larride:

You cannot claim a statement to be a general fallacy with providing fact to back it up. In your own words yourself you said



If you claim those words to be fallacy then i can claim that your write up are based on fallacy since the statement is made by you?

larride:

You cannot claim a statement to be a general fallacy without providing fact to back it up. In your own words yourself you said


i already did in my expalanation.

Mhyke:
did you say things were adequately okay
what happened to the first three refineries in oil producing Nigeria?

Mhyke:
what i was reffering to as fallacy is the belive that 'military government are known for consistency'
dont misquote me please.

sapientia1: ...mhyke hasn't answered my last question but I want him to remember that ASUU was formed in the military era, and I charge you to give an example where Lecturers were murdered on protest in the military regime.

Mhyke:
i will after you confirm that none of the protest in the military regime ends up brutal
where do you get the nerve to protest ss u like in the military regime
any opposition against the government is mostly considered as a coup,with a penalty of jail or death

larride: Mhyke, you haven't answered the following questions:

1. After over 14yrs, why hasn't the civilian government set up new refineries or rather upgrade the ones we have before (which was set up by the military).

2. Given their recorded achievement, which administration would you prefer, Jonathan (Civilian) or Gaddafi (Maximum dictatorship).

I await your answers.

Mhyke: @sepantia,the issue of 'terrorists' is to totally out of the question.the government has involved the military and the situation is yet to be curbed.meaning that there is no guarantee that a military govrtnment would handle the situation wt a click of the finger
Osama terrorized americs for years
does that mean the civilian security in the state is nothing to write home about?

larride:

And yet Jonathan had to ordered Soldiers to Ojota to stop anyone from protesting anymore about the subsidy crisis? What's the difference with that of the military you are trying so hard to crucify? How many times has the Police disrupted peaceful protest against the presidency while they claim they are protecting law and order?

Mhyke:
For the first question,we shouldnt shift the aftermath of a military regime to the civilian. we should judge them by their actions not by that of past governments.
Secondly,if a military government were to come into power, how can we guarantee that it would be lead by 'Gadafi'?.NOT all military rulers would behave like him.

larride:

And yet Jonathan had to ordered Soldiers to Ojota to stop anyone from protesting anymore about the subsidy crisis? What's the difference with that of the military you are trying so hard to crucify? How many times has the Police disrupted peaceful protest against the presidency while they claim they are protecting law and order?

Mhyke:
They were ordered to stop them to keep the orderliness.Nd the increase is just for a period of time.We should crucify the government before that time expires.nd besides,there are prices to pay for development...

larride:

I asked you a straight-forward question, which administration would you prefer given their recorded achievement.

a. Jonathan (Civilian)
b. Gaddafi (Maximum dictatorship)

A simple A or B will suffice.

Mhyke:
For the first question,we shouldnt shift the aftermath of a military regime to the civilian. we should judge them by their actions not by that of past governments.
Secondly,if a military government were to come into power, how can we guarantee that it would be lead by 'Gadafi'?.NOT all military rulers would behave like him.

Mhyke:
i will after you confirm that none of the protest in the military regime ends up brutal
where do you get the nerve to protest ss u like in the military regime
any opposition against the government is mostly considered as a coup,with a penalty of jail or death

larride:

Then we can also argue for the military that they are ordered to keep the orderliness, right? This also render your argument about violence null and void. Since the military are also preserving law and order

sapientia1: yeah, protests happens and it'l always happen, it turns bloody and the same applies to civilian government. The fact is we've not gotten it right in this civilian government. ASUU has been on strike for six months and has been going on strike for close to four years in a decade. All these NEVER happened in the military era

Mhyke:
it all turns out bloody?
we all know military government is more infamous for protests dat ends up bloody

larride:

The bolded. I'm not holding the civilian regime accountable for what happened during the military era but i'm asking you why THE CIVILIAN GOVERNMENT HASN'T BEEN ABLE TO SET UP OR UPGRADE ANY OF OUR REFINERIES?

sapientia1: oh! So you mean lecturers were owed salaries for months and they kept mute during the military era? You'll have to make a research my friend

sapientia1: I'm waiting for RESXUL to answer my question.