dalaman:

Sodom and Gomorrah is a mythical story.

johnydon22:

The historicity of Sodom and Gomorrah is still in dispute by
archaeologists, as little archaeological evidence has ever been found in the
regions where they were supposedly situated.

There are some other stories and historical names which bear a resemblance to the Biblical stories of Sodom and Gomorrah, and some possible natural explanations for the events described have been proposed, but no widely accepted or strongly verified sites for the cities have been found.

Little/No archeological success has been made on the supposed location of the cities, it is plausible that such cities may have existed in the ancient sumerian world but the events described in the biblical fable is sorely myth and bears no historical weight. . . For now, the actuality of a historical sodom and gomorrah remains a shadow.

johnydon22:


Hahahahahaha please can you just leave your devil out of real archeological findings. . . I don't know how you christians are so cutely naive when it comes to scientific knowledge. . . what concerns gay bible and real historical antiquities. . . anyway am not here to argue when you can't discern the difference between an archaeologically supported historical antiquity and myth. . . still clinging to the childish superstition of a devil. . . #Sighs

Macelliot:

Your 50th generation will pass, and religion might still remain....


I know you don't believe in the return of Christ... But oneday, He will return. (just like a thief in the night)...

Macelliot:

What else again?

Everything that happens thousands of years ago that doesn't suit them is myth and vice versa...

Yeah just like the story of the Trojan horse is Myth

AnyibestDede:
I understand u bro, i hv notin to gain frm the stroy of sodom

johnydon22:


Yeah just like the story of the Trojan horse is Myth

Atlantian:
Dont you think if he comes like a thief, I might mistakenly think he is a thief and shoot him dead ?

Macelliot:

Are you better than the Homosexuals?

The era of Christ changed things...

Jesus said, "What will befall men of this days will be worser than the days of Sodom and Gommorah."

Macelliot:

You have alot to gain...

Macelliot:


Seems to you guys that everything that happened thousands of years ago without proofs to verify them today is a myth .....

---

Don't let me use Thousands of years ago as an example.

---

Millions of people have died in this 21th century around the whole world......
Pls Mr. Right, can you proof to us that all these peoples actually existed in real life??

seriously guy there are real historical facts and there are fables. . .Many events that happened thousands of years ago are known historical facts...

Real historical facts should be taught as historical facts and fables as fables.... Learn to distinguish historical fact from myth, don't confuse myth as history.

. .so you really need to get your facts straight. . and seriously stop getting emotional because you sound very irked.

For the 21st century dead people, all you need do is dig up there graves

johnydon22:


seriously guy there are real historical facts and there are fables. . .Many events that happened thousands of years ago are known historical facts...

Real historical facts should be taught as historical facts and fables as fables.... Learn to distinguish historical fact from myth, don't confuse myth as history.

. .so you really need to get your facts straight. . and seriously stop getting emotional because you sound very irked.

For the 21st century dead people, all you need do is dig up there graves

Macelliot:
You failed woefully!
Were all of them buried? Can you locate their graves?
Lolz, That means they don't exist....

Hahahahahahaha am i even still replying the boy

Macelliot:

You failed woefully!

Were all of them buried?
Can you locate their graves?

Lolz, That means they don't exist....

Hahahahahahaha am i even still replying the boy how many people died in the 21st century. . you have to name them so we can know if they existed or not?

johnydon22:

Hahahahahahaha am i even still replying the boy how many people died in the 21st century. . you have to name them so we can know if they existed or not?

Macelliot:

Mr. Always Right, you see you aren't right...

Lmao. . . Lets see how wrong i was. . . mention one 21st century individual that is dead lets see if he or she existed My assertion remains correct because it is ONE of the methods that can be used to determine the authenticity of the subject... so boy mention one so i can direct you where to dig

johnydon22:
Lmao. . . Lets see how wrong i was. . . mention one 21st century individual that is dead lets see if he or she existed My assertion remains correct because it is ONE of the methods that can be used to determine the authenticity of the subject... so boy mention one so i can direct you where to dig

wiegraf:

oh nos. those damned are gays coming into my house and eating sausages

I'm confused as to what the problem is with calling a bigot a bigot. bemused. I mean, if you want to use xtianity as an excuse, why I don't see you treating those who wear different fabrics, eat shellfish or work on sabbath in the same way? one can only surmise the problem lies elsewhere

johnydon22:
Lmao. . . Lets see how wrong i was. . . mention one 21st century individual that is dead lets see if he or she existed My assertion remains correct because it is ONE of the methods that can be used to determine the authenticity of the subject... so boy mention one so i can direct you where to dig

Macelliot:

Double-mouthed...

Going by you assertion, The only people you see and can prove are the only ones that exist.....

---

That's why I told you that millions have died in this 21st century, but I bet you that you yourself can't prove the existence of only a thousand among them...

---

---

Because you Johnny can't prove the existence of a thousand people shouldn't make people believe that the population of the entire world is not more than a thousand...


I'm done!!!

hahahahahahahahahaha mention one??

wiegraf:

as for the legal issues, you might have a case in certain situations. but I also know there are ways to continue living like it were 4 millennia ago (as the op reminds us, ie assuming his fairy tale were true) if you want to. I know of reputable clubs that didn't allow black people in till the 90s. and that wasn't because the law required it of them, they simply realised they had to keep up with the times, and finally.

that said, I do know most jurisdictions have anti discriminatory laws that apply to institutions that meet certain criteria. heres a summary of some of californias history in that area

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Membership_discrimination_in_California_social_clubs

i'll add; tell me exactly how you'd feel if you showed up to collect your marriage certificate and were denied because you were...black? jewish?

a government institution? one run on public taxes? or even just aided by tax breaks on the assumption that they take on meritable public causes?

I needn't say more, I hope

anyways, as for private institutions, that's another story, yes, but the public general supports your right to be a bigot. recent fiascos like the chikenzila incident from last year or so demonstrate this.

these cases aren't even the norm. there must be afair amount of similar incidents daily in which the couple just shrugs and moves on. these particular couples are aggrieved for whatever reason. dunno, we'll just let the courts handle that. were laws broken? maybe, but claiming you are somehow being persecuted is a tad silly, no? let's not even get into the hypocrisy. you really might need some perspective.

for instance, 'advertising' in public school? are hetero unions also 'advertised' in those books? what of interracial marriages? are such abominations advertised in those books?

public (emphases on this word please) school books fa!

oga, if you live there, find yourself a private school suited to your (frankly bigoted) needs abeg. follow your own suggestions; just as you feel these people should find another venue/whatever for their weddings, you find a school which feeds your needs. don't expect publicly funded schools to cater to your narrow views

and you're the one being discriminated against?!

hmm

I'll pretend I didn't see that bestiality comment, for now.

johnydon22:
hahahahahahahahahaha mention one??

johnydon22:
hahahahahahahahahaha mention one??

Macelliot:
Your assertion are blurred....
You don't exist!
Bye.......... *unfollow*

Hahahahahahaha ok but mention one

Ubenedictus:


lol,
what concerns me and "sausage eating"? What concern damned Or gay or sausage eating?

Oh, i Guess that was a failed attempt to make an arguement from sympathy by describing gays as sausage eating people, well everyone eats sausages including heteros, pedos, e.t.c, it has nothing to do with this topic. Nor have I described anyone sofar as damned.

Now go eat some sausages



lol,

I am aware it is pretty difficult to prove a negative, infact most people prefer not to waste time on such things.

First my dear, a bigot is someone who is intolerant to other people because they hold ideas, thought or characteristics which differ.

If i prevented a jew from eating with other nations in my resturant simple 'cos he is a jew, then i'll be a bigot. If i start avoiding d muslims in my area for no reason other than religion then the name may apply. The same will apply if i was pursueing homosexuals away from my area or even my church, trying to avoid them.., simply because of their orientation.

And for the record, I actually know people who are not heteros and I don't avoid them, I actually have pretty good relationship with them, we actually are close enough to share tables. So sorry I am not intolerant or discriminatory to homosexuals.

So my dear I am no bigot.

The point I have expressed so far is that "marriage" properly speaking is an ancient institution that unite of man and woman for the procreation and upbringing of offsprings and companionship.

By definition a "gay marriage" is a impossibility. If the government is allowing unions of gay people, that is their business but it certainly is not marriage, it is a misnomer to describe it as such, or to equate it with marriage. Marriage unites man and woman and by that very fact a "gay marriage is a misnomer unless the couple are man and woman. And any redefinition of that term as the supreme court just did is not marriage at best a joke, as I said earlier d new definition simply say it is a way to prevent loneliness.


Oh and before I forget, It seems you are hopelessly confusing Christianity with Judaism! Shell fish and fabrics are not forbidden in Christianity I thought you should know that, it is judaism that forbids such.

On the otherhand, we do forbid stuff like stealing, murder, masturbation, addiction, adultery, fornication, bearing false witness and homosexual sexual relation and all those are considered sinful and discouraged.

And yes, I treat all who commit such sins the same way including myself, I remind them that such is immoral, I do not encourage it and I hope for repentance. That is exactly how I treat myself when I sin.