striktlymi:

Okay, cool!



I have no ish if we decide to include some members of this section but I will only support that move if those nominated would forfeit the right to have their threads selected in order to avoid any conflict of interest.

Also, I would suggest that we bring on board those members who have proven over time to be tolerant of the beliefs or disbelief of others because I wouldn't want a situation where good threads are relegated to the background because someone is of a different 'faith' or lack of 'faith'.

Onward...with the permission of the chairperson (ATMC) I ask that we make suggestions and agree on the criteria to be used in assessing any suggested thread. As I await the permission, I also ask that we liaise with mukina and the mods in order to get this 'FP reward' thingy on the way.

striktlymi:

Okay, cool!



I have no ish if we decide to include some members of this section but I will only support that move if those nominated would forfeit the right to have their threads selected in order to avoid any conflict of interest.

Also, I would suggest that we bring on board those members who have proven over time to be tolerant of the beliefs or disbelief of others because I wouldn't want a situation where good threads are relegated to the background because someone is of a different 'faith' or lack of 'faith'.

Onward...with the permission of the chairperson (ATMC) I ask that we make suggestions and agree on the criteria to be used in assessing any suggested thread. As I await the permission, I also ask that we liaise with mukina and the mods in order to get this 'FP reward' thingy on the way.

striktlymi:

Okay, cool!



I have no ish if we decide to include some members of this section but I will only support that move if those nominated would forfeit the right to have their threads selected in order to avoid any conflict of interest.

Also, I would suggest that we bring on board those members who have proven over time to be tolerant of the beliefs or disbelief of others because I wouldn't want a situation where good threads are relegated to the background because someone is of a different 'faith' or lack of 'faith'.

Onward...with the permission of the chairperson (ATMC) I ask that we make suggestions and agree on the criteria to be used in assessing any suggested thread. As I await the permission, I also ask that we liaise with mukina and the mods in order to get this 'FP reward' thingy on the way.

striktlymi: Why are you guys inactive?

striktlymi: Why are you guys inactive?

ATMC: I have been trying to post since yesterday but I don't know what's wrong
Of course we'll employ the very objective ones in RS...but can the neutral parties nominate the threads of those from RS they are working with?

Elantracey: ah ve been tryin to quote n it seems difficult moreover ah tink we should try and fix a tym n stick to it

Ishilove: Striky, has mukina responded?

Ishilove: Striky, has mukina responded?

striktlymi:

Sorry about that. Hope its better today?

Elantracey: yes it is

obi alfa: A point which we didn't raise in the first phase but which the current panel should discuss is how to avoid wuruwuru disenfranchisement by mods. I noticed last year that some mods used this tactic in some sections during end of year awards. They will ban some monikers on flimsy excuses, thus depriving them of their right to vote.

Also certain opinions that might influence vote patterns during campaigns are hidden by mods. HBG already did this at the beginning of this thread.

striktlymi:

That's fantastic!

ATMC is still having difficulties with the network.


@All,

Mukina just responded! She is in the process of reviewing the request to determine if it can be approved or not. Let's hope for the best.

ATMC: better

ATMC: thanks for ur help

striktlymi:


I am thinking: anyone can nominate threads except for those who are doing the assessment. As I suggested before, you or someone else can create a thread where the various links to those threads can be posted.

The thread can serve as some sought of repertoire where the panelists can go into daily and assess these threads based on the set criteria. This way, members can follow the work of this panel such that they are aware of the various threads and their contents which will help them make an informed decision when voting.

So instead of them voting for the thread owners based on the relationship they have with each of them, they might just decide to vote based on the strength of each thread, hopefully.

ATMC: work's in progress already.

Ishilove:
I seriously doubt this will work because the 'man know man' factor will still come into play.

striktlymi:

I made some suggestions which we are yet to debate or deliberate on.

Ishilove:
So let's deliberate then. I made a point up there.

Goodmorning Strik

Ishilove: I don't understand why we should access any of the threads and discuss on their viability. I thought it is the nominees that we will be accessing.

Maybe I'm not getting it. Please can you explain the whole process more? Thanks

Elantracey: Talking about d best thread can someone have more dan one of his/her threads nominated?

striktlymi:

That's a very good question. Guys what do you think? Ishi and ATMC you guys were members of the Phase 1 panel. What did you guys have in mind then as it relates to the question of Tracey?

Ishilove:
Yes, I don't see why not. If the threads are considered good enough, I definitely don't see anything wrong there.