SovietBomber:
Shymm3x, Duru1, OPCNAIRALAND, Change2015, ROSSIKE, aresa, abagoro, Dollyak, Gbawe, Severussnape, EasternLion.

Tallesty1:
^^^Are they gays?

EasternLion:
If I catch any gay around me, I go just cut his prick off.

I don't negotiate with gays.


Wetin sef >

SovietBomber:
Please I'd like to know your views/take on these issues:

1. What do you think about sexual relationships between parents and their children? It is still banned in the west - is it not a violation of their human rights if two consenting adults decide to have intimate relations?

2. Why is polygamy/polyandry still banned in the west? Is this not a violation of fundamental human rights? If consenting adults decide that a man can marry more than one wife and a woman can marry more that one man why is it banned in the west?

3. Where do you draw the line between morality and human rights?

I do not agree that gay relations should be criminalised but I agree that society should determine whether it is acceptable or not.

Waiting for your answers, please.

zendy:


Sexual relationship between parent and child or incest cannot be permitted to prevent "inbreeding".
Not allowing inbreeding or whatever you call it is a violation of human right if it is not allowed between two consenting adults as you guys will say.

Polygamy is not banned in the west, what is banned is bigamy.
We are informed people. Don't come here to spew lies. Polygamy is not allowed in the US. Even bigamy should be allowed so long it's between consenting adults.

Where I draw the line between morality and human rights is in humanity. I'm not gay and I'm not a gay rights per se, but I'm not about to reject a human being for being gay. Being gay is not something someone grows up to learn, you either have that inclination or you don't. If a person has that inclination and respects that I do not have the same, I'm ok with him. I cannot demonise a person because their sexual orientation is not the "norm" and what two consenting adults do behind closed doors is none of my business. People who look down on gay people are backward thinking in my opinion.
It is what someone grows up to learn. It's not their makeup. Someone normally introduces them to it and they get used to it with constant practice. It's like addiction to drugs.

zendy:


Sexual relationship between parent and child or incest cannot be permitted to prevent "inbreeding".

Polygamy is not banned in the west, what is banned is bigamy.

Where I draw the line between morality and human rights is in humanity. I'm not gay and I'm not a gay rights per se, but I'm not about to reject a human being for being gay. Being gay is not something someone grows up to learn, you either have that inclination or you don't. If a person has that inclination and respects that I do not have the same, I'm ok with him. I cannot demonise a person because their sexual orientation is not the "norm" and what two consenting adults do behind closed doors is none of my business. People who look down on gay people are backward thinking in my opinion.

AgapeCharis:


Clearly, you made no point.

AgapeCharis:


Clearly, you made no point.

AgapeCharis:


Clearly, you made no point.

zendy:


If you look at it from an open minded point of view, you will see I'm on point. Inbreeding is a strong point to ban incestuous relationship because the offspring(s) that may emerge from such relationship are most likely to have genetic anomalies which they can pass on to their own offsprings. In the USA, Mormon families and other religious sects are known to engage in polygamy as is in Europe. As for "getting used to being gay", I don't believe in that. For me to leave all the fine girls out there to sleep my fellow man is crazy so any man who does this is someone who has always been gay but did not yet have consenting partner yet. I believe people are born gay but my point it that if two consenting gay people decide to engage in that activity, it's no ones business. I know men and women who engage in far worse sexual activity than gays anyway

zendy:


If you look at it from an open minded point of view, you will see I'm on point. Inbreeding is a strong point to ban incestuous relationship because the offspring(s) that may emerge from such relationship are most likely to have genetic anomalies which they can pass on to their own offsprings. In the USA, Mormon families and other religious sects are known to engage in polygamy as is in Europe. As for "getting used to being gay", I don't believe in that. For me to leave all the fine girls out there to sleep my fellow man is crazy so any man who does this is someone who has always been gay but did not yet have consenting partner yet. I believe people are born gay but my point it that if two consenting gay people decide to engage in that activity, it's no ones business. I know men and women who engage in far worse sexual activity than gays anyway

ki02020:


I smell gay in your comment

You need a new nose.
I was just countering his points for supporting gay rights.

Tallesty1:
^^^Are they gays?

dinachi:

You are still not making sense. How does it concern you what two consenting adult family members do in private?
Homosexuality is a learned behaviour.

zendy:


If you look at it from an open minded point of view, you will see I'm on point. Inbreeding is a strong point to ban incestuous relationship because the offspring(s) that may emerge from such relationship are most likely to have genetic anomalies which they can pass on to their own offsprings. In the USA, Mormon families and other religious sects are known to engage in polygamy as is in Europe. As for "getting used to being gay", I don't believe in that. For me to leave all the fine girls out there to sleep my fellow man is crazy so any man who does this is someone who has always been gay but did not yet have consenting partner yet. I believe people are born gay but my point it that if two consenting gay people decide to engage in that activity, it's no ones business. I know men and women who engage in far worse sexual activity than gays anyway

Change2015:


So if I support freedom of worship that would mean I was religious?

Change2015:


So if I support freedom of worship that would mean I was religious?

zendy:


If you look at it from an open minded point of view, you will see I'm on point. Inbreeding is a strong point to ban incestuous relationship because the offspring(s) that may emerge from such relationship are most likely to have genetic anomalies which they can pass on to their own offsprings. How is this your business? Is it not between consenting adults? This is a double standard game playing here. By the way, there are no genetic anomalies from such relationships. It's not a relationship between a human and an animal. It's between two consenting humans.

In the USA, Mormon families and other religious sects are known to engage in polygamy as is in Europe. As for "getting used to being gay", I don't believe in that. For me to leave all the fine girls out there to sleep my fellow man is crazy so any man who does this is someone who has always been gay but did not yet have consenting partner yet. You're wrong. No one is born gay. Have you wondered why some persons are addicted to hard drugs? Even when it has eaten them up and slowly killing them, they still can't do without it. Are you telling me they were born with it also?

I believe people are born gay but my point it that if two consenting gay people decide to engage in that activity, it's no ones business. Really? Why then are you concerned if consenting adults decide to engage in bigamy or polygamy? How is it your business if biologically related adults decide to have a sexual relationship??

I know men and women who engage in far worse sexual activity than gays anyway

jesussaves22:
Also I will use spanner and screw their anus

AgapeCharis:

Once again, you made no point as all you wrote was just double standard playing and all your points are skewed.


There's no reason to justify gay acts. It should be totally discouraged.

woodcook:


Just to make this clear, in as much as you are entitled to your opinion am sure you know what you were trying to do with the question of 'incest'.

The truth is scientifically there is a high chance of having kids with genetic disorder when two blood relationship decides to procreate. There are studies and findings on it. You asked how does the relationship between two blood relation affects him, the problem is not with the relationship but with the offspring of the relationship. Just like the problem of two AS procreating. The point is not really on the effect on two consenting adults but on the offspring whom has no say in the matter. Not only but also the burden it places on the society as a whole.


Back to the op.

When it comes to gay issue, my opinion is that it should be decriminalized, two consenting adult should not go to jail because whom they chose to screw (not referring to minors). How does two gay screwing affects the society or the life of every ordinary man on the street? These are people with loved ones like me and you, these are like everyday people, who work to pay their taxes, who have done no harm to the society. There only offence is that they choose sodomy, or cunnilingus rather than the tradition sex involving penis and vagina.

Until someone comes up with a valid reason, I see it as discrimination and akin to what the whites did to the blacks and are still doing.

zendy:


If you look at it from an open minded point of view, you will see I'm on point. Inbreeding is a strong point to ban incestuous relationship because the offspring(s) that may emerge from such relationship are most likely to have genetic anomalies which they can pass on to their own offsprings. In the USA, Mormon families and other religious sects are known to engage in polygamy as is in Europe. As for "getting used to being gay", I don't believe in that. For me to leave all the fine girls out there to sleep my fellow man is crazy so any man who does this is someone who has always been gay but did not yet have consenting partner yet. I believe people are born gay but my point it that if two consenting gay people decide to engage in that activity, it's no ones business. I know men and women who engage in far worse sexual activity than gays anyway

AgapeCharis:
You need a new nose.
I was just countering his points for supporting gay rights.

Change2015:
You are looking at things from a certain prism. Let me ask you the following.
1. Is it OK for a society to agree that killing twins is a good thing?
2. Is it acceptable for a society to adopt scarification as a means of identifying it's members?
3. Is it acceptable for a 'society' to decree that all children born alive but differing from the norm physically, be put to death?

At the end of the day it is not just about the majority having its was, there must also be a moral (not necessarily religious) and ethical basis and understanding for the way people relate with others in society. Nigeria is full of adulterers and fornication who will happily quote the bible to justify their anti-Saraki sentiments, and then say man no be wood to explain their own shortcomings. Hypocrisy from any corner remains what it is, hypocrisy. We have a country that citizens pay good money to leave, they even trek across deserts to flee Nigeria, and we don't yet have time to ask ourselves serious questions about the kind of people we are.