nation.it still respects secularity and the citizens fought dearly against the imposition of of extremist islam in the nation.they were desperate and radical in promoting this,thereby aligning themselves with terrorist.

Saudi has a lot at stake if Egypt enters into civil war and its citizens oppose the ruling govt.its only supporting the Egyptian people and not his Religious doctrines.

So the analysts support the Army's coup?
The US congress is divided over this matter. You think they don't have analysts?
Or the EU using strong words against Sisi and his butchers don't have analysts?
El Baradei did not analyse the situation?
If the army wanted peace, they would have handled matter differently.

Please

maclatunji: ^Keep exaggerating and spinning information to suit yourself.

LOl Same scenario played out in Iran, the govt. mulled its opponents were millions protested the elections results, same thing happened in Syria the govt. massacred its people where the same individual who defends Syria president right to kill people in their thousands pretending that and insignificant protest against Asad should be met with sniper fire and scud missiles, there word for someone whose sings discordant tunes like this and who perpetually speaks from the two sides of his mouth, I think the word starts with H and ends with and E, any way the over half of the population that protested against morsi is a lie, that why in democracy you have election thru election people are able to express how powerful their opinion is about a govt., funny thing is this same half of the population were nowhere to be found when the constitution was passed just 5 months back, a this same half of the population were so unsure of themselves that they could wait for the parliamentary elections 2 months away to put a parliament in place which would have the powers to remove the president democratically, but guess what they choose a coup,simply because they are unsure of themsleves;

'Impossible' crowd estimates collapse under scrutiny

Was there any credible source for the widely cited figure of 33 million demonstrators? It has been impossible to locate one, either in English or Arabic media. As for the estimations of 17 and 14 million anti-Morsi protesters, there does not appear to be a valid source beyond the two anonymous military officials – not exactly dispassionate observers.

On July 15, the BBC reported that it was unable to find any legitimate sources for the opposition's claims of either 14, 17, or 33 million protesters, affirming the conclusions of BBC Middle East correspondent Wyre Davies, who concluded that mobilising such a massive number of protesters was "impossible."

[b]Through simple Algebra, the Egyptian blogger Shereef Ismail has also poked gaping holes in the opposition's numbers. Estimating that each protester occupied a space of approximately .45 square metres, Ismail calculated that the absolute maximum number of anti-Morsi demonstrators who could fit in the total area of major public spaces in Egyptian cities was at most 2.8 million.


There are other factors that cast doubt on the June 30 crowd estimates, like the basic logistics of cramming between 20 and 40 percent of Egypt's population into already densely populated urban spaces without a staggering number of deaths and injuries ensuing, especially in the oppressive summer heat. Yet many among the army-installed government's supporters are holding fast to their claims, insisting that "the people" led the way against the Muslim Brotherhood's anti-democratic "ballotocracy."

The opposition may have made an impressive showing on June 30 and in the days that followed, but the stunning crowd counts it spread across the world do not seem to hold up against critical scrutiny. And as the mirage of a 30-million-person march evaporates, an unsavory military coup stands exposed.



[/b]

http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/opinion/2013/07/2013717115756410917.html

http://egyptreborn..com/2013/07/mathematics-and-egyptians-dont-mix-june.html?m=1

When you are a shia who hates Salafist whom you repeatedly label as terrorist and slander, fabricating and repeating baseless information, YOU WOULD BELIEVE ANYTHING!

BetaThings:

So the analysts support the Army's coup?
The US congress is divided over this matter. You think they don't have analysts?
Or the EU using strong words against Sisi and his butchers don't have analysts?
El Baradei did not analyse the situation?
If the army wanted peace, they would have handled matter differently.

Please

the guy is just making many baseless claim

^^

call Maclatunji to come back here and explain himself.otherwise i'd be a buffoon with seven horns to reply the content of the above post of Vedaxcool,which is a mixture of half-truths,imaginations,poetry,prose,lies,no commas,shouting,screaming,rudeness,illogic,redherrings,etc.

^^^


you would do well by keeping shut when you have no tangible thing to say! You know schizophrenics tend to hear shouts when there aren't any! you would notice from mac response so far, he does not have your time, So do I, just setting the record straight for all to see the lies inherent in this thread so far!

General Abdul-Fattah al-Sisi,a Sunni Muslim against salafist/Wahhabi terrorists just like the anti-alqaeda Sunni brigades in Iraq:

Watching! A kingdom divided against itself shall not stand.

cleanvessel: Watching! A kingdom divided against itself shall not stand.

https://www.nairaland.com/1402885/anti-trinitarian-form-god-form-servant

https://www.nairaland.com/1341369/anti-trinitarian-please-kindly-frosbel-answer

https://www.nairaland.com/1403841/why-jesus-son-god-not

https://www.nairaland.com/1403830/excerpts-writings-trinitarians-literature-shocking

As usual jokers like you ignore the pile of garbage in your home while creaming over the a piece of paper in someone else's

vedaxcool:

https://www.nairaland.com/1402885/anti-trinitarian-form-god-form-servant

https://www.nairaland.com/1341369/anti-trinitarian-please-kindly-frosbel-answer

https://www.nairaland.com/1403841/why-jesus-son-god-not

https://www.nairaland.com/1403830/excerpts-writings-trinitarians-literature-shocking

As usual jokers like you ignore the pile of garbage in your home while creaming over the a piece of paper in someone else's

Hahahaha
But seriously, why do you think these guys violate virtually all the things we are told Christianity stand for
They are judgemental - "thou shall not judge"
They hardly post ion their section and continue to bring up distractions here - "the mole in our eye and the log in theirs"
They attack Muslims at every given opportunity - "turn the other check"
They fabricate tales - "thou shall not bear false witness"
Muslims call infidels - "thou shall not be yoked with the infidels" - (Corithinans)

They need to keep on attacking us as a defensive action. Imagine Muslims opening on Christianity 50% of the number of threads they start on Islam. They need to keep us occupied!
They need the prop of Islam to stand on. when confronted by atheists, they quickly start diverting attention to muslims

^
even an atheist wondered why christians easily turn their backs on their religious teachings!

BetaThings:

Hahahaha
But seriously, why do you think these guys violate virtually all the things we are told Christianity stand for
They are judgemental - "thou shall not judge"
They hardly post ion their section and continue to bring up distractions here - "the mole in our eye and the log in theirs"
They attack Muslims at every given opportunity - "turn the other check"
They fabricate tales - "thou shall not bear false witness"
Muslims call infidels - "thou shall not be yoked with the infidels" - (Corithinans)

They need to keep on attacking us as a defensive action. Imagine Muslims opening on Christianity 50% of the number of threads they start on Islam. They need to keep us occupied!
They need the prop of Islam to stand on. when confronted by atheists, they quickly start diverting attention to muslims

What do you guy have to say to "Islamic Injustice" by truthman2012? Dodging?

https://www.nairaland.com/1401015/islamic-injustice

"thou shall not be unequally yoked with unbelivers" means Christians should not do what they are doing, not to kill them like muslims do.

cleanvessel:

What do you guy have to say to "Islamic Injustice" by truthman2012? Dodging?

Nothing!
He can have his fun. No need to spoil it!

cleanvessel:
https://www.nairaland.com/1401015/islamic-injustice
"thou shall not be unequally yoked with unbelievers"

Thanks for the correction, You can be EQUALLY yoked, but not UNequally yoked.
Meaning if they are attacking, and you are not, it is unequal and you should not be so yoked with them.
So you need to match any attack with greater ferocity so that you can match the "unbeliever" and be "EQUALLY" yoked with them

cleanvessel:
Christians should not do what they are doing, not to kill them like muslims do.

Exactly. You further prove my point. Those are the things you say. But reality is different
Otherwise why the blood history, rather than living peacefully!
20m+ dead in Taiping rebellion alone
Your Wars of religion took 30 years!
Your crusade had you smacking your lips as your horses waded in knee-high pool of blood
You tagged along as your colonial soldiers massacred and subdued people all over the world and as soon as bloody "victory" after merciless "victor" was secured, you now stepped forward to deliver your message of "love, peace and salvation"; the message was never ever presented before the brutal conquests
The "Sun Never set of the British Empire" - so also was the reach of your message

Up Simon Bolivar!

Brilliant piece from Abdullah Al andalusi

Congratulations pro-Coup Egyptians! on your marriage to the Secular Military. I heard the UAE and Kuwait paid the Dowry, the two witnesses were King Abdullah of Jordan, and King Abdullah of Saud (who was reportedly crying tears of joy), Barack Obama was the qadi (judge), and Benyamin Netanyahu threw the confetti. The red carpet was dyed to the right colour, using in the recently shed blood of the enemies of Israel, the US and the secularists - namely, those they call 'Islamists'. And the thrown bouquet was picked up by the Secularists of Tunisia -tradition holds their marriage may be next!

Enjoy the honeymoon with the Secular Military while it lasts...they do like it when the people they have oppressed love them, and support their excuses to massacre their enemies...although honeymoons don't last, and you, the bride, will at some point be as vulnerable as a single woman at a anti-morsi demo in tahrir square.

You have helped your beloved St. Fateh of Sisi and the felool, to have liberated the 'poor and suffering' Mubarak from the 'evil' clutches of a (now deposed) elected regime. He's out of jail in 48 hours! Alf Mabrook!

http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/aug/19/hosni-mubarak-freed-egypt

But before you disregard this post, claiming that the Muslim Brotherhood are a bunch of 'terrorists' (deja vu, where have I heard that argument before...hmm, Ghaddafi, Bashar, Hosni..Oh but THIS time it must be different right? Sure...

Just a quick reality check, considering Israel and the US hate Hamas, has the Egyptian (secular) military - who you claim rescued Egypt from 'foreign powers' helped, or hinder the enemies of Israel and the US? Is Hamas in a better place now?

If the US support democracy and elected government, why haven't they condemned the coup leaders? Have they cancelled their financial aid that they pay, that's right, to your husband, the Egyptian Military?

Is the US even calling for the release of Morsi?!

Did Morsi ever lock up anyone for insulting him?

Did Morsi ever order the Police to shoot anti-morsi protesters? (no one is even charging him or prosecuting him for it - they had to find an alleged charge all the way back in 2011!).

Did you ever wonder why under Morsi, you could insult him (which as you remember last year - virtually most media did) without punishment, but you couldn't insult the military or judiciary? (who are both secular).

You were told the Muslim Brotherhood were going to take Egypt back centuries, and create a state like Iran - but does SECULAR
have its own SPACE PROGRAM like the 'Mullah ruled' Iran does? (oh that's right, it doesn't - and the US actually pressured Egypt to never have one, because Israel felt 'threatened').

http://www.anaonline.net/news/default/view/id/10783/lang/en/US+creates+obsta cles+for+Egyptian+space+progra m,+space+scientist+says#.UhJqY2TuVYg

Do you have any heavy industry that doesn't require you to buy spare parts from foreign countries - unlike the 'Mullah ruled' Iran?

You were told that Morsi was surrendering Egypt to foreign powers, yet you were also told he was making Egypt like Iran (and he was opening up links with Iran) - but has Iran surrendered itself to foreign powers?

Does Iran's army hold joint maneuvers with Israel to maintain the security of its border? Does the US pay the Iranian military any money? Can you say the same for your beloved Egypt?

If Islam is the religion of compassion and mercy, Egyptian Secularism has certainly separated it from politics...

...congratulations again

https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=10151831898572517&id=667102516&__user=665841360