Nickshrapnel:
Yeah, cunnilingus actually

pu7pl3:


Lol, what of Sandberg's own?

Nickshrapnel:
They may be doing it to spite him, either way, he should also move on, they’ve made it clear they don’t want to deal with him again.

TonySpike:


WB is very paranoid. They want to force their narrative on the fans and this will not go down well.

pu7pl3:


He has moved on, it doesn't mean he would stop taking about his favourite characters...it's WB that is finding it hard to move on

TheKingIsHere:


You're funny o.

You want to dictate to the owner of a property what to do?

Can Zack Snyder make a drawing of iron Man licking black widows pucci and post it on the internet and think he will go scot-free just like that? Especially, when the company where against it in their own animated show?

He should be lucky that they didn't take further action and only removed the image.

Y'all should learn to remove emotions from this matter.

Nickshrapnel:
They may be doing it to spite him, either way, he should also move on, they’ve made it clear they don’t want to deal with him again.

abduleez1:

Lol, they lie tell yourself.

He's moved on bawo. Person move on na Im I dey see taunts, week in week out. Suck it WB, AOTD is the 'DIRECTORS cut', continuous shade from him and his promoters. Abeg, make we try dey talk true.
If I may put it blunt, He's acting like a jilted ex.

I'm not supporting WB, but saying Zack isn't still stuck with them na premium lamba.

abduleez1:

Snyder fans emotional like KILODE....

pu7pl3:


WB should leave the guy alone and move the fvck on

TheKingIsHere:


Honestly, how's it WB fault?

A news came out saying that WB removed a Batman licking Catwoman scene in HQ show. They didn't want it.

Then Zack Snyder drew an unofficial and unauthorized image of Batman licking Catwoman and called it "Canon" to spite WB.

First, who is Zack to tag an unauthorized drawing Canon? Second, who gave him permission to draw an image that clearly goes against what the company and owner wanted?

I can assure you that if it's Disney, they would've slammed him with a law suit.

Zack should just be careful when doing things and focus on his Netflix shows/movies while negotiating with Discovery for JL2

TheKingIsHere:


Honestly, how's it WB fault?

A news came out saying that WB removed a Batman licking Catwoman scene in HQ show. They didn't want it.

Then Zack Snyder drew an unofficial and unauthorized image of Batman licking Catwoman and called it "Canon" to spite WB.

First, who is Zack to tag an unauthorized drawing Canon? Second, who gave him permission to draw an image that clearly goes against what the company and owner wanted?

I can assure you that if it's Disney, they would've slammed him with a law suit.

Zack should just be careful when doing things and focus on his Netflix shows/movies while negotiating with Discovery for JL2

TheKingIsHere:


I'm a Snyder fan but naturally I don't really attach myself to emotional things.

Zack knew what he was getting himself into. He's lucky it wasn't Disney

Tarvel:

pu7pl3:


if someone else not name Snyder did that would they also take it down? Did they take down Sanbergs repost?

abduleez1:

You peeps don't seem to get it. And that's the problem.

WB gives no fvvk bout Snyder. And wants little to no attachment with his universe. That's the point. You dig?

Dem dey tell person since say "we no want you" x10. How many times him go hear or how many heartbreaks him want before him understand.
Since Netflix don give am jumbo package and FULL CREATIVE FREEDOM, why Baba no go bask in utopia and enjoy himself and forget this 'trashy' people?

Nickshrapnel:

SniperAssassin:

It bothers me how Bruce Wayne has never been charged with child abuse.

abduleez1:

Hope they give that to Eternals with its New Gods copy cat and shït.

TheKingIsHere:


Honestly, how's it WB fault?

A news came out saying that WB removed a Batman licking Catwoman scene in HQ show. They didn't want it.

Then Zack Snyder drew an unofficial and unauthorized image of Batman licking Catwoman and called it "Canon" to spite WB.

First, who is Zack to tag an unauthorized drawing Canon? Second, who gave him permission to draw an image that clearly goes against what the company and owner wanted?

I can assure you that if it's Disney, they would've slammed him with a law suit.

Zack should just be careful when doing things and focus on his Netflix shows/movies while negotiating with Discovery for JL2

TheKingIsHere:


I'm a Snyder fan but naturally I don't really attach myself to emotional things.

Zack knew what he was getting himself into. He's lucky it wasn't Disney

Minemrys:

What lawsuit exactly? He wasn't using the image for promotional reasons or financial purposes. People draw fan arts of superheroes. They are pop culture. It wasn't like he was using it to make money off DC property for himself. He can't be sued bro. Haba, try reason legal matters before you jump into assumptions. If na like that, Disney for don Sue this graphic artist, Boss Logic then.

Minemrys:

You say wetin U donnn mean ittt...is that so?

Minemrys:

You say wetin U donnn mean ittt...is that so?

abduleez1:

Na sin not to be Snyder fan??

abduleez1:


I swear. Disney no send person if you no move with their flow.

pu7pl3:


if someone else not name Snyder did that would they also take it down? Did they take down Sanbergs repost?

Nickshrapnel:

1. If it’s copyrighted, that should make it canon
2. Under the fair use law, Snyder is within his right, calling it canon may be illegal though.

TheKingIsHere:


Do mind minemrys. He hasn't come out to tell us how the forbes article is fake and how hbomax didn't sponsor superman and Lois show