₦airaland Forum

skyp: A coach has just 20percent contribution in the success of a football team

as usuall: U were appointed to managed them

Swaginton: (frankly I don't believe manchester united should be given the privilege of being tagged as manchester city's rivals)

leggo: my friend any coach that prefers welbeck/young to kagawa/nani should be shot in the sac

Swaginton: Yesterday was perhaps a historic day in the world of English football.am not just talking about the mauling of manchester united by their rivals,manchester city. (frankly I don't believe manchester united should be given the privilege of being tagged as manchester city's rivals).

pDude: Same reason Goodluck Jonathan is always blamed for the idiocy of Nigerians.

If a Boko Haram dude does suicide bombing and kills people, you all will blame GEJ.

If a person is caught with koko inside their stomach by border patrol and he is Nigerian, you all blame GEJ

If someone does ritual killings and then is caught or not, you all will blame GEJ.

I have found out that Nigerians are the problem of Nigeria and not the govt, yet you all will blame GEJ and govt

Hope that answers ur question

Afam4eva: Why should a coach have an incompetent player in his team in the first place? It's the duty of the coach to get the very best legs for his team and also bring out the best in his players even if they're above average players. If that's not the duty of a coach then i wonder what is. Else, teams will be playing without coaches.

Swaginton: Yesterday was perhaps a historic day in the world of English football.am not just talking about the mauling of manchester united by their rivals,manchester city.

It was also the last day paulo di canio presided as sunderland's manager.poor canio*sighs.

Anyways,as I woke up to be greeted by the shocking yet expectant news of his sack while I was still recovering from d harsh reality of man u's game yesterday.

I began to wonder;why is the coach always the first to be blamed?.moyes himself is already under immense pressure.don't the players themselves have any sense of responsibility?.I personally believe(I stand to be corrected though) that sometimes players put up underwhelming performances either to get their coaches sacked or to force their out of their clubs so why are the coaches always at the receiving end?

nwekesimon68: Pls broda if ur ansa is correct then who do we blame for arsenal failure since 8 seasons now? Is it the coach or the management that refuses to bring out money to buy the best brains?

Swaginton: sometims a player does not follow the specific instructions of the coach..for example I dnt tink keshi instructs ahmed musa to jst dribble,dribble and shoot at jst abt anytin

born2fuck: The coach need to be blame for impotent players because with techniques, a coach can get a stand at least if we can apply strategy and game plans, selection and ability to build on stronger position. We have different formation that suite level of competence. When Ghana felt they aren't good enough, they came to world with 4-5-1 with attack standing from midfield only and massive defence, this means to score them with 2:0, you have to be a very good team and then got out of quarter final with ill luck, if that team played 4-3-3, I don't think they will get more than first round but the ended up in quarter final

Swaginton: Yesterday was perhaps a historic day in the world of English football.am not just talking about the mauling of manchester united by their rivals,manchester city.

It was also the last day paulo di canio presided as sunderland's manager.poor canio*sighs.

Anyways,as I woke up to be greeted by the shocking yet expectant news of his sack while I was still recovering from d harsh reality of man u's game yesterday.

I began to wonder;why is the coach always the first to be blamed?.moyes himself is already under immense pressure.don't the players themselves have any sense of responsibility?.sometimes the manager isn't given as much financial backing as he wants cause the board is more concerned with profits yet they want instantenous success..I personally believe(I stand to be corrected though) that sometimes players put up underwhelming performances either to get their coaches sacked or to force their out of their clubs so why are the coaches always at the receiving end?